Eminent doc: Media censored COVID-19 early treatment options that could have reduced fatalities by 85%

Dr. Peter McCullough also explained that given an 80% level of herd immunity, broad vaccination has ‘no scientific, clinical or safety rationale.’

AUSTIN, Texas, April 8, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — An exceedingly well-qualified physician, who was censored by YouTube last year, addressed the Texas State Senate Health and Human Service Committee last month providing thorough information on successful treatments of COVID-19, the present high-level of herd immunity from the disease, the very limited potential of “vaccines,” and the data that shows early treatment could have saved up to 85 percent of the “over 500,000 deaths in the United States.”

Dr. Peter McCullough, MD is an internist and cardiologist, along with being a professor of medicine at Texas A&M University Health Sciences Center. He is distinguished as the most published person in history in his field and an editor of two major medical journals.

McCullough explained that from the beginning of the pandemic, he refused to let his patients “languish at home with no treatment and then be hospitalized when it was too late,” which was the typical treatment protocol being discussed, promoted and offered across the west.

He thus “put together a team of doctors” to study “appropriately prescribed off-label use of conventional medicine” to treat the illness and they published their findings in the American Journal of Medicine.

“The interesting thing was, (that while) there were 50,000 papers in the peer-reviewed literature on COVID, not a single one told the doctor how to treat it,” he said. “When does that happen? I was absolutely stunned! And when this paper was published … it became … the most cited paper in basically all of medicine at that time the world.”

With the help of his daughter, Dr. McCullough recorded a YouTube video incorporating four slides from the “peer-reviewed paper published in one of the best medical journals in the world” discussing early treatments for COVID-19. The video quickly “went absolutely viral. And within about a week YouTube said ‘you violated the terms of the community’” and they pulled it down.

Due to the “near total block on any information of treatment to patients,” Sen. Bob Johnson hosted a November hearing on this important topic where McCullough was the lead witness.

With such an aggressive suppression of information on early treatments, and the default policy in COVID-19 testing centers to not offer any such resources to those who test positive for the infection, McCullough said, “No wonder we have had 45,000 deaths in Texas. The average person in Texas thinks there’s no treatment!”

And the blackout of such vital information goes well beyond the blatant censorship of big tech companies. McCullough said, “What has gone on has been beyond belief! How many of you have turned on a local news station, or a national cable news station, and ever gotten an update on treatment at home? How many of you have ever gotten a single word about what to do when you get handed the diagnosis of COVID-19? That is a complete and total failure at every level!”

“Let’s take the White House: How come we didn’t have a panel of doctors assigned to put all their efforts to stop these hospitalizations? Why don’t we have doctors who actually treated patients get together in a group and every week give us an update? … Why don’t we have any reports about how many patients were treated, and spared hospitalizations? … This is a complete and total travesty to have a fatal disease, and not treat it,” he said.

“So what can be done right here, right now?” McCullough proposed to the legislators. “How about tomorrow, let’s have a law that says there’s not a single (test) result given out without a treatment guide, and without a hotline of how to get into research. Let’s put a staffer on this and find out all the research available in Texas, and let’s not have a single person go home with a test result with their fatal diagnosis, sitting at home going into two weeks of despair before they succumb to hospitalization and death. It is unimaginable in America that we can have such a complete and total blind spot.”

In reference to early treatments that have been widely used outside the west with great success (with around 1 percent to 10 percent of the death rates of the first world), McCullough turned his attention to broad media suppression of information once again asking, “When was the last time you turned on the news and ever got a window to the outside world? When did you ever get an update about how the rest of the world is handling COVID? Never. What’s happened in this pandemic is the world has closed in on us.

“There’s only one doctor whose face is on TV now. One. Not a panel. (As) doctors, we always work in groups, we always have different opinions. There’s not a single media doctor on TV who’s ever treated a COVID patient. Not a single one. There’s not a single person in the White House Task Force who has ever treated a patient,” he said.

