03 Jul, 2020

Heinz Pommer with Jeff Prager, Google Censored: The German-French Consummate Proofs of Nuclear 9/11

Architects and engineers say planes don’t knock down skyscrapers.  Nuclear physicists say only atomic bombs can turn out this kind of heat and damage.

Submitted by Heinz Pommer with Jeff Prager to Veterans Today

Introduction by Gordon Duff with Ian Greenhalgh and Jeff Smith (Nuclear weapons designer/particle physicist/IAEA inspector)

With the uncredited help of FBI, CIA, Mossad, FSB, White House staffers, US military and key personnel of the United States Department of Energy whose names are withheld.

The material here is overwhelming, hours of lectures and dozens of detailed slides.  This is not an easy read.  It is another piece of irrevocable proof regarding 9/11 and the use of nuclear weapons and, on its own, worth much more than just scanning or flipping through.


Architects and engineers say planes don’t knock down skyscrapers.  Nuclear physicists say only atomic bombs can turn out this kind of heat and damage. The real investigators who were silenced by a grand jury and a wealth of threats said it was a conspiracy and named lots of names, some expected, some not.

Now an independent physicist has proven the work done by the original investigators who were silenced and much new work as well.  His modeling and detail are breathtaking.

We were recently introduced to the work of Germany physicist Heinz Pommer.  I chose to contact him.  His work deeply parallels work done by the US Department of Energy and IAEA which was censored and suppressed so that the fake 9/11 report could be published and blame put on Iraq and Afghanistan.

Unlike Pommer’s work (aided by Jeff Prager), the VT team included some of those involved in the ill-fated original investigation. Working from different data to an extent, both teams have ended up with nearly identical results.

VT knows the who, how and when from official sources.  Pommer (and Prager), however, have taken their portion a step further and have produced what the original team would have presented to congress and the president, had they been allowed, of the proofs of nuclear weapons and their effects.  Their work is identical to the secret work by the DOE and Sandia National Labs but adds much as well.

Included are video presentations sent by Pommer to me and his PDF slides.  This material has been submitted to the US team and we will get their comments.

6.3     Demon’s trap 9/11

Your mind is not your consciousness. Your consciousness is your state or quality of awareness of your existence, of being a person.

Your mind, however, can be hijacked and controlled. Your thoughts can be guided to this and that, and finally, your mind might simply play the role of an uneducated dog. It barks a lot: “be aware, intruders!”

If your mind is bent the right way (in the sense of the perpetrators of 9/11) you will accept nothing except the fairy tale of Osama bin Laden. Then your mind and your thoughts will clutch and grasp to the last straws, in order to save your world view. It will accept nothing, least of all an offending truth.

Truth, however, is important. So, let’s start this subchapter rendering homage to one great defender of the truth, Saint Augustine of Hippo.

Augustine of Hippo (354 – 430 AD)

Saint Augustine of Hippo from Numidia (a Roman province on the North African Coast) was in a certain sense an extremist, whose position could be condensed in the phrase:

“Better to fall with the truth than to stand with the lie.”

He knew Rome well, as he would recognize Rome in modern western society in his splendor and cruelty. Victory at all costs. The truth does not matter, the triumph of the lie is omnipresent and masked – if at all – by the cozy word “illusion”.

To understand the essence of truth – the love of God’s creation by all beings – he also studied the lie, defining how these two antipodes reveal themselves in human society.

The next pages show 25 steps in which the destruction process of the South Tower and the processes in the ground are sketched. These sketches did offend many people and were harshly criticized as “fantasy sketches”, or even as a “dangerous effort to deceive the public”.

However, these sketches should be regarded only as a playful approach in an effort to understand a physical process and to calculate a more precise model afterward. They don’t pretend about “The Truth”. For a conscious person, there is nothing offensive in them. Even if your mind tells you so.

Step 1: Opening of the building at a height of 350 m

Fig. 6-21                                                                                                   Scheme(modified):

Step 2: Connection of the nuclear chimney (ignition of small explosives)

Fig. 6-22                                                                                                   Scheme (modified):

Step 3: Weakening of the building structure through radiation (embrittlement)

Fig. 6-23                                                                                                   Scheme (modified):

Step 4: Weakening of the building structure through small explosives (statics)

Fig. 6-24                                                                                                   Scheme (modified):

Step 5: Weakening of the building structure through melting (radiation)

Fig. 6-25                                                                          Scheme (modified):

Step 6: Nuclear fizzle/neutron flash in the tower

Fig. 6-26                                                                          Scheme (modified):

Step 7: Impact of the explosion, start of the eruption

Hard Xray radiation in the Harfountain nozzle in the tower chamber

Fig. 6-27                                                                          Scheme (modified):

Step 8: Evaporation of the building core by the plasma needle (approx. 8,000 °C)


The bill (Reauthorization 2015)

In 2015, the Congress passed and President Obama signed the reauthorization of The James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act. It provided an additional 4.6 billion dollars in funding for its mission.

