I personally sent the President of Remington Arms a copy of my book to let him know that there were only two logical reasons for the lawsuit in the State of Connecticut where a Supreme Court Judge ruled that Remington could be held legally responsible. They were:
A. Their company was being used as the fall guy to help in the effort to further disarm the nation by challenging the 2005 federal law that granted them immunity from liability claims over violent acts in which their guns were involved… or
B. They agreed to be the fall guy as they were heading towards bankruptcy proceedings and that Connecticut would be the perfect place to carry out this new avenue to help further disarm civilians by using the children “victim” card.
The now-bankrupt gun manufacturer, Remington Arms Co. has offered to pay the Sandy Hook victims $33 million to settle claims and take responsibility that the (alleged) school shooting was a direct result of their marketing practices.
“Since this case was filed in 2014, the families’ focus has been on preventing the next Sandy Hook,” Mr. Koskoff said in a statement. “An important part of that goal has been showing banks and insurers that companies that sell assault weapons to civilians are fraught with financial risk.”
The Back Story (my 2020 published findings on gun manufactures and the gun-hating gang)
The Sandy Hook Shooting event energized a multi-pronged attack on gun ownership. The first attack was aimed at the gun owner and the second on the manufacturer.
The first prong – the Firearm Risk Protection Act 2015 and the second – the pending Sandy Hook lawsuit against various gun manufacturers to attempt to hold them criminally responsible for murders by which their products are used.
Staying with the second attack, we have to ask: are the gun-manufacturing owners also involved in the plot? Hillary Clinton secretly met with several alleged Orlando Night Club shooting victims recently and several families have agreed to join the Sandy Hook lawsuit. Lawyers representing some of the Orlando victims have already had preliminary talks with those representing the Sandy Hook families.
WHAT EXACTLY WAS THE SANDY HOOK LAWSUIT ABOUT?
TIMELINE – In January 2015, three years after the alleged mass murder at the Sandy Hook Elementary School, family members of some of the alleged dead victims filed a wrongful death suit against Remington Arms Company (the maker of the Bushmaster), the distributor (Camfour Holding, LLC), and Riverside Sales (the now-defunct East Windsor gun store).
The wrongful death suit argues Remington Arms as well as the other defendants “unscrupulously marketed and promoted the assaultive qualities and military uses of AR-15s to civilian purchasers.”
In December of 2015, all defendants asked Judge Bellis to throw out the lawsuit on the claim of ‘immunity’ under the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA). According to the Act,
“To prohibit civil liability actions from being brought or continued against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, or importers of firearms or ammunition for damages, injunctive or other relief resulting from the misuse of their products by others. <<NOTE: Oct. 26, 2005 – [S. 397]>>
Adam Lanza allegedly gunned-down 6 adults and 20 children using a Bushmaster AR-15 rifle (model XM15-E2S). Adam was also reportedly to have killed his mother, Nancy Lanza, with a .22 rifle prior to going to the elementary school that morning. It was also reported Nancy Lanza had purchased the AR-15 legally prior to the shooting from Riverside Sales.
The family members claimed the AR-15 military style rifle should not have been made available to the public citing it is a military style weapon and is not suitable for civilian usage. The families also claim the gun maker and sellers knew civilians are considered unfit to operate the assault rifle and yet they continue to sell it to civilians while disregarding the dangers and threats the weapon poses.
Following the shooting, a campaign to ban military style high-powered weapons and accessories from the civilian populous has emerged again and the gun advocates have been on a deceptive marketing campaign to disarm America – begging for more rules, regulations, codes, and laws to restrict the sale of these guns to just police or military. Remington, the primary defendant in the case filed to have the lawsuit dismissed. The Plaintiffs then ask the judge to not seal the gun maker’s records. Remington has argued to the judge the dangers of their company releasing trade secrets to the public due to this lawsuit.
According to Hartford Courant,
“Remington Arms, the principal defendant, has asked Bridgeport Superior Court Judge Barbara Bellis to keep records it views as proprietary from being made public. The company’s court filing said that for competitive reasons, it does not want the public or its competitors to see the records. The company has also asked the judge to dismiss the suit.
