APPEAL BRIEF in the Dane County, WI, Sandy Hook Defamation Lawsuit: Pozner v. Fetzer

[Editor’s note: This was a classic SLAPP suit masquerading as a defamation. For background, see “Why the Sandy Hook ‘Pozner v. Fetzer’ Lawsuit Matters: What’s Really at Stake” (18 January 2020). For a downloadable copy of the brief, click here. I am profoundly indebted to Richard Bolton, Attorney-at-Law, both literally and figuratively, for representing me post-verdict. Anyone who would like to support our efforts on behalf of the First Amendment is welcome to contribute to James Fetzer Legal Defense Fund, 800 Violet Lane, Oregon, WI 53575. The appeal has been…

SANDY HOOK “Pozner v. Fetzer” Lawsuit: Defendant Fetzer’s Proposed Undisputed Findings of Fact

Jim Fetzer After filing Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on 30 April 2019, I received a letter from the Court advising me that I could not speak for my co-defendants and otherwise would be practicing law without a license and that I had to supplement my Motion with a declaration of Proposed Undisputed Findings of Fact before the Court could consider it  So I filed both an Errata to change my submission to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and the following Proposed Undisputed Findings of Fact, which I hope will…