The bill (9/11 Victims Compensation Fund reauthorization 2019, until … 2090)

According to a Congressional Budget Office estimate, paying out the outstanding claims and future claims would cost $10.2 billion over the next decade.

The bill does not appropriate a specific amount of money to process victims’ compensation claims, instead of appropriating “such sums as may be necessary for the fiscal year 2019 and each fiscal year thereafter through the fiscal year 2090.”


Gordon Duff is a Marine combat veteran of the Vietnam War. He is a disabled veteran and has worked on veterans and POW issues for decades. Gordon is an accredited diplomat and is generally accepted as one of the top global intelligence specialists. He manages the world’s largest private intelligence organization and regularly consults with governments challenged by security issues.

Duff has traveled extensively, is published around the world and is a regular guest on TV and radio in more than “several” countries. He is also a trained chef, wine enthusiast, avid motorcyclist and gunsmith specializing in historical weapons and restoration. Business experience and interests are in energy and defense technology.

Gordon’s Archives – 2008-2014

Please follow and like us:

14 thoughts on “Heinz Pommer with Jeff Prager, Google Censored: The German-French Consummate Proofs of Nuclear 9/11”

  1. https://www.facebook.com/pg/911nucleardemolition/photos/?tab=album&album_id=552403548128000&ref=page_internal

    Radiological Cleanup
    483 Photos

    This FaceBook page reveals with 483 photos the massive effort to decontaminate and clean Ground Zero of the 911 nuclear event.·

    Here’s another FB page:
    https://www.facebook.com/groups/1018218638237490/

    Most of the FB Groups about nuclear 911 have been deleted.

    The Attachment photo shows the nuclear event as it happened.

    Attachment

    moderated
    1. Thanks Will…I’ve seen this video a few years ago…..these faked videos were seen on the evening TV News as ”LIVE”
      recordings. People still believe they were seeing ”live” videos of the ”planes”. This nonsense went on for months in 2001 and is still being shown on TV news in 2020.

      People have been so completely inundated with movies that they cannot tell real events from fake. William Casey-CIA is alleged to have said…. “We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false”. Over 99% of Americans STILL believe that planes were crashed into the WTC….it even now written into history textbooks. The same for Sandy Hook and Boston Bomb, etc. …99+% of people STILL think these were real events.

      moderated
  2. Everyone has their own theories about the 911 attacks and they are entitled to them. This one is really getting microscopic. I like to zoom out a bit more. I helped build four high rise buildings during summer breaks from engineering school. Super tough work and even tougher men, many of whom had very unpleasant demeanors. They were relentless on the college boys working the site so I never mentioned I was in college. The common thread of all of the projects was much of the load bearing walls were poured after the brass went home and we worked late into the evening when the daylight was long. There was a low level foreman supervising. We could have put anything into the walls like Jimmy Hoffa and no one else would know about it. My pet theory is that there were things done during construction of the twin towers that allowed or facilitated for their total destruction. And that the twin towers were built to be eventually destroyed at some politically expedient time. Is that too diabolical to be true?

    moderated
    1. ” And that the twin towers were built to be eventually destroyed at some politically expedient time. Is that too diabolical to be true?” …writes Dave.
      Well Dave, I have heard that theory before and I do believe that its too diabolical to be true.
      But I do believe that ALL of the higher ranking politicians knew that a nuke event had happened and have since tried to cover it up. [ but 1000s of nuclear radiation cancer deaths are hard to hide]
      Yes, each person is entitled to their opinion as to what happened. But so many weird things DID happen that one has to be brain dead not to know that it was a massive conspiracy of some kind. Like a ”hijacker’s” ID was magically found on a sidewalk….and a jet engine [the wrong make and model] was also found. lol

      moderated
    2. Not from my point of view. This entire nation has turned out to be a diabolic construct….so in the macrocosm and therefore in the microcosm.
      But I would recommend Dmitri’s Khalezov’s tome, 911-Thology..The Third Truth…for a similar perspective….long to say the least, but encyclopedic in the information it provides.

      moderated
  3. The 9/11 nukes were made in Dimona, Israel from out-of-date US Army nuclear munitions. They were refurbished at the Negev Nuclear Research Center at Dimona. These were brought into the US in Diplomatic Cargo, which is not checked by US Customs. Foreign governments are immune from US Customs scrutiny.

