Thomas Dalton, The Holocaust of Six Million Jews—in World War I

Thomas Dalton

[Editor’s note: Fairly to my astonishment, interviewing a GOP candidate from Wisconsin for the House of Representatives,, Erik Olsen, about the fake “pandemic” and the real (but deadly) vax, when I mention the Wisconsin State Journal was not publishing letters about these issues of public health, he asked if I were a “Holocaust denier”, to which I replied, “Everyone who has studied the case is a Holocaust denier!” I mentioned my blog, “The Holocaust Narrative: Politics trumps Science”, and Thomas Dalton in passing, where I welcome his latest. I have added images from another presentation of mine, “The Official WWII Narrative: Historical Fact or Mass Illusion?”]


I take it that the reader is familiar with the basics of the so-called Holocaust: the alleged deaths of some six million Jews, many in gas chambers, at the hands of the Nazis in World War II. This was, we are told, a deliberate policy of Hitler and his top men, something of highest priority—even above the war effort itself—and a policy of the utmost secrecy. It was so secret, in fact, that hard documentation and forensic evidence on this catastrophic, world-changing event are almost nonexistent: no ‘Hitler order’ to kill the Jews, no plans for homicidal gas chambers, no physical remains of gas chambers,[1] no photos of gas chambers or gassed Jews, no autopsies confirming death by gas, no consistent or coherent records of mass shootings that must have totaled over 1.5 million, no evidence of any of the 1 million or so ghetto deaths. Those ingenious devils, the Nazis, managed to destroy all the evidence—including the physical remains of virtually all six million Jewish corpses—in order to conceal their heinous deed. They were truly evil geniuses. Or so we are told.

You didn’t know there was a British soccer team at Auschwitz?

But this is not my topic for today. For the full story of the incredible World War II Holocaust, I must refer interested readers to my books The Holocaust: An Introduction (for the concise version), or, for a more detailed discussion, Debating the Holocaust: A New Look at Both Sides (4th ed, 2020). Also recommended is the book by Germar Rudolf, Lectures on the Holocaust (2017). Suffice to say that there are many facts about this notorious event that our friendly ‘Holocaust experts’ would rather have us not know.

Today, though, I want to focus on a related but perhaps more surprising event: the Jewish “holocaust” of World War I. (I will use the lower-case ‘holocaust’ for pre-WWII, reserving the upper-case ‘Holocaust’ for WWII itself.)

Wait, you say; World War I? But didn’t that occur decades before WWII? Yes. Wasn’t that years before the Nazi party even existed? True enough. Wasn’t Hitler a mere foot soldier in that initial war? Indeed he was. Then who committed the crime? And why? And how many Jews suffered in that holocaust?

It is truly a remarkable story, one that is too little known. It has often been said that “history repeats itself.” But who would have guessed that a monumentally tragic event like a holocaust could repeat itself, inflicted on the same people, in the same region of the world, and in the same numbers, in just three decades? This amazing occurrence is worth a bit of exploration; the holocaust of WW1 has huge implications for the Holocaust of WWII, and by extension, for Jewish-Gentile relations in the world today.

Or that Auschwitz also had a hospital with ob/gyn facilities?


Context for War

The precursors and causes of WW1 are vast and complicated, and I cannot delve into those here. But a key factor, and likely decisive, was the action of the global Jewish Lobby of the day, which pushed for war at every possible juncture; I have detailed this aspect in my book The Jewish Hand in the World Wars (2019), and I refer interested readers to it. The same Jewish Lobby, it turns out, also had a decisive hand in the holocaust narratives.

For the moment, I will have to restrict myself to the basic facts. World War I, as we recall, began in July 1914 and ran for a bit more than four years, ending on 11 November 1918. For the majority of this time, the Triple Entente of the UK, France, and Russia faced off against the Triple Alliance of Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy. The US eventually entered the war (on the side of the Entente) in April 1917. Russia, torn apart by the Judeo-Bolshevik Revolution, withdrew in March 1918. Germany held out for another seven months, but eventually, in November 1918, it too succumbed, in part as a result of internal Jewish agitation,. In the end, the Alliance suffered some 8 million total casualties (military plus civilian), and the Entente around 10 million. Despite the many complicating factors, a defeated Germany was ultimately assigned full blame for the war—completely overlooking the fact that that nation “did not plot a European war, did not want one, and made genuine…efforts to avert one,” in the words of historian Sidney Fay.[2] The onerous postwar reparations inflicted on Germany set the stage, in large part, for the later emergence of Hitler and his NSDAP party.