Bellis previously ruled that the process of “discovery” would go forward even as she considered whether to dismiss the lawsuit against the manufacturer of the AR-15 rifle used in the slayings. The discovery process allows the plaintiffs’ lawyers to demand internal documents that could provide insight into how the gun maker markets the AR-15 and to depose company executives. Lawyers said those depositions began earlier this month.
In unusually harsh language for a legal filing, the plaintiffs’ lawyers wrote: “The Remington Defendants ask the Court to order the plaintiffs to keep their secrets, in the name of preserving Remington’s competitive advantage among sellers of AR-15s. For plaintiffs, such conditions are repugnant.”
They also go on to say,
“Remington did not become the country’s leading seller of military weaponry to civilians by accident. It ascended to that position through its calculated marketing and pursuit of profit above all else. Plaintiffs lost family members, including children, in the service of that bottom line. Now Remington wants them to do more to protect its profitability. Plaintiffs will of course abide by whatever order the Court enters, but they will not by agreement help in a cover up of Remington’s marketing strategies or profit margins.”
Connecticut Superior Court Judge, Barbara Bellis ruled the lawsuit could go then go forward; trial was set for April 2018.
Following this lawsuit filing, just recently the Connecticut Supreme Court let part of the Newtown parent’s gun industry lawsuit move forward.
“The lawsuit brought by parents of nine of the Sandy Hook victims contends that the defendants negligently entrusted to civilian consumers an AR-15-style assault rifle that is suitable for use only by military and law enforcement personnel, and violated CUTPA through the sale or wrongful marketing of the rifle.”
“The plaintiffs have offered one narrow legal theory … that is recognized under established Connecticut law,” Justice Richard N. Palmer said in the majority opinion in Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms International LLC. “Specifically, they allege that the defendants knowingly marketed, advertised, and promoted the XM15-E2S for civilians to use to carry out offensive, military style combat missions against their perceived enemies. Such use of the XM15-E2S, or any weapon for that matter, would be illegal, and Connecticut law does not permit advertisements that promote or encourage violent, criminal behavior.”
“The Connecticut Supreme Court decision will give the plaintiffs the opportunity to subpoena the defendants for documents on how assault weapons are marketed.”
“This blockbuster decision is really a ‘wow’ moment in American legal history,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., said in a tweet Thursday. “It will seismically shift the legal landscape for gun violence victims.“
Blumenthal joined other Connecticut members of Congress in a related event on Capitol Hill Thursday to introduce a bill that would clarify that federal education dollars may not be used to arm teachers.
There was no immediate reaction from Remington or other defendants. But the National Shooting Sports Foundation, the trade association for the firearms industry, issued a statement that said “the majority’s decision today is at odds with all other state and federal appellate courts that have interpreted the scope of the [PLCCA] exception.”
Senator Richard Blumenthal appears here again in the behind-the-scene links as to why Sandy Hook happened. Following the decision, Blumenthal makes his stand on the ruling:
Sen. Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy have been trying for years to level that legal playing field to help people like the Phillips and other victims of gun violence seeking to sue the gun industry, including a group of Sandy Hook families.
On Tuesday, the senators introduced a bill for the fourth time that would repeal the gun industry’s legal protections.
Those protections were obtained in 2005 with Congress’ approval of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, or PLCAA, which shields firearms manufacturers and dealers from being held liable when crimes have been committed with their products. A similar bill was introduced by Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., for the third time, in the U.S. House.
The Democratic lawmakers hope their bill, called the “Equal Access to Justice for Victims of Gun Violence Act,” will bolster wrongful death lawsuits filed by the families of nine victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting against Remington Arms, the manufacturer of the rifle used in the massacre.
“All we are doing is giving victims of gun violence their day in court,” Blumenthal said.
As a former trial lawyer, Blumenthal said the “sweeping immunity” the gun industry has from lawsuits “is an abomination.”
Remember, Hillary Clinton met with the families prior to filing a lawsuit against Remington. The Clintons have much to do and say about disarming Americans of militarized style rifles.
