Edward Hendrie, Vaccines Cause Autism and Allergies

Edward Hendrie

[Editor’s note: For additional research supporting Edward Hendrie’s report, check out Dr. Alan Palmer, Truth Will Prevail (updated 15 August 2019)].

Vinu Arumugham, in an article written for the Journal of Developing Drugs, reveals a fact that has been hidden from the general public, and it seems also to be hidden from medical practitioners. “Nobel Laureate Charles Richet demonstrated over a hundred years ago that injecting a protein into animals or humans causes immune system sensitization to that protein.”

What does that mean for the person receiving the vaccine? Arumugham explains that “[s]ubsequent exposure to the protein can result in allergic reactions or anaphylaxis.” Thus, food proteins injected into a person through a vaccine can have the effect of causing a subsequent allergic reaction by that person who subsequently eats food that contains the food proteins in the vaccine. That means that vaccines can cause food allergies.

Shockingly, that fact regarding vaccine-induced allergies has been known by the scientific community for more than one hundred years, but the pharmaceutical companies, who largely fund the medical schools, keep physicians, most notably pediatricians, in the dark about it. Indeed, medical doctors are only given a few hours of instruction on vaccines during medical school. Physicians are ill-equipped by their medical training to assess the safety of vaccines. That ignorance is by design.

Arumugham reveals that this scientific fact of vaccine-induced allergies “has since been demonstrated over and over again in humans and animal models.”

Vaccines are the source of the explosion in food allergies in the United States. Indeed, there are more than 15 million Americans who suffer from life-threatening food allergies. Arumugham reveals how this happens.

Vaccines contain adjuvants such as pertussis toxins and aluminum compounds that also bias towards allergy. Adjuvants also increase the immunogenicity of injected food proteins. This combination of atopic children and food protein injection along with adjuvants contributes to millions developing life-threatening food allergies.

Vaccines contain food proteins derived from chicken eggs, casein, gelatin, soy, agar, etc. Those ingredients sound innocent enough. And if they were eaten they would not be harmful, and indeed would be nutritious. But when those same ingredients are injected into a human body, in a significant number of cases, they will cause a person to develop an allergic reaction or even anaphylaxis to that food protein.

Polysorbate 80 is also used in vaccines as a surfactant that allows the antigen to evenly dissolve in the excipient vaccine ingredients. Polysorbate 80 is manufacture from food sources such as coconut, palm, sunflower, tapioca, wheat, corn, etc. That sounds safe enough, but Arumugham explains that it is impossible to guarantee that these products from which the polysorbate 80 is derived do not contain residual allergen proteins.

Most of what is contained in vaccines fall into the category of inactive ingredients. These inactive ingredients are called excipient ingredients. The excipient ingredients are the carrier for the active ingredient, which is called the antigen. The antigen is a killed or weakened virus or bacteria that is supposed to induce the immune response from the body after the vaccine is injected. The U.S. Center for Disease Control (CDC) in a February 2020 publication titled Vaccine Exipient Summary, listed excipient ingredients according to their function into six categories. The CDC stated:

Some excipients are added to a vaccine for a specific purpose. These include:
Preservatives, to prevent contamination. For example, thimerosal.
Adjuvants, to help stimulate a stronger immune response. For example, aluminum salts.
Stabilizers, to keep the vaccine potent during transportation and storage. For example, sugars or gelatin.

Others are residual trace amounts of materials that were used during the manufacturing process and removed. These can include:
Cell culture materials, used to grow the vaccine antigens. For example, egg protein, various culture media.
Inactivating ingredients, used to kill viruses or inactivate toxins. For example, formaldehyde.
Antibiotics, used to prevent contamination by bacteria. For example, neomycin.

Please understand that the CDC does not actually test the vaccines to determine what ingredients are contained in the vaccines. The CDC simply takes the vaccine manufacturers at their word and republishes the ingredients found in the vaccine package insert.

