BOMBSHELL: FDA Allows Whistleblower Testimony that COVID-19 Vaccines Are Killing and Harming People!

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

[Editor’s note: I have added the stunning report from a UK Funeral Director that the COVID PANDEMIC is a hoax and that hospitals are killing seniors.]

The FDA held a Vaccine Advisory Committee meeting yesterday (September 17, 2021) to discuss authorizing a third Pfizer COVID-19 “booster shot.”

There were signs heading into the meeting this week that there could be some fireworks at this hearing, as two top vaccine research scientists at the FDA, Dr. Marion Gruber and Dr. Phillip Kause, the Director and Deputy Director of the Office of Vaccines Research, recently resigned.

This followed a report published in The Lancet from 18 officials at the FDA opposing the Biden Administration’s plan to start distributing Pfizer “booster shots” later this month (September, 2021) before the FDA had even approved them.

To say that there were fireworks at the Vaccine Advisory Committee meeting yesterday might be a gross understatement. The 18 member committee voted 16 to 2 AGAINST approving the booster shots, although later they did give their endorsement on approving them for people 65 and older.

BOMBSHELL! UK Funeral Director blows the cover of the COVID HOAX: Brace yourself.

During the “open session” part of the meeting, dissenting doctors questioning the Pfizer shots were given a chance to address the public with their concerns, and they presented to the public REAL data about the shots that up until now has been heavily censored.

Dr. Joseph Fraiman, an emergency room physician from New Orleans who did his studies at Cornell Medical School, stated that there are no trials large enough yet to prove that the COVID-19 vaccines reduce hospitalization without causing serious harm.

He lamented the fact that the “vaccine hesitant” coming into his emergency room were more educated on the risks of the COVID-19 vaccine than those vaccinated.

 I know many think that vaccine hesitants are dumb, or just misinformed. That’s not at all what I’ve seen.

In fact typically, independent of education level, the vaccine hesitant I’ve met in the ER are more familiar with vaccine studies, and more aware of their own COVID risks than the vaccinated.

For example, many of my nurses have refused the vaccine despite seeing COVID-19 cause more death and devastation than most people have.

I ask them why refuse the vaccine?

They tell me while they’ve seen the first hand dangers of COVID, the elderly, the obese, diabetics; they think their risk is low.

They’re not wrong. A 30-year-old female has about a 1 in 7000 chance of catching COVID and being hospitalized over it.

He pointed out that a recent study showed that the risk of vaccine-induced Myocarditis (heart disease) in young males is higher than their risk from hospitalization from COVID.

He called for larger studies to be conducted.

We the medical establishment cannot confidently call out anti-COVID-19 activists who publicly claim the vaccines harm more than they save, especially in the young and healthy, the fact that we do not have the clinical evidence to say these activists are wrong, should terrify us all.

Steve Kirsch, the Executive Director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund, also gave testimony, and he began his comments with:

I am going to focus my remarks today with the elephant in the room that nobody likes to talk about, that the vaccines kill more people than they save.

He presented data to prove that the belief that these vaccines are “safe” simply isn’t true. He gives several facts to show this, most all of which we have previously covered here at Health Impact News.

For example, people have 71 times more risk of heart attack following COVID-19 vaccines than any other vaccine.

Kirsch claims that expert analysis of existing data, including the 6-month Pfizer trials and VAERS data, prove that the shots kill more people than they allegedly save.

About 411 deaths per million doses. That translates into about 150,000 people have died (from the Pfizer shots).

He then presented some data from the Israel Ministry of Health.

The real numbers confirm that we kill more than we save. And I would love to look at the Israel ministry of health data on the 90+ year olds where we went from a 94.4% vaccinated group to 82.9% vaccinated in the last 4 months.

In the most optimistic scenario it means that 50% of the vaccinated people died and 0% of unvaccinated people died. Unless you can explain that to the public you cannot approve the boosters.

Dr. Jessica Rose, PhD, MSc, BSc, whom we have featured previously here on Health Impact News and has done extensive studies on the VAERS data, also gave a presentation where she showed that we have had a 1000% percent increase in adverse events following COVID vaccines, as compared to all previous vaccines in prior years, something we have covered extensively here at Health Impact News.

Listen to the presentations of these three doctors. This is from our Bitchute channel, and it is also on our Rumble channel.

Please follow and like us:

67 thoughts on “BOMBSHELL: FDA Allows Whistleblower Testimony that COVID-19 Vaccines Are Killing and Harming People!”

    1. I simply don’t understand why people get herded into taking vaccines which don’t work, according to my betters, however this is the Covid Crusher which would stop this Covid Pandemic dead, if everyone practiced it and it is free, from me:
      The Achilles Heel of Coronavirus, is while it is still in the developing stage as Coronavirus/Covid in the warm, wet areas inside the nasal passages of your head (nose) and before it gets to become Covid in your head and lungs, 10 to 14 days later. If Coronavirus is not treated with my free iodine salt clean water cure to flush out your nasal passages, as soon as possible, or during self isolation, it becomes Covid, which is where the money is. You cannot catch Covid! Always breathe through your nose and keep your mouth shut, because you really don’t want the Coronavirus to seed itself in your lungs!! My free salt water cure has “absolutely nothing” to do with mRNA test vaccines. Treating Coronavirus with my free iodine salt clean water cure, flushes out the nasal cavity and kills Coronavirus, before it gets to be Covid, irrespective of if you have had mRNA vaccines or not. Mix one heaped teaspoon of iodine salt in a mug of warm or cold clean water, cup a hand and pour some of the solution in, then sniff or snort that mugful up into your nose, spitting out everything which comes down into your mouth, by so doing, you flush out your nasal cavity, where Coronavirus lives. If you get a burning sensation (which lasts for 2-3 minutes) then you have a Coronavirus infection.When the soreness goes away, blow out your head with toilet paper and flush away, washing your hands afterwards and continue doing my salt clean water nasal cavity flush cure, morning, noon and night, or more often, if you want, until, when you do my free salt water cure, you don’t experience any soreness at all in your nasal cavity. While you are at it, swallow a couple of mouthfulls and if you get a burning sensation in your chest, then you are killing the Covid/Bronchitis there too, so keep it up, each time you do a salt water sniffle, until the soreness in your head and lungs goes away – job done. Pour some of the solution on a flat surface and allow to dry and see what you have then. This is what coats the nasal passages in your head and kills Coronavirus/Covid off. You can see why it is so effective. This is what I have done for the past 27 years and I am NEVER ill, nor do you need to be either.
      Please pass it around to everyone who wants to give it a try.
      “Even so, a key issue is that the current vaccines block severe disease but do not prevent infection, said Dr. Gregory Poland, a vaccine scientist at the Mayo Clinic. That is because the virus is still capable of replicating in the nose, even among vaccinated people, who can then transmit the disease through tiny, aerosolized droplets”
      Reuters – what my free salt water cure stops.
      He added that “Current vaccines are great at preventing [CO1] serious infection deep in the lungs, but not at blocking infection in the upper airways. What’s needed is a nasal-spray (vaccine) that would stop the coronavirus from taking hold at all.” – what my free salt water cure does and stops.
      No soreness when you do it, it feels like you are flushing your head with water, if you get sore reaction, you have a virus so deal with it, exactly as I have described above – did a sniffle today – Me, all OK!!
      We all need a cure which works instead of these vaccines, when you get a Coronavirus infection – now you have one.
      Do not use saline water bought online, use iodine based kitchen or sea salt, it is the iodine in the salt which kills Coronavirus dead
      More to the point, try it on anyone with a Coronavirus infection and see what happens to the virus and how quickly it is killed in the nasal passages of the head. No Coronavirus, no Covid it would otherwise become. – Simple
      Keep safe – Richard (smile)

    2. Taliban vs Vaccines

      “In just over five weeks since assuming control of Afghanistan, the Taliban have clearly demonstrated that they are not serious about protecting or respecting human rights. We have already seen a wave of violations, from reprisal attacks and restrictions on women, to crackdowns on protests, the media and civil society,” said Dinushika Dissanayake, with Amnesty, in a statement.

      Me: And those behind vaccines care about human rights:

      Vaccine contents by Dr Young: Well worth a read!!

    3. Let me tell you my true story and why I am concerned about vaccine shots

      Truth be told, 35/40 years ago, I was so mentally destroyed from my last marriage breakdown, the second and last one, that I wanted to commit suicide and as it turns out, I am a jumper from the top of high buildings and on the run in to jumping off and killing myself, just before I launched myself into eternity, I had an out of body experience – for want of a better explanation, a cone of light and silence descended over me and a voice came into my head and said “there is nothing wrong with you physically, this is all financial” and I stopped, turned around and walked away and that is the only reason I am still here today.

      15 years ago, roughly, I went with the female friend who I was caring for (part time paid carer), to a convention about fortune telling and other “weird” things that women generally believe in and while I was there we saw a guy doing Aura photos and both my friend and I, had ours done.

      Now, everyone has a motivation to their own cause, but I have never explained mine, so here goes.

      My Aura photo was 90% Gold and 10% Purple and when I looked at the card which came with my photo, there was nothing about Gold on it, so I had to inquire what Gold meant and I was told that Gold was nearest to perfection – that was 15 years ago.

      I decided then, that I wanted to be 100% Gold and I would do everything I could in life, to benefit others, to achieve my 100% Gold rating before I die and that is my motivation to push my free salt water cure for Covid, in the hope that I can save more than I lose, to vaccines.

      I have always had an easy connection with all animals, they take to me like, just like that and I personally think that they can see the Aura’s we each give out and determine if we are good or bad instinctively – I am an “animal whisperer”.

      So to Covid.

      Biden and newspapers have got the majority of you running around in confusion and the more confused you get, the easier it is to control you and have you do their bidding = vaccines.

      There is only one issue you should keep in mind to the exclusion of all else and that is Covid and how to avoid getting it – nothing else matters.

      Do my free salt water cure, stay on that, don’t get pulled or pushed away from my simple cure and live a long life, without any of the pressures to conform to the majority rule and vaccines – it is as simple as that:

      The Achilles Heel of Coronavirus, is while it is still in the developing stage as Coronavirus/Covid in the warm, wet areas inside the nasal passages of your head (nose) and before it gets to become Covid in your head and lungs, 10 to 14 days later.
      If Coronavirus is not treated with my free iodine salt clean water cure to flush out your nasal passages, as soon as possible, or during self isolation, it becomes Covid, which is where the money is.
      You cannot catch Covid! Always breathe through your nose and keep your mouth shut, because you really don’t want the Coronavirus to seed itself in your lungs!!
      My free salt water cure has “absolutely nothing” to do with 40 trillion lipid packages of graphene and mRNA test vaccines you get with one shot.
      Treating Coronavirus with my free iodine salt clean water cure, flushes out the nasal cavity and kills Coronavirus, before it gets to be Covid, irrespective of if you have had mRNA vaccines or not.
      Mix one heaped teaspoon of iodine salt in a mug of warm or cold clean water, cup a hand and pour some of the solution in, then sniff or snort that mugful up into your nose, spitting out everything which comes down into your mouth, by so doing, you flush out your nasal cavity, where Coronavirus lives.
      If you get a burning sensation (which lasts for 2-3 minutes) then you have a Coronavirus infection.
      When the soreness goes away, blow out your head with toilet paper and flush away, washing your hands afterwards and continue doing my salt clean water nasal cavity flush cure, morning, noon and night, or more often, if you want, until, when you do my free salt water cure, you don’t experience any soreness at all in your nasal cavity.
      While you are at it, swallow a couple of mouthfuls and if you get a burning sensation in your chest, then you are killing the Covid/Bronchitis there too, so keep it up, each time you do a salt water sniffle, until the soreness in your head and lungs goes away – job done.
      Pour some of the solution on a flat surface and allow to dry and see what you have then. This is what coats the nasal passages in your head and kills Coronavirus/Covid off. You can see why it is so effective. This is what I have done for the past 27 years and I am NEVER ill, nor do you need to be either.
      Please pass it around to everyone who wants to give it a try.
      “Even so, a key issue is that the current vaccines block severe disease but do not prevent infection, said Dr. Gregory Poland, a vaccine scientist at the Mayo Clinic. That is because the virus is still capable of replicating in the nose, even among vaccinated people, who can then transmit the disease through tiny, aerosolized droplets” Reuters – what my free salt water cure stops.
      He added that “Current vaccines are great at preventing [CO1] serious infection deep in the lungs, but not at blocking infection in the upper airways. What’s needed is a nasal-spray (vaccine) that would stop the coronavirus from taking hold at all.” – what my free salt water cure does and stops.
      No soreness when you do it, it feels like you are flushing your head with water, if you get sore reaction, you have a virus so deal with it, exactly as I have described above – did a sniffle today – Me, all OK!!
      We all need a cure which works instead of these vaccines, when you get a Coronavirus infection – now you have one.
      Do not use saline water bought online, use iodine based kitchen or sea salt, it is the iodine in the salt, which kills Coronavirus dead and by cupping a hand and pouring some of the salt water from the mug in and sniffing or snorting the lot up your nose, it flushes all of your nasal passages out, including around the brain bulb and brain stem, so no “Long Covid” for you.
      More to the point, try it on anyone with a Coronavirus infection and see what happens to the virus and how quickly it is killed in the nasal passages of the head. No Coronavirus, no Covid it would otherwise become. – Simple
      Help me save your life, so that you can help me achieve my 100% Gold Aura status, then win/win for all of us.
      Keep safe – Richard (smile)

    4. Thirteen gorillas test positive for Covid at Atlanta zoo
      Published on September 15, 2021
      Written by The Guardia
      Western lowland gorillas are believed to have caught the virus from a zookeeper claim ‘zoo officials’.
      More than a dozen gorillas have tested positive for Covid-19 at Zoo Atlanta, probably after contracting the virus from a keeper, zoo officials said.
      Staff were alerted when several of the zoo’s troop of 20 western lowland gorillas began exhibiting symptoms, including runny noses, mild coughing and loss of appetite.
      Fecal samples and swabs sent to the University of Georgia’s veterinary diagnostic laboratory showed that 13 of the great apes were positive for coronavirus, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported.
      In a statement posted to the zoo’s website, officials said they believed a vaccinated member of its animal care team, who was wearing personal protective equipment and asymptomatic when she came to work, probably transmitted the virus.
      “The teams are very closely monitoring the affected gorillas and are hopeful they will make a complete recovery,” Sam Rivera, Zoo Atlanta’s senior director of animal health, said.
      Further tests sent to the national veterinary services laboratory in Ames, Iowa, for confirmation, were pending, the statement added. Some of the gorillas are receiving monoclonal antibodies, and staff are paying close attention to Ozzie, a 60-year-old male thought to be most at risk of Covid complications.
      Zoo Atlanta’s gorillas live in close proximity to each other in four groups, making it impossible to isolate them individually. As they recover, they will receive the Zoetis coronavirus vaccine developed for veterinary use, the statement said.
      Other animals at Zoo Atlanta that will receive the vaccine in the coming days will include Bornean and Sumatran orangutans, Sumatran tigers, African lions, and a clouded leopard.
      In February, San Diego Zoo announced that all eight of its lowland gorillas who had contracted Covid-19 a few weeks earlier, including Winston, a 49-year-old male, had made a full recovery.
      The California zoo also reported in July that its two endangered snow leopards had coronavirus, but were responding well to treatment.
      See more here: Header image: The Daily Mail
      Me: So much for “herd immunity”