Israelis said they couldn’t tell the difference between them.

As in all wars, many civilians were caught in the crosshairs; here, the Jews were no exception. Their suffering, however, had already been ongoing for many years prior to the war. Or perhaps we should say, selfinflicted suffering. Jewish behavior, attitudes, actions, and beliefs have been a constant source of conflict throughout the centuries—even through millennia.[3] Jewish abrasiveness became particularly pressing by the late 18th century, as was noted by many prominent critics, including Kant, Voltaire, Hegel, Fichte, and Herder. By the mid-19th century, the likes of Schopenhauer and Bruno Bauer were issuing scathing critiques.

A particularly disturbing situation, though, was developing in Russia. By the late 1800s, Russia had some 5 million Jews within its borders, nearly all of whom lived in the so-called Pale of Settlement in the far west of the country; this represented about half of the global total of around 10 million Jews. This large Jewish population was a disruptive and agitating force within Russia and hence earned the dislike of Czars Nicholas I (reigned 1825 to 1855) and Alexander II (reigned 1855 to 1881). By 1871, Russian activist Mikhail Bakunin could make this observation about the Jews:

This whole Jewish world which constitutes a single exploiting sect, a sort of bloodsucker people (ein Blutegelvolk), a collective parasite (einzigen fressenden Parasiten), voracious, organized in itself, not only across the frontiers of states but even across all the differences of political opinion—this world is presently, at least in great part, at the disposal of Marx on the one hand and of the Rothschilds on the other. … Jewish solidarity, that powerful solidarity that has maintained itself through all history, united them [both].[4]

In 1881, a gang of anarchists known as Narodnaya Volya, which included a few Jews, succeeded in assassinating Alexander; this unleashed a series of anti-Jewish pogroms that persisted for decades.

Cynthia McKinney revealed “The Pledge” on Iranian TV: newly elected members of Congress are asked to sign a pledge to put the interests of Israel ahead of even those of the United States

By the late 1880s, American media was beginning to take notice of the Jewish situation in Russia—especially the New York Times. A brief item from 1889 began with the question “How many Jews are there?” meaning, globally. At a minimum, “the number of the ubiquitous race [is] 6,000,000.” It then continues with a reference to Jewish suffering: “With the exception of half a million, they are all in a state of political bondage.” Furthermore, “in Russia alone there were 4,000,000 of their race whose every step was dogged by that curse, religious hatred and persecution.”[5] Here we find an early reference to (almost) six million suffering Jews.

Another short piece appeared in 1891 entitled “Russia’s Christianity: Rabbi Gottheil says a word on the persecution of the Jews.” In a public lecture, Gottheil examined a number of facts “in relation to the treatment of Russia’s 5,000,000 to 6,000,000 Jews by the Christian population.” Notably, the population of Russian Jews, which was just 4 million two years earlier, was now as high as 6 million. Gottheil then proceeds to quote a recent article by one E. B. Lanin, who said, “about six millions [sic] persecuted and miserable wretches remain steadfastly faithful to a religion that causes their life to be changed into a fiery furnace.”[6] Prophetic, indeed.

Nearly a decade later, in June 1900, Rabbis Gottheil and Stephen Wise were the keynote speakers at a “Zionist mass meeting” in New York. They were anxious to highlight Jewish suffering around the world to help make their case for a Jewish homeland in Palestine. Gottheil spoke generically of the “oppressed in Russia,” but Wise made the point explicit: “There are 6,000,000 living, bleeding, suffering arguments in favor of Zionism.”[7] Within a few years, the pogroms became increasingly intense, eventually leading to small-scale killings. The so-called “Kishineff (or Kishinev) massacre” of 1903, in which all of 49 Jews were killed, became, for the first time, a “holocaust.” The NYT quotes from an editorial of the Jewish Chronicle:

We charge the Russian Government with responsibility for the Kishineff massacre. We say it is steeped to the eyes in the guilt of this holocaust. (16 May, p. 1)

The editorial goes on to speak of how the Russian Jews are being “slowly annihilated” and subject to “the process of extermination.” Such words obviously anticipate similar charges that would be leveled against the National Socialists some four decades later.


