Jim Fetzer, Joe Biden vs. Debate “Biden”: Just Not the Same Guy

Jim Fetzer 

Having dealt extensively with body doubles (in the case of Paul McCartney and of Hillary Clinton, for example), it was probably easier for me to notice that the guy who debated Donald Trump on the national stage (twice, in fact, the second time in Nashville, TN) was not Joe Biden than for most of the public. Having made that observation, however, it became incumbent upon me to bring the matter to the attention of the appropriate authorities, where a submission has been made to the FBI Field Office in Nashville by a California attorney of note with support from my friend and colleague, Scott Bennett, who, like myself, is a former commissioned officer of the US military (Scott, Army; me, Marine Corps).


As I understand the matter, the fraud involved here violates 52 USC 30102 on the organization of political committees, including the following:
(e) Principal and additional campaign committees; designations, status of candidate, authorized committees, etc.
(1) Each candidate for Federal office (other than the nominee for the office of Vice President) shall designate in writing a political committee in accordance with paragraph (3) to serve as the principal campaign committee of such candidate. Such designation shall be made no later than 15 days after becoming a candidate. A candidate may designate additional political committees in accordance with paragraph (3) to serve as authorized committees of such candidate. Such designation shall be in writing and filed with the principal campaign committee of such candidate in accordance with subsection (f)(1).
(2) Any candidate described in paragraph (1) who receives a contribution, or any loan for use in connection with the campaign of such candidate for election, or makes a disbursement in connection with such campaign, shall be considered, for purposes of this Act, as having received the contribution or loan, or as having made the disbursement, as the case may be, as an agent of the authorized committee or committees of such candidate.

Be that as it may, the American people are entitled to know that the so-called Democratic Party has been perpetrating a fraud upon the public, where their designated candidate, Joe Biden, appears to be in the stages of Parkinson’s Disease, including the loss of his cognitive abilities, where the anti-dementia medication he is taking has the unfortunate side effect of incontinence, such that he could not participate in a public debate with his opponent, Donald Trump, for 90 minutes without changing his adult diaper. For that reason, it appears, the DNC resorted to “Plan B”, which was to use an actor who strongly resembles Joe Biden in his place. This has been done without notice to the American people and clearly constitutes a form of campaign fraud upon the public, which I substantiate as follows:


I, James H. Fetzer, Ph.D., declare and state as follows:

  1. I have first-hand knowledge of the fact set forth hereinafter, or, at the least, based on the information stated herein, I have a good faith belief that the following is true and correct.
  1. I am 79 years old.  My residence address is 800 Violet Lane, Oregon, WI 53575. My telephone number is (608) 835-2707 and my email address is jfetzer@d.umn.edu.
  1. I watched the Presidential debates, and have studied the photographs, audio recordings, and visual information regarding the debates involving President Donald Trump and former Vice-President Joe Biden, which occurred on 22 October 2020 at Belmont University, 1900 Belmont Avenue, in Nashville, Tennessee 37212.
  1.   I am a former military office, who resigned his commission as a Captain, USMC, in 1966 to enter graduate school and earn a Ph.D. in the history and the philosophy of science, and a McKnight University Professor Emeritus of Philosophy on the Duluth Campus of the University of Minnesota, from which I retired in June 2006 after a 35-year career in higher education.
  1.   I have reason to believe that the person who appeared to debate President Trump was not the real Joe Biden, but another person (aka a “body double”). Comparing original photographs, and reviewing the debates several times, I have noticed that Joe Biden has free ear lobes, not attached ears, like his body double; that Joe Biden has a smooth chin, not a cleft chin, like his body double; and that Joe Biden also has a wider cranium than his body double.  Others, including myself, noticed that Joe Biden has blue eyes while his body double has brown. (See Exhibits A-F for photo comparisons.)
  1. Based upon the foregoing—and other indications of less significance, such as that Joe Biden ties his tie with a double Windsor, but his body double only a single Windsor–I believe that the person appearing during the Presidential debates as Joe Biden was, in fact, an impostor (a body double) and not the former Vice-President of the United States of America.
  1. If so, then I believe a great fraud has taken place over the nation’s airways to deceive the American people about the appearance, health and cognitive competence of the Democratic Party candidate for President of the United States; and that such inconsistencies may justify an investigation and/or certification of the former Vice-President’s appearance and attendance.
  1.  As far as the voice, I would defer to the analysis done by the FBI regional office in Nashville, Tennessee; but I understand that voice morphing technology has advanced to the point that even a body double can project a voice that is indistinguishable from that of the impersonated party.
  1.  I shall make myself available to discuss this matter at any time, and would encourage, recommend and implore the Federal Bureau of Investigation to conduct any other measurable analytics to ascertain and determine whether or not Joe Biden, the former Vice President of the United States, or an impostor (a body double) appeared in his stead at the first and second Presidential debates, held on 29 September 2020 and on 22 October 2020, respectively.

