Jury awards Sandy Hook father $450,000 for defamation by local conspiracy theorist

Chris Rickert

A Dane County jury on Tuesday decided a village of Oregon conspiracy theorist must pay the father of a boy killed in the 2012 Sandy Hook shootings $450,000 for falsely claiming that the father circulated fabricated copies of his son’s death certificate.

It took the jury nearly four hours to decide on the amount James Fetzer must pay Leonard Pozner, whose son, Noah, 6, was the youngest victim of the Dec. 14, 2012, massacre in Newtown, Connecticut. The award follows Circuit Judge Frank Remington’s ruling in June that Fetzer defamed Pozner with four false statements about the death certificate. The statements appeared in a book Fetzer co-authored and edited, and in his blog.

In his own statement after the jury delivered its decision, Pozner thanked the jury “for recognizing the pain and terror that Mr. Fetzer has purposefully inflicted on me and on other victims of these horrific mass casualty events, like the Sandy Hook shooting,” and emphasized that his case was not about First Amendment protections.

“Mr. Fetzer has the right to believe that Sandy Hook never happened,” he said. “He has the right to express his ignorance. This award, however, further illustrates the difference between the right of people like Mr. Fetzer to be wrong and the right of victims like myself and my child to be free from defamation, free from harassment and free from the intentional infliction of terror.”

Fetzer called the damages amount “absurd” and said he would appeal.

Fetzer — a professor emeritus of philosophy from the University of Minnesota-Duluth and prolific conspiracy theorist on a range of events — claims the Sandy Hook massacre never happened but was instead an event staged by the Federal Emergency Management Agency as part of an Obama administration effort to enact tighter gun restrictions.

In closing arguments, Pozner attorney Genevieve Zimmerman called Fetzer’s claims in the 2015 book and 2018 blog post “alt-right opium.”

“It went around the internet like a virus,” she said. “This kind of alt-right fact that they want to believe is fact.”

In videotaped testimony aired Monday and Tuesday, forensic psychiatrist Roy Lubit said Pozner had been recovering from the post-traumatic stress disorder he suffered as a result of the murder of his son.

‘Still suffering’

“But were it not for the denial of the death of his son, the harassment and threats, he would have healed and been having a relatively normal life several years ago and he wouldn’t continue to have post-traumatic stress disorder,” said Lubit, who was testifying on a pro bono basis as the expert witness for the plaintiff.

Fetzer’s accusations were “a key part of why he is still suffering” and still meets criteria for PTSD, Lubit said.

Pozner testified during the trial that he’s been the subject of repeated harassment by people who don’t believe the Sandy Hook shootings occurred, including through messages posted to photos of his son on a memorial website.

His attorneys played two profanity-laced voicemail messages from a Florida woman named Lucy Richards who told Pozner he was going to die. She was later sentenced to five months in federal prison for the threats.

Fetzer attorney Richard Bolton sought to undermine Lubit’s testimony, noting that Lubit did not evaluate Pozner in person or review any of his medical records.

He told the jury that there was no evidence that Fetzner had ever threatened Pozner or that the people who threatened Pozner had ever read what Fetzer wrote.

“They can’t connect any significant, if any, harm to these four statements,” he said. “That’s a dot they have to connect and they have not.”

He said Pozner’s attorneys were urging them down a “dangerous road” to say that even if someone doesn’t read statements directed at someone else, and later acts against the targets of those statements, “you become the insurer for everybody else … whether they read it or not.”

Bolton also sought to tie Pozner’s suit to his alleged “animosity” toward Fetzer and to Pozner’s broader efforts to remove online material created by Sandy Hook deniers — attempts plaintiff’s attorneys objected to and Remington largely rejected, instead keeping the focus on the four defamatory statements.

Pozner is among a group of Sandy Hook parents whose defamation case against right-wing conspiracy theorist and “Infowars” host Alex Jones is pending. Pozner has filed other Sandy Hook-related litigation and founded the nonprofit HONR Network, which seeks to counter online hoaxes and harassment.

During cross-examination by Bolton, Pozner said he remains active in efforts to get false information about Sandy Hook removed from the Internet and agreed with Bolton that he’s had some 1,500 videos removed from YouTube.

He said the work causes his some emotional distress, but “I feel I’m strong enough to do that.”

Fetzer’s assertion about the faked death certificate first appeared in an August 2014 article that would later become a chapter in the book “Nobody Died at Sandy Hook,” first published in October 2015. It was later released as a “banned” edition and in a free e-book form.

Fetzer claimed in an interview played during the trial that the ebook had been downloaded more than 10 million times. Plaintiff’s attorney Emily Stedman said about 3,000 hard copies of the book were sold.