I organized and moderated a conference on “Academic Freedom: Are there limits to inquiry?, using JFK, 911 and the Holocaust as examples


Two years later, we read that the “holocaust” is still ongoing. A short item of 1905 is headlined “Simon Wolf asks how long the Russian holocaust is to continue.”[8] Also that year, the NYT reported, once again, on “our 6,000,000 cringing brothers in Russia.”[9] The following year, in 1906, we read of “startling reports of the condition and future of Russia’s 6,000,000 Jews”; it is a “horrifying picture” of “renewed massacres” and “systematic and murderous extermination.”[10] At this point, one is tempted to ask: What is it about the Jews, such that they are subject to such continual and horrific abuse? And furthermore, why isn’t the figure of six million, first reported back in 1890, growing any larger? Is it now, somehow, fixed at six million? If so, why?

In 1910, we find “Russian Jews in sad plight,” and we are saddened over “the systematic, relentless, quiet grinding down of a people of more than 6,000,000 souls.”[11] In 1911, the New York Times reported that “the 6,000,000 Jews of Russia are singled out for systematic oppression and for persecution by due process of law.”[12] And yet things got worse still:

That Russia is pursuing a definite anti-Jewish policy, that the condition of the Jews in Russia is worse now than it ever was before, will be gathered from the following extracts… [T]he restrictive laws now in existence…intensif[y] the oppression of the Jews, and by which it is making the 6,000,000 Jews a people economically exhausted—a people without any rights at all. (10 December, p. SM8)

We need to remind ourselves that the leading Russians had a very low opinion of the Jews, and felt themselves fully justified in any recrimination. Sometimes their words were shocking. Russian prime minister Pyotr Stolypin wrote the following in 1911:

It is important that racial characteristics have so drastically set the Jewish people apart from the rest of humanity as to make them totally different creatures, who cannot enter into our concept of human nature. We can observe them the way we observe and study animals, we can feel disgust for them or hostility, the way we do for the hyena, the jackal, or the spider, but to speak of hatred for them would raise them to our level. … Only by disseminating in the popular consciousness the concept that the creature of the Jewish race is not the same as other people, but an imitation of a human, with whom there can be no dealings—only that can gradually heal the national organism and weaken the Jewish nation so it will no longer be able to do harm, or will completely die out. History knows of many extinct tribes. Science must put, not the Jewish race, but the character of Jewry into such condition as will make it perish.[13]

Just a few months later, Stolypin was assassinated by a Jewish radical, Dmitri Bogrov.

I emphasize that it was not only the New York Times that was reporting on the six million suffering Hebrews. Zionist Jews were repeating the same lines to their own people. Speaking at the 1911 Zionist Congress, Max Nordau said the following:


Virtuous governments…lay the groundwork with their own hands for the destruction of six million persons, and no one except the victims themselves raises his voice against this—even though this, of course, is an infinitely greater crime than any war which as yet has never destroyed six million human lives.[14]

Thus we find repeated linkage, over a period of many years, of “six million,” “extermination,” and “holocaust” with respect to the Jews. History indeed repeats itself.

Into the Great War

It seems, then, that our holocaust journey is even more intriguing than I indicated above. The first Jewish holocaust occurred in Russia, running, at a minimum, from the years 1903 through 1911. We don’t know how many Jews were killed in that period, but it was unquestionably small, given the over-emphasis on relatively minor events in which, for example, 49 were killed (see Andrew Joyce’s “Revisiting the Nineteenth-Century Russian Pogroms”). Based on scattered reports, the total would have been on the order of a few thousand, at most. And yet, the figure of 6 million recurred repeatedly, as a kind of token of mass Jewish suffering. This set the stage for the second holocaust, of World War One, as I am about to explain. And this, of course, leaves “the” Holocaust of World War II as holocaust number three. A rather remarkable turn of events, and one not likely to be covered in your local history class.

My Wiki entry was (almost immediately) gutted, but I had captured the page not long before and republished it on my blog here.