Remington is the oldest gun manufacturer in America. In 2018, they filed bankruptcy following the Sandy Hook shooting and was demeaned and given negative publicity from the mainstream and AP Press. Many global companies began to shut down their advertising and marketing campaigns following the shooting. However, only two months later, they exited from their bankruptcy after a pre-approved ‘restructuring’ plan that was supported by 97% of its creditors. I would encourage further research to determine if the ‘creditors’ forced a new deal to include requiring liability insurance from dealers, distributors, and citizens considering the legislation was already written and in the works at the time of the Sandy Hook shooting. I would also encourage more research into whether or not any ‘hate-speech’ or ‘hate-crime’ language is involved in their new terms to stay in business.
WHAT IS THE H.R. 1369 (113th): FIREARM RISK PROTECTION ACT OF 2015?
The Insurance banksters would like to have total control over American’s weapons including prohibiting the sale or purchase of a firearm without the purchaser first obtaining qualified liability insurance policy.
This could become an economic hardship for many families and owners of weapons during a planned economic collapse. Individuals will be classified as criminals and face legal sanctions and punishments if they do not or cannot comply. It appears there will be “new terms” waiting for those who want to purchase firearms from Remington.
The Firearm Risk Protection Act of 2015 was introduced on May 21, 2015 by N.Y’s 12th Congressional District Democrat, Carolyn Maloney. The Act is just another bowl of ‘word salad’ which appears to be a deceptive way to disarm more Americans while demanding gun owners purchase liability insurance on their weapons. Any person who fails to comply can be criminalized and face fines up to $10000 in fines and/or jail time. Of course, the Act would exempt any federal, state, or local agencies from having to comply with obtaining liability insurance on the sale and transfer of every weapon. So, it is clear the banksters want their cut in owning your firearm and penalizing you if you do not comply. In addition, the banksters, their criminal mafia insurance monopolies, and of course the government would have yet another way to access your name and location of your weapons at any time as their newly created database grows. Waiting to be implemented, it could cost thousands of gun owners their weapons and freedoms if they cannot afford to purchase or maintain the insurance. Of course, the government, its representatives, and the agencies on a federal, state, and local level have no requirement or obligation to purchase insurance for their weapons.
Summary: The Firearm Risk Protection Act of 2015 Amends the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act to: (1) prohibit the purchase or sale of a firearm unless the purchaser presents proof to the seller and the seller verifies that the purchaser is covered by a qualified liability insurance policy, and (2) require any person who purchases a firearm on or after this Act’s effective date to be covered by such a policy. Exempts the purchase or sale of a firearm for use by a federal, state, or local agency. Defines “qualified liability insurance policy” to mean a policy that: (1) provides liability insurance covering the purchaser specifically for losses resulting from use of the firearm while it is owned by the purchaser, and (2) is issued by an insurer licensed or authorized to provide the coverage by the state in which the purchaser resides.
Maloney makes these remarks in the House of Representatives on May 21, 2015:
“Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to introduce the Firearm Risk Protection Act, innovative legislation to promote safe gun ownership. Too often, our communities are left looking for answers after horrific tragedies inflicted with dangerous firearms. A requirement to carry liability insurance is a market-based solution that would hold gun owners responsible for the risk their firearms present, and create incentives for responsible gun safety practices. The Firearm Risk Protection Act would harness the power of insurance markets to allow professional actuaries to determine the risk presented by each gun and gun owner. Just as with car insurance, higher-risk owners of firearms would face higher premiums, while responsible owners could qualify for reduced rates. As gun violence continues to inflict scars on American families and our communities, Congress should look for new ways to promote gun safety and prevent future tragedies. I hope my colleagues will join me to support this forward-thinking legislation.”
EXPOSED: ZIONIST CAROLYN B. MALONEY
A brief peek into Maloney’s history says a lot about who she is really interested in pleasing. I can guarantee, it is not the People; it is financial interests and the Jewish Agenda to Disarm America: Communism’s Secret Back Door. She has deep background ties to the banksters and works to criminalize speech, eliminate guns, and enslave the American people. She is the snake slithering in the grass waiting to dupe and bite the People using manipulative and dirty tactics. Maloney and her counterparts in law, banking and politics market deceptively named campaigns against the Civilian population which are intended to generate corporate profits by selling access to the Second Amendment in the form of insurance premiums for gun ownership.