Notice that thimerosal is listed as a preservative. Thimerosal (which contains mercury) has been identified as an ingredient in childhood vaccines that causes autism in children. The thimerosal-autism connection has been the focus of controversy. Some scientific studies have alleged that thimerosal does not cause autism.

On or about 1999, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) determined that mercury in vaccines, in the form of thimerosal, exceeded FDA guidelines for mercury exposure. The mercury safety standards were determined by measuring methylmercury. But the mercury in thimerosal metabolizes in the body as ethylmercury. The FDA had no safety guidelines for ethylmercury. The FDA did not know what to do so, they correctly required vaccine companies to reduce or eliminate the use of thimerosal in vaccines.

By the way, the CDC identifies thimerosal as a preservative that is still being used in vaccines. While thimerosal has been removed from childhood vaccines, according to the CDC, it remains an ingredient in influenza and tetanus and diptheria vaccines.

But since the thimerosal (and its appended mercury) has been removed from childhood vaccines, the acceleration in autism has continued.  It seems that the acceleration in autism is correlated to the bombardment of young children with more than 23 CDC recommended vaccinations before the child reaches 15 months old.

A recent study involving 666 children that compared 405 vaccinated children with 261 unvaccinated children revealed that vaccinated children had 4.7 times greater diagnoses of autism.

That study raised a furor among the powerful pharmaceutical companies and allied interests. They took immediate action to force the Frontiers in Public Health Journal to retract publication of the study. It was republished in the Journal of Translational Science but similar pressure was brought on that journal and it subsequently also retracted publication of the study. It is interesting to note that those who denigrate that study never discuss the details of the study. They limit their discussion to general allegations of bias, with no specifics. Indeed, they cannot allow the information in the study to be generally known. The study can be downloaded from the link provided below. See also the study by Dr. Andrew Wakefield that linked vaccines to autism that was retracted by the Lancet.

You will never hear of a study that alleges that there is no connection between vaccination and autism suddenly withdrawn from publication. Indeed, when you look at the studies closely they studiously limit their study to only the MMR vaccine. Often they are comparing groups where the unvaccinated group has actually received other vaccines, it is just that they did not receive the MMR vaccine. And so the results are announced that the study shows that the MMR vaccine does not cause autism because the rates of autism are the same as for the non-MMR group.

For example, in the largest study of its kind, researchers in Denmark compared a group of 625,842 vaccinated children with 31,619 unvaccinated children. The unvaccinated children were those that had not received the MMR vaccination. Whereas the vaccinated children had received the MMR vaccination. They concluded that the MMR vaccine did not cause any appreciable difference in the rate of autism between the groups. That is how it was portrayed to the public. But let us look at that study a little closer.

The problem is that the unvaccinated group was not truly unvaccinated. 26,890 of the 31,619 children in the “unvaccinated” group received other vaccinations. Thus, more than 85% of the children that were labeled as unvaccinated actually received vaccinations. They all received the diptheria, acellular pertussis, tetanus, inactivated poliovirus, and Haemophilus influenza type b vaccines.  Any one of those vaccines could cause an increase in autism in the mislabelled “unvaccinated” group. And certainly, the cumulative effect of those seriatim vaccinations on a young child could be devastating to a young child’s undeveloped immune system. The only vaccine missed by the unvaccinated group was the MMR vaccine. That fact was not revealed to the general public in the press releases. One must read the study and uncover the obscure table buried in it that reveals the truth that the study was a sham.

Table of Population Characteristics in the Denmark MMR Vaccine Study

The Denmark study authors concluded:

The study strongly supports that MMR vaccination does not increase the risk for autism, does not trigger autism in susceptible children, and is not associated with clustering of autism cases after vaccination.