As I stated above, World War I began in July 1914. Already in December of that year we were reading accounts of mass suffering of Jews—and we can guess the number. The New York Times reported as follows:

Appeal for aid for Jews: American Committee tells of Suffering Due to War. The American Jewish Relief Committee called a conference…to consider the plight of more than 6,000,000 Jews who live within the war zone. (2 December, p. 12)

The “war zone” in question was the Eastern Front, which ran through parts of present-day Poland, Ukraine, Austria, and Hungary, as well as portions of western Russia. Just a month later, the Times reported,

In the world today there are about 13,000,000 Jews, of whom more than 6,000,000 are in the very heart of the war zone; Jews whose lives are at stake and who today are subjected to every manner of sorrow and suffering. (14 January, p. 3)

A year later, we read that the head of a Jewish aid society has declared that “even the wrongs of the Belgians could not be compared to the outrages heaped upon the Polish Jews. ‘Nearly six million Jews are ruined, in the greatest moral and material misery. … And the world is silent’.”[15] And in case we had forgotten, the Times would soon remind us that, indeed, this horrific situation constituted…a holocaust. In October, a Jewish organization—The Joint Distribution Committee of Funds for Jewish War Sufferers—launched a $10 million appeal with these words:

The new campaign is the largest ever undertaken by Jews of the United States. … Dr. Judah Magnes has been enabled [to ascertain] the present needs of the Jewish people in Europe, who have fallen under the blight of the world holocaust. (29 October, p. E9)

Into 1917, the war evolved into a sort of stalemate, with the infamous trenches defining much of the front. Despite growing fatalities on all sides, the number of suffering Jews stayed remarkably constant: “Six millions [sic] of Jews are living in lands where they are oppressed, exploited, crushed, and robbed of every inalienable human right.”[16] By September of that year, the Times was reporting on an appeal for an aid fund,

to alleviate the suffering of Jews in the European war zones…[whose] suffering is unparalleled [!] in history. … [W]omen, children, and babies must be saved if the Jewish race is to survive the terrible holocaust… (24 September, p. 20)

Once again, we see the repeated connection between ‘holocaust’ and ‘six million’ suffering Jews.

By mid-October of 1918, it was becoming clear—at least to the crew at the New York Times—that the war was about to end. Hence they excitedly reported on an astonishing “$1 billion fund to rebuild Jewry” (18 October, p. 12).[17] As it turns out, of those “six millions” of Jews who were suffering, starving, and dying in the “holocaust”—well, miraculously, all of them survived. And they needed cash. “Six million souls will need help to resume normal life when war is ended,” we read. Send your checks now.


Interwar Holocaust?

No sooner had World War I ended than our ever-industrious Jewish Lobby went to work again, conjuring up yet more Jewish suffering. In September 1919—less than one year after the war—the New York Times was reporting on renewed mass Jewish suffering, now in Poland and Ukraine. In a story headlined “Ukrainian Jews Aim to Stop Pogroms,” we read, with by now little surprise, that “6,000,000 are in peril.” Apparently half of these are in Poland, half in Ukraine, but “all of whom are in need of assistance from America.” According to the story, President Wilson had recently issued a statement of concern in which he said:

This fact that the population of 6,000,000 souls in Ukrainia and Poland have received notice through action and by word that they are going to be completely exterminated—this fact stands before the whole world as the paramount issue of the day. (8 September, p. 6)

Assuredly so.

The final section of my moon book includes essays by Thomas Dalton, Robert Faurisson, Nicholas Kollerstrom and me questioning the Holocaust


Lest we might forget, this situation was quickly described as, yes, a “holocaust.” In one of the most craven and pandering articles ever to be penned by a non-Jewish politician, former New York governor Martin Glynn published an essay for American Hebrew in October 1919, titled “The Crucifixion of Jews Must Stop!” It reads, in part:


From across the sea, six million men and women call to us for help, and eight hundred thousand little children cry for bread. … With them reside the illimitable possibilities for the advancement of the human race as naturally would reside in six million human beings. … In this catastrophe, when six million human beings are being whirled toward the grave by a cruel and relentless fate. … Six million men and women are dying from lack of the necessaries of life; eight hundred thousand children cry for bread. … In this threatened ho­locaust of human life, forgotten are the niceties of philosophical distinction. … And so in the spirit that turned the poor widow’s votive offering of copper into silver … the people of this country are called upon to sanctify their money by giving $35 million in the name of the humanity of Moses to six million famished men and women. Six million men and women are dying… [italics added]

A truly appalling bit of servility, if there ever was one. Clearly Glynn owed much to his Hebrew supporters.

The very next month, the NYT reported on prominent Jewish banker Felix Warburg, who had recently traveled to Europe to witness the suffering firsthand:


The successive blows of contending armies have all but broken the back of European Jewry, and have reduced to tragically unbelievable poverty, starvation, and disease about 6,000,000 souls, or half the Jewish population on the earth. (12 November, p. 7)

The storyline persisted in subsequent years:

* April 1920: “Mr. Louis Marshall declared that typhus menaced 6,000,000 Jews of Europe.”[18]

* May 1920: “Hunger, cold rags, desolation, disease, death—six million human beings without food, shelter, clothing…”

* July 1921: “Russia’s 6,000,000 Jews are facing extermination by massacre” (again!).