During questioning by Stedman, Fetzer referred to the four defamatory statements from his book and blog as “allegedly” defamatory, which drew a rebuke from Remington and an instruction to the jury to disregard what Fetzer had said.

“You won’t be using this court and this trial as a collateral attack on this court,” he told Fetzer.

James Fetzer, a retired professor who lives in the village of Oregon, appears Tuesday with one of his attorneys in Dane County Circuit Court. Fetzer was found in June to have defamed the father of a victim of the Sandy Hook shooting in 2012. A jury awarded his victim, Leonard Pozner, $450,000 in damages after his attorneys argued Fetzer’s writing contributed to his post-traumatic stress disorder JOHN HART, STATE JOURNAL

‘I needed to be his voice’

Pozner testified that he became aware of Fetzer in mid-2014.

“He was writing about Noah and about me,” he said. “It said a lot of ugly things, and I felt like I needed to defend my son. He couldn’t do that for himself so I needed to be his voice.”

He said Fetzer’s writing caused him to worry about his safety and his family’s safety and how his surviving children could be treated online and in life. One of his two daughters is Noah’s twin.

Fetzer last month was found in contempt of court for sharing a confidential deposition of Pozner with fellow Sandy Hook “researchers” and ordered to make attempts to get the document back, as well as to pay the plaintiff’s attorneys $7,000 to cover the cost of bringing the contempt complaint.

Genevieve Zimmerman in her closing argument characterized this as “ongoing, continuous, systematic rejection of” the legal system jurors were participating in.

Another of Pozner’s attorneys, Jacob Zimmerman, confirmed Fetzer had made the $7,000 payment. In an Oct. 10 letter to the court, Bolton said he had been able to get two of the people Fetzer shared the deposition with to destroy transcripts of it, but one of them refused to delete images of Pozner contained in the deposition.

Jacob Zimmerman has said his client sought to keep personal health and financial information in the deposition private, but also wanted to avoid providing fodder to conspiracy theorists who could pose a threat to Pozner and his family.

Pozner had originally sued Fetzer and his co-editor on “Nobody Died at Sandy Hook,” Mike Palecek, along with Wrongs Without Wremeidies LLC, which published the book under the name Moon Rock Books.

Those defendants later reached out-of-court settlements with Pozner — Wrongs Without Wremedies in June and Palecek last month. Terms of the settlements were not disclosed.

Palecek, in a statement provided by Jacob Zimmerman, said “the court has ruled that the death certificate of Noah Pozner is not a fabrication as stated in the book ‘Nobody Died at Sandy Hook.’ I accept the court’s ruling without appeal, and I apologize for any resulting distress that I may have caused.”

Earlier this year, National Public Radio reported that Dave Gahary, the principal officer at Moon Rock Books, agreed to stop selling “Nobody Died at Sandy Hook” by the end of June and apologized to Pozner’s family, saying he now believed Pozner was telling the truth about Noah.

During his testimony, Pozner, who moved to Florida in 2013, described his son as a normal, funny child who would sometimes “joke that he would go to work at night while his sisters slept at a taco factory.”

He told the jury that he remembered the large number of people at Noah’s funeral and the heavy law enforcement presence, and said that when viewing his son’s body he wanted to hold his hand, but couldn’t because that was a part of his body hit in the shooting.

“I remember saying goodbye to him and kissing him on his forehead,” he said.

Please follow and like us:
error20

37 thoughts on “Jury awards Sandy Hook father $450,000 for defamation by local conspiracy theorist”

  1. (warning: reading this post may cause an emotional response and by doing so will be at your own risk)

    Jim, I knew right away when your court case was assigned to Dane County, Wisconsin there was going to be some trouble ahead considering the Mossad has settled there as well as Connecticut. It was a set-up from the beginning and Pozner was brought to the stage to help set a precedent to punish those who investigate the infiltrators and their agenda.

    Dr. Fetzer was used as an example of how they were going to rewrite the first amendment. Re-writing it meaning (using the anti-Semitic / Noahide laws to award people damages for words spoken in any format that may inflict an emotional response they do not agree with). In this case, Pozner’s claim of PTSD was the diagnostic. Is there proof of this medical condition?

    Two days after the shooting, police began threatening prosecution to those online who may post misinformation about the event.
    “Misinformation is being posted on social media sites,” Connecticut State Police Lt. J. Paul Vance said at a news conference Sunday. “These issues are crimes. They will be investigated, statewide and federally, and prosecution will take place when people perpetrating this information are identified.”

    My research into the Sandy Hook shooting reveals the darkside of the Sandy Hook event, which explains and predicted this very precedent. I agree that not letting the forensic scientists testify who analyzed the death certificate originally is enough to declare corruption.

