THE HELLISH REALITY AND TRUTH ABOUT VACCINES HIDDEN IN PLAIN VIEW-SECTION 13 OF THE VACCINE INSERTS

The Fullerton Informer

EVERYTHING YOU HAVE BEEN TOLD IS A LIE AND A FRAUD. JOE IMBRIANO IS THE FULLERTON INFORMER AND BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW, WE DARE TO PUSH THE ENVELOPE.

CHECK BELOW FOR THE 83 VACCINES’ MANUFACTURERS’ INSERT INFORMATION (FOR PHYSICIANS) ON SECTION 13WHERE THEY STATE THAT…NO vaccine has been evaluated for the potential to cause:

  • Cancer
  • Mutate DNA
  • Or Impair Fertility of Both Males and Females

THE SOURCE OF THIS INFORMATION IS THE U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION – FDA) –http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/ucm093833.htm 

In addition, vaccine manufacturers are held to a lower standard than other pharmaceutical, and are not required to do double-blind placebo studies or long-term studies past 6 months, nor have they ever compared vaccinated populations with the unvaccinated! Meanwhile, every person who gets a vaccine is being injured by them.  See VACCINE SUMMARY –http://www.healthalertphilly.org/Vaccines.htm

NOTE: Beware of “patients inserts” are not the same as “physicians inserts” and may not contain the same information.

SAMPLE VACCINE INSERT SECTION:  Section 13 NONCLINICAL TOXICOLOGY 13.1 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility VAXCHORA has not been evaluated for the potential to cause carcinogenicity or genotoxicity, or to impair fertility.e