* September 1924: “1,235 Pogroms” in the Soviet Union; “The Jewish population, which number in Russia over 6,000,000, live scattered. … [Events] have subjected the Jews to greater suffering than any other section of the Russian population.”


Israel asked Amazon to ban books that challenge the Holocaust, which Amazon obliged and my moon book was banned. It remains available at

And so on. But the point is proven. Through a long series of incredible, unbelievable circumstances, six million Jews were perpetually suffering through various incarnations of a “holocaust” for decades prior to World War II. Such references tapered off through the 1930s, but accelerated again with the approach of the second great war. Several mentions of the “six million” appeared between 1936 and 1939. With the onset of war in September 1939, the predictions became explicit. In June of 1940, leading Zionist Nahum Goldmann was quoted as saying “Six million Jews in Europe are doomed to destruction, if the victory of the Nazis should be final.”[19] What an astonishing prediction! How could Goldmann have known, at that early date, of the final death toll? Jewish foresight never fails to amaze.


The facts here are clear and indisputable. The reader is strongly encouraged to look up a few of the old New York Times citations that I mentioned, to confirm that the words are really there. Most any online search engine or a local library research database can find them. They are highly damning. Our friends in the Jewish Lobby have no plausible reply, no reasonable defense, no good explanation; they can only stifle the whole discussion. And this is precisely what they do.

There are clear lessons here for history. If six million Jews suffered, but very few died, in the first holocaust (Russia), and if another six million suffered, but very few died, in the second holocaust (World War I), then we might reasonably infer, by inductive logic, that perhaps the alleged toll in the third Holocaust (World War II) was—let us say—not quite right. Especially so, given the facts that I mentioned at the very start of this essay. We can also plausibly infer that the claimed ‘six million’ figure of World War II did not come from a body count—it didn’t—but rather is a symbolic number, a token, used over many years, to represent mass Jewish suffering. As an actual death toll, it could be far removed from reality.

Voltaire got it right! We must “never forget”!

And if all this is true, then there are profound consequences. First, we must significantly rewrite our history of the mid-twentieth-century; second, we have to hold accountable all those historians and politicians, Jewish or otherwise, who foisted upon us a distorted picture of human suffering; and third, we need to recompensate Germany, Switzerland, Belgium, and all those who were extorted into paying billions in “reparations” to Israel and global Jewry. It is not hard to find the money; American Jews alone own or control perhaps $50 trillion in assets, and this would go a long way toward a restorative justice.[20] We have the means. We need only muster the will to act.

Thomas Dalton, PhD, has authored or edited several books and articles on politics, history, and religion, with a special focus on National Socialism in Germany. His works include a new translation series of Mein Kampf, and the books Eternal Strangers (2020), The Jewish Hand in the World Wars (2019), and Debating the Holocaust (4th ed, 2020). Most recently he has edited a new edition of Rosenberg’s classic work Myth of the 20th Century and a new book of political cartoons, Pan-Judah!. All these works are available at See also his personal website


[1] Those alleged gas chambers that they show to tourists in Auschwitz Main Camp, Majdanek, and Dachau are postwar reconstructions, and could never have functioned as mass killing sites using poison gas. See my books for details.

[2] As quoted in Fay’s “classic study” of the war, The Origins of the World War (1928), p. 552.

[3] For this story, see my book Eternal Strangers (2020).

[4] Cited in Wheen, Karl Marx (1999), p. 340.

[5] 10 February, p. 14.

[6] 26 January, p. 8.

[7] 11 June, p. 7. Incidentally, the New York Times was, by this time, formally a Jewish newspaper; Adolph Ochs purchased the firm in 1896. It has retained Jewish ownership and management ever since.

[8] 10 November, p. 2.

[9] 23 March, p. 7.

[10] 25 March, p. SM6.

[11] 11 April, p. 18.

[12] 31 October, p. 5.

[13] Cited in Vaksberg, Stalin Against the Jews (1994), p. 6.

[14] Cited in Herzl Year Book, vol. 2 (1959), p. 156. The chapter author explicitly comments on Nordau’s “astonishing accuracy.”

[15] 28 February, p. 8.