    5. Dr. Fauci: “Heck, No, I Haven’t Been Vaccinated”
      By Michael Baxter from REAL RAW NEWS
      The Deep State’s primary Covid-19 vaccine peddler, Dr. Anthony Fauci, boasted to colleagues at the NIH that he has not taken and will not take the Covid jab, said a former NIH employee who claims Fauci personally fired him in June for “violating or considering to violate non-disclosure agreements” pertaining to vaccination protocols.
      Our source, who wishes to remain anonymous at this time, told Real Raw News that he’d been wrongfully terminated—unjustifiably because he never signed non-disclosure paperwork on the Institute’s Covid-19 policies. And the reason he never signed said paperwork is that he had worked for NIH’s Division of AIDS, which was largely excluded from Covid-19 plandemic response meetings and vaccine development.
      For ease of reading, RRN will refer to our source as Brian Stowers. RRN has vetted Stowers’ education and employment history, and we found no reason to believe he had a vendetta against Fauci or that he would engage in deception; his credentials seemed unimpeachable. As a Level 2 lab technician, his primary duty at the NIH was spinning blood through a centrifuge and passing results to his superiors. Nothing glamorous.
      Although he had no exposure to Covid-19 data, he had been exposed to Dr. Anthony Fauci’s hubris and overbearing presence.
      “At least once a week, Fauci made rounds through the departments. He liked to stick his nose in everyone’s business, belittle and ridicule people for no good reason. Anyway, on February 15, 2021, about two months after the FDA gave emergency use authorization to Pfizer’s vaccine, Fauci strolls into our department and tells us that we ought to encourage our friends and family to get vaccinated at the earliest possible date. But he tells us lab workers—there were about 9 in the lab at that moment—to delay getting vaccinated until, as he put it, ‘we see what happens,’” Stowers said.
      A long, uncomfortable silence followed Fauci’s statement, our source added.
      According to him, one lab worker asked Fauci why the vaccine was safe for friends and family but not for NIH employees.
      “Fauci’s face turned red. He was clearly angered by the question. He started berating us, telling us we weren’t qualified to question his judgement. If we didn’t follow his guidance, we’d be jeopardizing the health of our friends and family, Fauci told us. He was on a tirade for like 5 minutes, and cussing like a sailor,” Stowers said.
      Then Stowers asked Fauci, respectfully, whether he had been vaccinated.
      “What kind of question is that? Not that it’s any business of yours, but, no, heck no, I haven’t been vaccinated. And I don’t plan to be, at least not for a long time, if at all…If I take the vaccine and get sick from it, then what? I’m too important here to take that risk. You all are, too—that’s why I’m telling you to wait. But you can be replaced; I’m irreplaceable. The administration needs me to helm this response,” Fauci reportedly said.
      Four months later, unexpectedly, Stowers received a termination letter claiming he had violated the Institute’s confidentiality clause. The notice bore Fauci’s handwritten signature.
      “I knew fighting would be pointless. I got 6-month’s severance package and figured that would be enough to hold me until I found new work, and I have,” Stowers said.
      In closing, Stowers said Fauci never wore a mask inside NIH facilities, only when, in Fauci’s words, “outsiders and interlopers and media” were nearby.
      Real Raw News

    6. Owner Of Diagnostic Lab Reports 20 Times Increase Of Cancer In Vaccinated Patients 
      September 18, 2021
      A doctor, who is also the owner of a diagnostic lab has found a 20 times increase in cancers since the COVID-19 vaccine rollout. Explaining his findings he said that the vaccines seem to be causing serious autoimmune issues, in a way he described as a “reverse HIV” response.
      On March 18, Dr. Ryan Cole, a board-certified pathologist and owner and operator of a diagnostics lab, reported to the public in a video produced by Idaho state government’s  “Capitol Clarity” project,  that he is seeing a massive ‘uptick’ in various autoimmune diseases and cancers in patients who have been vaccinated.  
      “Since January 1, in the laboratory, I’m seeing a 20 times increase of endometrial cancers over what I see on an annual basis,” reported Dr. Cole in the video clip shared on Twitter.  
      This doctor trained at the Mayo Clinic and runs the largest independent testing laboratory in Idaho.

      Listen to what his lab testing is showing:
      “I’m not exaggerating at all because I look at my numbers year over year, I’m like ‘Gosh, I’ve never seen this many endometrial cancers before’,” he continued.  
      Explaining his findings at the March 18 event, Cole told Idahoans that the vaccines seem to be causing serious autoimmune issues, in a way he described as a “reverse HIV” response. 
      Cole explained that two types of cells are required for adequate immune system function: “Helper T-cells,” also called “CD4 cells,” and “killer T-cells,” often known as “CD8 cells.” 
      According to Cole, in patients with HIV, there is a massive suppression of “helper T-cells” which cause immune system functions to plummet, and leave the patient susceptible to a variety of illnesses.  
      Similarly, Cole describes, “post-vaccine, what we are seeing is a drop in your killer T-cells, in your CD8 cells,” 
      “And what do CD8 cells do? They keep all other viruses in check,” he continued. 
      Much like HIV causes immune system disruption by suppressing CD4 “helper” cells, the same thing happens when CD8 “killer” cells are suppressed. In Dr. Cole’s expert view, this is what seems to be the case with the COVID-19 jabs.  
      Cole goes on to state that as a result of this vaccine-induced “killer T-cell” suppression, he is seeing an “uptick” of not only endometrial cancer, but also melanomas, as well as herpes, shingles, mono, and a “huge uptick” in HPV when “looking at the cervical biopsies of women.”  
      This is not the first time the COVID-19 vaccines have been linked to serious issues regarding women’s health. 
      According to Intermountain Healthcare doctors women who were recently vaccinated for COVID-19 may show symptoms of Breast Cancer as a side-effect of the vaccine.
      As per reports women are experiencing irregular menstruation after getting vaccinated against COVID with more heavier and painful periods.
      Six months after the coronavirus vaccines were widely distributed in the United States, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has called for a $1.67 million study on how the COVID-19 vaccines affect women’s menstrual cycles.
      According to March data from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), there were 34 cases reported where pregnant women suffered from spontaneous miscarriages or stillbirths post COVID-19 vaccination.
      Recently, according to VAERS data a breastfeeding baby died of blood clots and inflamed arteries weeks after his mother was given the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine.
      Meanwhile, researcher at the University of Miami have recommended men to have a fertility evaluation before receiving the COVID vaccine and to consider to freeze their sperm before vaccination in order to protect their fertility.
      Dr. Cole states in his video that, not only are melanomas showing up more frequently, like endometrial cancers, the melanomas are also developing more rapidly, and are more severe in younger people, than he has ever previously witnessed. 
      “Most concerning of all, there is a pattern of these types of immune cells in the body keeping cancer in check,” stated the doctor. 
      “I’m seeing invasive melanomas in younger patients; normally we catch those early, and they are thin melanomas, [but] I’m seeing thick melanomas skyrocketing in the last month or two,” he added. 
      Cole came into prominence in January of 2021 when the Idaho government put in place an effort called “Capitol Clarity,” with the stated goal of keeping Idahoans informed about the facts surrounding COVID-19.  
      Capitol Clarity has since hosted Dr. Ryan Cole multiple times to provide information to the public about vaccine safety and COVID-19 measures more broadly.  
      The videos of Dr. Cole at these events, which were originally posted on YouTube, have since been deleted by the Google owned video platform in a continual effort of censorship by Big Tech.

    7. The European Union database of suspected drug reaction reports is EudraVigilance, and they are now reporting 24,526 fatalities, and 2,317,495 injuries, following COVID-19 injections.
      A Health Impact News subscriber from Europe reminded us that this database maintained at EudraVigilance is only for countries in Europe who are part of the European Union, which comprises 27 countries.
      The total number of countries in Europe is much higher, almost twice as many, numbering around 50. (There are some differences of opinion as to which countries are technically part of Europe.)
      So as high as these numbers are, they do NOT reflect all of Europe. The actual number in Europe who are reported dead or injured following COVID-19 shots would be much higher than what we are reporting here.
      The EudraVigilance database reports that through September 11, 2021 there are 24,526 deaths and 2,317,495 injuries reported following injections of four experimental COVID-19 shots:
      From the total of injuries recorded, almost half of them (1,126,869) are serious injuries.
      “Seriousness provides information on the suspected undesirable effect; it can be classified as ‘serious’ if it corresponds to a medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalisation, results in another medically important condition, or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.”
      A Health Impact News subscriber in Europe ran the reports for each of the four COVID-19 shots we are including here. It is a lot of work to tabulate each reaction with injuries and fatalities, since there is no place on the EudraVigilance system we have found that tabulates all the results.
      Since we have started publishing this, others from Europe have also calculated the numbers and confirmed the totals.*
      Here is the summary data through September 11, 2021.
      Total reactions for the mRNA vaccine Tozinameran (code BNT162b2,Comirnaty) from BioNTech/ Pfizer – 11,711 deaths and 980,474 injuries to 11/09/2021
      · 26,634   Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 156 deaths
      · 26,940   Cardiac disorders incl. 1,745 deaths
      · 253        Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 21 deaths
      · 13,005   Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 9 deaths
      · 728        Endocrine disorders incl. 5 deaths
      · 15,314   Eye disorders incl. 28 deaths
      · 87,239   Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 489 deaths
      · 256,117 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 3,330 deaths
      · 1,098     Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 55 deaths
      · 10,351   Immune system disorders incl. 64 deaths
      · 32,834   Infections and infestations incl. 1,141 deaths
      · 12,714   Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 179 deaths
      · 24,765   Investigations incl. 368 deaths
      · 7,178     Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 210 deaths
      · 130,077 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 149 deaths
      · 757        Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 67 deaths
      · 173,079 Nervous system disorders incl. 1,278 deaths
      · 1,211     Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 36 deaths
      · 168        Product issues incl. 1 death
      · 17,756   Psychiatric disorders incl. 156 deaths
      · 3,348     Renal and urinary disorders incl. 198 deaths
      · 19,084   Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 3 deaths
      · 43,232   Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 1,376 deaths
      · 47,012   Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 105 deaths
      · 1,805     Social circumstances incl. 14 deaths
      · 887        Surgical and medical procedures incl. 31 deaths
      · 26,888   Vascular disorders incl. 497 deaths
      Total reactions for the mRNA vaccine mRNA-1273 (CX-024414) from Moderna – 6,358 deaths and 281,505 injuries to 11/09/2021
      · 5,465     Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 59 deaths
      · 8,364     Cardiac disorders incl. 687 deaths
      · 113        Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 2 deaths
      · 3,466     Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 1 death
      · 221        Endocrine disorders incl. 2 deaths
      · 4,302     Eye disorders incl. 18 deaths
      · 24,595   Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 237 deaths
      · 75,804   General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 2,461 deaths
      · 458        Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 24 deaths
      · 2,485     Immune system disorders incl. 11 deaths
      · 8,436     Infections and infestations incl. 416 deaths
      · 6,013     Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 121 deaths
      · 5,460     Investigations incl. 120 deaths
      · 2,693     Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 145 deaths
      · 35,728   Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 129 deaths
      · 333        Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 37 deaths
      · 49,722   Nervous system disorders incl. 650 deaths
      · 538        Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 6 deaths
      · 59           Product issues incl. 1 death
      · 5,316     Psychiatric disorders incl. 110 deaths
      · 1,632     Renal and urinary disorders incl. 107 deaths
      · 3,558     Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 3 deaths
      · 12,150   Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 614 deaths
      · 15,102   Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 57 deaths
      · 1,188     Social circumstances incl. 25 deaths
      · 905        Surgical and medical procedures incl. 69 deaths
      · 7,399     Vascular disorders incl. 246 deaths
      Total reactions for the vaccine AZD1222/VAXZEVRIA (CHADOX1 NCOV-19) from Oxford/ AstraZeneca: 5,254 deaths and 980,909 injuries to 11/09/2021
      · 11,826   Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 221 deaths
      · 16,641   Cardiac disorders incl. 603 deaths
      · 158        Congenital familial and genetic disorders incl. 5 deaths
      · 11,541   Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 1 death
      · 504        Endocrine disorders incl. 4 deaths
      · 17,332   Eye disorders incl. 22 deaths
      · 96,191   Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 270 deaths
      · 257,766 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 1,278 deaths
      · 831        Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 51 deaths
      · 3,987     Immune system disorders incl. 23 deaths
      · 24,674   Infections and infestations incl. 330 deaths
      · 11,183   Injury poisoning and procedural complications incl. 141 deaths
      · 21,578   Investigations incl. 121 deaths
      · 11,626   Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 73 deaths
      · 148,195 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 74 deaths
      · 510        Neoplasms benign malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 16 deaths
      · 204,423 Nervous system disorders incl. 840 deaths
      · 439        Pregnancy puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 11 deaths
      · 158        Product issues incl. 1 death
      · 18,501   Psychiatric disorders incl. 47 deaths
      · 3,639     Renal and urinary disorders incl. 48 deaths
      · 12,993   Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 2 deaths
      · 34,557   Respiratory thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 629 deaths
      · 45,140   Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 36 deaths
      · 1,291     Social circumstances incl. 6 deaths
      · 1,142     Surgical and medical procedures incl. 22 deaths
      · 24,083   Vascular disorders incl. 379 deaths
      Total reactions for the COVID-19 vaccine JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S) from Johnson & Johnson: 1,203 deaths and 74,607 injuries to 11/09/2021
      · 690        Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 31 deaths
      · 1,201     Cardiac disorders incl. 120 deaths
      · 25           Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
      · 560        Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 1 death
      · 42           Endocrine disorders incl. 1 death
      · 1,006     Eye disorders incl. 5 deaths
      · 6,822     Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 56 deaths
      · 19,539   General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 303 deaths
      · 96           Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 9 deaths
      · 302        Immune system disorders incl. 7 deaths
      · 1,679     Infections and infestations incl. 66 deaths
      · 694        Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 16 deaths
      · 3,861     Investigations incl. 72 deaths
      · 431        Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 26 deaths
      · 11,861   Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 30 deaths
      · 31           Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 2 deaths
      · 15,493   Nervous system disorders incl. 142 deaths
      · 26           Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 1 death
      · 20           Product issues
      · 988        Psychiatric disorders incl. 11 deaths
      · 280        Renal and urinary disorders incl. 11 deaths
      · 863        Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 4 deaths
      · 2,629     Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 136 deaths
      · 2,296     Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 5 deaths
      · 212        Social circumstances incl. 4 deaths
      · 546        Surgical and medical procedures incl. 38 deaths
      · 2,414     Vascular disorders incl. 106 deaths
      Me: “EudraVigilance is only for countries in Europe who are part of the European Union, which comprises 27 countries” AND “The total number of countries in Europe is much higher, almost twice as many, numbering around 50”.