Trade Name
1.     Adenovirus Type 4 and Type 7 Vaccine, Live, Oral
Section 13, omittted
No Trade Name
2.     Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed
13. NONCLINICAL TOXICOLOGY The effect of BioThrax on embryo-fetal and pre-weaning development was evaluated in a developmental toxicity study using pregnant rabbits. One group of rabbits was administered BioThrax twice prior to gestation and during the period of organogenesis (gestation day 7). A second group of rabbits was administered BioThrax twice prior to gestation and on gestation day 17. BioThrax was administered at 0.5 ml/rabbit/occasion, by intramuscular injection. No adverse effects on mating, fertility, pregnancy, parturition, lactation, embryo-fetal or preweaning development were observed. There were no vaccine-related fetal malformations or other evidence of teratogenesis noted in this study
Biothrax
3.     BCG Live
BCG VACCINE has not been evaluated for carcinogenic, mutagenic potentials or impairment of fertility.
BCG Vaccine
4.     BCG Live
TICE® BCG has not been evaluated for its carcinogenic, mutagenic potentials or impairment of fertility.
TICE BCG
5.     Cholera Vaccine Live Oral
VAXCHORA has not been evaluated for the potential to cause carcinogenicity or genotoxicity, or to impair fertility.
Vaxchora
6.     Diphtheria & Tetanus Toxoids Adsorbed
Diphtheria and Tetanus Toxoids Adsorbed has not been evaluated for carcinogenicity, mutagenic potential, or impairment of fertility.
No Trade Name
7.     Diphtheria & Tetanus Toxoids & Acellular Pertussis Vaccine Adsorbed
Tripedia vaccine has not been evaluated for its carcinogenic or mutagenic potentials or impairment of fertility.
Tripedia
8.     Diphtheria & Tetanus Toxoids & Acellular Pertussis Vaccine Adsorbed
INFANRIX has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility.
Infanrix
9.     Diphtheria & Tetanus Toxoids & Acellular Pertussis Vaccine Adsorbed
DAPTACEL has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility.
DAPTACEL
10.  Diphtheria & Tetanus Toxoids & Acellular Pertussis Vaccine Adsorbed, Hepatitis B (recombinant) and Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine Combined
PEDIARIX has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility.
Pediarix
11.  Diphtheria and Tetanus Toxoids and Acellular Pertussis Adsorbed and Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine
KINRIX has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility.
KINRIX
12.  Diphtheria and Tetanus Toxoids and Acellular Pertussis Adsorbed and Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine
Quadracel has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility.
Quadracel
13.  Diphtheria and Tetanus Toxoids and Acellular Pertussis Adsorbed, Inactivated Poliovirus and Haemophilus b Conjugate (Tetanus Toxoid Conjugate) Vaccine
Pentacel vaccine has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility.
Pentacel
14.  Haemophilus b Conjugate Vaccine (Meningococcal Protein Conjugate)
Liquid PedvaxHIB has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or potential to impair fertility.
PedvaxHIB
15.  Haemophilus b Conjugate Vaccine (Tetanus Toxoid Conjugate)
ActHIB vaccine has not been evaluated for its carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility.
ActHIB
16.  Haemophilus b Conjugate Vaccine (Tetanus Toxoid Conjugate)
HIBERIX has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility.
Hiberix
17.  Haemophilus b Conjugate Vaccine (Meningococcal Protein Conjugate) & Hepatitis B Vaccine (Recombinant)
COMVAX has not been evaluated for its carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or its potential to impair fertility.
Comvax
18.  Hepatitis A Vaccine, Inactivated
HAVRIX has not been evaluated for its carcinogenic potential, mutagenic potential, or potential     for impairment of fertility.
Havrix
19.  Hepatitis A Vaccine, Inactivated
VAQTA has not been evaluated for its carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or its potential to impair fertility.
VAQTA
20.  Hepatitis A Inactivated and Hepatitis B (Recombinant) Vaccine
TWINRIX has not been evaluated for its carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility.
Twinrix
21.  Hepatitis B Vaccine (Recombinant)
RECOMBIVAX HB has not been evaluated for its carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or its potential to impair fertility.
Recombivax HB
22.  Hepatitis B Vaccine (Recombinant)
ENGERIX-B has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility.
Engerix-B
23.  Human Papillomavirus Quadrivalent (Types 6, 11, 16, 18) Vaccine, Recombinant
GARDASIL has not been evaluated for the potential to cause carcinogenicity or genotoxicity. GARDASIL administered to female rats at a dose of 120 mcg total protein, which is equivalent to the recommended human dose, had no effects on mating performance, fertility, or embryonic/fetal survival. The effect of GARDASIL on male fertility has been studied in male rats at an intramuscular dose of 0.5 mL/rat/occasion (120 mcg total protein which is equivalent to the recommended human dose). One group of male rats was administered GARDASIL once, 3 days prior to cohabitation, and a second group of male rats was administered GARDASIL three times, at 6 weeks, 3 weeks, and 3 days prior to cohabitation. There were no treatment-related effects on reproductive performance including fertility, sperm count, and sperm motility. There were no treatment-related gross or histomorphologic and weight changes on the testes.
Gardasil
24.  Human Papillomavirus 9-valent Vaccine, Recombinant
GARDASIL 9 has not been evaluated for the potential to cause carcinogenicity, genotoxicity or impairment of male fertility. GARDASIL 9 administered to female rats had no effects on fertility [see Pregnancy (8.1)].
Gardasil 9
25.  Human Papillomavirus Bivalent (Types 16, 18) Vaccine, Recombinant
CERVARIX has not been evaluated for its carcinogenic or mutagenic potential. Vaccination of female rats with CERVARIX, at doses shown to be significantly immunogenic in the rat, had no effect on fertility.
Cervarix
26.  Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine
Neither Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine nor AFLURIA has been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or for impairment of fertility.
No Trade Name
27.  Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine
Neither Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine Live, Intranasal nor FluMist have been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or potential to impair fertility.
No Trade Name
28.  Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine
Neither Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine nor FLULAVAL has been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility.
No Trade Name
29.  Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine
Neither FLUVIRIN nor the Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine have been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility.
No Trade Name
30.  Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine
Neither Fluzone vaccine nor Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine have been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility.
No Trade Name
31.  Influenza Virus Vaccine, H5N1 (for National Stockpile)
Influenza Virus Vaccine, H5N1, has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility.
No Trade Name
32.  Influenza A (H5N1) Virus Monovalent Vaccine, Adjuvanted
Influenza A (H5N1) Virus Monovalent Vaccine, Adjuvanted has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or male infertility in animals. Vaccination of female rats with Influenza A (H5N1) Virus Monovalent Vaccine, Adjuvanted had no effect on fertility [see 385 Pregnancy (8.1)].
No Trade Name
33.  Influenza Vaccine, Adjuvanted
FLUAD has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of male fertility in animals. FLUAD did not affect female fertility in a rabbit reproductive and developmental toxicity study.
FLUAD
34.  Influenza Vaccine
AFLURIA QUADRIVALENT has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or male infertility in animals. A developmental toxicity study conducted in rats vaccinated with AFLURIA (trivalent formulation) revealed no impact on female fertility (see Pregnancy [8.1]).
AFLURIA QUADRIVALENT
35.  Influenza Vaccine
FLUCELVAX QUADRIVALENT has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of male fertility in animals. Administration of Flucelvax vaccine (45 mcg HA/dose) did not affect female fertility in a rabbit reproductive and developmental toxicity study.
Flucelvax Quadrivalent
36.  Influenza Virus Vaccine
(Trivalent, Types A and B)