I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Tennessee that, based on a good faith belief and information, the foregoing is correct and true.

Further Affiant Saith Not.

/s/ James H. Fetzer, Ph.D.

James H. Fetzer, Ph.D.

Executed this 29th day of October 2020, at Oregon, WI 53575.

EXHIBIT A: Joe Biden vs. Debate “Biden”

Joe Biden has pendant ear lobes, his double does not. Biden has a smoother chin, his double strongly dimpled. Biden has a wider cranium, his double a narrower. His double appears to be a more diminutive version.

EXHIBIT B: They have different colored eyes

James Woods was the first to observe that the double has brown eyes, while Biden’s eyes are blue.

EXHIBIT C: These differences are repeatedly manifest

Thousands upon thousands of additional examples are readily available on the internet via a search.

EXHIBIT D: Some photos leave no room for doubt

It turns out that ears cannot be surgically altered and are just as distinctive as fingerprints.

EXHIBIT E: Body language reinforces their difference

The body double and Jill stand apart, not close together, where she is not beaming but appears to be distressed and he is not smiling, which is one of Joe Biden’s distinctive behaviors

EXHIBIT F: Body language likewise leaves no doubt

With the double, she looks grim, he is not smiling, and they are remain physically separated. She is not reacting the same way because this is not her husband. It would be easy to find a huge number of photos on-line, because they are using the double a lot.


The difference in signatures seems to me to be decisive. This was observed by a pharmacist, who has to compare signatures to make sure that imposters are not acquiring drugs illegally, where the well-known and highly respected Gateway Pundit published his findings on 2 February 2021:

As a sometime student of graphology, I would suggest this cannot possibly be one and the same guy, where they took the occasion of the first Presidential Debate to effect the substitution, just as Hillary used subs during her debates with Donald Trump (as well as on a wide-range of other occasions, as I explain in “Fake News: Issues of Identity” (2 August 2020), which I highly recommend.



Please follow and like us:

23 thoughts on “Jim Fetzer, Joe Biden vs. Debate “Biden”: Just Not the Same Guy”

  1. I’m catching up on the BitChute shows, but I had to write in and express how sick and tired I am of hearing Fetzer insist, every time the presidential debates were brought up, that this was a body double, and states it, ad nauseam, with such conviction as though it’s fact. The only thing I agree with is that the tie in the debate may be a single windsor. But what he repeatedly states in his shows as though it were a script, as well as what is portrayed in this article, is provably wrong. It’s clear he hasn’t done how OWN research on this, and if he had, which isn’t hard to do, he would have seen that the points he’s put forth here don’t hold water.

    I’ve been listening to Fetzer for years through his different show incarnations, and I don’t think he’s out to deceive anyone. I think he believes what he says, but I’ve noticed that with certain things conspiratorial, especially if it’s against the Democrats, he just readily believes it. Hearing about this body double fascinated me, so instead of just blindly believing Fetzer, I set out to do my own research on this. Despite all of the points he made in this article, none of them stand up, except for the second weakest argument being the single windsor (the body language while with his wife being THE weakest argument). Come on, Jim; rather than just listening to James Woods, do your own research.