    I wrote in my book just released a section about Noah’s funeral:

    With all of the alleged dead children listed in the Sandy Hook story and no autopsies released or any family members personally identifying the children (only through photos), how can the public trust that any children actually died at Sandy Hook? How do we know these children were not kidnapped children – used and with no connection to the alleged parents? Are we to just believe the story as provided by CNN and the known corrupt State of Connecticut or do we ask the hard questions? I could not find any evidence of any open caskets except Noah Pozner. According to Jewish Daily Forward, Noah’s mother, Veronique, wanted to have an open casket for his wake and compared her sons murder to the memories of Emmitt Till, who was a 14 year-old African-American boy, who was murdered by two white men in 1955 for allegedly cat-calling a white woman. This murder started a national debate after the boy’s battered face was displayed on national media. This event helped incite more protests during the civil-rights movement. Till’s mother wanted the rest of the country to see “what they did to her baby.”

    “Veronique told the press, she made the painful decision to show people the “ugliness” of gun violence. Noah’s mouth and jaw were allegedly covered during the wake. “I just want people to know the ugliness of it so we don’t talk about it
    abstractly, like these little angels just went to heaven. No. They were butchered. They were brutalized. And that is what haunts me at night,” Pozner’s mother said. Noah’s Mother, Veronique requested Connecticut governor, Daniel Malloy, come to Noah’s wake and physically see her son’s body.” Governor Malloy accepted, attended the wake, made a public speech after he attended, and immediately began calling for stricter federal gun control legislation, while disarming Connecticut. “If there is ever a piece of legislation that comes across his desk, I needed it to be real for him.”

    Some researchers believe the children were actors and their pictures shown to the public were photos of other children or even younger versions of the alleged parents. However, there was no proof the children died. We just have a flawed story line and now extreme censorship against those who have not accepted the official story of the Sandy Hook shooting as well as the dead children and grieving parents. Victim Rights groups advocating to not release info to the public because it might be harmful to their emotional status.

    Also, if Noah Pozner’s mother really wanted the public to see what gun violence has done to her son by having an open casket wake, then, why were no photos released to the nation via newspapers, media broadcasts, and other outlets? No disrespect intended, but if she was trying to make a political stance and compare it to a 1955 murder of a black child, then we would have seen his pictures in the casket as well. ”

    There is much more to the story and the release of my book will place the mortar needed to seal the bricks of truth together to continue a thorough investigation into Sandy Hook.

    The question remains why aren’t the parents of these alleged dead children questioning the mounting evidence against the official Sandy Hook shooting storyline? One parent already committed suicide and Lenny Pozner is running around the country targeting and harassing those who are providing evidence that the Sandy Hook shooting was a giant lie waiting for exposure. Clearly, Pozner’s claims are specifically for agitation to keep the country distracted from looking at the evidence. Why is he distracting the nation and trying to derail those who have been exposing the fraud? After all, if these children did indeed died as a result of all the agenda that I list in my book, then wouldn’t Pozner want his son to rest
    in peace with the truth exposed rather than continuing to believe his son and others were brutally murdered at the hands of a lone-gunman?

    Clearly, Lenny’s son did not die as the Sandy Hook script led us to beLIEve…. and he knows it…

    That is not anti-Semitic, that is the hard truth…

    Keep your head up and we will continue exposing one of the most egregious lies ever foisted upon the American Public…

    Stephanie Sledge

    1. In cases like this where there are deaths, there are always wrongful death lawsuits filed….usually in the first six months.
      But please notice that these fake parents are too terrified to file such suits. Why? In that type of case you have to PROVE a death occurred in the Discovery phase if a trial in a courtroom. Insurance lawyers would want to see everything….including bodies.

      People do this so that they can dig into the deep pockets of insurance companies. Insurance companies don’t like to be a made to look like suckers and fools.

      1. There was a wrongful death suit filed, by the Pozner’s and Jesse Lewis’ parents.Judge ruled against the parents last year, they appealed that ruling in April.

        wshu.org/post/arguments-begin-sandy-hook-wrongful-death-suit#stream/0

      2. Two parents did.

        wshu.org/post/arguments-begin-sandy-hook-wrongful-death-suit#stream/0

        “A judge ruled last year that school officials are immune from being sued and that security protocols are discretionary.”

      3. There should have been 26 lawsuits. We can see that the judge is corrupt in his verdict…he allows the cover-up of the hoax to continue without any examination in a court of law.