Ironically, Jared Lee Loughner allegedly shot Judge John Roll to death in 2011, who ruled that large portions of the Brady Bill were unconstitutional.
“Today, all across New York, all across the country, Americans are sitting in and standing up because we are tired of watching as each day 89 people die from gun violence,” said Congresswoman Maloney. “We are tired of being told that the solution to gun violence is more guns. We are tired of massacres like Orlando and Sandy Hook. And we are tired of tweets and prayers that do nothing to stop the bloodshed. Today, we are here to continue the movement that began on the House floor last week. We are sitting in to demand action. It is time for a vote to keep guns away from dangerous terror suspects, a vote to require background checks on all gun sales, a vote to stop gun trafficking, a vote to lift the ban on gun violence research, a vote on common sense. It’s time for gun violence to end.”
“Just one week after the historic sit-in on the House floor, today leaders in Congress will hold yet another historic event to urge our elected officials in the U.S. House of Representatives to hold a vote on bipartisan legislation that protects the rights of law-abiding Americans, keeps guns out of the wrong hands, and saves lives,” said former Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, Co-Founder of the gun violence prevention organization Americans for Responsible Solutions. “I want to thank Congresswoman Maloney for helping lead the fight against our nation’s gun violence crisis. Speaking is difficult for me. But I haven’t been silenced. And neither should the American people. Their Representatives must vote to make our communities safer.”
Senator Richard Blumenthal was also highly involved in the Congressional ‘sit-in’ as well. His words put it blatantly where gun control sits and who is behind it.
“I was proud to walk over and join my colleagues in the House – led by Congressmen John Lewis and my fellow Members of the Connecticut Congressional Delegation – today in demanding action. Gun violence is a public health epidemic that is killing our constituents, and Congress’s refusal to address it is nothing short of a profound injustice. Like the Senate filibuster I helped to lead last week, the House sit-in is a powerful demonstration of our responsibility not to give up, not to relent in calling for action to end the horror show of death and injury that Congress’s failure has perpetuated.”
SLITHERING SNAKES IN THE GRASS
HILLARY CLINTON, GIFFORDS, AND CAROLYN MALONEY
HOW DOES H.R. 1369 (113th): FIREARM RISK PROTECTION ACT OF 2015 TIE INTO THE SANDY HOOK LAWSUIT AGAINST THE GUN MANUFACTURERS?
There are a lot of questions to be asked and as everyone is diverted by the most current false-flag details or ‘wooing’ the next post in line on Facebook, the snakes slither in the grass to turn Civilian’s choice of weapons purchases into a tightly regulated ‘pay-up’ or do the time to keep and possess them.
The families of the Sandy Hook lawsuit argue the rifle allegedly used by shooter, Adam Lanza, should not have been entrusted to the general public…
“Shouldn’t have been entrusted to the general public because it is a military-style assault weapon that is unsuited for civilian use.”
“They say the gun companies knew—or should have known—about the high risks posed by the weapon, including the ability for a shooter to use it to inflict maximum casualties and serious injury.”
Now, in the ‘discovery phase’ this lawsuit is the first of its kind to challenge the 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) after its enactment. According to the so-called experts on the fake news network, (CNN),
“This is precedent setting in the sense that, after PLCAA, this is the first case against a firearms manufacturer under a negligence theory that looks like it might make it to trial,” said Georgia State University law professor Timothy Lytton, who studies gun industry litigation.”
The attorney, Joshua Koskoff, is representing families of nine people who allegedly died in the Sandy Hook shooting saying, “It was Remington’s choice to entrust the most notorious American killing machine to the public.” (Killing machine? In 2014, for example, there were approximately 275 people killed with a rifle of any kind – hardly a killing machine).
He also denied claims that the lawsuit amounted to an attempt to ban assault weapons.
CLINTON, BLUMENTHAL, GIFFORDS, & THE GUN HATING GANG FOLLOWING SANDY HOOK
Hillary Clinton and Gabrielle Giffords
Hillary and the gun-hating gang are right where we would expect them to be following the Sandy Hook alleged shooting and even right at the front gates of the alleged mass murder at the Orlando Pulse Night Club.