[16] 22 January, p. 6.

[17] In present-day dollars, this would come to almost $20 billion.

[18] Notably, it was typhus that likely produced most Jewish fatalities during WW2.

[19] 25 June, p. 4.

[20] See my essay, “A brief look at Jewish wealth” (2019). But the situation has become even more extreme due to the Covid pandemic, during which Jewish tech billionaires prospered immensely. Just the five wealthiest American Jews—Larry Ellison, Larry Page, Sergey Brin, Mark Zuckerberg, and Michael Bloomberg—now own over half a trillion dollars. We need to contemplate this for a moment: five individual men, five Jews, collectively own more than $500 billion. When we then consider the total wealth of the six million or so American Jews, it is quite easy to reach $50 trillion, or more.

Please follow and like us:

18 thoughts on “Thomas Dalton, The Holocaust of Six Million Jews—in World War I”

  1. Well done for posting this important Thomas Dalton essay Jim.

    Your statement is so true : “Everyone who has studied the case is a Holocaust denier!”

    Unless, of course, one enjoys being used and taken for a mug …

    We were all true believers once …

    See also :

    The First Holocaust: The Surprising Origin of the Six-Million Figure

    The First Holocaust
    by Don Heddesheimer

    List of 287 Pre-Nuremberg References to “Six Million jews,” Starting in 1850

    1. Wow….But it’s fine that little circled “K” that pollutes a great number of food products we purchase (possibly the majority?). I sure would love to know how many shekels that has generated for gawds “chosen” through the years. I doubt it’s even calculable. Where’s the circled “C” for Christians or the circled “M” for Muslims or the circled “A” for Agnostic or the circled “U” for Universalist or the circled “P” for the poor and homeless (there’s a damn good way to get them off the streets, eh?) Freedom of religion, my arse….freedom of THE religion, eh? But, after all, they are special and as far as I know, they will always be special, especially through the halls of CONgress. No one and I mean NO ONE in the government (McKinney being the one exception..and we know what they did to her) has ever dared raise that question.

      …and we all know how the Donald boosted them during his administration.

      And many here (check out the “traitorous” War Room) would vote for him again.
      …we all know the definition of insanity.
      …remember, voting for the lesser of two evils is STILL voting for evil.

      Fulford has countlessly said all that is coming to an end.
      ……from his writings to the ears of the Universe!…may it come true.

      NO ONE RELIGION is special. NO ONE PERSON IS SPECIAL. Everyone, individually is special.

      Chosen? What omnipotent, infinitely wise creator would put any one of its creations above another?

  2. I think I have read most of the bullet points of this some time ago. I appreciate the greater detail of this one. The Holocaust is a yoke of submission on an elephant from the mouse that roared with the loudest bull horn the world over. Do you see the Apaches erecting museums all over Earth to their suffering? How about the Lakota? Utes? Is their any American Indian tribe that does this? Of course not. Who wants to identified with victimhood as their badge of honor? No one but the Zionists.

  3. Good points, Bahmi and Will. I am certainly no fan of the political and military agendas of Israel and the genocidal treatment of the Palestinians. Mossad does certainly mess with the affairs of America bigtime; just check out 911 and the laughing “artists” who apparently helped facilitate the event to justify America As Military Vassal’s invasion of the Mid East. But once again, all intelligence agencies work together under the aegis of the New World Order. I feel sorry for all the Jews who bought into the universal victimhood meme supporting the creation of Israel as the salvation of persecuted Jews. Alas, you’re only being used as a foil for geopolitical dominance in the region by the NWO and there seems little peace ahead for you, even with a genocide right now by your “protectors” with this Jabdemic Lockdown. Even the Christian right in America likes to see you play a role in the “End Times.” One would think the best strategy for everyone is universal honesty and communication and brotherly/sisterly love and a Palestinian State which a large percentage, even half, of Jews support in Israel — but certainly not the Zionist NWO faction. We need to work together as humans beyond all this religious divide and conquer nonsense. We need to wake up and honor the prophets of all major religions in seeking peace and universal harmony together. A dream, I know, but possibly the only one worth pursuing.

    1. If we allow that when Dalton writes “Jews,” he of course is not referring to “all Jews,” I think your criticism is mostly, if not entirely, unwarranted.

      Jews have been kicked out of nations over 100 times including before there ever was a Rothschild. Over the centuries, some sacrificed Gentile children. Its list of transgressions is quite long. And where are fellow Jews exposing the ills of their tribal brethren? Far too little for my taste.