AFLURIA has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or male infertility in animals. A reproductive study of female rats vaccinated with AFLURIA revealed no impairment of fertility (see Pregnancy, 8.1).
Afluria
37.  Influenza Virus Vaccine
(Trivalent, Types A and B)

FLULAVAL has not been evaluated for carcinogenic, mutagenic potential, or male infertility in 15 animals. Vaccination of female rats with FLULAVAL had no effect on fertility [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1)].
FluLaval
38.  Influenza Vaccine, Live, Intranasal
(Trivalent, Types A and B)
FluMist Quadrivalent has not been evaluated for its carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or its potential to impair fertility.
FluMist
39.  Influenza Virus Vaccine
(Trivalent, Types A and B)

FLUARIX has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility.
Fluarix
40.  Influenza Virus Vaccine
(Trivalent, Types A and B)

FLUVIRIN® has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility.
Fluvirin
41.  Influenza Virus Vaccine
(Trivalent, Types A and B)

AGRIFLU has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of male fertility.
Agriflu
42.  Influenza Virus Vaccine
(Trivalent, Types A and B)

Fluzone has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or for impairment of fertility.
Fluzone High-Dose has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or for impairment of fertility.
Fluzone, Fluzone High-Dose and Fluzone Intradermal
43.  Influenza Virus Vaccine
(Trivalent, Types A and B)

FLUCELVAX has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of male fertility in animals. FLUCELVAX did not affect female fertility in a rabbit reproductive and developmental toxicity study.
Flucelvax
44.  Influenza Vaccine (Trivalent)
Flublok has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of male fertility in animals. A developmental toxicity study conducted in rats vaccinated with Flublok revealed no evidence of impaired female fertility (see Pregnancy [8.1]).
Flublok
45.  Influenza Vaccine (Quadrivalent)
Flublok Quadrivalent has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of male fertility in animals. A developmental toxicity study conducted in rats vaccinated with Flublok (trivalent formulation) revealed no evidence of impaired female fertility (see Pregnancy [8.1]).
Flublok Quadrivalent
46.  Influenza Vaccine,Live, Intranasal
(Quadrivalent, Types A and Types B)

FluMist Quadrivalent has not been evaluated for its carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or its potential to impair fertility.
FluMist Quadrivalent
47.  Influenza Virus Vaccine
(Quadrivalent, Types A and Types B)

FLUARIX QUADRIVALENT has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or male infertility in animals. Vaccination of female rats with FLUARIX QUADRIVALENT had no effect on fertility [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1)].
Fluarix Quadrivalent
48.  Influenza Virus Vaccine
(Quadrivalent, Types A and Types B)

Fluzone Quadrivalent has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential. A reproductive study of female rabbits vaccinated with Fluzone Quadrivalent was performed and revealed no evidence of impaired female fertility [see Pregnancy (8.1)].
Fluzone Quadrivalent has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential. A reproductive study of female rabbits vaccinated with Fluzone Quadrivalent was performed and revealed no evidence of impaired female fertility [see Pregnancy (8.1)].
For: Package Insert – Fluzone Quadrivalent – Southern Hemisphere formulation (PDF – 288KB)Section 13 omitted
Fluzone Quadrivalent
49.  Influenza Virus Vaccine
(Quadrivalent, Types A and Types B)