Following the recent alleged shady shooting in Orlando, Hillary Clinton promptly met privately with family and friends of the alleged victims of the Pulse Night Club shooting. ‘Shady- meaning there are unanswered questions, signs of crisis actors and false reporting from the mainstream media. The details reported by the ‘Fake New Networks, (FOX, CNN, ABC, NBC, ETC) about the shooting itself is suspect and should be classified by the general populous as another suspicious shooting with gun-control as it’s primary marketing strategy. Just like the shootings in Tucson, Sandy Hook, the Navy Yard, San Bernardino, Aurora Theatre, and numerous others we had to endure during the Obama Administration and now continuing in the Trump administration.
While in Orlando, Hillary uses the perfect mix of ‘word-salad’ to bring together people who are vulnerable and ready to buy into the lies about ‘terrorism’ while labeling everything a ‘hate’ crime. As Hillary and the Gang continue to find more ways to disarm the nation, Gabrielle Giffords implements her ‘victim marketing scam’ aka Americans for Responsible Solutions anti-second amendment organization (Now Giffords Law Center). Giffords, Maloney, and Clinton are part of a malicious deception to disarm Americans coincident with the deliberate destruction and looting of the American financial system and collapse now in progress, not coincidently caused by same people funding this anti-American agenda.
Most Americans go throughout their day unaware of what is really happening around them. Most people are told through the fake news networks and Hollywood deception media what the weather will be, how the economy is shaping up, what clothes to wear, what shoes to purchase, who is popular and who is not, and what is happening around the world. The majority of Americans do not have a clue as to the real matrix in which we now live – a real life version of the Truman Show. I like to refer to the nation as being ‘duped’ and deprived of the real pleasures of truth and freedom.
Since the Sandy Hook shooting there has been fuel poured on the already burning fire to incite a war between blacks and whites, blacks and police, whites and police – a total divide. Rumors surface after each alleged shooting and chatter starts among social media on their opinions as to what is really happening. All of this was great news for Hillary considering she was out promoting racial division in the nation and was targeting black women using the St. Louis Ferguson shooting planned event. It seems very peculiar when there is another shooting Hillary, Giffords, Blumenthal, Maloney and others already have their war paint on and speeches prepared.
Hillary’s presidential campaign route was right in alignment with the Sandy Hook shooting. Another reason for their BULLHORNS to be screaming and preaching VICTIMS, VICTIMS, VICTIMS… MORE GUN CONTROL… WE HAVE MORE VICTIMS….
Next, we have to question the gun manufacturers…
REMINGTON & BUSHMASTER… ARE THE GUN MANUFACTURER OWNERS ACTUALLY SELLING US THE GUNS TO SHOOT OURSELVES WITH?
REMINGTON and BUSHMASTER have been specifically named in the Sandy Hook lawsuit. Clearly, without question, the primary agenda for the lawsuit is to challenge the 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. Remington and Bushmaster are owned by Freedom Group (FG), which has a parent company called Cerberus Capital Management. Other companies FG owns are:
Advanced Armament Corp, Barnes Bullets, Dakota Arms, DPMS Panther Arms, H&R Firearms, Marlin, Para USA, Parker Gunmakers, and TAPCO
There are some specific shady actions that Cerberus Capital Management displayed directly following the Sandy Hook shooting.
WHY SHOULD WE TRUST THE GUN COMPANIES WHEN THEY ARE NOT STANDING AGAINST THE GUN HATERS?
As most people already know, following the Sandy Hook shooting, gun sales were on the rise like because Americans felt threatened by gun-control and laws that might ban the civilian population from obtaining military-style high powered rifles, extended magazines, and other accessories.
What exactly gives the gun haters the right to claim, “the gun maker and sellers knew civilians are considered unfit to operate the assault rifle” … Unfit? Really?
Definition: Oxford Dictionary – UNFIT– (Of a person) not having the requisite qualities or skills to undertake something competently:
REMINGTON ARMS – is the manufacturer of the Bushmaster. Freedom Group (FG) is the owner of Remington Arms and is a subsidiary of the private equity firm known as Cerberus Capital Management. L.P, Est. 1992. They are well-known for their takeover of struggling Chrysler, who was eventually rescued by the taxpayer. Zionist Stephen Feinberg is the co-founder & CEO.