That conclusion in the Denmark study can be likened to a study of the intoxicating properties of rum. In the rum study, we will have a person consume a shot of vodka, a shot of whiskey, a shot of gin, a shot of tequila, and a shot of rum and another person consume all of those shots but not the shot of rum. Both persons end up drunk and so we can then announce that because both persons got drunk, rum is not an intoxicating liquor. Those are the kinds of shenanigans being pulled by “scientists” portraying dangerous vaccines as safe to the public.

And so the non-MMR group, being not truly an unvaccinated group, is presenting a higher autism number than would be the case for a truly unvaccinated group. When looking at a study that truly compares a vaccinated group vs. an unvaccinated group the results are significant. The recent study cited above that compared truly unvaccinated children with vaccinated children revealed that vaccinated children had 4.7 times greater diagnoses of autism.

There are synergistic effects of the vaccine ingredients. Vaccines contain adjuvants that are designed to stimulate the immune response to the antigen in the vaccine. A common adjuvant is aluminum.

Indeed, the CDC lists aluminum, aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate, aluminum sulfate, or aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate as ingredients in 27 vaccines, including some childhood vaccines.

Aluminum is a dangerous neurotoxin and carcinogen. Research has established that “[t]he adverse neurologic, hematopoietic, skeletal, respiratory, immunologic, and other effects associated with excessive aluminum (Al) exposures are well known.”

Research has proven that the neurological effects of aluminum include “impairment on neurobehavioral tests for psychomotor and cognitive performance and an increased incidence of subjective neurological symptoms.”

Indeed, “studies clearly identify the nervous system as the most sensitive target of aluminum toxicity.”

In studies involving “intramuscular administration of aluminum hydroxide or aluminum phosphate vaccine adjuvants in rabbits, increased levels of aluminum were found in the kidney, spleen, liver, heart, lymph nodes, and brain (in decreasing order of aluminum concentration).”

The aluminum is put in the vaccine to act as an adjuvant, which stimulates the immune response from the body. When the aluminum is injected along with the food proteins, it not only increases the immunogenicity (immune response) to the antigen, but it also increases the immune response to the food proteins in the vaccine.

A vaccine is designed only to have the body’s immune system respond to the antigen and not the other ingredients that make up the excipient in the vaccine. But that is not what happens. Instead, there is a concomitant immune response to the food protein in the excipient. The food protein is supposed to be an inactive ingredient, but it suddenly becomes an active ingredient when the adjuvant stimulates that immune response in the body. The body then treats the food protein as an invader that invites a response from the immune system. This is manifested in an allergic response when the food protein is later eaten by the vaccinated person. Not all allergies rise to the level of anaphylaxis. Most allergic reactions fall into the category of sensitization. But the bottom line is that the epidemic of food and other allergies, whether anaphylaxis or sensitization, is being caused by vaccines.

It is not simply conjecture that vaccines cause allergies. In one study comparing vaccinated children with unvaccinated children, it was found that vaccinated children were significantly more likely than the unvaccinated to have been diagnosed with allergies.

Arumugham discovered that “there are no specifications limiting allergen content in vaccines approved for use in the United States.” What does that mean for vaccine patients? It means that no safe level has been established for any allergens contained in vaccines. Those who make vaccine excipients such as sorbitol and Polysorbate 80 are not limited in any way by government regulations as to the residual allergens contained in their injectable grade products. Arumugham made the disturbing discovery that “[s]ince there are no limits, suppliers do not test for allergens in production. Further, residual allergens that may be present in the excipients are not even listed in the vaccine package inserts.” Thus, there is no way for a doctor to know all of the excipient ingredients that are in the vaccine that is being injected into his patient.  The doctor (and the patient) are literally flying blind. Each new vaccine injection poses a risk of the patient developing food or other allergies.

For more information on the dangers of vaccines visit:

Children’s Medical Safety Research Institute

Age of Autism

Children’s Health Defense

Please follow and like us:

34 thoughts on “Edward Hendrie, Vaccines Cause Autism and Allergies”

  1. And I love that Fetzer can’t crucify the parents of the Sandy Hook victims so he’s moved on to vaccine denial, and HCQ nonsense. Why didn’t HCQ work in the several RCTs is was tried in? Lemme answer my own Q: CONSPIRACY!