      It would be safe to assume that by multiplying the numbers above by 2, we would have a clearer overall picture of how many are being affected by these vaccines over all 50 countries.

      1. Richard, have you any idea if these figures are being hidden as in the US or being reported via their MSM?

    8. A new study out of Israel, pending peer review, has found that “fully vaccinated” people are 27 times more likely to get infected with COVID-19, develop symptoms, and 8 times more likely to experience hospitalization than unvaccinated people with natural immunity.
      A new study from Israel, one of the most vaccinated countries in the world, claims that “fully vaccinated” people are significantly more likely to get infected with COVID-19 and develop symptoms requiring hospitalization than those who are unvaccinated and have the natural immunity that comes from catching the virus and recovering.
      The study, Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity: reinfections versus breakthrough infections, examined medical records of tens of thousands of people between the dates of June 1 and August 14 and is currently the largest real-world observational study to date on coronavirus immunity with respects to both vaccinated and unvaccinated people.
      The study found that “fully vaccinated” people are 27 times more likely to be infected and develop COVID-19 symptoms than unvaccinated people with natural immunity. The study also found that “fully vaccinated” people are 8 times more likely to be hospitalized from a “breakthrough” infection.
      “It’s a textbook example of how natural immunity is really better than vaccination,” said Charlotte Thålin, a physician and immunology researcher at Danderyd Hospital and the Karolinska Institute. “To my knowledge, it’s the first time [this] has really been shown in the context of COVID-19.”
      As National File previously reported, the fourth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in the US appears to be nearly twice as deadly as the second wave, which occurred months before hundreds of millions of people received vaccinations for coronavirus. According to data from the CDC, US coronavirus death rates in the first ten days September 2021 are nearly twice as high as they were during the first ten days of September 2020.
      While the Biden administration and international health authorities insist that the current outbreak of coronavirus is a “pandemic of the unvaccinated,” studies are indicating that vaccinated people are dying from COVID at a higher rate than unvaccinated people as mainstream news outlets scramble to justify them. “At first glance, this may seem alarming, but it is exactly as would be expected,” reported The Conversation.
      Thus far, it appears the “safe and effective” vaccinations for COVID-19 do not prevent vaccinated people from contracting COVID-19 or spreading it to others, but that has not stopped the Biden administration from instituting unprecedented federal vaccine mandates in moves that many constitutional experts have said are “in open defiance of the Constitution.” (READ MORE: Fully Vaccinated Carry 251 Times The Normal Viral Load Of COVID-19, May Be Super Spreaders – Study)
      The Israeli study, combined with other increasingly surfacing evidence, may raise questions about why the US government is imposing forced vaccinations on Americans working for large companies despite evidence indicating that vaccinated individuals are overwhelmingly more likely to catch, spread, and be hospitalized by COVID-19. National File

    9. 2.4. Four Immunological Problems with COVID-19 Vaccines
      While the now clearly established widespread cross-immunity against SARS-CoV-2 implies that most of us are safe from severe COVID-19 disease, it also means that we are vulnerable to the harms of geneu based vaccines. Due to recall immunity against the virus, vaccination will cause our immune systems to fight aggressively against not only the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, but against ourselves. This deleterious autoimmune attack must be expected to intensify with each repeated injection.
      The COVID-19 vaccine technology’s interaction with the immune system creates the following four specific problems:
      1. Flying under the immune system’s radar with the vaccine’s genetic code
      2. Delivering the spike protein into the bloodstream
      3. Inducing immune attack on the blood vessel lining
      4. Enhancing the severity of natural infection
      2.4.1. Flying Under the Immune System’s Radar with the Vaccine’s Genetic Code
      To understand why COVID-19 vaccine technology is dangerous, it is necessary to first understand how the gene-based vaccines differ from traditional vaccination methods.
      A conventional viral vaccine can be a live virus strain derived from the pathogenic virus that has been attenuated through one or more genetic mutations, or it can consist of chemically inactivated virus particles that are no longer able to infect any cells. In both cases, protein antigens will be exposed on the surface of the vaccine particles, which can be recognized by antibodies once these have been formed.
      COVID-19 vaccines, on the other hand, are not protein antigens but the genetic blueprint for the SARSC CoV-2 spike protein antigen. That blueprint comes in the form of mRNA or DNA, which, after vaccination, enters our body’s cells and instructs those cells to manufacture the spike protein. The spike protein then protrudes from the cell and induces antibody formation. In response, the immune system will react not only with the spike protein, but will attack and try to destroy the entire cell.
      If we are injected with a traditional live virus vaccine to which we have no immunity, then these vaccine virus particles will also infect some of our body cells and propagate within them. Two kinds of immune reactions will then occur:
      1. Cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (killer T-cells) (see section2.4.3.1) that recognize viral protein fragments associated with the infected cells will proliferate, attack, and destroy the infected cells.
      2. B-lymphocytes that recognize viral proteins (see section2.4.3.2) will proliferate and start producing antibodies—soluble protein molecules that can recognize and neutralize virus particles.This immune reaction will in principle resemble that to an infection with the corresponding wild-type virus. It will be milder, since the vaccine strain of the virus has been attenuated; however, some cells will get destroyed in the process, which may sometimes cause functional organ damage. Live virus vaccines therefore tend to be more prone to adverse reactions than are inactivated virus vaccines.
      Now, a key point to note is that if we inject a live traditional vaccine into a person who is already immune —due to either a previous vaccination, or to prior infection with the corresponding wild-type virus—the extent of cell destruction will be much reduced. Such a person will already have antibodies to the virus; these will recognize the viral protein antigens and will bind and inactivate most of the vaccine virus particles before they manage to infect a cell. Therefore, even though the killer T-cells may be all riled up, they will not find very many infected cells to pounce on.
      The crucial difference between a conventional live virus vaccine and a gene-based COVID vaccine—and in particular an mRNA vaccine—is that the latter contains no protein antigens whatsoever; instead, it only contains the blueprint for their synthesis inside the infected cells. Therefore, if such a vaccine is injected into a person with antibodies and existing T-cell immunity, the vaccine particles will “fly under the radar” of the antibody defence and reach our body cells unimpeded. The cells will then produce the spike protein, and subsequently be destroyed and attacked by the killer T-cells. The antibodies, rather than preventing the carnage, will join in by also binding to the cell-associated spike protein and directing the complement system (see later) and other immune effector mechanisms against these cells. In a nutshell, pre-existing immunity mitigates the risk of conventional vaccines, but it amplifies the risk of gene-based vaccines.
      Importantly, before COVID, this risky gene-based vaccine technology had never before been used on a wide scale against infectious disease and is inherently experimental. The COVID-19 vaccination program is thus the largest human experiment ever performed in history.
      2.4.2. Delivering the Spike Protein into the Bloodstream
      A dire danger of COVID-19 vaccines is that spike proteins produced by myriad endothelial cells, i.e. the innermost cells lining blood vessel walls, will be exported to the cell surface and protrude directly into the bloodstream. Moreover, a fraction of these spikes will be cleaved during their passage to the outside world. They will fall off the cells into the bloodstream and then bind to their receptors on other endothelial cells at distant sites.
      While at the outset of the vaccination campaign in 2020 it was unknown to what extent COVID vaccines entered the bloodstream, human data from 2021 reveal that the spike protein shows up within the intramuscular injection, reaching maximum plasma concentration within just two hours. Very high levels have subsequently been recorded in the liver, the spleen, the adrenal glands, and the ovaries. Vaccine components have also been observed in the central nervous system (the brain and the spinal cord), albeit at lower concentrations. Such widespread distribution throughout the body via the bloodstream is a feat that the SARS-CoV-2 virus does not usually achieve. Open Questions in the Ongoing Experiment
      But how do COVID-19 vaccine particles enter the circulation in the first place? The vaccine is injected intramuscularly, and the vaccine particles are too large to passively diffuse across blood vessel walls. Most obviously, the vaccines will follow the conventional, relatively time-consuming path which takes them via the draining lymph nodes to the blood circulation. But additionally, two possibilities for very rapid entryinto the bloodstream should be heeded. The first is via direct uptake by vessels that are damaged during insertion of the needle. Secondly, it is possible that the vaccine particles undergo ‘transcytosis’, a process that enables large molecules to be transported across intact cell layers. Whatever the case may be, although Pfizer knew before the onset of clinical trials that their vaccine reached the bloodstream rapidly, either they failed to file these findings with medical regulators in Europe, the US and other Western
      This is a critical oversight where patient safety is concerned. Given that the gene-based vaccines induce the body’s cells to become immune targets, where in the body this takes place is of critical concern. While immune-mediated cell death is never favourable, it is particularly detrimental and dangerous if it afflicts the blood vessel walls.
      2.4.3. Attacking the Vessel Walls: Clotting and Leaky Vessels
      While all vaccines seek to stimulate an immune response, not all immune responses are created equal. Some are safe and well-modulated whereas others can be misdirected and out of control. Immune responses are problematic when they attack the self, as in autoimmune conditions, and/or when they are excessively intense and severe.
      COVID-19 vaccines incur problematic immunity in both key ways. First, they can be expected mobilise a self-to-self immune response against the endothelial cells lining blood vessel walls. Second, by boosting SARS-CoV-2 immunity, they can be expected to incite an increasingly aggressive response with each administration of the vaccine.
      To understand the realities of these processes it is necessary to first understand the basics of the underlying immune response. There are three key components of the immune system relevant to risks from COVID- 19 vaccines: T-cells, antibodies and the complement cascade. T-cells
      Once the body’s cells have been infected with a virus, immune cells known as cytotoxic T-cells or T-killer cells attack and destroy the infected cells. This prevents infected cells from replicating the virus and spreading the infection throughout the body. After the initial battle with a certain pathogen is over, some of the specifically adapted T-cells enter a state of dormancy to become memory T-cells. In case the same virus is encountered again, these dormant T-cells can be swiftly reawakened and propagated to mount a faster and more vigorous response next time. Known as a secondary or memory-type response, it will also occur with viruses that are not exactly the same as the one initially encountered but sufficiently similar to be recognised. This latter phenomenon is referred to as cross-immunity.
      It has been known since mid 2020 that we are protected against SARS-CoV-2 by cross-reactive memory and with the SARS virus in a small number of people. Such prior experience has been found to confer Antibodies
      Before the new discoveries of 2021, scientists’ concerns about clotting and bleeding were based primarily on the prediction that killer T-cells would attack spike-producing endothelial cells, causing lesions onvessel linings and promoting blood clots. While this mechanism remains valid, we now know that a memory-type antibody response will join the attack on the vessel walls as well.
      Whereas killer T-cells attack their targets cell-to-cell, antibodies are proteins that exert their effect by binding to signature structures on the pathogen’s surface, known as epitopes. Instead of destroying cells directly, once attached to an epitope, antibodies help to defeat invaders by “calling out the cavalry” on infected cells.
      This leads to the second process by which cells coated with viral spikes will inadvertently come under immune attack. “Calling out the cavalry” means that the antibodies attached to the unnaturally created spikes will trigger activation of the complement system, which thereupon will mount a massive attack on the endothelial cells.
      Importantly for deciphering the recent discoveries on SARS-CoV-2 immunity, the first time that the immune system encounters a new pathogen, new antibodies in a shape capable of binding to that pathogen’s epitopes must be formed (by immune cells known as B-cells). First-time antibody production is slow, taking approximately four weeks. Should the same pathogen or family of pathogens invade again, however, memory-type antibodies are then manufactured more rapidly, within one to two weeks. This is a cardinal sign that the immune system has seen that pathogen before.
      Another defining feature of a memory antibody response concerns the order in which antibody sub-types are produced. If a pathogen is new, IgM is the first type of antibody to arrive on the scene. It is followed later by IgG and IgA. The next time the pathogen arrives, however, IgG and IgA will be the first to arrive, indicating that the virus, or its relatives, have invaded before.
      Importantly, this is precisely what we see with COVID-19.
      Several research groups found in 2021 that upon first exposure to SARS-CoV-2, and following COVID-19 vaccination, the antibody response was characteristic of the memory type, due both to the timing and nature of antibodies measured. [xv-xvii] As a result, we now know that our immune systems recognise a novel coronavirus after all.
      With respect to variants and the need for booster shots, memory B-cells, like memory T-cells, can recognise not only a specific virus, but a whole family of viruses bearing related epitopes. It is unsurprising, therefore, that memory B-cells recognise SARS-CoV-2 from the common cold. With cross immunity this robust, closer relatives of SARS-CoV-2 in the form of variants will pose no obstacle to our antibody response. The rising “cases”, hospitalisations and deaths attributed to Delta and other variants are therefore almost certainly driven by false positive PCR results and misclassification than by a true increase in COVID-19 disease. Indeed, according to Public Health England data, the Delta variant is non-
      But why haven’t circulating antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 been detected in populations before? The answer is that neither the antibodies nor T-cells associated with a memory-type response circulate in the bloodstream. Once they are no longer needed, they become dormant, existing as a memory alone. Unless elicited by re-exposure to a virus, they remain invisible in the bloodstream. The dormant antibodies will, however, be ready and waiting to re-activate and call out the cavalry on the spike protein, in the form of the complement cascade. Complement
      Recent findings indicate that complement activation is a serious concern with respect to COVID-19 vaccine-immune interactions.
      In light of the newly characterised antibody response to SARS-CoV-2, when antibodies attach to spikeI producing endothelial cells on vessel walls following vaccine administration, activated complement ensuing death of the endothelial cells will expose the tissue underneath the epithelium, which will initiate pathogenic mechanism has been documented in biopsies taken from SARS-CoV-2-infected patients this immune response that COVID-19 vaccines seek to induce.
      Such vaccine-immune interactions are consistent with adverse events involving visible capillary rupture Leaky Vessels—The Promise of Booster Shots
      Given that booster shots repeatedly boost the immune response to the spike protein, they will progressively boost self-to-self immune attack, including boosting complement-mediated damage to vessel walls.
      Clinically speaking, the greater the vessel leakage and clotting that subsequently occurs, the more likely that organs supplied by the affected blood flow will sustain damage. From stroke to heart attack to brain vein thrombosis, the symptoms can range from death to headaches, nausea and vomiting, all of which
      As well as damage from leakage and clotting alone, it is additionally possible that the vaccine itself may leak into surrounding organs and tissues. Should this take place, the cells of those organs will themselves begin to produce spike protein, and will come under attack in the same way as the vessel walls. Damage to major organs such as the lungs, ovaries, placenta and heart can be expected ensue, with increasing severity and frequency as booster shots are rolled out.
      2.4.4. Enhancing the Severity of Wild Coronavirus Infection
      aggravate rather than mitigate illness. This is called antibody-dependent enhancement of disease. The underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated but it is already clear that the net effects are severely detrimental.
      Attempts to develop vaccines to the original SARS virus, which is closely related to SARS-CoV-2, antibodies, but when the vaccinated animals were subsequently infected with the wild-type virus, they
      3. Implications for Doctors and Patients
      Although vaccine manufacturers and regulators are aware of the risks of antibody enhancement of disease, this possibility was not adequately addressed in the clinical trials on any of the COVID-19 vaccines. TheFDA noted that Pfizer, “identified vaccine-associated enhanced disease, including vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease, as an important potential risk” [23]. The EMA similarly acknowledged that “vaccine associated enhanced respiratory disease” was “an important potential risk… that may be specific to vaccination for COVID- 19”.
      Why neither regulator sought to exclude such dangers prior to emergency use authorisation is an open question that all doctors and patients are entitled to ask. Why medical regulators failed to investigate the finding that large vaccine particles cross blood vessel walls, entering the bloodstream and posing risks of blood clotting and leaky vessels is yet another open question again.
      The fact that vaccine rollout began before the immune profile of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 vaccines had been adequately delineated is symptomatic of a rushed and highly politicised approach to the approval and regulation of COVID-19 vaccines. As is the lack of clinical trials investigating the safety of COVID- 19 booster shots.