In just a few days following the Sandy Hook shooting, Cerberus Capital Management made a stunning move and announced the sale of Freedom Group. As most Americans were distracted by the sorrows of the alleged Sandy Hook shooting, Cerberus Capital Management’s executives, who own America’s largest gun company, made their move making arrangements to sell off Freedom Group after receiving a harsh phone call from the California State Teachers’ Retirement System, or CalSTRS, which had $750 million invested in the private equity firm at that time. After just a few short hours of contemplating, Cerberus announced it was putting Freedom Group up for sale. How could this decision be made so soon after an event that brought gun sales and gun control to the forefront of every conversation in America?
Instead of taking the heat and fighting back (considering they know their products are not the reason for murder by guns), Cerberus took the cowards way out and gave notice to the nation it wanted to remove itself from the heated gun debate uproar. It was announced they would sell Freedom Group, which made the weapon Adam Lanza allegedly used in the massacre. For the first time in history,
According to PR News Wire, Cerberus released the following statement publicly following the shooting at Newtown.
“We were shocked and deeply saddened by the events that took place at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, CT on December 14, 2012. We cannot comprehend the losses suffered by the families and friends of those killed by the unthinkable crimes committed that day. No words or actions can lessen the enormity of this event or make a dent in the pain that was inflicted on so many.”
“It is apparent that the Sandy Hook tragedy was a watershed event that has raised the national debate on gun control to an unprecedented level. The debate essentially focuses on the balance between public safety and the scope of the Constitutional rights under the Second Amendment. As a Firm, we are investors, not statesmen or policy makers. Our role is to make investments on behalf of our clients who are comprised of the pension plans of firemen, teachers, policemen and other municipal workers and unions, endowments, and other institutions and individuals. It is not our role to take positions, or attempt to shape or influence the gun control policy debate. That is the job of our federal and state legislators.”
However, they did take a position in the fierce gun control policy debate. Cerberus claims in their press release, “Our role is to make investments on behalf of our clients who are comprised of the pension plans of firemen, teachers, policemen and other municipal workers and unions, endowments, and other institutions and individuals.”
This alone should make the reader question everything considering these national shootings revolve around special medical operations which use crisis actors, firemen, police officers, teachers, municipal workers, doctors, nurses, medical centers, news media(s), local Masonic orders, etc. Do you see where this is going? However, as Cerberus is hiding under the table, knowing they are going to profit on both sides of the operation, Remington’s profits soared 52+ percent following the alleged Sandy Hook shooting as a direct result of this event as well as the national gun debate.
The surge in profits to Freedom Group came at the right time as Remington was preparing to replace 7.5+ million rifle triggers in a major recall resulting from a class action lawsuit. Interesting…
Plus, let’s not forget about the amount of money many states make from the sales of guns with licensing fees and permits and such. Wow, is this what Obama meant by we are a nation investing in the service industry? What Obama meant by America’s service industry growing was clearly in medical professions, mental health, technology, prisons, and the police-state.
Regardless, more than two-years after Cerberus made the announcement to sell Freedom Group, after the phone call from the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS), they exited their investments in the gun manufacturer anyway. Then months later, according to Forbes, CalSTRS made national headlines by:
“voting at its annual board meeting to divest the$193.1 billion pension fund from manufacturers of firearms that are illegal for sale in the state of California.”
Following the decision, CalSTRS liquidated $3 million of investments in the public shares of gun makers such as Smith & Wesson and Sturm Ruger, most of which the pension fund held through ordinary index fund investments. However, when it came to exiting a $375 million investment in the Cerberus pool that owned Remington, CalSTRS hit a roadblock.
Contractual and legal constraints made it hard for the fund to quickly exit Remington, CalSTRS said, leading to a multi-year frustration with the fund’s continued firearms investment.
It could be safe to say hypothetically if a person wanted to make some money on the next false-flag or alleged national tragedy… they might want to invest in the players or sponsors… We have private humanitarian organizations, disaster relief agencies, jobs and more jobs to keep filled. Yes, we have become the new service nation to make sure state and federal workers are employed and continue to remain the heroes in the eyes of the civilian populous.