    But do you have evidence that anyone conspired to alter the results of the HCQ trials? Of course not! But then again, you people don’t know what evidence is or how to evaluate it, so there’s that.

    moderated
    1. Who is this guy? Wearing out his welcome just as he enters the door. Did he miss the blog by Catherine Austin Fitts? She explained that it appears to be the additives that are making the difference to autism. So if we don’t have everything just right from the beginning, we are a lost cause? I am sorry, but I am not impressed. Writes like a troll, acts like a troll. What else could he be? And apparently he can’t read, either, because the appeal of my case demarcates a dozen or more major defects in how it was handled by the court. RIDICULOUS! They don’t make a fuss over those who get things WRONG.

    2. There were no Sandy Hook ”victims”. There were NO deaths at that school. It was a hoax about gun control. Obama was deeply involved in it.

      File photo: Obama posing with some of the fake victims of Sandy Hook. This was moments after the fraud Memorial Service and Obama can’t stop laughing.

      brso4? Another troll….we’ve seen many here before.

      Attachment

      moderated
  2. Just a Gish Gallup of BS. The Danish study, e.g. was only looking at MMR because you a-holes said that it causes autism LOL. Now you’re unhappy because the non-MMR vaccinated kids had other vaccines. Changing the goal posts, as always. And it was not misrepresented to the public. The NAME of the study is “Measles, Mumps, Rubella Vaccination and Autism” for Chrissakes. So the FIRST piece of “evidence” you present, when you actually read on, is just a lie, made clear by the TITLE OF THE PAPER! Just lie after lie after lie. You guys are the WORST.

    moderated
  3. https://youtu.be/zDKWRRnS-BQ
    Robert F. Kennedy Jr. disavows need for individuals to change behavior
    September 29, 2014 By Rod Adams

    FacebookTwitterRedditBufferEmail
    During the march held in New York City on September 21, PJTV reporter Michelle Fields spoke with Robert F. Kennedy about his plans to change his personal consumption habits. The good news is that RFK Jr. has absolved all of us of having to make any changes in our personal choices; the bad news is that he believes that the only necessary changes to make it possible to prosper without CO2 is to pass a few laws.

    I am a proud liberal in the classic sense of the word; I don’t believe that ordering people or businesses to take action that is detrimental to their health and prosperity is an effective or acceptable means of achieving progressive goals. Far too many people in political fringe groups have seized on a genuine problem of rising CO2 production and atmospheric concentration as a political tool to further already existing agendas that have little to do with addressing the underlying technical challenge.

    They also have little to do with advancing human development and enabling better living for more people.

    Unfortunately, far too many people on the right have been entranced by the “don’t worry, be happy” messages sponsored by fossil fuel interests. They ridicule people who are concerned about the rate of CO2 emissions. They dispute our concerns because the models developed so far do not predict future effects with sufficient precision. They assert that taking action would be too costly compared to simply adapting to whatever changes come about from continuing business as usual while seeking economic growth through burning ever greater quantities of hydrocarbon fuels like coal, oil and natural gas.

    I tend to agree with Kennedy in pointing to the problems caused by excessive oil interest money and power. I also agree that fighting wars to control oil resources is both immoral and economically wasteful.

    I tend to agree with Fields in pointing out that many climate change activists are hypocritical because their actions do not match their words.

    However, if I were to confront Kennedy, I wouldn’t ask him about his cell phone or his automobile; neither of those has any significant impact on CO2 emissions.

    Instead, my litmus test would include pointed questions about nuclear energy. That technology is the best way to take effective action to slow both CO2 emissions and to reduce the economic disparity caused by excessive profits in oil and gas extraction. Anyone who is serious about climate change should also be serious about using nuclear energy as a tool in the battle; it is the only available power source that can function reliably despite the weather and despite geographic location without producing any CO2.