    10. Dr. Jessica Rose has a BSc in Applied Mathematics and completed her MSc in Immunology at Memorial University of Newfoundland in Canada. She completed her PhD in Computational Biology at Bar Ilan University and then did her first Post Doctorate at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in Molecular Biology.

      I have retrieved the report she compiled which is located here, and I am reproducing it below as well. The Abstract states:

      Abstract: Analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database can be used to estimate the number of excess deaths caused by the COVID vaccines. A simple analysis shows that it is likely that over 150,000 Americans have been killed by the current COVID vaccines as of Aug 28, 2021.

    11. 220,000 military service members say ‘no’ to Biden’s forced Covid injections: File lawsuit claiming they already have natural immunity
      The Biden administration is trying to redefine the meaning of the word “immunity” in its attempt to force the Covid injection on 220,000 U.S. military service members who have already contracted and survived the SARS COV-2 virus that originated in Wuhan, China.
      This has opened the door for a federal lawsuit filed August 30 by two active-duty service members against Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, Homeland Security Director Xavier Bacerra and U.S. Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Janet Woodcock.
      The Navy this week gave its sailors 90 days to get the shot and the Army and Air Force were poised Thursday to enforce their own timetables, reported
      The suit, filed August 30 in U.S. District Court in Colorado, seeks immediate injunctive relief.
      The two plaintiffs, Daniel Robert, a 33-year-old drill sergeant at Fort Benning Army base in Columbus, Georgia, and Hollie Mulvihill, a 29-year-old staff sergeant at the Marine Corp base in Jacksonville, North Carolina, are asking the court for a temporary restraining order preventing the forced injections before a full hearing can be scheduled. They are ultimately seeking a permanent injunction and declaratory judgment against Biden’s Department of Defense.
      The two defendants represent 220,000 other U.S. military active-duty members who have natural immunity and do not want any of the three synthetic gene-based “vaccines” shot into their bodies.
      All three injections, manufactured by Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson, are based on an all-new technology, never before used in any previous vaccine, and have never been tested for the long-term health effects on the human body.
      The three shots combined have resulted in an unprecedented number of adverse reactions being reported to the government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, including over 13,000 reported deaths, more than double the number of all the other vaccines combined since VAERS was established in 1990.
      According to the lawsuit, Army Regulation 40-562 is the all-service publication that governs the administration of “Immunizations and Chemoprophylaxis for the prevention of infectious diseases.”
      AR 40-562 clearly states that documented survivors of an infectious disease have a “presumptive exemption from vaccination due to natural immunity acquired as a result of having survived the infection,” the lawsuit states.
      Army Regulation 40-562 states:
      “General examples of medical exemptions include the following …Evidence of immunity based on serologic tests, documented infection, or similar circumstances.”
      U.S. Health and Human Services Assistant Secretary Dr. Admiral Bret Diroir stated on August 24 in an interview with Fox News:
      “So natural immunity, it’s very important… There are still no data to suggest vaccine immunity is better than natural immunity. I think both are highly protective.”
      In fact, data exists that would suggest it’s the other way around – that natural immunity far exceeds that of vaccine immunity. A recent study out of Israel showed natural immunity is significantly stronger and lasts longer than the synthetic immunity delivered by the vaccines, protection from which even the CDC has admitted begins to wane after three to five months.
      Yet, on the very same day that Diroir was playing up the importance of natural immunity on Fox News, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin issued a memo mandating the entire Armed Forces be inoculated with the Covid shots.
      In that memo, Austin created an all-new concept never before existing in the history of medical science and in complete contradiction to the plain language of the DoD’s own regulations. He said “those with previous COVID-19 infection are not considered vaccinated.”
      The lawsuit states that the DoD regulation “contains no such term, nor concept, and the defendant Secretary of Defense’s new definition effectively wipes away the DoD’s own regulation. The secretary of defense is not a doctor, and this declaration has no basis in medical science at all, nor did this instant change to the regulation go through any notice and comment period, nor rulemaking process, nor any process at all. Indeed, the Secretary of Defense simply declared it without a scintilla of evidence to support it.”
      Dr. Lee Merritt, a retired U.S. Navy surgeon, speaking at a White Coat Summit of America’s Frontline Doctors in July 2021, said more U.S. service members have likely died of the vaccine in 2021 than the combined total who died of Covid in all of last year. She stated at that conference:
      “One of my big problems is our vaccination of the military. I was a 10-year Navy surgeon so I have Navy people and Army people calling me. There were only 20 deaths of all the active duty in 2020 for Covid, in all the services put together. They have a big epidemiological base and they can find out exactly what’s going on. There were only 20 deaths and we are vaccinating everybody. We’ve already had tumors and we’ve had 80 cases of myocarditis, which has a significant five-year mortality rate, I think it’s 66 percent… So, with the vaccination program we have ostensibly killed more of our young active-duty people than Covid did.”
      Lawyers for the plaintiffs, led by Todd Callender in Denver, stated in the lawsuit that repeated attempts to leave voicemail messages for Austin in an attempt to settle the grievance out of court have been ignored by Austin, leaving them no choice but to file suit.
      The lawsuit concludes: “On August 30, 2021, the plaintiffs filed a motion for an emergency restraining order in the form of a stay pendente lite, preventing the Defendant Department of Defense from inoculating them and anyone similarly situated that comprises the class of service members who can document that they previously had Covid-19 and as a result have developed natural immunity that exempts them from inoculation under AR 40-562.”
      A lot of active-duty service members and their parents are pinning their hopes on this lawsuit.
      “This may be the last stand,” the father of an Air National Guardsman stationed at Selfridge Air National Guard Base in Harrison Township, Michigan, told
      If the lawsuit fails, it is feared that Biden’s Defense Department could try to up the stakes by dishonorably discharging those who reject the jab. So far, the Pentagon has stopped short of such threats and is allowing for religious exemptions.
      A movement is afoot in the U.S. House where some lawmakers are getting behind legislation prohibiting dishonorable discharges for troops who refuse the Covid shot.
      Legislation sponsored by Rep. Mark Green, R-Tenn., requires only honorable discharges for anyone who is separated from the military over rejecting the injection. It was added to the fiscal 2022 defense authorization bill, passed by the House Armed Services Committee on Thursday. [See Lawmakers Try to Ban Dishonorable Discharges for Troops Who Refuse Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccines, Sept. 2, 2021, by Travis Tritten,]
      “No American who raises their hand to serve our nation should be punished for making a highly personal medical decision,” Green said in a statement. reported on a Marine corporal who said she was discharged for refusing to wear a mask, possibly the first service member to be pushed out of the military in connection with COVID-19 rules.
      According to the Pentagon, roughly 63 percent of all U.S. forces had received at least one dose of the controversial vaccine as of Aug. 18.

    12. Hundreds of Navy SEALs Refuse Vaccine, Told They Won’t Be Deployed
      According to a new report, over 600 U.S. Navy SEALs—which is about a quarter of all the active-duty SEALs in America—are currently facing the very real possibility of not being able to go on missions anymore—because of the vaccine mandate.
      Meanwhile, in New York, the new governor has just put in place a mask mandate on all school kids—up to and including children who are as young as 2 years old.
      And New York is not the only state to do this. There are currently 16 states, as well as the District of Columbia, which have likewise put in place school mask mandates.
      However, not all rules are created equal. At the Emmy Awards, the only people wearing masks were the hired help. But according to a statement from the Los Angeles County Health Office, that’s okay.
      American Hartford Gold (866-242-2352):
      ? Navy SEALS:
      ? Honorable Discharge:
      Epoch Times

    13. Leaky Vaccines Enhance Spread of Deadlier Chicken Viruses
      ByEd Yong
      Published July 27, 2015
      • 7 min read
      Over the past fifty years, Marek’s disease—an illness of fowl—has become fouler. Marek’s is caused by a highly contagious virus, related to those that cause herpes in humans. It spreads through the dust of contaminated chicken coops, and caused both paralysis and cancer. In the 1970s, new vaccines brought the disease the under control. But Marek’s didn’t go gently into that good night. Within ten years, it started evolving into more virulent strains, which now trigger more severe cancers and afflict chickens at earlier ages.
      Andrew Read from Pennsylvania State University thinks that the vaccines were responsible. The Marek’s vaccine is “imperfect” or “leaky.” That is, it protects chickens from developing disease, but doesn’t stop them from becoming infected or from spreading the virus. Inadvertently, this made it easier for the most virulent strains to survive. Such strains would normally kill their hosts so quickly that they’d die out. But in an immunised flock, they can persist because their lethal nature has been neutered. That’s not a problem for vaccinated individuals. But unvaccinated birds are now in serious trouble.
      This problem, where vaccination fosters the evolution of more virulent disease, does not apply to most human vaccines. Those against mumps, measles, rubella, and smallpox are “perfect:” They protect against disease and stop people from transmitting the respective viruses. “You don’t get onward evolution,” says Read. “These vaccines are very successful, highly effective, and very safe. They have been a tremendous success story and will continue to be so.”
      He is more concerned about the next generation of vaccines that are being developed against diseases like HIV and malaria. People don’t naturally develop life-long immunity to these conditions after being infected, as they would against, say, mumps or measles. This makes vaccine development a tricky business, and it means that the resulting vaccines will probably leak to some extent. “This isn’t an argument against developing those vaccines, but it is an argument for ensuring that we carefully check for transmission,” says Read.
      “The candidate Ebola vaccines are also foremost in my mind,” he adds. “Some of the monkey trials suggest that they may be perfect, but we need to be very confident that they don’t leak. If they do, and some vaccinated individuals are capable of passing on Ebola, that might lead to the evolution of very dangerous pathogens.”
      He is also concerned about animal vaccines, which are often leaky. These include vaccines against Newcastle disease in poultry, Brucella in livestock, and especially bird flu. When bird flu outbreaks hit American and European farms, the birds are culled. But in Southeast Asia, they’re often vaccinated, “and those vaccines are leaky,” says Read. “It creates an analogous situation to Marek’s.” The birds might survive more lethal forms of the virus, which they could then spread to each other—and potentially to people.
      Read first proposed the “imperfect vaccine hypothesis” back in 2001, on purely theoretical grounds. It proved controversial, not least because he had neither experimental evidence nor case studies to support the idea. Then, a colleague told him that the hypothesis might explain the increasing virulence of Marek’s disease. “I wrote the name down, misspelled it, and couldn’t find anything in the literature!” Read says. He only heard about the condition again when he was asked to speak at a Marek’s conference. There, someone put him in touch with Marek’s expert Venugopal Nair from the Pirbright Institute.
      The duo infected vaccinated and unvaccinated chicks with five different strains of Marek’s virus, of varying virulence. They found that when unvaccinated birds are infected with mild strains, they shed plenty of viruses into their surroundings. If they contract the most lethal strains, they die before this can happen, and their infections stop with them. In the vaccinated chicks, this pattern flips. The milder strains are suppressed but the lethal ones, which the birds can now withstand, flood into the environment at a thousand times their usual numbers.
      Read and Nair also found that the “lethal” strains could spread from one vaccinated individual to another, and that unvaccinated chickens were at greatest risk of disease and death if they were housed with vaccinated ones.
      All of this is consistent with the imperfect vaccine hypothesis. It doesn’t prove that imperfect vaccines drove the evolution of today’s extra-virulent strains, “and we may never know for sure why those evolved in the first place,” Read writes. Other factors, like the fact that modern chickens are genetically similar or raised in dense, crowded conditions, may have also played a role. Still, it’s at least clear that vaccines can keep virulent strains in circulation. “For the chicken industry, these results are actually an argument for getting the vaccine,” says Read. “Any chicken that doesn’t get it is at even greater risk than it would be in the 1950s.”
      “This work may drive change in the way that vaccines are developed and tested, so that there is much greater emphasis on their ability to prevent infection and transmission, rather than only on their ability to prevent clinical disease,” says Joanne Devlin from the University of Melbourne.  “I think that would be a positive step.”
      Katherine Atkins from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine agrees. “While more theoretical work is now being conducted prior to vaccine roll-outs,” she says, researchers need to look beyond how vaccines curb epidemics. They must also consider “the long-term evolutionary consequences of new vaccine introduction.”
      But Vincent Racaniello from Columbia University says, “We still do not have any proof that allowing a virus to replicate in a vaccinated individual will select for more virulent viruses.” The new results simply show that leaky vaccines allow virulent viruses to spread—not that they allow those viruses to evolve in the first place. The only way of doing that is to infect vaccinated chickens with mild strains and see if more virulent ones arise after many rounds of transmission.
      Racaniello is also unconvinced that the effect would generalise to other vaccines. For example, the Salk polio vaccine—one of two that are used—is a little leaky. “People who are immunized can be infected with poliovirus and the virus can replicate in their guts, be shed, and transmitted to others,” says Racaniello. “This behaviour has been well documented in human populations, yet the virulence of poliovirus has not increased for the 50+ years during which this vaccine has been used.”
      That is no reason to rest on our laurels, says Read. It’s important to at least check for the emergence of deadlier viruses if vaccines are imperfect—and perhaps to take preventative measures. For example, a leaky malaria vaccine could be paired with bed nets that would stop mosquitoes from spreading more virulent strains of malarial parasites to unvaccinated people. “If someone developed [such a vaccine] and it worked, we should go ahead and use it, but not think of it as a magic bullet,” says Read. “I’d say that anyone who is vaccinated against malaria should be under a bed net too.”
      Reference: Read, Baigent, Powers, Kgosana, Blackwell, Smith, Kennedy, Walkden-Brown & Nair. 2015.  Imperfect Vaccination Can Enhance the Transmission of Highly Virulent Pathogens. PLoS Biol

      Me: So we are all animals on this planet and you can tell that because we all breathe, drink, smell, shit, fuck and die, – however “we” are the Human species, Chickens are the “Bird” species and then there are all of the other species, like the Gorilla’s with Covid in the Zoo, re “Herd Immunity” which is a fallacy!!