  2. James Fetzer has joined the ranks of hero warriors in American history; great men like George Washington and Patrick Henry, Crocket, Bowie, Boone and Jackson who gave us liberty even in the face of death. Dr. Fetzer is a teacher and leader – traits of great a warrior hero and out of the loss of this one battle can come the impetus necessary to win the war. Dr. Fetzer has exposed the weakness of a system so corrupt it must now sacrifice its officers to visible acts of total lawlessness. The Sandy Hook Hoax story is coming apart at the seams and the unpreventable publicity of “Nobody Died At Sandy Hook” by the criminally complicit mainstream media is inadvertently, and unstoppably, pushing the masses to the truth they are desperately trying to bury.

    I believe those distancing themselves from “General” Fetzer, providing space for their own safe passage in the case of a rout, can be taken as call for other men to follow the lead, push past the fear and take the fight to the finish. Robert David Steel has proposed that we organize into the solution and bring the fight to enemy; are we all not tired of living on the edge of the next false flag?

    It’s time to investigate the people behind the Sandy Hook Hoax – starting with the Judge in Dane County Wisconsin – walking this crime backward to the source, finally exposing the degenerate corrupt state of Connecticut and its octopi connections to the mafia now controlling the US Federal government, media, banking and using the US Military as a mercenary army in service of a malignant and growing evil around the world.

    Nobody Died at Sandy Hook! The crime scene was tainted and destroyed, the laws of the state were changed to prevent access to substantiating evidence, the alternative media was silenced and criminalized and many people behind the scenes have died suspiciously trying to bring some light to this very dark story. What else do men of good conscious need to forcibly bring this event to full public disclosure?

    Dr. Fetzer has started the campaign and like other great campaigns in history let’s use this opportunity to charge forward and wield might for right and do what is right! To quote Percy Shelley can we not

    Rise like Lions after slumber
    In unvanquishable number,
    Shake your chains to earth like dew
    Which in sleep had fallen on you –
    Ye are many – they are few.

  3. Posted as Administrator [ Note this comment was unable to be posted by the user name Joanne] She asked that I post in her stead. Jack Mullen

    Dr. Fetzer,

    I thought you were going to appeal before it went to a jury.

    Paul Preston, former California Principal and Superintendent, was told by Obama’s Department of Education that Sandy Hook was a FEMA Drill. This man should have been subpoenaed. Tony Meade should have been used as a witness among many other people that know the truth. Every American should see the documentary Wolfgang Halbig – Revisiting Sandy Hook. One of many excellent documentaries Wolfgang has made but taken down by Pozner. Pozner colludes with CNN, then CNN contacts UTUBE. They all work together to hide the truth. How can a jury award Pozner $450,000 when this corrupt judge would not allow affidavits from two forensic scientists stating the death certificates were forged. Miraculously, Pozner comes up with a death certificate that nobody has seen. Connecticut and this judge are corrupt as hell.

    1. I submitted an application for an Interlocutory Appeal, which is at the discretion of the Appeals Court. They can accept it or not, insofar as the case has not come to a final resolution. To my surprise, they declined to review it. With the case now final, the Appeals Court cannot decline to review my appeal. But these things take time and several months are likely to pass before I have more to report about the appeals process.

      1. Jim, don’t be surprised to be “approached” by some the suspected perps prior to any further court action. As things stand, Pozner has to decide if he’s OK with looking like a swindler in front of the entire country. I think this new information and reasoning will incite some peristalsis of sorts and start to break up this floe. I had a hunch many months ago and stated it on this site that Pozner could have been tied to Mossad or other desperadoes, there were many unanswered questions then, but things are starting to gel now and it’s conceivable some of the perps will step forward in acts of contrition.

  4. So much for free speech! I guess that’s what fascists do, right? They cry and cry about free speech until they think that they have enough advantage (i.e., Trump as POTUS) and then suddenly their principles start to…waiver. I get it Jim.

    Maybe if I say something antisemitic you’ll post it?

  5. What if I read an article that gives me “PTSD”? Oh, what if it tears at my heart so rapaciously? Do I sue the writer for my alleged grief? Hell, let’s level with each other. Who among us did not feel a long time ago that the sequelae of SH would never allow for a real search for the truth by the “authorities”? In a sense, this verdict is farcical beyond belief, but in another sense it is what we all figured would happen in this case.
    In a normal case that had many of the same questionmarks, would exhumations of the bodies have been done to at least assert if there was a body in a gravesite? Yer dern tootin’…..I live in the most self righteous state in the union, Connecticut. The SH case was sheltered and hidden from public view, new laws were hastily created, etc. SH was not your typical jurisprudence event, it was created for a direct purpose, that of putting a damper on gun ownership. Who ever heard of calling an AK or AR lookalike an assault weapon even if it were not fully automatic?
    SH, thusly was a highly politicized fiasco emanating from the highest levels of our government. As Jim has found out, any small aspect of the case could have been used to convict him, any little whim could have spelled disaster. We had no irons in the fire, per se, Jim had all his irons in the fire, there’s a big difference there. An appeal will bring a new judge, let’s hope for a better resolution.
    Let’s never forget one thing. SH was engineered so the perps would never get caught. The US gulag was fabricated to make doubly sure those who challenged the government edicts would never get the best of the powers that be. Moreover, the lawsuits that were spawned such as those suing gun manufacturers for their part in this farce were bogus as hell, but so what? NWO is knocking at the door, that’s the bottom line.