    1. This is a baseless critique. They have different eye color, different ears, different shapes of skull. A pharmacist familiar with signature verification observed that the signatures of the new “Bide” are complete different than of the “old”. And he began using his left hand to sign but had to be changed to the right (because Joe was right-handed but the double left). Indeed, on the contrary, the body language turns out to be exceptionally telling, since Jill was always beaming in the company of the real Joe, but separates herself from the fake. I don’t understand how anyone, given this evidence, could dispute these facts. Something IS wrong here, but it’s not with me.

      1. Jim, I can see why you’d think my argument was baseless. To tell you the truth, with the article being so old, I didn’t expect my response to be seen by anyone, so I didn’t want to get into it too much. Let me address the two strongest arguments regarding the “fake” Biden:

        1. Eye color: I watched the debate. If he had brown eyes, and given the distance of the camera, it would be very difficult to discern any pupil. During the debates, and especially at those points where he opened his eyes wide, you clearly see his pupils as distinguished from his iris. Yes, it’s a darker hue of blue, but clearly not the brown as you show in your Exhibit B, which seems to be fake coloring. Please see my attachment (Biden Vs Fiden) which illustrates everything I’m talking about here.

        2. Ears: You always mention his ears (plural). Only his right ear has lost its pendant lobe. This is due to an obvious face lift he had before his 2020 campaign. My attachment shows an image of his right, and an extreme closeup of his left where you can clearly see the scar tissue on the anterior of the lobes left behind as a result of his cosmetic surgery. The left ear is a better picture, but the pic of his right where the surgeons apparently screwed up and didn’t attach his lobe back properly and left it how we now see it, hopefully shows up close enough to also show the scar tissue.

        Believe me, I’m not a Biden fan. I’m just all about the truth, and for me, the truth points in the direction of this man indeed being Biden and not some body double. I’m curious to get your thoughts on this.


      2. Well, I am open to new evidence and alternative hypotheses and could be convinced that I am wrong, but the body-language difference and the difference in their signatures (which I thought I had also included here, but obviously not) are further indications this is not the same guy. Please search for the pharmacist who observed that the “President” and the “Senator” have completely different signatures, which (in my opinion) is decisive proof that they are not the same guy. On the other hand, the cognitive decline of this guy we see on TV appears consistent with the “old Biden”. Let me see if I can track down the signature comparison. Found it on Gateway Pundit: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/odd-joe-bidens-signature-latest-official-documents-raising-eyebrows/ Here’s a link to the signature comparison: http://jamesfetzer.org/wp-content/uploads/Signatures-not-the-same.jpg which I have now added to the original article. Thanks for raising the issue again.

      3. Thanks for your continued research, and all your research you’ve done over the years; as well as your quick responses. Too bad the attached picture on my previous post came in so small and is not able to be blown up (or at least I couldn’t blow it up) in order to see his blue eyes, especially from the first debate (striped tie), and the scar tissue in front of his lobes from his obvious facelift, better seen at the following link. (The facelift may also explain why his head shape appears different).

        To me, physical attributes are more solid proof that it’s the same guy than how his tie appears to be tied, whether his wife is smiling or not, or his signature, which I agree, is indeed odd that his signature has changed so drastically. I suppose we’ll just have to agree to disagree on this one. With that, keep fighting the good fight. Thanks again.


  2. Pingback: Jim Fetzer, Joe Biden vs. Debate “Biden”: Just Not the Same Guy – @Adrenogate | Fringe Culture
  3. Pingback: SOMETHING’S BREWING! Dan Scavino Posts Series of Tweets After Raucous Oval Office Meeting – Trump Is Ready to Take Action – @Adrenogate | Fringe Culture
  4. Pingback: Biden a bien un sosie ! Cf. le débat et le coup du pied cassé conclu par une sortie si rapide de l’hôpital. Par le chercheur américain Jim Fetzer. – nicolasbonnal.com
  5. Pingback: Jim Fetzer, The Real Joe Biden vs. The Actor "Joe Biden" - James Fetzer
  6. Pingback: Today’s Show: Guest host James Fetzer w/ guests James McCanney & Scott Bennett – The Power Hour
  7. Pingback: Jim Fetzer, Joe Biden vs. Debate “Biden”: Just Not the Same Guy - TGR Intelligence Report
  8. I have been posting the following on various sites , literally for years, and not once had a response,
    in particular regarding the “paul is dead” bollocks….

