Paul Craig Roberts, Who Remembers the Sandy Hook School Shootings?

Paul Craig Roberts The official explanation given of the Sandy Hook school shootings struck many people at the time as fishy.  Various aspects of the story did not seem to go together well or fit normal procedures for such a crime.  Contradictory evidence was never explained, and doubts based on evidence were ignored rather than answered.   Now a Wisconsin state judge, Frank D. Remington, has renewed doubts about the Sandy Hook event.  This was not Judge Remington’s intention.  It was the result of his summary judgment in a civil defamation lawsuit in favor of…

Jim Fetzer, The Sandy Hook “Pozner v. Fetzer” Lawsuit: Defendants’ Application for Appellate Court Review

Jim Fetzer My experience in Dane County Circuit Court on 17 June 2019 during which the Honorable Frank Remington presided over Defendants’ and Plaintiff’s Motions for Summary Judgment has shaken my confidence in the judicial system of Wisconsin to the core. You will see the grounds on which I am appealing this case, where the most blatant violation of my rights occurred when the Court decided that there was no dispute about the authenticity of the death certificate, when I had the reports of two forensic document examiners to the…

Jim Fetzer, Why the Sandy Hook “Pozner v. Fetzer” Lawsuit Matters

Jim Fetzer [Editor’s note: My dear friend, Dr. Katherine Horton, has made some of the key documents in this case available on her website. But her description of the case is flawed and I have written to ask her to correct it to read as follows: On 17th June 2019, a Dane County Judge, the Honorable Frank Remington (Branch 8 of the Court), decided that Prof. James Fetzer and Mike Palecek had defamed Leonard Pozner by claiming that the death certificate for his son, Noah Pozner, who has been alleged…

SANDY HOOK “Pozner v. Fetzer” Lawsuit: Defendant Fetzer’s Proposed Undisputed Findings of Fact

Jim Fetzer After filing Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on 30 April 2019, I received a letter from the Court advising me that I could not speak for my co-defendants and otherwise would be practicing law without a license and that I had to supplement my Motion with a declaration of Proposed Undisputed Findings of Fact before the Court could consider it  So I filed both an Errata to change my submission to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and the following Proposed Undisputed Findings of Fact, which I hope will…

The Sandy Hook Lawsuit: Defendant’s Answer to Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendant’s Answer

Jim Fetzer When I published NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK (2015), with fifteen contributors (including six current or retired Ph.D. college professors), we proved the school had been closed by 2008 and there were no students there. One contributor, Paul Preston, who had run drills for school systems as an administrator in the past, was so bothered by what he observed being reported that he reached out to his contacts in the Obama Department of Education, all of whom told him that it had been a drill, that no children…

Sandy Hook Lawsuit Discovery: Request for Admissions from Plaintiff Leonard Pozner

Jim Fetzer The lawsuit brought by Leonard Pozner, who feigns to be the father of “Noah Pozner”, a fiction made up out of photos of his “older step brother”, Michael Vabner, as a child, proceeds to discovery. These files are public records available from the Dane County Circuit Court using the file number for the case, which is NO. 2018-CV-003122. For background to the case, here are some recent publications and interviews that should make what’s going on here easily intelligible: “Let’s Get Ready to Rumble: Jim Fetzer vs. The…