      So, we know what vaccines do to chickens, but we don’t know what the long term effects of these mRNA Covid vaccines are do we?

    14. More Than 726,000 COVID Vaccine Injuries Reported to VAERS as CDC, FDA Overrule Advisory Committees’ Recommendations on Third Pfizer Shot
      VAERS data released Friday by the CDC included a total of 726,965 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 15,386 deaths and 99,410 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and Sept. 17, 2021.
      By Megan Redshaw
      Data released Sept. 17 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) showed that between Dec. 14, 2020 and Sept. 17, 2021, a total of 726,965 adverse events following COVID vaccines were reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). The data included a total of 15,386 reports of deaths — an increase of 461 over the previous week.
      There were 99,410 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 7,887 compared with the previous week.
      Excluding “foreign reports” filed in VAERS, 569,294 adverse events, including 6,981 deaths and 44,481 serious injuries, were reported in the U.S. between Dec. 14, 2020 and Sept. 17, 2021.
      Of the 6,981 U.S. deaths reported as of Sept. 17, 12% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination, 17% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination and 30% occurred in people who experienced an onset of symptoms within 48 hours of being vaccinated.
      In the U.S., 383.6 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of Sept. 17. This includes: 220 million doses of Pfizer, 149 million doses of Moderna and 15 million doses of Johnson & Johnson (J&J).
      This week’s U.S. VAERS data, from Dec. 14, 2020 to Sept. 17, 2021, for all age groups combined, show:
      20% of deaths were related to cardiac disorders.
      54% of those who died were male, 42% were female and the remaining death reports did not include gender of the deceased.
      The average age of death was 72.9.
      As of Sept. 17, 3,726 pregnant women reported adverse events related to COVID vaccines, including 1099 reports of miscarriage or premature birth.
      Of the 2,835 cases of Bell’s Palsy reported, 50% were attributed to Pfizer vaccinations, 42% to Moderna and 8% to J&J.
      606 reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome, with 39% of cases attributed to Pfizer, 33% to Moderna and 27% to J&J.
      152,309 reports of anaphylaxis with 42% of cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine, 50% to Moderna and 7% to J&J.
      9,441 reports of blood clotting disorders. Of those, 4,047 reports were attributed to Pfizer, 3,442 reports to Moderna and 1,903 reports to J&J.
      2,537 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis with 1,608 cases attributed to Pfizer, 825 cases to Moderna and 95 cases to J&J’s COVID vaccine.
      The Defender

    15. Navy doctor seen misleading service members about injection-related deaths, injuries
      The U.S. Naval Air Command held a recent online conference call in which 1,800 service members and personnel participated. A whistleblower present on the call secretly recorded parts of the meeting that show a Navy doctor providing blatantly false and incomplete information to the participants about the safety of Covid injections.
      The meeting took place at the Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division, or NAWCAD, headquartered at Patuxent River, Maryland.
      The meeting facilitators can be seen on video misleading the service members about the number of injection-related deaths and the effectiveness of natural immunity versus the synthetic immunity provided by the shots.
      Rear Admiral John S. Lemmon, the commander of NAWCAD, led the meeting, and handed many of the questions off to Lt. Cmdr. Matthew Doubrava, a flight surgeon with NAWCAD who can be seen sitting alone wearing a mask while answering questions.
      The meeting began with an anonymous attendee asking, “Do you know the death count by receiving the vaccine?”
      This question received 73 “likes” on the livestream chat and the facilitators could not avoid giving an answer.
      Watch their response in the video clip of the event where Doubrava says:
      “Blood clots to the brain (Johnson & Johnson). Very few deaths, if at all, have been associated with the vaccine.” 
      “We are saving hundreds of thousands of lives, thousands of hospitalizations… so we’re saving lives, we’re saving money, and we’re saving our healthcare capacity. So, we appreciate the question, but no, there are very few deaths, if at all, associated with the vaccine. But compared to the problem we’re facing it’s a drop in the bucket.”
      Dr. Doubrava provided no solid data nor any resources to back up his outlandish claim that “very few …if at all” had died from the experimental gene-therapy injections.
      Another anonymous attendee asked the question, which appeared to be censored: “RE deaths associated with COVID-19 vaccine – The CDC has a database to track deaths and other adverse reactions. The status: 14,506 deaths, 58,440 hospitalizations, 77,919 urgent care, 106,184 office visits, 5,783 anaphylaxis, 1,757 miscarriages, and more. This is a nicely formatted version of the raw VAERS data. The original source of the data is on the CDC website here: Why is NAVAIR [Naval Air Systems Command] pointing to CDC when it is supporting the COVID narrative, but they omit CDC data when it goes against the narrative?”

      The reports of adverse events and deaths can’t be denied. Especially since, “Health Care professionals are required to report all adverse events that come to their attention,” according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
      Most VAERS reports are filed by healthcare professionals but has received numerous reports of hospitals pressuring doctors and nurses not to report adverse events.
      Dr. Lee Merritt, who served nine years as a Navy physician and orthopedic surgeon after completing her residency, said during a recent address of the American Frontline Doctors that she discussed how in 2020 there were 20 deaths among all active-duty military personnel related to COVID. Since then, there are now many reports of tumors and over 80 cases of myocarditis (inflammation of the heart), which has a five-year mortality rate of around 66 percent following the COVID-19 shots given to our military women and men.
       “With the vaccine program we’ve ostensibly killed more of our young active duty people than COVID did,” Dr. Merritt said.
      The question remains, why isn’t the FDA pulling these shots as they have done for a long list of other drugs that were found to have caused adverse events up to and including death? The Swine Flu vaccine was pulled after 53 deaths in 1976.
      At the end of the meeting an anonymous attendee asked, “Is there data to back up the claim that the vaccine is more protective than our own natural antibody?”
      Watch Dr. Doubrava’s answer to the above question, in which he is either ignorant of or deliberately withholds hard data out of Israel and Washington University — see this video clip where he says:
      “Boy, I don’t know – don’t even know where to begin with that. The answer is yes [inaudible]… How long they last depends on the severity of the disease you have. If you have a mild disease, you have a mild antibody response, you may not be protected even though it may linger for a while.”
      Dr. Doubrava proceeded to tell the 1,800 Navy Air system participants that “natural immunity’s great but it’s an unknown quantity that we don’t know how long it lasts.”
      He also told the service women and men “that the data shows that the vaccine will work about eight months until you need a booster.”
      The obvious spin and lack of concrete evidence left many of the 1,800 attendees not trusting nor believing what Dr. Doubrava was telling them, according to the whistleblower.
      A study from researchers at The Washington University School of Medicine have said antibodies after having had COVID-19 “could persist for a lifetime, churning out antibodies all the while.”
      The findings were published May 24 in the journal Nature where it continues to say, “COVID-19 leave those infected with lasting antibody protection and that repeated bouts of illness are likely to be uncommon.”
      An Israeli study showed that natural immunities are at least 13 times more robust and long lasting than vaccine immunities.
      This debunks the narrative the doctor was presenting to the attendees that the shot was the only solid evidence for antibodies.
      Dr. Anthony Fauci, the Biden regime’s top coronavirus advisor, seemed to be caught off guard when asked by CNN’s Dr. Sanjay Gupta last Friday if people with natural immunities still needed to get the injection.
      “I don’t have a really firm answer for you on that. That’s something that we’re going to have to discuss regarding the durability of the response,” Fauci said.
      No firm answer? Really? Then why has Fauci and the government and its army of corporate cohorts been demanding that every man, woman and child get the vaccine regardless of immune status?
      The article in Nature points out that, “Last fall there were reports that antibodies wane quickly after infection with the virus that causes COVID-19, and mainstream media interpreted that to mean that immunity was not long-lived,” said senior author Dr. Ali Ellebedy, an associate professor of pathology and immunology, of medicine and of molecular microbiology. “But that’s a misinterpretation of the data.
      “It’s normal for antibody levels to go down after acute infection, but they don’t go down to zero; they plateau. Here, we found antibody-producing cells in people 11 months after first symptoms. These cells will live and produce antibodies for the rest of people’s lives. That’s strong evidence for long-lasting immunity.”
      Throughout the meeting, Dr. Doubrava never provided substantiating data that supported his numbers and claims when he spoke to the 1,800 sailors participating.
      Liberty Counsel Founder and Chairman Mat Staver said in a release that Americans who signed up for the military to defend freedom should not be given hard facts about the shots and their health, not subjected to propaganda and mind games.
      However, the military does not have a stellar record of informing America’s fighting forces when it comes to medical facts. There is the disgusting history of Tuskegee, Alabama, in which the CDC conducted syphilis experiments on black soldiers from 1932 to 1972 [more than 100 died]. In Vietnam there was the disaster with Agent Orange defoliant chemicals, and more recently during the Iraq war, U.S. Army soldiers and Marines were subjected to the often debilitating anthrax vaccine.
      “They did not sign up to be human guinea pigs or social experiments,” Staver said. “We hurt our soldiers with Agent Orange and turned abled-bodied soldiers into disabled veterans with the experimental anthrax vaccine. These heroes voluntarily gave up everything to defend us and now we must honor them and not threaten them with discharge. Some who are close to retirement.”

    16. New England Journal of Medicine Backtracks – Now Admits COVID Vax May Not Be Safe for Pregnant Women
      By Jim Hoft Published September 20, 2021 at 8:08am
      The esteemed New England Journal of Medicine posted a correction last week and now admits the COVID vaccine may not be safe for pregnant women.
      The study was updated after it found that 104 of 827 pregnant participants experienced a spontaneous abortion after receiving the COVID vaccine. That is roughly 1 of 8 pregnant women losing their baby after getting the vaccine.
      NEJM published a correction… they now admit that there is no evidence that the vaccines are safe for pregnant women. Whoops. Took them months to respond to our group. Look for the “1” at the VERY top of the page.
      Here is the corrected update from September 8, 2021:
      At the time of publication of preliminary findings in the Original Article related to this editorial, the number of spontaneous abortions was 104 and there was 1 stillbirth. However, no proportion could be determined for the risk of spontaneous abortion among participants vaccinated before 20 weeks of gestation because follow-up information was not yet available for the majority of those persons. The article has now been updated. In the fifth paragraph of this editorial (page 2342), the first sentence should have read, “Among 827 registry participants who reported a completed pregnancy, 104 experienced spontaneous abortions and 1 had a stillbirth,” rather than, “…a completed pregnancy, the pregnancy resulted in a spontaneous abortion in 104 (12.6%) and in stillbirth in 1 (0.1%); these percentages are well within the range expected as an outcome for this age group of persons whose other underlying medical conditions are unknown.” In the same paragraph, in the sentence beginning “Among live-born infants” (page 2343), the expression “were also consistent” should have read, “were consistent.” In the seventh paragraph, beginning “Given that,” the first sentence should have ended, “…limitations in their ability to draw conclusions about spontaneous abortions, congenital anomalies, and other potential rare neonatal outcomes,” rather than “…to draw conclusions about congenital anomalies and other potential rare neonatal outcomes.” The editorial is correct at
      Revolver News.

    17. North Carolina Hospital Systems Suspends Nearly 400 Employees for Refusing to Get Covid Vaccine
      By Cristina Laila
      Published September 23, 2021 at 6:23pm
      Novant Health, a massive healthcare network with hospitals, outpatient centers and physician clinics suspended hundreds of employees for refusing to get the Covid vaccine.
      Nearly 400 employees were suspended Tuesday and given five days to comply with the vaccine mandate or be terminated.
      Advertisement – story continues below
      “They will have an opportunity to comply over a five day, unpaid suspension period,” Novant said in a statement. “If a team member remains non-compliant after this suspension period, he or she will have their employment with Novant Health terminated.”
      Novant said 375 workers have been suspended for failing to get vaccinated against COVID-19. They have five days to comply or they will be fired.
      Novant said suspended employees will have five days to comply with the vaccination policy or be terminated. Novant announced that 98.6% of its team, made up of more than 35,000 employees are compliant with the mandate. This means those workers have received the single-dose Johnson & Johnson vaccine, the first dose of the Moderna or Pfizer vaccine, or if given, a medical or religious exemption.
      Advertisement – story continues below
      Novant employees who have started a two-dose vaccine series will have until Oct. 15 to get their second dose to remain compliant. Novant Health joined Atrium Health and other health care systems in North Carolina with its mandate in July.
      Workers who were given a medical or religious exemption will be required to undergo weekly COVID-19 testing and wear N95 masks or other appropriate personal protective equipment
      Gateway Pundit

      Me: 400 staff less than normal = Hospital closures, sooner, or later and if the same trend occurs throughout hospitals in America, they will be forced to close – workers won’t trust their previous employers to reinstate them if mandates are lifted, after all, they will suspect that some other way of getting them vaccinated would occur – When you sup with the Devil, use a loooong spoon!!