    1. Back when this Sandy Hook shooting happened I moved into a place where the party I was to be renting from told me they had scored a million online hits overnight, this from spoofing that Sandy Hook shooting was all made up. I knew immediately that these million hits were from those upset with his remarks. But this person had followers and so now years latter I’m happy to see these trolls get what they deserve.

      By the way, this party was a sole plaintiff to an 11 year court action he undertook for money he never gained in an attempt at creating lies against other parties in early 2000. This court case ended without benefit to the plaintiff, so I firmly believe at this ending that this person saw the Sandy Hook issue as a “Trolls Gold Mine.” Surely I suspected then that many would follow this person and too score big on profiting on others misery. I see it had.

      Me, I started learning in the later 1970s how to program in college, as I still love to do. I know the power of the web from the beginning of its creation. I too also was using in 1974 the device that 10 years later became the cell phone. So I’ve seen and was aware of the control the web and a single communication device had, and knew what a troll and blacklisting was long before 1990s. Living my life in Northern Idaho and having traveled millions of miles has given me insight; that we all are responsible for our actions which some flagrantly will abuse.

      I am now very happy to see this as it’s finally unfolding in court. That those that generate such profound hatred are placed in the spotlight they truly deserve, on showing them as hate mongers for profit! But sadly those who originally create such hate seemingly are those never reprimanded for their action.

  6. I hope Tony Mead doesn’t mind that I’m copying his first person account here from a comment he made on James Tracy’s memoryholeblog Facebook page
    https://www.facebook.com/pg/memoryholeblog/posts/?ref=page_internal

    Tony Mead:
    Yesterday I was scheduled to appear as an expert witness in the Pozner vs Fetzer case in Wisconsin

    Unfortunately, at the last second, the decision was made that they didn’t need my testimony. Supposedly the attorney felt that they had presented a case strong enough to convince the jury

    Pozner sued Jim Fetzer for emotional damage caused from the 2018 book called”Nobody Died at Sandy Hook”

    During the preliminary hearings the judge narrowed the scope of the case to include only 4 statements from the book

    All 4 statements said essentially the exact same thing- that Lenny Pozner had posted a fraudulent death certificate of his son Noah on the Internet.

    Fetzer had 2 “document experts” that were willing to testify that the death certificates (there were four different ones)were either photoshopped or altered and explain how they knew.

    The judge would not allow their testimony but instead decided that the documents were authentic and also took it upon himself to rule that the opinion that they were faked was, in and of itself, a defamatory statement.

    The death certificates had multiple anomalies such as no county seal, a multitude of font sizes and styles, the wrong time of death, Lenny Pozner listed as father (Lenny is a nickname for Leonard) and other assorted discrepancies! As a “witness”, I was not permitted in the courtroom. I had to sit outside, but I could see both Pozner and Fetzer take their turns on the stand. I’m really not sure what area I was needed to testify on, but I am well versed in all aspects of the event.

    Once I had been excused as a witness, I was allowed to observe the closing arguments. The plaintiffs attorney tried to turn on the tears, but failed as miserably as any of the other Crisis Actors from Newtown !

    The plaintiff had presented an “expert witness” who was allegedly a psychiatrist who had never diagnosed, examined or even MET Lenny Pozner. He had spoken to him on the telephone and testified that based on his conversations with Lenny he could vouch for him that he is suffering from PTSD!!

    When asked how he found it possible to organize his HONR Network that has effectively removed over 15,000 YouTube videos on Sandy Hook, Lenny said he somehow finds the strength to do it despite his PTSD.

    The judge claimed that allowing the document experts to testify would have been “inflammatory”

    He did, however, permit the jury to hear threatening phone calls that had been made by Lucy Richards (a 56 yr old mentally ill woman who is confined to a wheelchair) to Lenny as they claimed that Fetzer’s book had inspired her and others to threaten Pozner’s life!! The media has continually claimed that it was Alex Jones that influenced Lucy Richards. Lucy is also the only person that has ever “threatened” Pozner. There was never even a police complaint filed about Richards. Pozner supposedly contacted the CT FBI who then had her arrested by the FBI in Florida.

