03 Dec, 2021

The Diversity Problem on Campus | Opinion

DORIAN S. ABBOT AND IVAN MARINOVIC , PROFESSORS


Students sit on a bench in front of the library at the University of South Carolina on August 10, 2020, in Columbia, South Carolina (above)
. SEAN RAYFORD/GETTY IMAGES

American universities are undergoing a profound transformation that threatens to derail their primary mission: the production and dissemination of knowledge. The new regime is titled “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” or DEI, and is enforced by a large bureaucracy of administrators. Nearly every decision taken on campus, from admissions, to faculty hiring, to course content, to teaching methods, is made through the lens of DEI. This regime was imposed from the top and has never been adequately debated. In the current climate it cannot be openly debated: the emotions around DEI are so strong that self-censorship among dissenting faculty is nearly universal.

The words “diversity, equity and inclusion” sound just, and are often supported by well-intentioned people, but their effects are the opposite of noble sentiments. Most importantly, “equity” does not mean fair and equal treatment. DEI seeks to increase the representation of some groups through discrimination against members of other groups. The underlying premise of DEI is that any statistical difference between group representation on campus and national averages reflects systemic injustice and discrimination by the university itself. The magnitude of the distortions is significant: for some job searches discrimination rises to the level of implicitly or explicitly excluding applicants from certain groups.

DEI violates the ethical and legal principle of equal treatment. It entails treating people as members of a group rather than as individuals, repeating the mistake that made possible the atrocities of the 20th century. It requires being willing to tell an applicant “I will ignore your merits and qualifications and deny you admission because you belong to the wrong group, and I have defined a more important social objective that justifies doing so.” It treats persons as merely means to an end, giving primacy to a statistic over the individuality of a human being.

DEI compromises the university’s mission. The core business of the university is the search for truth. A university’s intellectual environment depends fundamentally on its commitment to hiring the most talented and best trained minds: any departure from this commitment must come at the expense of academic excellence, and ultimately will compromise the university’s contribution to society. This point is particularly urgent given that DEI considerations often reduce the pool of truly eligible candidates by a factor of two or more.

DEI undermines the public’s trust in universities and their graduates. Some on campus might be surprised to learn that, according to a recent Pew poll, 74 percent of Americans think only qualifications should be taken into account in hiring and promotion, even if this results in less diversity. If current trends continue, employers and consumers will quickly adjust their perception of the value of a university degree.

We propose an alternative framework called Merit, Fairness, and Equality (MFE) whereby university applicants are treated as individuals and evaluated through a rigorous and unbiased process based on their merit and qualifications alone. Crucially, this would mean an end to legacy and athletic admission advantages, which significantly favor white applicants, in addition to those based on group membership.

Simultaneously, MFE would involve universities investing in education projects in neighborhoods where public education is failing to help children from those areas compete. These projects would be evidence-based and non-ideological, testing a variety of different options such as increased public school funding, charter schools and voucher programs.

Viewed objectively, American universities already are incredibly diverse. They feature people from all countries, races and ethnicities (for example, one of us was born and raised in Chile, and is classified as Hispanic by his university). This is in stark contrast with most universities in Europe, Asia and South America. American universities are diverse not because of DEI, but because they have been extremely competitive at attracting talent from all over the world.

Ninety years ago Germany had the best universities in the world. Then an ideological regime obsessed with race came to power and drove many of the best scholars out, gutting the faculties and leading to sustained decay that German universities never fully recovered from. We should view this as a warning of the consequences of viewing group membership as more important than merit, and correct our course before it is too late.

Dorian S. Abbot is an associate professor of geophysics at the University of Chicago. In his research he uses mathematical and computational models to understand and explain fundamental problems in Earth and planetary sciences.

Ivan Marinovic is an associate professor of accounting at Stanford Graduate School of Business. In his research he uses game theory to understand incentive and information transmission problems in capital markets.

The views expressed in this article are the writers’ own.

Please follow and like us:

5 thoughts on “The Diversity Problem on Campus | Opinion”

  1. Think the US governments heavy hand is not influencing WalMart’s policies (likely through Blackrock that seems to now own the world)….think again. It’s time to boycott that shitehole, since they want their employees to undergo what is most certainly a two day brainwashing process. Read the letter.

    Walmart launched a critical race theory training program that denounces the United States as a “white supremacy system” and… (HOLY COW! )…..….teaches white hourly-wage workers that they are guilty of “white supremacy thinking” and “internalized racial superiority.”

    So Walmart now joins the long line of racist anti-White and Marxist companies out to destroy America? I shop there every few weeks…. Guess what…. NO MORE. Sending this to everyone I know. For Walmart to do this is like a total betrayal in my eyes – my opinion – Sgt L

    https://generaldispatch.whatfinger.com/walmart-launched-a-critical-race-theory-training-program-that-denounces-the-united-states-as-a-white-supremacy-system-and-holy-cow/

    moderated
  2. The environment I grew up in was… serious people become Engineers, MDs, Architects, Lawyers, Real Estate Developers. Captains of Industry, etc. By the same token…. music and art were hobbies, not occupations. I could not see I was on the wrong path pursuing an engineering degree. I never took to it, it always felt foreign to my nature. Only organic chemistry really clicked with my brain. But I blazed ahead anyway. Then something happened as I reached the higher levels. I became disillusioned with the assembly line building professional adults and walked away, seldom looking back. I decided where I lived was more important than what I did. That is still the case. I think there’s millions of college students that don’t belong there. They are following a path someone else built.

    moderated
  3. It’s difficult to express an opinion or worse yet facts on any subject as there is so much propaganda. I was talking with a Hispanic neighbor a few houses away the other evening. He tells me that Ron Paul is really bad because, “he’s too political.” Then he tells me that, “Trump almost died from COVID.” I said, “No, he was in and out of the hospital very quickly.” He says, “Oh no, he just about keeled over getting on the helicopter after he got out.” I don’t know but it seems to me his stay was rather short and he never seemed very sick to me. There just is no agreement on almost any subject, and the anti-Trumpers seem the worst. They can suddenly become enraged over almost anything, even things that should be quite trivial. I have a new theory. I believe the “vaccine” is turning large numbers of people into Zombies who have sudden mood swings. I believe it’ possible that the spike proteins generated by the “vaccine” are invading their brains and disrupting the neurological connections. There are also an increasing number of reports of fully vaccinated people suddenly dropping dead very unexpectedly. You will have to draw your own conclusions, but it is something to think about. Maybe you’ve had similar experiences where you are around people who are completely incapable of discussing anything, Their argument always ends up being that, “your sources are bad, and then they go on to cite some MSM news channel they listen to that has the facts, because it’s the majority opinion, and therefore has to be true.

    moderated
    1. I have seen the exact thing you describe countless times. Just last night. A young guy full of life and we started chatting . I told him about the Sturgis Motor Cycle Rally. How I was hip deep in sweaty bikers playing music at bars and no one was afraid, no masks, no Karens! and nothing but good times. What did our young lad say about it? “that was a super spreader event” and he was 500 miles away but knew exactly what to say! He simply parroted what the news saiid about the event. And ignored my eye witness account of no trace of illness.

      moderated

Leave a Reply

Get Exclusive Updates from James Fetzer in Your Email

Loading

Good Day!

Would you like to get my latest blog posts and other news and updates?

It's FREE! Simply enter your best email below and you will get notified as soon as they are published.

* We never share your information or spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.

Loading

It's FREE! Simply enter your best email below and you will get notified as soon as they are published.

Good Day!

Would you like to get my latest blog posts and other news and updates?

* We never share your information or spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
 

Loading