      When you refer to honoring the prophets of all major religions, correct me if I am wrong, but it suggests to me you are quite unaware of Judaism in its present orthodox form. Their most revered book is not the Old Testament, it is the Talmud, a completely filthy and demonic book that is the moral antithesis of divine love as it is described in the New Testament.

      Here is some of the thought of chabad lubavitch, an orthodox Jewish sect made up of far more Jews than “Rothschild Zionists.” They are the words of Rabbi Schneerson, so revered by many Jews that some thought he was the Messiah.


      “The difference between a Jewish and a non-Jewish person stems from the common expression: “Let us differentiate.” Thus, we do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely on a superior level. Rather, we have a case of “let us differentiate” between totally different species.”

      “This is what needs to be said about the body: the body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of [members] of all nations of the world … The difference in the inner quality between Jews and non-Jews is “so great that the bodies should be considered as completely different species.”

      “An even greater difference exists in regard to the soul. Two contrary types of soul exist, a non-Jewish soul comes from three satanic spheres, while the Jewish soul stems from holiness.”

      “As has been explained, an embryo is called a human being, because it has both body and soul. Thus, the difference between a Jewish and a non-Jewish embryo can be understood.”

      “…the general difference between Jews and non-Jews: A Jew was not created as a means for some [other] purpose; he himself is the purpose, since the substance of all [divine] emanations was created only to serve the Jews.”

      “The important things are the Jews, because they do not exist for any [other] aim; they themselves are [the divine] aim.”

      “The entire creation [of a non-Jew] exists only for the sake of the Jews.”

      In short, it seems to me your awareness of the scope of Jewish perfidy is close to nonexistent and this causes an inaccurate understanding of the article.

      1. ((correct me if I am wrong, but it suggests to me you are quite unaware of Judaism in its present orthodox form.))

        OK…from this article:

        It is not unfair to estimate that between 60 and 75 percent of the estimated 13.5 to 14.5 million Jews in the world consider themselves religious in this sense.* Let us examine this estimate in detail. Israel has somewhat over 3.5 million Jews. According to the best available studies, up to 25 percent, or 850,000, consider themselves Orthodox while an equal number consider themselves secular. That leaves 50 percent who consider themselves traditional. The latter is a declining number, consisting principally of people from the immigrant generation who came from traditional religious environments, retaining religious beliefs and varying degrees of religious observance while not being ideologically Orthodox. Therefore, let us assume that only 40 percent of this group, or approximately 1,360,000 Jews, are today traditional in any meaningful way. Thus, at a minimum, some two-thirds of the Jews of Israel or over 2.3 million, fit our definition of religious, while approximately one-third or 1.2 million do not.

        Eleven percent of American Jews defined themselves as Orthodox in the 1970 study, or approximately 600,000 people. That figure has remained relatively consistent. The Conservative movement claims 1,250,000 and the Reform slightly more. Taking those figures together would give us approximately 3.1 million religiously affiliated Jews, which comes closer to the estimates of synagogue membership. The other 1.25 million may include approximately 250,000 who are members of Reconstructionist, traditional and other small movement or nonmovement affiliated congregations and many who consider themselves religious without really identifying with any one of the Jewish religious streams.

  4. Well, friends, it looks like they are at it yet again…..

    Texas officials say all hostages safe, out of Colleyville synagogue; hostage-taker dead

    …and here is Jim Stone’s take….

    For any meals they serve on the sabbath, they get prepared ahead of time and are put in things like crock pots that have timers to turn them on. They absolutely do not cook on the sabbath unless it happens as the result of something automating it.
    This is not a guess, it is a cold hard reality. They absolutely will not livestream any legit sabbath meeting. The livestream was for show, so they could present video of their STUPID TRASH ASS HOAX to the world. There is no hostage crisis. THE EFFING STUPID, RIDICULOUSLY STUPID LIVE STREAM PROVES IT, if they did that then that particular synagogue is another Sandy Hook elementary, there was no sabbath service happening there.
    Having spent several years in the Jewish community with the intention of converting (until I learned the cold hard truth) my statement is certified accurate, SABBATH LIVE STREAM? NO WAY.

    Me…Livestreaming at 2 PM ON THE SABBATH?…I doubt that very much.