    The jury consisted of 9 women and 3 men all under the age of 30. Two jurors who doubted the 9/11 Official story were excused prior to selection.

    The jury had only one item to deliberate:

    “What amount, if any, would compensate Lenny Pozner for the defamatory statements made by James Fetzer”
    Pozner was suing for $1,000,000

    After deliberating for nearly 4 hours the jury decided to award Pozner $450,000

    They refused to talk to anyone as they left the courthouse.

    1. Three from Ch. 11 of the book, one from a memorandum included in Robert David Steele, ed., MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT ON SANDY HOOK (2018), https://phibetaiota.net/2018/08/memoranda-for-the-president-on-sandy-hook-is-fema-a-false-flag-fake-news-terrorist-node-should-googlegestapo-be-closed-down/ Dr. Lubit, their expert, testified that Mr. Pozner was recovering from the loss of his son until, beginning around sixteen months later, he began to relapse into his PTSD because of those sentences, which (at the earliest) appeared in August 2014 and were subsequently published in 2015 (1st edition, NOBODY DIED AT SAND HOOK) and 2nd (2016). No one explained how a sentence published in 2018, for example, could induce PTSD in 2014, but the jurors found his argument persuasive! Alex Jones has affirmed that he has never read the book. Nor has Leonard Pozner. But according to Dr. Lebit, Alex Jones was publicizing ideas he had received from Dr. Fetzer and Lucy Richards was (likewise) similarly inspired by words she had never read. The whole case was an absurdity from beginning to end. The reason Kelley and Tony were not put on the stand, which I only learned yesterday, is because their testimony related to Lenny’s conduct PRIOR TO THE PUBLICATION OF THE FOUR OFFENDING STATEMENTS, which meant they would have been subject to repeated objections from the Plaintiff. Although they were not given the opportunity to testify, I had the opportunity to meet them, which made it worthwhile for me to have flown them to Madison for this event. They are both exceptional students of Sandy Hook and terrific people.

  7. On Zero Hedge from Caitlin Johnstone….

    I want to live in a world where being a manipulator is more shameful than being the victim of manipulation.

    I want to live in a world where manipulation of any kind stands out as weird and creepy.

    I want to live in a world where the subtleties of sovereignty are understood by kindergarteners.

    I want to live in a world where the spirit of the law is upheld over the clever diddling of loopholes.

    I want to live in a world where actual justice takes precedence over being found to have adhered to the rules of engagement while committing grave injustices.

    I want to live in a world where empathy thrives and psychopathy fails.

    I want to live in a world where war is seen clearly for the horrific and disgusting thing that it is.

    I want to live in a world where people understand power dynamics.

    I want to live in a world where people are skeptical of power and give the disempowered the benefit of the doubt, rather than the other way ‘round.

    I want to live in a world where the only time all politicians and media unify across partisan divides is to advocate for something healthy that we all agree is in everyone’s best interest, rather than to advocate for war and tyranny.

    I want to live in a world where more value is given to those who contribute to the thriving of the whole, rather than one that elevates a singular person’s ruthless desire to get on top no matter what he ruins.

    I want to live in a world where a mother’s work pays better than a stockbroker.

    I want to live in a world where you can spend a lifetime of caring for others and retire well on savings of your own.

    I want to live in the world that values a forest being left alone more highly than one being stripped for resources.

    I want to live in a world where it’s impossible to make a profit out of illness.

    I want to live in a world where it’s impossible to make a profit out of perpetuating illness.

    I want to live in a world where it’s impossible to make a profit out of creating illness.

    I want to live in a world where it’s impossible to make a profit out of mass murder. Which means I want to live in a world where it’s impossible to make a profit out of war.

    I want to live in a world where it’s impossible to make a profit out of scaring people into thinking they have problems they don’t have in order to sell them “solutions” that they don’t need.

    I want to live in a world where garbage is not a thing. I want to live in a world where if it can’t be recycled, reused or composted, then it isn’t used.

    I want to live in a world where resources are considered the property of all living beings and they cannot be hoarded by a few of the most ruthless and predatory members of a single species.

    I want to live in world of private citizens and public servants, where citizens are entitled to quiet enjoyment of their private lives, while those that have the privilege of serving the needs of the many do so in a glass house, under intense public scrutiny. Power will not seem so desirable to those who would use it badly if this were the case, and it would be no impediment to those who wish to use it well.

    I want to live in a world where you can’t sell your ideas. You either share them for no profit or profit off them yourself, but artless predators can’t mine (or hide) the inspiration of others for financial gain.

    I want to live in a world where informed adults are free to choose what substances they put into their own bodies.

    I want to live in a world where culture is created by the people, rather than by Hollywood.