    About three blocks from the NYC 9/11 Ground Zero were several hundred cars in a parking lot. These cars suffered damage that is typical of a blast from a nuclear bomb. But there was something very interesting about these cars…..many were MISSING their cast-iron engine blocks. This is only possible to happen when exposed to a certain type intense nuclear radiation. [ref: Dimitri Khalezov – WTC Nuclear Demolition – https://youtu.be/Lec9giab90I ]

    moderated
    1. Don, I appreciate more than I can say, you bringing up Dmitri’s extremely valuable contribution to 911. However, this video was made prior to the final (second edition of his book). When this came out, I watched the entire vid, but I cannot remember the part about the Negev Nuclear Research Center at Dimona. It may be in there and as the day goes on, I will listen for that reference. I CAN say with more certainty that it’s not in the second addition of the book (1096 pages). I could be incorrect, so, I will go through the book again for verification. I am also quite sure he does not attribute the toasted cars to a nuclear event…something else I will verify. There was a first edition of the book (which this video references) that was almost immediately banned….and for which several sites offered the first 11 chapters free…BUT, I know of no source that has the entire first edition on line. If you do,. I would more than appreciate a link. I was fortunate enough to be privy to the second addition as it was being written, as a good friend of mine who lived in Cambodia at the time met with Dmitri (in Bangkok, if I remember correctly) and agreed to edit that edition as Dmitri wrote it.
      Too many have forgotten Dmitri’s research, so, again, I cannot thank you enough for your giving him the credit he deserves.

      moderated
      1. Yes Will…..I know a military reporter-photographer in Israel. I met him during the Israeli Cast Lead war* with hooligans in Gaza. He offered to take me to Dimona to see the nuclear base and science center. Its very secure with a huge fence and military arms surrounding it. Of course we could only see it through the barbed wire fencing. Dimona is mentioned in many reports I have read concerning the 9/11 munitions.

        I have emailed Dimitri in Bangkok several times. He gets most of the facts but not all. Even the essay above is excellent but does not contain the entire story. A few small details are missing….but the basic report is correct.

        The toasted cars and emergency vehicles are a fact. Cast-iron has some molecular elements that make it vulnerable to atomic disassociation when hit by certain gamma radiation….it vaporizes. This is not the case with most steel sheeting as used in vehicles.

        The attachment is a mini nuke that fits into a duffel bag. It can be easily transported by taxi.

        * Operation Cast Lead, also known in the Muslim world as the Gaza Massacre and the Battle of al-Furqan by Hamas, was a three-week armed conflict between Palestinians in the Gaza Strip and Israel that began on 27 December 2008 and ended on 18 January 2009 in a unilateral ceasefire.

        Attachment

        moderated
        1. Don…Seems I was not clear enough with my question, so I’ll ask it in another way. Do you disagree with Dmitri’s idea these were not mini nukes, but full-fledged 150 kiloton nukes planted beneath the towers and building seven as he mentions in that video? And, do you disagree with his idea in the book that the toasted cars are NOT a result of radiation, but were more likely made to look that way through some other means? I certainly have no problem with your disagreeing with his perspective. I just find it odd that you post that video which explains in minute detail how the 150 kiloton devices brought down the towers and then state that mini-nukes were actually behind it all.

          moderated
          1. Will…….I disagree with both of Dimitri’s theories. These were not 150 KT events. There were mini nukes used. [150 KTs would have taken out the entire lower end of Manhattan.]

            The so-called toasted cars were exactly what they appeared to be. Nuclear events do strange things such as remove the marble facade of a building but leave paper and green leaves intact. Office file cabinets vaporized but the paper contents were mostly also intact. Fires of heatless blue flames were observed.
            Remember there were hundreds of toilets in the towers but not one was found. If you have ever stood on a toilet you know how tough and solid they can be….they don’t easily break. Toilets are fired during manufacture at very high heat. The heat and radiation of nukes are able to cause the atomic structure of the toilets to vaporize…to put it it simple language.

            The theories of Pommer (and Prager) have refined the event into an outline of what actually happened.

Leave a Reply