    If I had the chance to confront Leonardo DiCaprio, I would not beat him up about his use of private airplanes, I would ask if he is interested in learning the useful example that could be set by building yachts powered by atomic engines.

    It is both understandable and admirable to be concerned about the current state of nuclear technology and the high cost of building and maintaining nuclear power plants. The solution, however, is to continue improving the technology, find and eliminate the bottlenecks in regulation, skilled labor and industrial capacity, and work to lower the existing political barriers that add many years to the development timeline for most projects.

    Unfortunately, Kennedy and many of his cohorts dismissed nuclear energy long ago and have so far refused to take a hard look at why they made that decision and to question if it is now time to revise that position in light of new information. They loudly berate people who deny the science of climate change while frequently denying the more settled science that tells us that atomic fission works safely and reliably while producing abundant quantities of affordable energy.

    moderated
  4. This chart illustrates the horror of vaccine caused autism.

    Giving dozens of vaccines to toddlers is a felony crime. A small child’s brain cannot handle the onslaught of the chemicals in the multiple doses of vaccines.

    Most all grade schools have entire classes devoted to the babysitting care of vaccine damaged kids.

    Attachment

    moderated
    1. And it’s totally unacceptable that the companies that manufacture this poison (and make no mistake….that’s what it is) are beyond liability and reproach and WE, through government payouts PAY FOR THE BILLIONS IN SETTLEMENTS. Tell that to those in the populace who believe (and I know many) the government would never hurt our children.

      I blame most, if not all, on the media. Until we gain some portion of the MSM, it will continue.
      Without a voice in the MSM, we are lost in regard to this travesty and countless others. YouTube, Facegarbage, Twitter and whatever others may exist should be the voice of men and woman….NOT OF THE CORPORATIONS! Until that happens, we are pissin’ in the wind.
      I beg anyone to tell me otherwise. Maybe I am missing something.
      WHY, oh why do I hear nothing from Trump???

      moderated
      1. I have learned to be very careful of Trump. He’s a man of very limited knowledge in depth. His knowledge of the world is a mile wide and an inch deep. He knows next to nothing concerning most things.
        He still thinks that people were injured with pressure cooker bombs at that Marathon in Boston.

        In the pic we see crisis actor Jeff Bauman. His is missing left leg is in those pants, showing his bulky prosthetic leg many years before the Marathon…..Remember, he’s the guy in the wheelchair.

        Attachment

        moderated
      2. It’s not just the media. It’s the Jewish Problem at work on several different levels.

        1. Jews control much of poisonous big pharma.
        2. Jews control much of big tech and its censorship.
        3. Jews control US media.

        And perhaps most importantly,

        4. Jews control Donald Trump!

        So, happy birthday America. Not only are you controlled by American Jewish Zionist billionaires and International Jew bankers, you are now officially a colony of Israel.

        Of course this has been going on for a while now and therefore should be obvious to anyone paying attention. But apparently because propaganda works and Americans are stupid, it goes largely unnoticed.

        Maybe Americans will finally catch on to the game in the next few years when they come to the realization that Jew bankers own most of the hard assets in the US (including the house they live in) and the US dollar is worthless.

        Alex Jones wants you to believe the “Chicoms” are taking over America; nothing could be further from the truth.

        moderated
        1. If 1-4 were true, then why would Big Tech, the MSM and Social Media be working overtime to dump Trump? I would suggest that the extraordinary steps being taken to deny him a second term refute your position. I think (flaws and all) he’s for America!

          1. I concede you have a point. Trump is not completely horrible like Hillary or Biden, or any number of other idiots in Washington. Joel Skousen says that Trump has good instincts and I agree with that. But Trump is weak. Weak to the extent that he has made a complete mess of his administration. I think we can all agree on that.