“Why don’t we do something bold. Why don’t we put together a panel of doctors that have actually treated outpatients of COVID-19, and get them together for a meeting. And why don’t we exchange ideas, and why don’t we say how we can finish the pandemic strongly.”

“Isn’t it amazing?! Think about this. Think about the complete and total blind spot (regarding home treatments),” he said.

The DNC/CV Conspiracy: How BLM, Antifa and the DNC Agenda fit together (26 July 2020)

Herd immunity and vaccination

“The calculations in Texas on herd immunity … right now with no vaccine effect (is) 80 percent,” McCullough said. “And more people are developing COVID today. They’re going to become immune (as well).”

“People who develop COVID have complete and durable immunity. And (that’s) a very important principle: complete and durable. You can’t beat natural immunity. You can’t vaccinate on top of it and make it better. There’s no scientific, clinical or safety rationale for ever vaccinating a COVID-recovered patient. There’s no rationale for ever testing a COVID-recovered patient,” he continued.

“My wife and I are COVID-recovered. Why do we go through the testing outside? There’s absolutely no rationale (for such testing).”

Given the high levels of herd immunity, McCullough said any impact from broad vaccination in preventing COVID-19 can only be minimal at best.

“There’s plenty of COVID-recovered patients. Let them forgo the vaccine and let people who are clamoring for it get it. But at 80 percent herd immunity, in the vaccine trials fewer than one percent … in the placebo actually get COVID. Fewer than one percent. The vaccine is going to have a one percent public health impact. That’s what the data says. It’s not going to save us, we’re already 80 percent herd immune,” he said.

“If we’re strategically targeted we can actually close out the pandemic very well with the vaccine,” the cardiologist stated. “But strategically targeted. (For) people under 50 who fundamentally have no health risks, there’s no scientific rationale for them to ever become vaccinated.”

Addressing the broad “misinformation” of asymptomatic transfer of COVID-19, which has supported the need for lockdowns due to the notion that the virus can be unintentionally spread by infectious, asymptomatic people, the medical professor said, “One of the mistakes I heard today as a rationale for vaccination is asymptomatic spread. And I want to be very clear about this: My opinion is there is a low degree, if any, of asymptomatic spread. Sick person gives it to sick person. The Chinese have published a study … [of] 11 million people. They tried to find [evidence of] asymptomatic spread. You can’t find it. And that’s been, you know, one of important pieces of misinformation.”

Finally, McCullough highlighted the impact of suppressing information on effective and safe early treatments during this last year. Citing two “very large” studies, he said “when doctors treat patients early who are over age 50 with medical problems, with a sequence multi-drug approach … there’s an 85 percent reduction in hospitalizations and death.”

“We have over 500,000 deaths in the United States. The preventable fraction could have been as high as 85 percent (425,000) if our pandemic response would have been laser-focused on the problem: the sick patient right in front of us,” he concluded.


Outpatient Early Treatment Algorithm for COVID-19 – a Webinar with Dr Peter A. McCullough – This Oct. 2020 webinar includes a great deal of additional information, many incredibly useful slides from Dr. McCullough as well as some participation from Dr. Brian Tyson.

‘Only a one in 17 billion chance hydroxychloroquine doesn’t work’: medical professor

Frontline Doctors: Experimental vaccines are ‘not safer’ than COVID-19 

EXCLUSIVE – Former Pfizer VP: ‘Your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death.’