    I want to live in a world where propaganda of any description is considered psychological abuse and stands out against the background of normality like a black cat shitting on a white carpet.

    I want to live in world where the behavioral patterns set by trauma atrophy as people love themselves enough to undo them, one by one.

    I want to live in a healthy information ecology where people are sincerely attempting to describe their pinhole view on the diorama as truthfully as possible, even (and especially) when that truth contradicts their beliefs or their agenda.

    I want media companies to be tiny, agile, and beholden to no one.

    I want indie journalism to become the new punk rock.

    I want people to fully understand how mental narrative works and how easily it can be manipulated.

    I want women to know their worth.

    I want women to deeply know they are the sexual choosers. I want women to have the entitlement to choose whoever they want, or not choose anyone at all.

    I want all the machinations of sexual manipulation that reverse the position of women as the natural sexual choosers to stand out as weirdly as a monkey smoking a cigarette.

    I want women to start embodying their naturally large, intelligent, intimidating presence so that men have to rise to meet it, rather than making themselves small so that men feel like they can safely control them.

    I want to live in a world where being able to “press someone’s buttons” is not an admirable trait but rather seen as being deliberately abusive.

    I want to live in a world where one person controlling the resources of millions is a cause for alarm, not a cause for idolization.

    I want to live in a world where people feel as entitled to food, shelter and water as any other animal born on the land or in the sea.

    I want to live in a world where you can’t gamble away other people’s livelihoods on Wall Street.

    I want to live in a world where government works more like organized crowdfunding, where money is collected and used for the common good in the most transparent way possible.

    I want to live in a world where any attempt to unduly influence the spending of taxes beyond one-person, one-vote is considered extremely antisocial behavior.

    I want to live in a world where money is for helping people, not for killing them.

    I want to live in a world where humans understand that money was invented by humans, for humans, and humans can change the way it works whenever they want. Or replace it with something else entirely.

    I want to live in a world without intelligence agencies.

    I want to live in a world where every decision about the use of land is ultimately arbitrated by the original custodians of that land.

    I want to live in a world that understands that manipulators are always accusing others of doing what they themselves are doing, and that you can learn about their real motives by simply applying to them what they’re saying about others.

    I want lobbying to be illegal.

    I want think tanks to be mocked.

    I want poverty to be considered a shocking aberration which must be rectified immediately.

    I want the inequities of the past acknowledged and reconciled with material wealth and a big fat apology.

    I want an end to victim-blaming and consequences for victimizers.

    I want to defund the Pentagon.

    I want to defund the Queen.

    I want to defund the Vatican.

    I want to return all the false constructs of power-mad men to the earth for renewal.

    I want to end patents.

    I want ideas to be free.

    I want people to be so relaxed and secure that they cannot be manipulated by the false siren of fear.

    I want to call an end to the insane competition we are all trained to engage in from birth, and I want a no-contest declared, and the prize to be divided by 7.7 billion.

    I want a playful collaboration to begin with each other and with our ecosystem.

    I want us all to truly, deeply see each other.

    I want us all to truly, deeply see ourselves.

    I want us all to become natural terrestrials, back at home on this planet at long last.

    I want everyone to make their own list of demands.

  8. Dr. Fetzer is a rare entity . He walks the talk. Few of us have that courage. We type on our keyboards hopelessly thinking our electrons will be heard above the trillions upon trillions. It takes the walk and not just the stroke….which leads me to an interesting question….
    All of us on this blog and many, many others in support of exposing the SH fraud et al have also committed defamation. AND, in essence, we have likely reached SO many more with our words than the good Dr. in his book with his words. Blogs and free e-books are read voluntarily….so, should not all of us be charged with defamation? Reminds me of “I am Spartacus…I am Spartacus….etc. Of course, we know there is a legaleeze explanation for this anomaly. There always is. Common sense and Common Law never prevail in a UCC corrupted court.
    I am Spartacus. I am Spartacus. I am Spartacus.
    So are YOU!

    1. I tried to break this down for you already, but I guess I’ll give it another shot. This case isn’t about free speech. You can type or say whatever you want about Sandy Hook. This website still exists, Jim can continue to post and make videos, and his book is available for download or purchase. Jim went after a private citizen. That’s the only difference. You would think that someone with advanced degrees would understand that, but Jim loves the spotlight so much that it is now costing him 450k. I’m sure everyone here will pitch in to help him though, right?

      1. Jim did not ”go after” anyone. His book merely points out several discrepancies concerning the various bogus Death Certificates of one of the fake victims. Pozner, one of the fraudulent parents, is claiming mental problems. His complaint is a lot of hocus pocus about PTSD.