          2. I certainly agree that Trump is for America and I will vote for him as I did before. Yes, flaws and all he’s an authentic patriot.

          3. You can make a case that Trump is at best a mixed bag. He talks a good game. But no matter how well intentioned Trump might be, results are what matter. And I suggest that the Trump administration’s record is a disgrace.

            Why in the world would he not pardon Julian Assange?

            Why would he go along with the Corona Virus Hoax when at this point the evidence is overwhelming that it is a fraud?

            Why would he go along with Steve Mnuchin and allow the Fed to print unlimited currency administered by Black Rock that creating a windfall for Wall Street banks and disaster for the country?

            Why would he not prosecute Obama and Hillary and all the other criminals that staged the ongoing coup against him?

            Why would he not take steps to cure voter fraud?

            Why would he keep Jared and Ivanka in policy making positions.

            Trump campaigned on troop withdrawals. Where are they?

            Build the Wall, Drain the Swamp, Eliminate Budget Deficit, Lower Drug Prices, Appoint Special Prosecutor for Hillary Clinton, Eliminate Gun Free Zones, Increase Visa Fees

            This list is endless……..

          4. So, Something very interesting happened after I posted that link to Trump saying he was going into hiding…this site just disappeared. I had to re-load….
            Anyway,. here’s a post Jim Stone just made related to the Beirut bombing and Trumps going into hiding….Something big is in the wind…silver and gold skyrocketing is another good sign.
            Yes, it’s strange…but when earth shaking events are about to occur, prophesies always seem to surface.

            VERY INTERESTING APPARITION HERE
            I don’t like publishing this, but it appeared to Claudia twice to stop an assassination of Trump.
            Yesterday an apparition from Beirut appeared to Claudia, said it was a bombing and that the elite were going to blame Trump (who did not do it) as an excuse to assassinate him and that she had to tell me to post this to stop the assassination. Claudia said nothing to me and figured she imagined it all, because she did not even know there was a bombing, she was unaware of anything happening in Lebanon. She did not know what on earth the apparition was talking about.

            Today the apparition appeared again and told her to tell me. So she came to me, asking about a bombing and wondering what on earth all of this was about. When I told her that Beirut got bombed, (it was clearly a bombing,) she was shocked and apologetic for not telling me yesterday

            This entity specifically told her he died in the Beirut blast and was here to give a warning and tell us to state that Trump had nothing to do with the Beirut blast, which will be determined to be a bombing (probably already has) in the elite circles, and that a disinformation campaign was going to happen in the background to get Iran and Lebanon to kill Trump. If this happens, – if Trump is assassinated, all hell is obviously going to break loose and evil will win. The entity was not an evil entity, it was more like a political figure that was not corrupt. From what Claudia said, it was clearly aware of geopolitics.
            I posted this because:

            1. Claudia was clueless anything at all happened in Beirut. She knew I was working on a big report, but did not know what it was about.

            2. I know damn well that was a bombing and am not stuck on the idiotic prospect of pure ammonium nitrate doing this, when it has to have diesel or gasoline added to it to do anything at all, and –

            3. This apparition appeared twice stating it was a bomb blast and I don’t want Trump assassinated. If Claudia was clueless about a bombing, how on earth could she have come to me telling me about a “ghost” that told her what happened in Lebanon, specifically stating he was from Beirut if it was not something real?

            It appeared to Claudia and not me, because I’d have called bullshit and denied it was even there before it even had a chance to speak.

            UPDATE: Claudia had more detail
            She said he was tall and looked middle eastern and that he was a reader of the site, and that’s how he knew to come here. Claudia wanted me to prove I had readers in Lebanon to know she was not crazy. Done: (from July)

            Claudia said he was killed by a head injury from flying debris, and that he said he died while he was investigating a tip off that there would be an explosion in the harbor, and that in death, he had the head injury to the left side of his head. She also said that he said something far worse was soon to happen but he did not say what, other than that it would not happen in Lebanon, it would happen elsewhere. He said he spoke to us in the hopes we would get the word out and at least have something to stop future events. He specifically called the “elite” evil.