It’s ‘entirely possible’ vaccine campaigns ‘will be used for massive-scale depopulation’: Former Pfizer VP

Asymptomatic transmission of COVID-19 didn’t occur at all, study of 10 million finds

The anti-hydroxychloroquine campaign was based in politics, not science: biologist

Patrick Delaney

Please follow and like us:

21 thoughts on “Eminent doc: Media censored COVID-19 early treatment options that could have reduced fatalities by 85%”

  1. Pingback: Today's Guest Host: James Fetzer | The Power Hour
  2. It’s important to remember that COVID-19 was created by ALIENS to CULL – not KILL the Human Herd. THEY could easily kill us all, but we represent their FOOD SUPPLY [NSE – Negative Spiritual Energy, produced from/during human negative emotions: FEAR, HATE, AWE, ENVY, etc. and ACTS OF VIOLENCE (WARS, MURDER, ARSON, etc.]. COVID-19 also was designed to DISRUPT human civilization and facilitate creating the ANWO – Alien New World Order [SLAVE STATE]. No human is capable of producing such a complex virus.


    1. One more tidbit: How wide is the Intelligence/Technology gap between us and ANY ALIEN RACE that has visited Earth [several from different planets in our galaxy of 200-400 Billion Solar (Star) systems]? We are termites and THEY are Einsteins! That’s what we’re up against! :O

  3. Am I the only one here who finds it more than interesting that we have commenters who eschew the fake media and fake news, yet still accept the official ‘vid death figures from those same sources?

      1. JHU is John Hopkins University, that’s been putting out fake stats about Covid 19 for the past year. Its gotten so ridiculous that even left-leaning DRUDGE has had to remove their stat feed in the past ten days.

      2. Well, I was at Perris Island, S.C., and over there, the D. I.s had all the fun. 😉

    1. Exactly Will. I’ve been trying to post comments here for a week or so. So let’s see if this one goes through. I’ve tried to reply to you r question Will regarding South Dakota and David Icke but they’ve got removed ??

      1. No. I rarely remove any post. I did not remove any of yours. Maybe one GodSend post in the last couple of months.

      2. SS…I am not sure what comment to which you refer. Could you go back and post the comment and your reply?
        I have never seen Fetz remove a comment UNLESS it was some form of an ad hominem attack on another poster.
        Does “exactly Will” refer to the hypocrisy I spoke of in my above comment?

  4. It is always good when a medical professional comes out against needless and dangerous vaccination, needless and dangerous hospitalization, needless and dangerous lockdowns, and other facets of the Plandemic. The eminent Dr McCullough, however, does not seem to know that viruses are exosomes, there is no real “disease” of COVID-19, it is not communicable between individuals, “herd immunity” is a fabrication, and there were not over 500,000 deaths in the USA from COVID-19. No one died of the fake disease, but only of other causes, including the very real cause of death by ventilator. But, yes, one can treat the symptoms associated with COVID-19, which itself is defined only by a set of symptoms, which are so broad as to be meaningless as a defining mechanism.

    1. “No one died of the fake disease, but only of other causes, including the very real cause of death by ventilator. But, yes, one can treat the symptoms associated with COVID-19, which itself is defined only by a set of symptoms, which are so broad as to be meaningless as a defining mechanism.”

      Very well said, Vivian…I have never heard it said as clearly.

  5. The problem about treatment for corona virus were President Trump’s words. Any treatment he talked about or recommended was a dose of poison to the MSM. He may have well recommended a lollipop or an ice cream cone for all the good it did.

    Remember its easier to split the atom than to change the mind and attitude of the LEFTY main stream media.


  6. Jim Stone just posted this. It does not get an scarier. From a former Pfizer VP:

    Life Site News got what was probably the most important interview ever done.

    EXCLUSIVE – Former Pfizer VP: ‘Your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death.’
    Look out the window, and think, “why is my government lying to me about something so fundamental?” Because, I think the answer is, THEY ARE TRYING TO KILL YOU USING THIS METHOD. THEY ARE GOING TO KILL YOU AND YOUR FAMILY.’

    April 7, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – Dr. Michael Yeadon, Pfizer’s former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory who spent 32 years in the industry leading new medicines research and retired from the pharmaceutical giant with “the most senior research position” in his field, spoke with LifeSiteNews.

    He addressed the “demonstrably false” propaganda from governments in response to COVID-19, including the “lie” of dangerous variants, the totalitarian potential for “vaccine passports,” and the strong possibility we are dealing with a “conspiracy” which could lead to something far beyond the carnage experienced in the wars and massacres of the 20th century.