    as far as I’m aware everyone has a unique “voice print” as distinctive as a fingerprint,
    so it should be quite easy, particularly in the case of Paul M, to simply compare voiceprints from before and after recordings, of which are thousands and thousands of examples of both singing and speaking.
    yet no one ever does this, or even acknowleges the technology exists!
    I have commented mentioning this over about 15 years now,
    never had a reply, not once ever from anyone,
    and I’m not holding my breath here either.

  9. Pingback: Jim Fetzer, Joe Biden vs. Debate “Biden”: Just Not the Same Guy |
  10. Your point echoes those of others on the Internet–the evidence for different earlobes is very persuasive.


    But it is also possible that this was the result of cosmetic facial surgery:

    I only saw the first debate in its entirety, and it was obvious that Biden in that forum was dysnomic (struggling to find words), dysphasic (struggling to pronounce words), suffering from mental blocks, and way, way off in some of his statements/numbers. These have been characteristic of his public appearances ever since he began the run for the presidency, although he did seem to perform better than in many other occasions.

  11. Wow, the body double must have had very extensive training. He even kisses the wife on several occasions and she goes along with the scam. They even walk hand in hand. One wonders what the budget is for the fraud….it may be in the millions of dollars. Why hasn’t the media said anything about this hoaxing? You would think that someone would have loudly said…..”Hey, that’s not the ”Joe” we all know.”

    1. James McCanney just wrote “guy on the right has had plastic surgery see the eyes pulled up and out”. Which makes excellent sense. They made him look more like Joe, just as they made Billy Shears look more like Paul McCartney. (See the video linked at start.)

    2. Of course it’s millions. And Hillary has 8! It’s an indicator of just how much money these people steal.

      With respect to the media, this just reinforces how controlled they are. It truly is mind blowing.

  12. Very good work – thanks. The nose looks noticeably different too. What the hell kind of
    world are we living in anyway ?!! Lends credence to the idea it’s a simulation !

  13. This is fascinating stuff, Jim. You certainly make a persuading case. You should found a study group, who out of shear interest and concern for the United States would at their own will dig into this, and perhaps find other productions where this actor has participated. I must say that his grin — which he shows quite often these days — is very well executed,- it looks like the real thing. I notice some kind of blamage on his right chin next to his ear, which suggest some kind of old injury/surgery.

    I suppose you are familiar with Lieutenant General Thomas McInerney
    United States Air Force (Retired), who has impeccable credentials as the man who lead the attack on Libya in 1986 from the UK, and was third in command in the US Airforce. Martin Armstrong gave us this video on Election Day: https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/politics/the-cia-ability-to-hack-the-vote/
    Here is my notes taken when I watched the video, spelling of this Mary Finning girl is probably not correct. As you can see it is jam-packed with intriguing information, which would be obvious to include in next weeks TvNI-show. Synopsis: The CIA has the ability to shift votes electronically, and McInervey tells us that theu have used it in elections abroad (I would like to now which), and in the US Presidential election in Florida in 2012. Can you chip in, and tell us about your observations concerning Florida in 2012? Is it the old Broward-canard which is involved again?

    American Report
    Mary Finning
    Dennis Montgomery
    inventor of Scorecard
    Hammer,- Sigint program NSA game up with it
    overtaken by the CIA during the Obama admin.
    The Obama administration tooked this system and added the applikation ‘Scorecard’ and used it during the 2012 election in Florida, ‘so both Obama and Biden are very familiar with it’.

    Scorecard changes votes at a certain point in the voting stream.
    Was used in the primaries to get Bernie out.
    It will be used in Pennsylvania changing 3% of the vote.

    Obama administration took it with them out
    the DNC tried to use it during the 2016 election.

    Lieutenant General Thomas McInerney
    United States Air Force (Retired)
    broke the story in March 2017
    ‘about what they were doing on the Russian Hoax’.


Leave a Reply