FLULAVAL QUADRIVALENT has not been evaluated for carcinogenic, mutagenic potential, or male infertility in animals. Vaccination of female rats with FLULAVAL QUADRIVALENT had no effect on fertility [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1)].
FluLaval
Quadrivalent
50.  Japanese Encephalitis Virus Vaccine, Inactivated, Adsorbed
IXIARO has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential. IXIARO was found to have no effect on fertility of female rats at intramuscular doses of up to 300-fold excess relative to the projected human dose (on a mg/kg basis) administered prior to and after mating [See Use in Specific Populations (8.1)]. The effect of IXIARO on male fertility has not been evaluated.
Ixiaro
51.  Japanese Encephalitis Virus Vaccine Inactivated
No studies have been performed to evaluate carcinogenicity, mutagenic potential, or impact on fertility.
JE-Vax
52.   Measles and Mumps Virus Vaccine, LiveM-M-VAX has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or potential to impair fertility. M-M-Vax
53.  Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Virus Vaccine, Live
M-M-R II has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or potential to impair fertility.
M-M-R II
54.  Measles, Mumps, Rubella and Varicella Virus Vaccine Live
ProQuad has not been evaluated for its carcinogenic, mutagenic, or teratogenic potential, or its potential to impair fertility.
ProQuad
55.  Meningococcal (Groups A, C, Y, and W-135) Oligosaccharide Diphtheria CRM197 Conjugate Vaccine
MENVEO has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of male fertility.
Menveo
56.  Meningococcal Groups C and Y and Haemophilus b Tetanus Toxoid Conjugate Vaccine
MENHIBRIX has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility.
MenHibrix
57.  Meningococcal (Groups A, C, Y and W-135) Polysaccharide Diphtheria Toxoid Conjugate Vaccine
Menactra has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of male fertility. A developmental animal toxicity study showed that Menactra had no effects on female fertility in mice [see Pregnancy (8.1) ].
Menactra
58.  Meningococcal Group B Vaccine
BEXSERO has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or impairment of male fertility.
BEXSERO
59.  Meningococcal Group B Vaccine
Trumenba has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility in males.
TRUMENBA
60.  Meningococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine, Groups A, C, Y and W-135 Combined
Menomune – A/C/Y/W-135 vaccine has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility.
Menomune-A/C/Y/W-135
61.  Plague Vaccine No trade name
62.  Pneumococcal Vaccine, Polyvalent— Section 13 omitted Pneumovax 23
63.  Pneumococcal 7-valent Conjugate Vaccine
(Diphtheria CRM197 Protein)
Prevnar® has not been evaluated for any carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or impairment of fertility.
Prevnar
64.  Pneumococcal 13-valent Conjugate Vaccine
(Diphtheria CRM197 Protein)
Prevnar 13 has not been evaluated for the potential to cause carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or impairment of male fertility. In a study in rabbits, no vaccine-related effects were found regarding reproductive performance including female fertility [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1)].
Prevnar 13
65.  Poliovirus Vaccine Inactivated (Human Diploid Cell) – No link Poliovax
66.  Poliovirus Vaccine Inactivated (Monkey Kidney Cell)
CARCINOGENESIS, MUTAGENESIS, IMPAIRMENT OF FERTILITY: Long-term studies in animals to evaluate carcinogenic potential or impairment of fertility have not been conducted.
IPOL
67.  Rabies Vaccine (found no information on carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, or impairment of fertility Imovax
68.  Rabies Vaccine
Long-term studies with RabAvert have not been conducted to assess the potential for carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, or impairment of fertility.
RabAvert
69.  Rabies Vaccine Adsorbed No Trade Name
70.  Rotavirus Vaccine, Live, Oral
ROTARIX has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility.
ROTARIX
71.  Rotavirus Vaccine, Live, Oral, Pentavalent
RotaTeq has not been evaluated for its carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or its potential to impair fertility.
RotaTeq
72.  Smallpox (Vaccinia) Vaccine, Live
Section 13 omitted
ACAM2000
73.  Tetanus & Diphtheria Toxoids Adsorbed for Adult Use
No studies have been performed with MassBiologics’ Td to evaluate carcinogenicity, mutagenic potential, or impairment of fertility.
No Trade Name
74.  Tetanus & Diphtheria Toxoids Adsorbed for Adult Use
TENIVAC vaccine has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility.
TENIVAC
75.  Tetanus Toxoid(Discontinued)
No studies have been performed to evaluate carcinogenicity, mutagenic potential, or impact on fertility.
No Trade Name
76.  Tetanus Toxoid Adsorbed
Diphtheria and Tetanus Toxoids Adsorbed has not been evaluated for carcinogenicity, mutagenic potential, or impairment of fertility.
No Trade Name
77.  Tetanus Toxoid, Reduced Diphtheria Toxoid and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine, Adsorbed
Adacel vaccine has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or impairment of fertility.
Adacel
78.  Tetanus Toxoid, Reduced Diphtheria Toxoid and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine, Adsorbed
BOOSTRIX has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility.
Boostrix
79.  Typhoid Vaccine Live Oral Ty21a
Long-term studies in animals with Vivotif have not been performed to evaluate carcinogenic potential, mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility.
Vivotif
80.  Typhoid Vi Polysaccharide Vaccine
Typhim Vi vaccine has not been evaluated for its carcinogenic potential, mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility.
TYPHIM Vi
81.  Varicella Virus Vaccine Live|
Section 13 is missing!
Pregnancy: Do not administer VARIVAX to females who are pregnant; the possible effects of the vaccine on fetal development are unknown. Pregnancy should be avoided for 3 months following vaccination with VARIVAX. (4.4, 8.1, 17) See 17 for PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION and
Varivax
82.  Yellow Fever Vaccine
YF-VAX has not been evaluated for its carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or its effect on fertility.
YF-Vax
83.  Zoster Vaccine, Live, (Oka/Merck)ZOSTAVAX has not been evaluated for its carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or its potential to impair fertility Zostavax