        Let’s remember that there have been no wrongful death lawsuits in the Sandy Hook debacle. Why? In that type of case you have to PROVE a death occurred in Discovery in a courtroom. Insurance companies don’t like to be bamboozled and made to look like fools.

      2. You didn’t break anything down matey. You posted a smug retort, simply to big note yourself. The Sandy Hook hoax was a massive criminal deception from go to woe. If Pozner’s child was actually killed (and he may have been) it certainly wasn’t at the hands of the fictitious Adam Lanzer. An honest court of law would first ensure that Pozner was telling the truth about the source of his PTSD and that his child’s death certificate is legitimate and not a CIA fabrication. Hell they managed to “create” Obama’s birth certificate so what’s a child’s death certificate? The judge is obviously corrupt and likely knows full well that Jim Fetzer isn’t guilty and that Pozner junior’s death didn’t happen as a result of a staged mass shooting….if at all. The Pozner legal team used the classic Zionist / B’nai B’rith tactic of finding a “friendly judge and/or prosecutor” to ensure that the first stage of their judicial fraud is rubber stamped. This tactic has been used relentlessly to silence and jail so-called “Holocaust deniers” in Europe. The idea is to lump the victim with such massive legal costs that they inevitably give up and admit fault to stave off bankruptcy. The Zionist/CIA/Soros crime gang, has access to billions of dollars of dirty money and can tie anyone up in court for years. Sadly “dial-a-judge” Remington’s ruling, has ramifications that reach far beyond this case. The EU, Australia, NZ, GB, the US, Canada etc have all signed off on legislation that intrudes massively into an individual’s personal internet communications. This legislation was remarkably “all ready to go” (as was NZ’s gun grab legislation) after the Christchurch Mosque shootings. Yet another mass shooting that came off as contrived, very suspicious and ever so conveniently timed. In that case, armed NZ police were calling around to civilian’s houses (often multiple times) so as to intimidate them if they posted anything challenging the Deep State “story-line”. The “Terror World Tour” team had updated their tactics after previous staged shootings were challenged/disproven by citizen investigators.

      3. The “death certificate” was a disputed fact. The Judge disallowed testimony of expert witnesses who could dispute the validity of the documents.Whoever heard of a nickname being used on a government document? “Lenny” was listed as the father. Leonard (or Elizer) is his legal name (supposedly) He told me that his birth name was Leonid! Pozner’s inability to prove who he is and his relation to the child also led to his inability to respond to Professor James Tracy’s copyright counterclaim.
        Instead, Pozner relies on the heavily corrupted media to brainwash the public into thinking he is a poor, innocent victim.
        Pozner has been an internet expert for decades. His role has always been to silence online dissent. He has no verifiable income or place of employment. His job is to stalk, harass and censor those who seek to expose Sandy Hook for the fraud that it was.
        If Lenny lost a child, it wasn’t one Dec 12, 2014 at the hands of Adam Lanza.

        1. I wonder if Lenny pays his income taxes…..state, federal, and perhaps even local. Likewise, I wonder if the parents of the sorrowfully deceased children pay their taxes on what could be millions of dollars of gross income. Would an anonymous email to the IRS uncover some inconvenient facts? Or, is the IRS in on this ruse? It is postulated that these grieving, woe is me, parents could have raked in upwards of 5 million clams individually thanks to the generosity of the general public. Has that ever been tested or have they been given a special dispensation by the PTB? Is it time to ask Judicial Watch for help? I think it is, they know the sue business like nobody’s business. Let’s ring up Tom Fitton and see if we can get some sort of idea to help Jim.

      4. Hey, 1bigmouth: Was Jim permitted his free speech at the trial? No? And to think you say nothing in this case has to do with free speech??? Too bad you didn’t pass your bar exam. Try, try again.

  9. How did they come up with that dollar amount? It makes no sense. And the book was not about Lenny. The book was about the hoax. God will judge them all, eventually.

  10. This ridiculous kangaroo court proceeding shows the US to be nothing more than a police state ruled by oligarchy.

    From financial markets to judiciary, EVERYTHING is rigged.

    William Casey: “We’ll Know Our Disinformation Program Is Complete When Everything the American Public Believes Is False.”

  11. This sad verdict is the result of a relentless seven year assault on people’s minds with false information and lies about what did not happen at Sandy Hook. The brain, which after all is a lot of mush, can be molded and formed into just about whatever is wanted. When people lack critical thinking abilities, this is what happens.

    The term ”conspiracy theorist” is a CIA created meme to demonize anyone who dares to question the official government position on a given event. In Medieval times, people who questioned religious or government dogma were burned alive.

    Amazon dot com is engaged in interstate commence and therefore must abide by the Laws of the USA. The 1st Amendment applies to Amazon. The USA allows this company to flout the Law.

Leave a Reply