    18. Source
      As you can see above 14,265 people died within 21 days of having the first dose of a Covid-19 vaccine, and 4,388 people died within 21 days of having the first dose of a Covid-19 vaccine whose death allegedly involved Covid-19.
      Another 11,470 people died within 21 days of having their second dose of having a Covid-19 vaccine, and 182 people died within 21 days of having their second dose of a Covid-19 vaccine whose death allegedly involved Covid-19.
      Therefore 30,305 people died within 21 days of having the Covid-19 vaccine in England during the first 6 months of 2021. A further 123,796 people also died 21 days or more after having the Covid-19 vaccine, but it’s currently impossible to know the exact parameters for the further deaths unless ONS release the data in response to a Freedom of Information request.
      This means people who had a Covid-19 vaccine account for 70% of deaths due to all causes (excluding Covid-19) during the first 6 months of 2021. It also means the number of people to have died within 21 days of having a Covid-19 vaccine (30,305) in a period of 6 months is eight times greater than the number of people who have died of Covid-19 within a period of 18 months (3,832).
      The Expose UK

    19. Twitter Censored Dr. Baric’s CV and Its Documentation of Gain-of-Function Research and Me for Accurately Reporting the Bombshell Story
      Naomi Wolf September 19, 2021 Updated: September 19, 2021
      The Intercept’s recent FOIA results added abundant documentation of Dr. Anthony Fauci’s funding, using U.S. tax dollars, for dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab—funding that Fauci had denied in testimony to Sen. Rand Paul; funding, indeed, that I had tried to share with the public on Twitter in early June, the day before Twitter deplatformed me permanently.
      The Intercept’s FOIA trove adds important detail to existing documentation of that NIH-funded gain-of-function research and its potential links to the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic. Natalie Winters of The National Pulse has been out front with this story before The Intercept confirmed it separately.
      So was I. Indeed, my own deplatforming from Twitter followed my having pinned private detective Brian O’Shea’s (disclosure, my husband’s) reading of Dr. Ralph Baric’s full CV, which linked this North Carolina researcher to gain-of-function work funded by Fauci’s agency. Twitter has yet to tell me exactly why I was kicked off its platform and blocked from sharing this well-sourced information with my 145,000 followers.
      Twitter went so far as to deplatform me and then slander me across the globe: news reports mis-stated—via a Twitter spokesperson—that I’d been deplatformed for “vaccine misinformation.”
      The First Amendment in the United States means that the government cannot outright censor critics or opponents; but the private sector—in this case Big Tech—is clearly aligned to do the dirty work of the administration.
      I was accused of “Madness” (The New Republic), of having “always struggled with the truth,” of being an “anti-vaxxer.” Matt Gertz of Media Matters and CNN charged me with “pushing increasingly bonkers conspiracy theories”; he did so on Twitter, a platform on which I am no longer able to respond.
      It seems my real crime may have been asking questions that other reporters have failed to ask, and in sharing information that undermines Fauci’s claims to Congress.
      This very public silencing of a critic of pandemic-related “lockdowns” and of a debunker of Fauci’s denials of having ever funded gain-of-function research was no doubt meant to chill other critics. I received countless emails from other reporters and influencers stating that they supported me, but were scared to say so publicly, lest they be deplatformed as well.
      Millions in Funding
      Baric’s CV details millions of dollars in funding from the NIH and NIAID, including funds for a “gain-of-function” study. Baric’s research, according to Vanity Fair, could be described as “gain-of-function” research. Indeed, Baric sat on a “gain-of-function” research committee.
      This CV is troublesome to the Biden administration, current patron of Big Tech, and beneficiary of its current wave of censorship, because it creates links between this research and Fauci, who has become this administration’s brand centerpiece and key re-election strategy talking point.
      Fauci stated directly to Senator Rand Paul in May 2021 that the NIH had NOT funded “gain-of-function research.” Indeed the NIH went even further when this question was raised, and denied ever funding research that would have made viruses more infectious to humans.
      But Baric’s CV shows evidence to the contrary. His research on coronaviruses in bats—finding that “synthetic recombinant bat SARS-like coronavirus is infectious”—and research on the transmissibility of coronaviruses to other species, including bats, mice, and humans, goes back many years. (You can see “McRoy, W. and Baric, RS. 2004. Mechanisms of coronavirus cross species transmission” on p. 14.  “Becker, M.M., Graham, R.L., Donaldson, E.F., Rockx, B., Sims, A.C., Sheahan, T., Pickles, R., Corti, D., Johnston, R.E., Baric, R.S. and Denison, M.R. 2008. A synthetic recombinant bat SARS-like coronavirus is infectious in cultured cells and in mice” on p. 17.  “Rockx, B., Corti, D., Donaldson, E., Sheahan T., Stadler K., Lanzavecchia A., and Baric, R.S. 2008. Structural Basis for Potent Cross-Neutralizing Human Monoclonal Antibody Protection Against Lethal Human and Zoonotic SARSCoV Challenge”  on p. 17.)
      The CV of Baric’s lab assistant E F Donaldson even more clearly details work done with Baric to, as Donaldson puts it, “resurrect bat coronaviruses to determine the cross species transmission” and “I am currently employed as a Research Assistant Professor in the Department of Epidemiology, working in the lab of Dr. Ralph Baric. I am funded by the NIAID to conduct a study looking at the viruses in bats and studying how viruses cross the species barrier to emerge into new populations. In addition, I am working with Dr. Baric to resurrect bat coronaviruses to determine the cross species transmission potential of a variety of novel coronaviruses identified in bats.” The work detailed here took place when Dr Fauci was the NIAID director.
      E F Donaldson also received hundreds of thousands of U.S. tax dollars in NIH/NIAID funding to study bat coronaviruses’ cross-species’ infectiousness, in a bat roost with “seven to twelve” different species, located, alarmingly enough, right here at home—in  Maryland: “Donaldson 9/12/09 – 8/31/11 NIH/NIAID $301,000 10% FTE Metagenomic Analysis of the virome of Eastern North American Bats. The major goals of this project are to define the virome of seven to ten different bat species that cohabitate in one roost in Maryland to determine the viral population of each and define the role of orthologous receptors to viral cross-species transmission.” That’s on p. 4.
      E F Donaldon’s CV also notes a 2011-16 request to the NIH for $1.85 million in funding for SARS-related bat coronavirus cross-species infectiousness research: “Donaldson 07/01/11 – 06/30/16 NIH $1,850,000 25% FTE Cross species emergence of coronaviruses from bats. This work builds upon our ARRA grant, which allowed us to discover a novel Coronavirus in bats that is closely related to a human pathogen, human Coronavirus 229E. The major goals of the proposal are to characterize the coronaviruses found in bat species in the northeastern United States, by sequencing several bat fecal samples to determine the complete genomic sequences, isolate and/or synthetically resurrect these coronaviruses using in silico biology, and assess the ability of these viruses to emerge into the human host.”
      That newsworthy grant, to see if bat coronaviruses could emerge “into the human host,” is on p. 5.
      Dr. Fauci had stated flatly to Sen Paul, on national television, that he had not funded “gain-of-function” research in the Wuhan lab. But Baric himself described his research as “gain of function,” in a workshop linked to the NIH, called—wait for it—“Potential Risks and Benefits of Gain of Function Research.”
      “Dr. Ralph Baric, University of North Carolina […] explained that GoF [Gain of Function] experiments for CoV research encompass a very diverse set of experiments that are critical to the development of broad-based vaccines and therapeutics.”
      Censorship and Liberty
      The video I posted of Baric’s CV detailing Fauci’s funding of Baric’s gain of function research, had received 74,000 views when I was permanently suspended from Twitter.
      It’s very serious that such a newsworthy and important piece of reporting—Baric’s CV—got erased from our social media universe and that I was publicly ridiculed as a punishment for attempting to open this discourse to the public.
      Republicans have been pressing for investigations of the origins of the coronavirus. Without Baric’s CV, Americans do not have all the relevant information.
      How is it that Twitter (and Youtube, which also froze my account, although it later restored it) went as far as heavy-handed, outright censorship of my findings? There is nothing in my sharing of this information that presents misinformation as their spokesperson apparently reported to the press as the reason for banning me. The social media companies have yet to tell me that what I posted that was inaccurate.
      Sadly, Twitter, Youtube, and Facebook are now closely allied to the DNC and the Biden administration, which is one reason it is important to further unredact what Mark Zuckerberg had to say to Fauci via email, correspondence that belongs in the public domain given its content is of great public interest, and Fauci is a public servant.
      I’m a lifelong Democrat and I voted for President Biden, but in the wave of deplatforming of conservative voices after the inauguration, I saw the danger to our system of this unholy alliance.
      I don’t care much about personal attacks. I won’t be bullied or silenced. But I do care that American citizens deserve a free press and open debate, and that they risk losing it due to censorship by Big Tech.
      We deserve every bit of information that could allow for a better understanding of the gain of function research that may have been related to the virus that has debilitated world economies and affected millions, as does the rest of the world. Big Tech, with its compromised platforms, should have no say in whether such information survives a committee of millennials deciding, in an airy workspace, on what may or may not be read by other free peoples around the world.
      Without a free press our country could not have been born. And if we allow random personal smears and Big Tech censorship of important news stories to derail our governance and to keep our people ill-informed, our state of liberty cannot survive.
      Naomi Wolf, Ph.D., is CEO of DailyClout and author of “The End of America.”
      Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.

      Naomi Wolf

      Dr. Naomi Wolf is CEO of DailyClout and author of “The End of America.”

      Epoch News

      1. Once again, as long as the LEFT controls the MSM and social media platforms, the truth will never make it to the general public as they continue to line up for their own demise. Someone in the alternative media must have some idea of how to interrupt the flow of lies from the MSM and the censorship of social media. Where’s our own V for Vendetta? Why and how we allow this continue without a major uprising beats the hell out of me.

    20. Vaccines emergency use in children ages 5 to 11 by the end of October 2021
      Washington — Former Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Dr. Scott Gottlieb predicted Sunday that the agency he helmed will authorize Pfizer’s coronavirus vaccine for emergency use in children ages 5 to 11 by the end of October.
      In an interview with “Face the Nation,” Gottlieb, who serves on Pfizer’s board of directors, said the drug company is expecting to have data on its vaccines in young children before the end of September, which will then be filed with the FDA “very quickly.” The agency then has said it will be weeks, rather than months, before determining whether it will authorize the vaccine for kids ages 5 to 11. 
      “In a best-case scenario, given that timeline they’ve just laid out, you could potentially have a vaccine available to children aged 5 to 11 by Halloween,” Gottlieb said. “If everything goes well, the Pfizer data package is in order, and FDA ultimately makes a positive determination, I have confidence in Pfizer in terms of the data that they’ve collected. But this is really up to the Food and Drug Administration to make an objective determination.”
      · Transcript: Dr. Scott Gottlieb on “Face the Nation”
      Pfizer has been conducting clinical trials of its two-dose vaccine in children 2 years and older, and its approval could be crucial to helping combat the spread of the highly contagious Delta variant in schools. Children represent 25% of new COVID-19 infections.
      The shot has already been authorized for children ages 12 to 15, and Gottlieb said he believes COVID vaccines will eventually be among those required for children in public schools.
      “I think you’re going to see more local school districts and governors make those recommendations,” he said. “Eventually ACIP is going to make a recommendation about whether this should be included in the childhood immunization schedule. My guess is they’re waiting for more of the vaccines to be fully licensed to make that kind of a recommendation. But I would expect this eventually to be required as part of the childhood immunization schedule.”
      For parents who may be wary of their children receiving a vaccine that is under emergency use, rather than fully approved by the FDA for children, Gottlieb encouraged them to consult with their pediatricians, but stressed they are not facing a “binary decision” of getting their children vaccinated against COVID-19 or not.
      “There’s different ways to approach vaccination. You could go with one dose for now. You could potentially wait for the lower dose vaccine to be available, and some pediatricians may make that judgment. If your child’s already had COVID, one dose may be sufficient. You could space the doses out more,” he said. “So, there’s a lot of discretion that pediatricians can exercise, making largely off-label judgments, but exercising discretion within the context of what an individual child’s needs are, their risk is, and what the parents’ concerns are.”
      While the FDA is expected to make a decision on whether to authorize COVID vaccines in children in the coming weeks, federal health agencies are also weighing whether to approve booster shots for vaccinated Americans.
      The Biden administration initially announced in August that it was prepared to begin offering the boosters the week of September 20, and Americans would need to get their additional shots eight months after receiving their second vaccine dose. But Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, told “Face Nation” last week that it may only be Pfizer’s booster that receives federal approval by September 20. 
      The FDA’s advisory committee is scheduled to meet Friday to discuss the booster shots, and Gottlieb said the agency is positioned to act “very quickly” depending on the outcome of the meeting. If the boosters are approved, he said a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention advisory committee would then recommend which populations would get them first, likely those who are at higher risk of severe illness or death from COVID-19 such as elderly Americans living in nursing homes.
      Pfizer has already filed its application with the FDA for approval of its booster, and Gottlieb predicted Johnson & Johnson will likely be next to do so.
      “They have very good data also looking at boosters. They’ve showed a good response,” he said of Johnson & Johnson. “And I think that vaccine also could be in a position to get authorized by FDA in short order.”
      Coronavirus Crisis
      First published on September 12, 2021 / 11:48 AM
      © 2021 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

      1. If parents do not step up and stop the genocide of their own children, they deserve what they get. THAT is reality. Gawd help us all.