VACCINE SECTION 13

This entry was posted on February 14, 2019, 11:00 am and is filed under forced sterilizationforced sterilization of school childrenFORCED VACCINATIONS. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

This website contains my personal opinion and experience based on my own research from scientific writings, internet research and interviews with doctors and scientists all over the world. Do not take this website, links or documents contained herein as a personal, medical or legal advice of any kind. For legal advice, please consult with your attorney. Consult your medical doctor or primary care physician for advice regarding your health and your children’s health and nothing contained on this website is intended to provide or be a substitute for medical, legal or other professional advice. The reading or use of this information is at your own risk. THE TRUTH WILL STAND ON ITS OWN AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE-SEEK IT AT ALL COSTS!

Please follow and like us:

9 thoughts on “THE HELLISH REALITY AND TRUTH ABOUT VACCINES HIDDEN IN PLAIN VIEW-SECTION 13 OF THE VACCINE INSERTS”

  1. Pingback: My Homepage
  2. I would say Jim Stone is on target here:

    TIFFANY DOVER, THE NURSE WHO PASSED OUT AFTER THE CORONAVIRUS SHOT, IS DEAD. THEY WILL NEVER ADMIT THIS, BUT THE INFORMATION THAT SUPPORTS THIS 100 PERCENT IS AT THE END OF THIS REPORT.
    CORONA VAX CREATING HIGH NUMBERS OF SEVERE ADVERSE REACTIONS
    1,200 times higher than the usual number of reported adverse reactions to be exact.
    Maybe the numbers the CDC is reporting are real, but maybe not. That said, they are high anyway, with over 3 percent of vaccinations getting reported for bad side effects.
    Three percent does not sound like a lot, until you consider The link is legit. It is a source used by the CDC.

    Here is the summary of what is at the link: About 25 percent of vaccines cause an adverse reaction (a number that is known via survey, stats, and medical observation). These can be mild reactions up to severe. Of that 25 percent, one percent gets reported. The reason is because everyday people do not know who to report adverse reactions to, and the fact that doctors tend to be extremely uncooperative with patients and adverse vaccine reactions, so they don’t report it either.

    So let’s math this out:
    25 percent of people have an adverse reaction to vaccines in one form or another. Of that 25 percent, only 1 percent gets a report in. So adverse reactions to vaccines are subsequently recorded at a rate of 0.0025% on average, for all vaccines across the board. This is basically how the report, which is an official source, sums it up. I’ll put that differently so this is very clear:

    It is known that 25 percent of vaccinations have an adverse reaction, ranging from mild to severe. That’s 25 out of 100 people. (0.25) Out of that 25 people, there is only a 25 percent chance that ONE (1) of those people will report something bad happened. One percent of .25 is 0.0025. Take .25 on a calculator and multiply it by 1 percent.

    If the corona vax gets a 3 percent adverse reaction reporting rate, you have to turn that 0.0025 into a 0.003 and then shift it to the left THREE WHOLE DIGITS. The reactions must be severe enough for people to report at a far higher rate than usual, 3 percent of ALL RECIPIENTS, rather than 1 percent of “adverse reactions” reported means the coronavax has to be about 1,200 times as bad as other vaccines.