  5. By the way, the article above is kind of sloppy and mean-spirited. It puts down Jews without offering general examples of their great universal “crimes”, rather than the abuses perpetrated by what were probably Rothschilds Zionists covering up the Rothschilds world-dominance agenda. I quote from above: “This large Jewish population was a disruptive and agitating force within Russia and hence earned the dislike of Czars Nicholas I (reigned 1825 to 1855) and Alexander II (reigned 1855 to 1881). By 1871, Russian activist Mikhail Bakunin could make this observation about the Jews: This whole Jewish world which constitutes a single exploiting sect, a sort of bloodsucker people (ein Blutegelvolk).” This without any concrete example of any universal crimes on the part of Jews. This is frankly kind of sordid and despicable polemical journalism. While, once again, the Rothschilds apparently used the Jews as a front for world domination, a spearhead in the near east, primarily including a small sect of Jewish Zionists compared to the population at large, this author tarbrushes all Jews as being morally culpable with no tangible evidence of universal wrongdoing. It thus plays right into the hands of the Rothschilds, who knew that any resistance to their goals could be branded as “anti-semitic.” And while the Holocaust was visited on tens of millions of Russians (by Stalin) and the Chinese (by Mao), far more than on the Jews, the Jews did suffer horribly at the hands of the Nazis, there is no disputing this. Such articles, in their virulence against all Jews, only brand true patriots as hateful anti-Semites and should be looked upon with great dismay and concern by true freedom fighters. And meanwhile, let’s hold the Rothschilds to account, not all Jews, many of whom are dying due to the Modern Scamdemic Holocaust currently proceeding apace on the general population of Israel. To the Rothschilds, all Jews are expendable. As well as to the sources this author cites, hateful, bigoted, virulent, without concrete examples of universal wrongdoing on the part of the Jews.

    1. JFT…..We do not always agree, but you are correct. Even Jim has made it a point to distinguish between Jews and Zionists. I see this little different than distinguishing between Democrats and American at this point here in the US. I cannot imagine every Jew at that time being a cause of trouble. There are of course radicals in all religious groups. And it could be the nature of Jews as a tribe that makes them easier to manipulate. …little different than the Democratic sheep being manipulated to get that jab today. I have no idea why Dalton takes this approach; maybe Jim has an explanation. I think Jim’s Conspiracy Theory presentation….especially the interview with Monika serves better as an illustration to Erik Olsen than this particular article.
      But I am not a student of the Holocaust, so I could very easily be incorrect.

  6. We don’t have to remember anything; the Holocaust is happening right now, with the Gates/Fauci/Rothschilds/Soros/Eugenics/Agenda 21/Genocidal Jab and 5G/Global Reset Scamdemic. Wouldn’t it be nice to have an “Anti-Holocaust Day”, when people communicate with one another and rise up to make sure holocausts like the one we’re going through right now don’t happen again? Well, I guess that’s what we have here, a force against Holocausts, every day, courtesy of heroic patriots like James Fetzer and this loyal crew of posters. Let’s go global!

    1. Why should the world keep uttering the word “holocaust” anyway? Why give the word constant publicity? There are a number of interpretations of “The Holocaust”, notably the Elie Weisel story and his book describing his alleged incarceration and phony appearing but famous photo of his faux doppelganger in the camp.
      Why do some people say we’ve got to make sure “this” doesn’t happen again? The scamdemic was long in preparation and the scamdemic is but a small part of a campaign that will likely take a long, long time. There’s no 2 scamdemics exactly the same. I’d sooner see Israel dumped in a ditch and forgotten. We need to rise up and come out strongly against Israel, are you OK with that, Joe?

      1. Sorry to get in between you and Joe, but I care not what happens to Israel….let them go the way of all other terrorists nations (unfortunately, that at times inclues the old USA)……BUT, I would absolutely like to outlaw any out of proportion support by our CONgress of the terrorist nation known as Israel. THAT get under my skin more than anything. We have invaded one supposed terrorist nation after another and most of them at the behest of israel. That makes no sense whatsoever. Man, talk about a great topic for the next “CONgressional investigation”, eh? Bring in McKinney as a witness. They ALL know and they all keep quiet. Good Lawd, how many honeypots does Israel have on the payroll?

    2. Mrs Kimberley Ann Goguen after a recent interview was asked by a lady who researched the geneology of the Rothschilds and complained it was very difficult Mrs Goguen claimed that such research is very difficult because the Rothschilds have obscured their geneology. I do not understand how the family came to their previous name Bauer.


Leave a Reply