    His main points included:

    There is “no possibility” current variants of COVID-19 will escape immunity. It is “just a lie.”

    Yet, governments around the world are repeating this lie, indicating that we are witnessing not just “convergent opportunism,” but a “conspiracy.” Meanwhile media outlets and Big Tech platforms are committed to the same propaganda and the censorship of the truth.

    Pharmaceutical companies have already begun to develop unneeded ��top-up�� (“booster”) vaccines for the “variants.” The companies are planning to manufacture billions of vials, in addition to the current experimental COVID-19 “vaccine” campaign.

    Regulatory agencies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, have announced that since these “top-up” vaccines will be so similar to the prior injections which were approved for emergency use authorization, drug companies will not be required to “perform any clinical safety studies.”

    Thus, this virtually means that design and implementation of repeated and coerced mRNA vaccines “go from the computer screen of a pharmaceutical company into the arms of hundreds of millions of people, [injecting] some superfluous genetic sequence for which there is absolutely no need or justification.”

    Why are they doing this? Since no benign reason is apparent, the use of vaccine passports along with a “banking reset” could issue in A TOTALITARIANISM LIKE THE WORLD HAS NEVER SEEN. Recalling the evil of Stalin, Mao, and Hitler, ��mass depopulation�� remains a logical outcome.

    The fact that this at least could be true means everyone must “FIGHT LIKE CRAZY TO MAKE SURE THAT SYSTEM NEVER FORMS!!!

    A couple good quotes from this lengthy report –

    “And if you wanted to introduce a characteristic which could be harmful and could even be lethal, and you can even tune it to say ‘let’s put in it some gene that will cause liver injury over a nine-month period,’ or, cause your kidneys to fail but not until you encounter this kind of organism [that would be quite possible]. Biotechnology provides you with limitless ways, frankly, to injure or kill billions of people. ”

    “The human immune system is a thing of wonder. What it does is when it faces a new pathogen like this, you’ve got professional cells, they’re called professional antigen-presenting cells – they’re kind of rough tough things that tend not to succumb to viruses. And their job is to grab foreign things in the near environment and tear them limb from limb [inside the cell]. They really cut them up into hundreds of pieces. And then they present these pieces on the surfaces of their cell to other bits of your immune system, and amazingly, because of the variability that God and nature gave you, huge variability to recognize foreign things, and your body ends up using 15 to 20 different specific motifs that it spots about this virus. They’re called epitopes, basically they’re just like little photographs of the details about this virus. That’s what they do. And that is what is called your repertoire, your immune repertoire is like 20 different accurate photographs, close-ups, of different bits of this virus.

    Now, if a tiny piece of the virus changes, like the .3% I’ve just described, if you are reinfected by that variant, your professional cells tear into that virus and cut it into pieces, present them again, and lo and behold, most of the pieces that you have already seen and recognized, are still there in the variants.

    There is absolutely no chance that all of them will fail to be recognized and that is what is required for immune escape, to escape your immunity. It must present to you as a new pathogen. It must be sufficiently different that, when it is cut up by your professional checker cells, it won’t find mostly the same thing it has seen before. And that is just absurdly impossible when you have only varied .3%, so it is 99.7% (similar).”

    He then goes on to explain that this is precisely why only one vaccination would be needed for this virus and no vaccine would be needed for the variants, because variants would be recognized and whatever differences they had would automatically be added to your “immune repertoire”


    1. If a person believes the vaccine is safe and effective, S/he most likely believes Creepy Joe was honestly elected, and legitimately deserves to be the puppet dictator that he is. The claim of variants is perfect cover for the likely event that that vaccine is found to be very ineffective while at the same time causing many adverse harmful, and sometimes fatal reactions. There is not one single vaccine, but at least four which vary in their frequently observed hazardous side effects.


Leave a Reply