    I’d like to ask a question here –

    If LOTS of people get wiped out by the flu shot, and only 1 percent of 25 percent report it, how freaking bad does the Corona vax have to be to get THREE WHOLE PERCENT of the population to report it? Obviously bad enough to have LOTS of people dropping dead, just like nurse Tiffany Dover who fell out live on TV, with no updates to her condition other than a possible hoax obituary, and obvious trolls saying she’s OK. Maybe Snopes debunked it too, and who would trust the MSM other than an intellectual drooler?

    Here is the official MSM cover story for her passing out:

    “After recovering from fainting, she explained that she has a condition calledVasovagal Syncope, which makes her faint whenever she feels pain, sees needles, feels intense heat, stands for too long or is dehydrated. She did not explain why she volunteered to get the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine live on TV despite her condition.

    HERE IS MY RESPONSE TO THAT:
    If you want to play the public, BAFFLE THEM WITH BULLSHIT and then put a BIG NAME on it. Oh gosh, she has “Vasovagal Syncope”. GET THIS: THE HEAD NURSE, THE MOST IMPORTANT ONE AT A MAJOR HOSPITAL, HAS A CONDITION THAT CAUSES HER TO FAINT WHEN SHE SEES NEEDLES.

    THAT’S RIGHT: THE HEAD NURSE FAINTS WHEN SHE SEES NEEDLES. THAT’S THE MOST F***ED UP LIE THEY COULD HAVE EVER TOLD TO COVER UP THIS OBVIOUS DEATH.
    They claim she went on air explaining this afterward, only she did not. No such video exists anywhere and you can safely bet they’d blow it to the moon if it did exist. They’d be desperate to do ANYTHING, including film her in a hospital bed to prove she’s not dead, because they admitted beforehand this vaccine could put people in bed (so they are covered by that) yet there is NOTHING. They just expect you to believe Snopes and endless TEXT BASED denials. Let’s see her out jogging with today’s paper.

    Alinsky tactic: Cover up a lie by re-enforcing it with BIG WORDS. “Vasovagal Syncope” would fit that bill!

    Attachment

    moderated
    1. https://youtu.be/5cVpIUQjXH0
      https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=ABWXM71OGK9O
      Hard to believe that this nurse could suffer her condition as she describes it, and still be a nurse, let alone volunteer to get the vaccine needle on camera. If her story is true, she is a liability and she would know she is, and even her superiors would know she is. “Vasovagal Syncope” sure sounds like a cover story for her very real bad reaction to the vaccine.

      My dad who just turned 90 had the ‘regular’ flu vaccine earlier this year, and had a bad reaction. He ended up in the hospital the next day. The doctor confirmed it was a reaction to the vaccine. Now he says, and our family insists, that neither he nor my mother will get the covid vaccine.

      They both still insist that the vaccine is “the only way we can open up again.” Like a lot of people, the unspoken thing for my parents is, “they can’t keep us locked down after the vaccine!” This is exactly the response intended by the perpetrators of the plandemic in their vaccine roll-out phase.

      moderated
  3. This is a wonderful simplification of the virus isolation process via a conversation twixt Rappoport and Dr. Tom Cowan. If you still believe this virus exists, this will be the proof you will need to understand IT DOES NOT!
    It’s a scam. It’s a fake. It’s the most insidious psyop ever pulled off on the population of the world.
    AND, taking it a step further…how can anyone possibly make a vaccination for something that has never been proved to exist? We are all being played for fools. I would also ask, as a semi-informed layman….Has ANY virus ever been isolated? If your answer is yes, show me the proof.

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/bwccxrH4tDXW/

    moderated
  4. PLEASE, DO NOT MISS THAT VID I POSTED AT 10:25 AM…..It’s devastating, honest, human and it’s also a CALL TO REVOLUTION. As much as I support Trump, whatever strategy he is pursuing in regard to this death jab is WRONG….DEAD F’ING WRONG. JUST ONE PERSONS DEATH PROVES IT.
    I pray he has a good excuse, but right now I doubt it.
    This is outrageous and cannot be tolerated. Get armed and get ready. Any possibility of justice now seems to be something of the past. Stop complaining, stop talking and start preparing to save your own lives and those of your loved ones.

    moderated
  5. If there are any sane beings left on this earth, this ‘vid vax will be the biggest bust of all time.
    That’s a BIG IF. Is it not ashame that the Fauci/Gates devil duo will be SO disappointed?
    Unfortunately, those in nursing homes (read prisons of convenience) have little choice. This is simple genocide of the elderly. Gates MUST HANG! Make it so!

    moderated

Leave a Reply