    21. WHO Insider Blows Whistle on Gates and GAVI
      Story at-a-glance
      · The WHO has turned global health security into a dictatorship, where the director general has assumed sole power to make decisions by which member states must abide
      · According to a long-term World Health Organization insider, Bill Gates’ vaccine alliance, GAVI, is directing the WHO
      · GAVI is headquartered in Switzerland. In 2009, GAVI was recognized as an international institution and granted total blanket immunity, including immunity against criminal sanctions. It is also exempt from paying taxes
      · In 2017, Gates asked to be part of the WHO’s executive board — like a member state — because of his funding. While the “one-man nation-state of Gates” was not officially voted in, it appears he may have been granted unofficial power of influence
      · Swissmedic, the Food and Drug Administration of Switzerland, has entered into a three-way contract agreement with Gates and the WHO. It appears other WHO member states have entered into this three-way agreement as well
      This article was previously published March 19, 2021, and has been updated with new information.
      OK folks, today you are in for a real treat. We have presented many of the pieces previously, but this will help put them in the proper perspective. That is the phase we are in now. We have the facts, we just need to understand what they mean and interpret them properly.
      This is a really important article. It catalyzed my understanding of what the heck is going on. The facts are obvious; the entire response to the global pandemic was facilitated by the World Health Organization. Their recommendations were followed lock-step by virtually every government on Earth.
      No one will dispute this fact. The next data point is: Who controls the WHO? Some will dispute this, but the evidence is pretty clear and solid. It is Bill Gates, who became the WHO’s biggest funder when then-President Trump removed U.S. support in 2020.
      What does Gates have to benefit from controlling the WHO? How about the best investment he ever made, with many tens of billions of dollars running through his “nonprofit” GAVI Vaccine Alliance? The maniacal suppression and censorship of any inexpensive natural alternative for COVID-19 makes perfect sense now.
      These natural therapies, with nebulized hydrogen peroxide, ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine being the best examples, would be serious competition for the vaccines. If everyone knew that these remedies were readily available, highly effective and practically free, who would risk their life for a vaccine? Virtually no one. It all makes perfect sense.
      With that framework, enjoy the information our team has compiled that expands on this general concept. Every day we are putting the pieces of the puzzle together, and the more pieces we fit together, the sooner you will see the bigger picture.
      WHO Insider Speaks Out
      In July 2020, four German attorneys founded the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss1).2,3 In the video above, the founding members, led by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich,4 interviews Astrid Stuckelberger, Ph.D., a WHO insider, about what she discovered about Bill Gates and GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance.
      Stuckelberger has served as deputy director of the Swiss national program of aging since the 1990s, and is the president of the WHO-funded Geneva International Network on Ageing.
      According to her bio,5 she “is an internationally recognized expert on issues related to evaluating scientific research for policymakers, in particular in health and innovation assessment, pandemic and emergency management training and in optimizing individual and population health and well-being.”
      She’s also a published author, with a dozen books to her credit, as well as more than 180 scientific articles, policy papers and governmental and international reports. Stuckelberger points out that much of the research was and still is highly politicized and primarily done to support and justify political decisions.
      For the past 20 years, since 2000, she’s been involved with public health at the WHO, and was part of their research ethics committee for four years. In 2009, she got involved with the WHO’s international health regulations.
      Stuckelberger points out that the whole purpose of WHO’s international health regulations is to prepare member states to be ready for a pandemic, to be able to not only prevent outbreaks but also respond swiftly when an outbreak occurs. However, the WHO has actually been actively preventing and undermining this pandemic preparedness training.
      The Center of Corruption
      According to Stuckelberger, Switzerland is at the heart of the corruption, largely thanks to it being the headquarters for GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance, founded by Bill Gates. In 2009, the GAVI Alliance was recognized as an international institution and granted total blanket immunity.6
      As explained by Justus Hoffmann, Ph.D., one of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee members, GAVI has “qualified diplomatic immunity,” which is odd, considering the organization has no political power that would warrant diplomatic immunity. Odder still is that GAVI’s immunity clauses go beyond even that of diplomats. GAVI’s immunity covers all aspects of engagement, including criminal business dealings.
      GAVI is a nongovernmental organization that is allowed to operate without paying any taxes, while also having total immunity for anything they do wrong.
      “They can do whatever they want,” Stuckelberger says, without repercussions. The police, for example, are barred from conducting an investigation and collecting evidence if GAVI were to be implicated in a criminal investigation. “It’s shocking,” she says. GAVI is also completely tax exempt, which Stuckelberger notes is “very strange.”
      Essentially, GAVI is a nongovernmental organization (NGO) that is allowed to operate without paying any taxes, while also having total immunity for anything they do wrong, willfully or otherwise. This is rather unprecedented, and raises a whole host of questions. It’s particularly disturbing in light of evidence Stuckelberger claims to have found showing that GAVI is “directing, as a corporate entity, the WHO.”
      Furthermore, documents cited by Stuckelberger show the WHO has assumed what amounts to dictatorial power over the whole world. The director general has the sole power to make decisions — including decisions about which tests or pandemic medications to use — that all member states must then obey.
      The Nation-State of Gates
      What’s more, Stuckelberger discovered that, in 2017, Gates actually requested to be part of the WHO’s executive board — like a member state — ostensibly because he gives them so much money. Indeed, his funding exceeds that of many individual member states.
      Like Stuckelberger says, this is truly incredible — the idea that a single man would have the same power and influence over the WHO as that of an entire nation. It’s a brazen power grab, to say the least. While there’s no evidence that Gates was ever officially granted the status of a member state, one wonders whether he doesn’t have it unofficially.
      One thing that raises Stuckelberger’s suspicion is the fact that Swissmedic, the Food and Drug Administration of Switzerland, has entered into a three-way contract agreement with Gates and the WHO. “This is abnormal,” she says.
      Essentially, in summary, it appears that when he did not get voted in as a one-man nation state, Gates created three-party contracts with member states and the WHO, essentially placing him on par with the WHO. As mentioned earlier, whatever the director general of the WHO says, goes. They’ve effectively turned global health security into a dictatorship.
      The question is, is Gates the real power behind the curtain? Does he tell the director general what to do? When you look back over the past year, it seems Gates has often been the first to announce what the world needs to do to address the pandemic, and then the WHO comes out with an identical message, which is then parroted by world leaders, more or less verbatim.
      As noted by Fuellmich, it’s becoming clear that many private-public partnerships have been hijacked by the private side — and they’re immune from liability. “This has got to stop,” he says.
      A complete review and overhaul of the United Nations, which established the WHO, is also required as the U.N. has done nothing to prevent or rein in undemocratic and illegal activity. As noted by Fuellmich, we probably need to reconsider whether we even need them.
      Changed Definition of Pandemic Allowed Health Dictatorship
      In the interview, they also highlight the WHO’s role in setting the stage for a global health dictatorship by changing the definition of “pandemic.” The WHO’s original definition, pre-2009, of a pandemic was:7,8
      “… when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity, resulting in several, simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness.”
      The key portion of that definition is “enormous numbers of deaths and illness.” This definition was changed in the month leading up to the 2009 swine flu pandemic.
      The change was a simple but substantial one: They merely removed the severity and high mortality criteria, leaving the definition of a pandemic as “a worldwide epidemic of a disease.”9 This switch in definition is why COVID-19 was and still is promoted as a pandemic.10,11,12
      We now have plenty of data showing the lethality of COVID-19 is on par with the seasonal flu.13,14,15,16,17 It may be different in terms of symptoms and complications, but the actual lethality is about the same. Yet we’re told the price we must all pay to keep ourselves and others safe from this virus is the relinquishing of our civil rights and liberties.
      In short, by removing the criteria of severe illness causing high morbidity, leaving geographically widespread infection as the only criteria for a pandemic, the WHO and technocratic leaders of the world were able to bamboozle the global population into giving up our lives and livelihoods.
      WHO Rewrites Science by Changing Definition of Herd Immunity
      The WHO has also radically altered the definition of “herd immunity.” Herd immunity occurs when enough people acquire immunity to an infectious disease such that it can no longer spread widely in the community. When the number susceptible is low enough to prevent epidemic growth, herd immunity is said to have been reached.
      Prior to the introduction of vaccines, all herd immunity was achieved via exposure to and recovery from an infectious disease. Eventually, as vaccination became widespread, the concept of herd immunity evolved to include not only the naturally acquired immunity that comes from prior illness, but also the temporary vaccine-acquired immunity that can occur after vaccination.
      However, in October 2020, the WHO upended science as we know it, revising this well-established concept in an Orwellian move that totally removes natural infection from the equation.
      As late as June 2020, the WHO’s definition of herd immunity, posted on one of their COVID-19 Q&A pages, was in line with the widely-accepted concept that has been the standard for infectious diseases for decades. Here’s what it originally said:18
      “Herd immunity is the indirect protection from an infectious disease that happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection.”
      The updated definition of herd immunity, which appeared in October 2020, read as follows:19
      “‘Herd immunity’, also known as ‘population immunity’, is a concept used for vaccination, in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached. Herd immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus, not by exposing them to it.
      Vaccines train our immune systems to create proteins that fight disease, known as ‘antibodies’, just as would happen when we are exposed to a disease but — crucially — vaccines work without making us sick.
      Vaccinated people are protected from getting the disease in question and passing it on, breaking any chains of transmission. With herd immunity, the vast majority of a population are vaccinated, lowering the overall amount of virus able to spread in the whole population.”
      After public — and no doubt embarrassing — backlash, the WHO revised its definition again December 31, 2020, to again include the mention of natural infection, while still emphasizing vaccine-acquired immunity. It now reads:20
      “‘Herd immunity’, also known as ‘population immunity,’ is the indirect protection from an infectious disease that happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection.
      WHO supports achieving ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination, not by allowing a disease to spread through any segment of the population, as this would result in unnecessary cases and deaths.
      Herd immunity against COVID-19 should be achieved by protecting people through vaccination, not by exposing them to the pathogen that causes the disease.”
      WHO’s Recommendation of PCR Test ‘Intentionally Criminal’
      Stuckelberger also shocks the Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee by pointing out that twice — December 7, 2020,21,22 and January 13, 202123 — the WHO issued medical alerts for PCR testing, warning that use of high cycle thresholds (CT) will produce high rates of false positives, that the CT value should be reported to the health care provider and that test results be considered in combination with clinical observations, health history and other epidemiological information.
      Yet since the beginning of the pandemic, it has pushed PCR testing as the best way to detect and diagnose infection. This, she says, makes it intentionally criminal. The January 13, 202124,25 medical product alert was, incidentally, posted online January 20, 2021, mere hours after Joe Biden’s inauguration as the president of the United States.
      In this alert, the WHO stressed that the “CT needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load,” and that “Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested.”
      It also reminds users that “disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results,” so that “as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases.” The alert goes on to explain:26
      “This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity.
      Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.”
      Taking a patient’s symptoms into account and using a scientifically defensible CT count should have been routine practice from the beginning. It just didn’t fit the geopolitical narrative. Since the start of the pandemic, the WHO has recommended using a CT of 45,27,28,29 which guarantees an enormous number of false positives, and therefore “cases.” This alone is how they kept the pandemic fearmongering going.
      The scientific consensus has long been that anything over 35 CTs renders the PCR test useless,30,31,32 as the accuracy will be a measly 3%, meaning 97% are false positives.33 By finally recommending lower CTs and more precise criteria for diagnosis, the WHO engineered an assured end to the caseload at a desired time. Coincidentally, the next day, January 21, 2021, President Biden announced he would reinstate the U.S.’ financial support for the WHO.34
      Time to Put an End to the Global Health Mafia
      The WHO was created as a specialized agency of the U.N., established in 1948 to further international cooperation for improved public health conditions. It was given a broad mandate under its constitution to promote the attainment of “the highest possible level of health” by all peoples.
      It is now beyond dispute that the WHO is beyond compromised. Because of its funding — a large portion of which comes from the “one-man nation-state of Gates” — it fails to complete its original mandate. Worse, WHO serves corporate masters and through its dictatorial powers is essentially destroying, not improving, the health of the world.
      In June 2010, the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly (PACE) issued a report35 on the WHO’s handling of the 2009 pandemic of novel influenza A (H1N1), which included the recommendation to use a fast-tracked vaccine that ended up causing disability and death around the world.
      PACE concluded “the handling of the pandemic by the WHO, EU health agencies and national governments led to a waste of large sums of public money, and unjustified scares and fears about the health risks faced by the European public.”36
      Specifically, PACE found “overwhelming evidence that the seriousness of the pandemic was vastly overrated by WHO,” and that the drug industry had influenced the organization’s decision-making — a claim echoed by other investigators as well.37,38,39,40,41
      The Assembly made a number of recommendations, including greater transparency, better governance of public health, safeguards against undue influence by vested interests, public funding of independent research and, last but not least, for the media to “avoid sensationalism and scaremongering in the public health domain.”42
      None of those recommendations were followed and, if anything, the WHO’s mismanagement of public health, thanks to private-public partnerships with NGOs such as GAVI, has only worsened. Other reports, two published in 201543,44 and one in 2017,45 also highlighted the WHO’s failures and lack of appropriate leadership during the 2013 through 2015 Ebola outbreak in West Africa.
      While the WHO is recognized as being uniquely suited to carry out key functions necessary in a global pandemic, experts at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, and the Harvard Global Health Institute, have pointed out, years ago, that the WHO has eroded so much trust that radical reforms would be required before it can assume an authoritative role.
      Yet here we are, still, and no reforms ever took place. Instead, the corruption festered and metastasized, and the WHO turned into a power hub for the technocratic deep state that seeks to assume power and control over all nations.
      As noted by Fuellmich, we probably need to take a long hard look at the WHO and the U.N., and decide whether they’re even worth saving. At bare minimum, the disproportionate influence by private vested interests, disguised as NGOs such as GAVI, must be thoroughly investigated and routed out.

    22. Why are the FDA and CDC advisory panel members so afraid to debate COVID Vaccine Safety?

      SteveKirsch September 25, 2021

      Opinion Editorial By: Steve Kirsch 
      Note that views expressed in this opinion article are the writer’s personal views and not necessarily those of TrialSite. This article is currently FREE to read and SHARE without paying.
      Recently, both the FDA and CDC advisory panels have voted to approve COVID vaccine booster shots for certain groups of people.
      I believe that that vote was a mistake. They should have voted to stop the vaccines entirely and replace it with early treatment protocols since such protocols are safer and more effective than the vaccines. Instead, they completely avoided talking about the issue in their meetings and they refused all reasonable attempts to be challenged on what the science actually shows.
      How we got here
      Let’s recap a quick history of how I came to this conclusion.
      In early May, my friends reported death and disability after being vaccinated. I started looking at the data and the more I looked, the more troubled I became. I arranged to tell the world what I learned on Bret Weinstein’s Darkhorse Podcast with my friend Robert Malone. That video went viral with almost 1M views before YouTube censored it. Here is the one hour version.
      Fast forward to  September 17, 2021. I spoke out about the vaccines in the public input section of the FDA advisory meeting. I said that everyone was avoiding the elephant in the room: that the vaccines kill more people than they save. Nobody on the panel was paying attention to my talk. This is pretty typical. I wasn’t offended. But the public was listening and I got millions of impressions on my talk. No one in the mainstream media contacted me to challenge my statement. 
      New results show two stopping conditions were triggered
      After the meeting, I did some additional research (summarized here) and I discovered that two stopping conditions have been triggered: 
      1. The vaccines have killed over 150,000 Americans. I verified this 7 different ways.
      2. The vaccines kill more people than they save for all age groups
      The most troubling thing to the panel members is that both stopping conditions are now validated in the peer reviewed scientific literature.
      I have attempted to point this out to the panel in multiple emails which I’ve posted to my Gab account.
      I offered to share the original research. No interest. 
      I offered to share the studies published in peer-reviewed medical journals backing up what I found. No interest.
      Next, I offered to donate to their research if they would debate a team of scientists on the two stopping conditions. They could name any donation amount they wanted to make it worth their time.  No interest. 
      I pointed out that 100% of the hundreds of people I surveyed wanted to see an open debate on this as soon as possible (and not see the debate happen in slow motion in the scientific literature). No interest.