There is quite a bit of information to digest when it comes to the Sandy Hook lawsuit, the Orlando shooting alleged victims families also joined the lawsuit, the manufacturer’s response to the Sandy Hook shooting, and the introduction of the Firearms Risk Protection Act. Studying the information closely, as well as the gun hater’s agenda, it is quite clear the Second Amendment is either up for sale or being re-written.
Thanks to the Tucson and Sandy Hook shootings, the Firearms Risk Protection Act alone could profit billions to insurance companies by making it mandatory gun owners have liability insurance on their weapons. Depending on your ‘risk assessment’, you may either be considered a ‘low risk’ individual and pay lower rates or a ‘high risk’ person and pay higher rates. What they do not specify is how they determine what risk you are. I suppose all the tracking and databases are tied together now so who knows what lies ahead for American gun owners. The saddest thing of all is most of the gun owners around continue to regurgitate the same slogan, “they ain’t gonna get my guns” or “come an take em” however, they have no clue this operation of this magnitude is even going on. They won’t be coming for the guns, they will come for insurance payments and the owners might just be handing over the weapons to escape the payment.
Mental health agenda is also tied into the gun control debates. Following the Sandy Hook shooting, the push for DNA testing and studies for the ongoing search for the ‘evil gene’ is underway. Obama was demanding the CDC receive millions of dollars in funding to study gun-violence and Hillary Clinton vowed to keep the guns out of the hands of who she believes are dangerous individuals.
Just recently, House Democratic appropriators allocated $50 million to the CDC & NIH gun violence and behavioral studies including research into genes. The CDC has been “off-limits” for over two decades from such research after racking up trillions, now finally gets the millions they need to accelerate again. As you can now clearly see the link between gun-control, the Surgeon Generals, prominent doctor groups, healthcare, insurance companies, and more. The reason why the CDC was not allowed to study gun violence for over two decades prior to the Sandy Hook alleged shooting is because money embezzlement and laundering was out of control. The CDC’s funds were cut because they could not produce evidence that guns are a public health crisis. Now, prior to the Sandy Hook shooting, Janet Napolitano announced the crazy lone-gun man would be everywhere, including the schools.
Suddenly, the CDC and National Institute of Health are back in the saddle researching the public health crisis because of the suspicious rise in mass shootings.
According to Politico, “Lawmakers haven’t provided funding to study gun violence at the CDC in over two decades, largely because of a spending provision that had a chilling effect on research. A budget deal in March 2018 clarified that the federal government can study gun violence, as long as it doesn’t use the research to promote gun control.”
Earlier this year already, Democrats passed a bill, H.R. 8 (116) mandating more federal background checks for gun sales. This time they received a “boost” from surgeons, doctors, healthcare workers, EMS workers, using their social media slogan, #ThisIsOurLane.
Once again, we see CT Senator Richard Blumenthal appear in the midst of all these stricter gun regulations. This time, bussing in the victims and family members and bringing in the doctors and medical workers.
Cicero and countless others have reminded us “A nation can survive it fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.”
Mahoney, Clinton, and Giffords wear the face of do-gooders. Acting as of they are concerned women exercising the natural feminine desire to make things safe, but, in fact, they are liars, criminals, and frauds. All real women should be chasing these non-women down and dragging them to their Sheriff’s department by the hair and demanding they be locked up for life. And, because of the New Legislation called “A Thin Blue Line” we should now insist they get the death penalty. However, there is no justice because the Justice Department is also part of the Sandy Hook plot.
“These scums help rot the soul of a nation while working secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of America’s Constitution, tirelessly seeking and exploiting weak spots wherein to insert their treason. “
“These women and many other men and women are not Americans, nor are they nationalists, rather they are globalists, spiritual Talmudists, serving a self-fulfilling prophecy. The stateless one world government, a new world order, and new religion of tyranny – dictated by the same kinds of personalities that destroyed the old world order. These chosen-ones fantasize about a new paradise of psychopaths, bringing order out of chaos, but we expect in the end, once again, they will remain miserable, having nothing left to destroy but themselves.” – Jack Mullen
Video: Sandy Hook “Victims” To Get $33 Million Settlement
Video: 153News: Thechadchaddington