            >
            UPDATE: Trump is rumored to have gone into hiding due to “powerful rich enemies wanting him assassinated”. We will have to see how this proves true or not. If it is true, he was probably made aware of what went on in Lebanon and it appears he’s out to get blood now. I think Lebanon either angered him badly or served as a wake up call.

          5. RS…I find it very difficult to accept that Trump is weak. Real estate billionaires…especially those who can come out on top in NYC cannot be weak. A president who has gone through 4 years of one attack after another and still maintain his decorum, popularity and functionality is not weak. Can one imagine Biden going through the same? Trump may be many things….a Zionist, a showman, an opportunist, a germaphobe, someone with a bad hair-do………but a weakling he is not.

        2. This is a reply to Don and RS in regard to Trump.

          I just finished watching a movies called Under Suspicion starring Morgan Freeman
          and Gene Hackman. It’s 2000 movie, so I am not going to be concerned about a spoiler alert. Hackman plays a well respected corporate attorney under suspicion by an investigator played by Morgan Freeman for murdering and raping two young girls. Hackman’s wife (in name only) is played by Monica Bellucci. The evidence of Hackman’s guilt is built up throughout the movie to where everyone, including his wife, KNOW he is guilty. In the final scene, Hackman finally confesses out of pure frustration. In the middle of his videoed confession, Freeman’s secretary calls him to the door and informs him they have caught the real murderer.

          On November 4th, 2020 there may well be a knock on our collective door and all will be revealed as Trump is vindicated.

          moderated
  5. Pingback: Important News Updates About the War on Humanity for On August 6, 2020 - TGR Intelligence Report
  6. If that post I made at 6:27 AM does not get removed, my apologies. It got crossed with an email I was sending.

    Here’s the correct post….

    So much of the problem comes down to the companies that manufacturer these vaccines have no liability and can put whatever they like in the vaccines with no oversight…..

    ((Please understand that the CDC does not actually test the vaccines to determine what ingredients are contained in the vaccines. The CDC simply takes the vaccine manufacturers at their word and republishes the ingredients found in the vaccine package insert.))

    What if the same madness was allowed for other product manufacturers…autos for instance. If wheels fell off, or seat belts malfunctioned or windshields fell out. ….imagine the uproar from consumers. Yet, we allow this to go on with things injected into our own bodies.

    Go figger!

    moderated
    1. It’s a joke. Just like everything else in Washington.

      Think about the money the Trump administration has given out to big pharma for corona virus Vaccine. And Trump says he has plans for the military to administer vaccines!

      How can anybody defend this clown?

      moderated
  7. We have curfew: 8pm-5am, must wear amsks, many people not allowed to work. Luckily I can because I am involved in construction. They say they need to keep that going. Lots of houses but not much work for the unemplyed. Some business people are becoming bankrupt. I had to give myself a fromn to say I can leave my house, if as a director I am wrong, my firm faces a fine up to a bout $100,000. This is madbess of the highest order.

    moderated
    1. Penalties
      Completing this document with false or misleading information may cause you to be in breach of the Permitted Worker Permit Scheme Directions and liable to penalties up to $19,826.40 (individuals) and $99,132 (bodies corporate).

      moderated
  8. The Kennedy relative is anti-vax but then he said on the same show his passion is climate change caused by CO2, so is this true, certainly he is wrong about the CO2 being bad.

    moderated
  9. you say 23 vaccinations before 15 months old. Do you count triple or quadruple as 3 and four or just one? eg. is MMR 3 or 1? anyhow by 13 years old in Melb Aust they have:
    1,1×4,1,1,1×4,1,1×4,1,1×3,1,1 (12 months 11 or 22),1,1×4,(18 months)1×3,1,1,1,1=18 or 34

    moderated

Leave a Reply