      America wants a debate ASAP. The CDC and FDA committee members refuse to discuss this. They won’t debate my team under any conditions. 
      And I even named the team:
      1. Jessica Rose
      2. Mathew Crawford
      3. Chris Martenson
      4. Bret Weinstein
      5. Byram Bridle
      6. Myself
      Let’s be very clear: no researcher would refuse a $1M academic research grant for a two hour debate unless they were hiding something very serious.
      At this point, I must conclude that this is a tacit admission that we are right about our two stopping conditions being triggered and that the vaccines should be immediately halted.
      The message that the committee is sending to America could not be more clear:

      One of our team members sent me this message after my final message to the committee members asking them to debate the key issues. 
      We really need to call out these people and make it as public as possible that they refuse to talk based on the science. The public does not need a deep understanding of the science. If they see that we have our team of gladiators in the arena and no other team in the entire world is willing to step in, that will speak volumes. Even those who are firmly entrenched on the other side will have to start asking why their champions are showing such cowardice.

    23. Vaccine Effectiveness Against Delta Down to Just 7.6% in the Over-50s, 24% in the Under-50s, as the Vaccinated Continue to Experience Higher Infection Rate
      The latest Technical Briefing on the Variants of Concern, number 23, has been published by Public Health England (PHE), so we can update our (unadjusted) estimates of vaccine effectiveness against the Delta variant using the data it includes from sequenced Delta samples from positive PCR test results in England.
      As before, we subtract the figures in the latest briefing from those in briefing 17 to give the figures for the period June 22nd to September 12th. This gives us a picture for the whole Delta surge, which allows for the fact that most of the early reported infections were in the unvaccinated and most of the later reported infections were in the vaccinated (see below). PHE has recently also published the most recent month’s data for all reported infections (not just sequenced Delta ones), which shows lower vaccine efficacy in the most recent four weeks (a new report released on Friday shows this has dropped even further in the most recent week). However, given the apparently delayed infections in the vaccinated, when estimating vaccine efficacy against Delta it seems most accurate to look at the figures for the whole surge, not just the last month.
      We use figures for proportions of the population vaccinated by age derived from the PHE Covid surveillance reports.
      Starting with the over-50s, for the period June 22nd to September 12th, PHE reports 68,445 Delta infections in the double vaccinated and 7,575 in the unvaccinated. PHE figures show that in this period the proportion of the over-50s double vaccinated increased from 87% to 89%, giving a mean of 88%, and the proportion unvaccinated was stable at 9%. Calculating the vaccine effectiveness against Delta infection in the over-50s (1-(68,445/88%)/(7,575/9%)) gives a figure of just 7.6%. This is down from 15% two weeks ago and 24% two weeks before that. This continues to be very different to the estimate in the recent Oxford University study using ONS survey data, a study which I criticised for numerous inconsistent and implausible findings.
      With regard to deaths with Covid (within 28 days of a positive test), PHE reports 1,515 in the double vaccinated and 552 in the unvaccinated in the over-50s in this period. This works out (1-(1,515/88%)/(552/9%)) at a vaccine effectiveness against death of 72%, down slightly from 74% using data from the previous briefing. This is a 72% reduction in mortality including any reduced risk of infection, not in addition to it. It continues to be an encouraging figure, albeit lower than earlier studies have suggested, and dropping week on week.
      For the under-50s, for the period June 22nd to September 12th, PHE reports 81,718 Delta infections in the double vaccinated and 195,957 in the unvaccinated. PHE figures show that in this period the proportion of under-50s double vaccinated increased from 18% to 42%, giving a mean of 30%, and the proportion unvaccinated decreased from 61% to 50%, giving a mean of 55%. Calculating the vaccine effectiveness against Delta infection in the under-50s (1-(81,718/30%)/(195,957/55%)) gives a figure of 24%. This is down from 27% two weeks ago and 37% two weeks before that. Though higher than in the over-50s, it is still very low and much lower than earlier studies (including the trial) indicated.
      For deaths, PHE reports 48 in the double vaccinated and 126 in the unvaccinated in the under-50s in this period. This works out (1-(48/30%)/(126/55%)) at a vaccine effectiveness against death of 30%. This is up from 20% two weeks ago and 12% two weeks before that, but is still very low and much lower than in the over-50s. This may be because higher risk people are prioritised for vaccination, or are more likely to consent to it, in the younger age groups, and the rising efficacy may reflect the increase in lower risk people being vaccinated.
      These figures are much lower than those commonly quoted and used in modelling, and if they are closer to the truth then they mean the official, self-congratulatory estimates of “100,000 deaths” and “24.4 million infections” prevented by the vaccines are huge overestimates.
      By plotting the differences between the reported total Delta cases in the last five briefings we can also get a picture of how they are changing over time in the different age and vaccine-status cohorts. The red and yellow lines in the chart below show that new reported Delta infections in the unvaccinated have continued gently to increase, as have reported infections in the vaccinated over-50s (dark green line). On the other hand, new reported Delta infections in the vaccinated under-50s dropped in the last two weeks, driving an overall drop in reported Delta infections in the vaccinated. This may mark the peak of the Delta surge in the vaccinated, and possibly overall, though the gentle rise in reported infections in the unvaccinated since the start of August adds a smidgen of doubt into that inference.
      Daily Sceptic

  1. Reiner Fullmich’s latest installment: leaked documents… staged horror to scare the living shit out of people. It worked so well, it made fearless extreme athletes scared of the invisible, when they are accustomed to cheating death daily! Mavrik watched his best ski pal get swallowed in an avalanche and dug him out deader than Sanskrit. He went skiing the backcountry the next day !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NPR and BBC turned this formerly fearless lad into a premenstrual Karen Army.

    1. Thanks for that, Dave. An excellent report and a good review. Might you agree that when he uses the term “Mr. Global” he is referring to the Rothschild’s to avoid any defamation or libel issues?

      1. Dave, thank you for the reply. I have no problem with the phrase. Just asking if you think it means “the Rothschilds”.

    Is there evidence of millions of deaths and serious adverse events
    resulting from the experimental COVID-19 injections?
    V E R S I O N 1 . 0 S E P T E M B E R 2 0 2 1

    These figures will scare the hell outta ya.

    C O M P L I C I T Y
    The data suggests that we may currently be witnessing the greatest organized mass murder in
    the history of our world. The severity of this situation compels us to ask this critical: will we rise
    up to the defense of billions of innocent people? Or will we prefer personal profit over justice,
    and be complicit? Networks of lawyers all over the world are preparing class action lawsuits to
    prosecute all who are serving this criminal agenda. To all who have been complicit so far, we say:
    there is still time to turn and choose the side of truth. Please make the right choice.


  3. More on patenting life forms… I do remember German pig farmers being up in arms about a pig gene patent being granted and it sounded a lot like when the terminator seeds were patented and Monsanto sued a Canadian farmer because they found some rape seed growing in a ditch on his property. It was pitch fork, torch and tar n’feather time for Monsanto but those awe shucks Canadians are just too damned polite.

    1. Dave, Schmeiser was not quite that polite. He fought it through several courts. He did not win, but he did not lose…at least he did not have to pay Monsanto for the profits from his crop (if there were any that year). There is a really good documentary, David vs Monsanto. It does bring up the question of this mRNA vax. If it does not kill the recipients, are they owned by those who formulated the injection since the genetics have been altered? Not that we are not owned presently, but this act is more overt than covert to the informed. So there’s another reason not to be vaxxed…IF you live, you may be owned by Gawd knows who. What a world, eh? Damned two ways if you do. AND, damned through isolation and alienation if you don’t.
      Where’s the door?

    1. Rubber bullets actually have a plastic or metal base with a hard rubber cap and be very painful. They are not as benign as some people believe.


  4. “once a company goes liberal and woke, we will make them go broke.” Wayne Root’s slogan is catchy. He has a plan to go on the offensive against the Communist takeover, economically. By harnessing the boycott power of the 80 million who voted for Trump… Wayne has a new book that goes into detail. Who knows if it will grow legs. Wayne told a fascinating story about the Vegas oddsmakers who called him to say election night betting made no sense. After Fox called Arizona for Sleepy Creepy out of the blue, billions in bets came in for China Joe at 8 to 1 odds in favor of Trump. It sure looked like a loser bet as far ahead as Trump was. Then magically all voting stopped.

    Wayne was an oddsmaker himself for quite a while, thus his connections to the betting line.

  5. Listen to this Aussie piece of trash. WHY is he still breathing?
    Who are these so called leaders? They cannot be human. Would even the lowest form of humanity sell out the rest of his species? In a rational world, this makes no sense. But now, we live in a madhouse and anything goes… should that not include helping this monster make his way to hell ASAP?

  6. Jim thanks for including the Mortician’s interview. I would love to see a flood of Morticians exposing what they have seen from the trenches. There is a constant tug of war in my brain… is Covid a real thing or not? So many conflicting viewpoints. Dr Andrew Kaufman, David Icke and Jon Rappaport all came out of the Kung Flu starting gate with guns blazing that it was not an actual thing. I took their viewpoints into consideration. And I saw Harry Vox’s old cable access tv appearance exposing the Rockefellar’s plan to destroy freedom with a planned-demic from 2014. Then I saw the Gates/John Hopkins Kung Flu war games. After I saw the war games, I was firmly in the “Kung Flu is a fraud” camp. This was happening while my closest friends swallowed the scamdemic hook, line and sinker and swam away towing the fishing rod. Powder Mark wouldn’t ride the gondola with me anymore. Mavrik projected his kung Flu fear like he an Uber-Karen Army all by himself. He became the dictionary picture of Virtue Signaler. Now he’s dying from the Vaxx while still urging me to take the death stab. It’s a surreal life experience. I just changed my sisters’ names to Karen One and Karen Junior as I wrote this.

    1. Believe the ‘vid exists or not. It matters little. Humanity has caught colds since its beginning and reacted accordingly. JUST DON’T TAKE THE VAX. That’s when they gotcha.
      From all I can see, that’s the real agenda.

  7. Pingback: A few finds…..a reflection….. – LOVE IN ACTION NOW
  8. Correct me if I’m wrong, but I ran the alleged numbers myself and found that the Pfizer trial result data shows that the “vaccine” was only 1% more effective than the placebo. Now these results claim the vaccine is more dangerous than doing nothing. Joe Biden is an absolute moron for mandating this “vaccine.” I think a better choice of words over “vaccine” would be “product” or “products.” The FDA is going to have to walk this back and apparently this is the first step. “Jab Product Passports need to be abandoned too. I’m personally upset that therapeutics like HCQ and Ivermectin have been taken off the market. The lock down was about flattening the curve, but the present situation is much more dire. There seem to be more people infected after the product injections started than before. The only certainty is that Joe BIden wasn’t legitimately elected, and that the Medical Industrial Complex has really let us down on this one. If President Trump was in office it would have been blamed entirely on him. Perhaps this will be reason to finally get rid of Joe the Bozo.

  9. Please listen to the end. I don’t know if it’s real. I don’t know from whence it came, but I can find no disagreement with the contents. It’s where we are now. There can be no denial. Only about 9 minutes. I know what is said at the end is happening at this moment. Most here UNDERSTAND to some degree who they are. They cannot hide any longer. Stand up to the bastards every chance you get and work TOGETHER to rid this world of their plague of hatred, divisiveness, exclusivity and secrecy.

  10. This is not to diminish the importance of this article, but to go on with all this WHEN THE SUPPOSED VIRUS ITSELF HAS YET TO BE IDENTIFIED AND ISOLATED is putting the cart before the horse. I’ll say something else….that study they are looking for will never happen since there is NO BASIS FOR THE VACCINE TO BEGIN WITH. PERIOD. How the hell do you make a vaccine for a virus that for all intents and purposes does not exist??
    The world populace had been getting cold since the beginning of mankind. Those who are immune compromised and older have been dying as a result of complications forever.
    What else is there to say?
    My Gawd, let’s put our energy and efforts into bringing this farce to a halt.
    We need to stop the lie, not enhance it.

    1. Will, yes, progress is incremental. We KNOW the virus has NEVER BEEN ISOLATED. I hope you will find some consolation (even though there are lingering remnants of fakery) in the reports to the FDAa by experts and from the Funeral Director. We are never going to have perfection. Ever!

      1. Jim, I am not seeking perfection…just truth. Perfection is an unreachable goal to which many aspire and none reach.. Truth is self apparent and simple, in spite of the dark side attempt to hide it and obfuscate it. As you said a few days ago, it’s a magicians trick. …watch this hand as the other rips out your heart.
        An article like this has merit. It’s a beginning hopefully to the end. But, coming from the FDA who has in the past sold us out to one poison after another and provably killed millions with the help of animals like Fauci, it’s to be taken cautiously with that proverbial grain of salt. I see it as a steam release on a pressure cooker.

      2. Hey Jim, how did they get a Kung Flu patent without ever being isolating the bug? There was a time when no life forms could be patented. I forget how the door was opened, anyone remember ?

      3. That’s an excellent question, Dave. Obviously, either I or other parties have something not quite right. The patents suggest it has been. I am going to have to take another look. Thanks for this!

      4. I could easily be incorrect, but it seems what they have done is taken a particular isolated polypeptide of the SARS virus they say they discovered (this is from the original Sars virus in 2006 ) and patented that. It’s not that they have isolated the virus, they just isolated a part of a material that likely appears in all these viruses and patented that, using the logic that it does not exist by itself in nature, so the isolation was a man-made process.

        Here’s the original patent….see if it helps. and this

        Pure speculation on my part. And I think we should face that the patent office could easily be compromised and part of the entire farce.

      5. I think the Kung Flu was patented in 2001… more intrigue to the year… the vaccine if I remember was first patented in the mid to late 2000-teens. I have always thought the anthrax attacks were pure evil genius on the austin powers level of Dr. Evil. Because after the initial shock of the 911 attacks started to fade for the heartland of the country, the average rancher and hinterland dwellers resumed living as usual… safe in the comforting idea they were far removed from any high value targets. Then the anthrax attacks came and everyone gets mail. That reengaged the hinterland in the fake war on terror. Without that, the Patriot Act might have lost traction.

      6. Thanks for that info, Will… Reiner Fuellmich’s newest presentation summarizes the Kung Flu from A to Z better than anyone else has done that I’ve seen to date. From the guy that slayed giants like Volkswagen, Deutchebank …. always wanted to call it duchebank

        Harry Nilsson once said “Goin’ where the weather suits my clothes” it was snowing in Laramie, Wy last night and 28 degrees. Accumulations on the Snowy Range.

      7. Dave…Everybodys Talkin’….song by my mothers godchild, written by Fred Nell…In my mind, one of the greatest songs ever in a movie….and that final scene in Midnight Cowboy….tear your heart out, eh? I also see it as Dustin Hoffman’s finest role. He was truly remarkable. “I’m walkin’ here…I’m walkin here”. He could have won the Oscar, but John Wayne was pasted in…no comparison. At least it did win best picture.

Leave a Reply