23 Aug, 2019

Why the Jussie Smollett Case looks like a Cover-Up to protect Kamala Harris

Tyler S. Farley

Today a somewhat shocking announcement came out of Chicago where prosecutors decided that they are dropping all charges against Jussie Smollett related to his staged attack early this year.

The news comes as quite a surprise seeing as how the evidence against him was seemingly airtight, including witnesses, confessions by those he hired, and physical evidence that all pointed towards his guilt.

And although many people are upset that Smollett’s wrongdoing is being swept under the rug for political reasons, this is probably just the beginning of a much bigger scandal.

Going back to the early days of the investigation, I wrote an article that suggested Kamala Harris’ connection to Jussie Smollett was much more than just circumstantial in regards to the hoax. In the article it shows what others had been digging up, including Harris sponsoring an anti-lynching bill in Congress. As you may remember, just a day after Smollett went public with his alleged assault story, Kamala Harris took to twitter to call it a “modern day lynching”. Not only that, Harris and Smollett were long time friends, and Smollett has even campaigned with Harris.

But the story gets even more interesting because of Kamala Harris’ connection to Cook County Prosecutor Kim Foxx. Foxx, who would normally oversee the Smollett case abruptly and mysteriously recused herself from the case soon after he was charged. Her reason was as she described an “abundance of caution” and possible contact with witnesses. However, it was later discovered that she had substantial contact with Smollett’s family. A potential prosecutor having contact with Smollett’s family before charges were filed and while police were still investigating is very strange.

As it turns out, Foxx and Harris are close friends. Not only that, Foxx credits Harris as her mentor and the one responsible for her own career. In addition, Harris was part of Foxx’s transition team when she became Cook County Prosecutor. So it would seem Foxx is in debt to Harris and said as much herself.

Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸

@JackPosobiec

I’m told this is why Kim Foxx recused in the Smollett case

Kim Foxx@KimFoxxforSA

I’m so excited that @KamalaHarris has decided to run for president. I would not be where I am today without her guidance during my first run for political office, and she has continued to mentor me as I work to reform the criminal justice system in Cook County.  —KF

View image on Twitter

 

When the charges were first filed against Smollett, I suspected Foxx and Harris were actively trying to quash the investigation. There was no doubt there was a good deal of communication between Harris and Foxx, and as Foxx admitted, with Smollett’s family as well. The fact that today prosecutors have asked a judge to seal the case suggests they want those communications to be kept secret as they would be very damaging to Harris and Foxx. Harris sticking her nose into an investigation in a state where she holds no office would open up countless questions as to what her motives were for doing so. Especially since she was friends with the suspect being investigated.

However, before charges were even filed against Smollett, Foxx and her team were trying to get the case moved to the FBI. This is very significant and it brings up a point I believe many people are missing. It seems the same people who have now dropped the charges against Smollett and asked the case to be sealed are the same ones who asked for the FBI to handle the case. The same people with close ties and communication with Harris. This suggests that they knew once the case was in the hands of the FBI, they could make it go away. Someone in that circle of Foxx and Harris believed that they had an “in” with the FBI and sending the investigation there could make it go away.

If Foxx’s team ultimately dropped the charges against Smollett, that suggests they always wanted this case to go away and the details to be hidden away forever. If they felt the FBI was going to do an honest investigation, there is no reason they would want it handed over to them as they already knew the evidence against Smollett was very solid. The only reason they would have wanted things moved to the FBI is because Harris advised them that the FBI could make it “go away”.

Going back to Foxx’s recusal, I suggested the reason was because she didn’t want to become part of the case. Her contact with Harris was going to be brought up by Smollett’s high-dollar legal team as a defense. Even in the early days, Smollett’s legal team was suggesting their whole defense was going to be based around the procedures of the investigation. This means everybody, including Foxx and her communications were going to be brought to light in open court. Foxx recused herself as an early attempt to avoid her communication with Harris, and possibly other higher-ups in the Democratic party from becoming public.

As the case went on, they started to realize there was no way they could go to trial and not have their backdoor communication to protect Smollett come out. So they decided the best bet was to drop the charges and fight to have the entire case sealed.

But if the case was dropped, will the Nigerian brothers who admitted to being a part of the hoax be charged with lying to police? If what they said was a lie, they should be charged. If what they said was true, prosecutors should not drop the charges against Smollett because an obvious crime took place.

We must also look at Smollett himself. He is neither wealthy enough nor famous enough to have used his position or wealth to have 16 felony charges dropped and expunged from his record before even going to trial. Some in the media are trying to portray this as a case of two systems of justice, one for the rich and one for the rest of us. However, Smollett is not a part of that elite group who can circumvent the judicial system, he simply isn’t rich or famous enough. The only explanation is that someone higher up is being protected here, and that someone is most likely Kamala Harris. Harris appears to be the DNC golden child in the upcoming 2020 election and her ties to Smollett can be damaging. Not only that, Cook County Prosecutor Kim Foxx was contacted by former First Lady Michelle Obama’s chief of staff Tina Tchen to offer “advice” on how to handle the Smollett case. So here we have evidence of highly connected members of the Democratic party actively engaging in trying to steer the Smollett investigation while it was ongoing.

Based on social media reaction, a majority of Americans seem angry at what transpired today in regards to the Smollett case. But I feel this isn’t the end of the story at all, and in fact it’s just the beginning of something much bigger.

Please follow and like us:
error

41 thoughts on “Why the Jussie Smollett Case looks like a Cover-Up to protect Kamala Harris”

  1. Here is a YT video, 33:39 video time length,

    ___________________________

    xxxxxhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSpqX9kS-Rkxxxxx

    #GreatAwakening #Chicago #DrainTheSwamp
    Child Trafficking Agent Called In on Smollett Case
    37,228 views
    6.2K
    42
    Share
    Save
    Amazing Polly
    Published on Mar 29, 2019
    CORRECTION: I was not thinking straight – Kimbal Musk is a man – a chef – NOT Elon Musk’s wife! Yikes! Sorry for the error.
    Why would a Special Agent – one of the US’s foremost experts on Child Trafficking – be called in to look at the fake hate crime on Jussie Smollett? There were no minors involved? Stay tuned to the last part of the video where I go over a theory of what might be going on in Chicago.

    ___________________

    where Canadian researcher, Amazing Polly, applies her brilliant reasoning skills and profers her hypothesis on the Jussie Smallett case involving a sting operation whereby FBI special agent, Gregory Wing, does a sting operation on Smallett and substitutes two Black attackers for the planned two White attackers on Smallett.

    Polly’s analysis connects all the deep dots between the D.C. / Chicago / Hollywood swamp creatures and, in my opinion, renders author Farley’s hypothesis rather superficial, just like the play performed by Rahm and his Chicago Police cast of players.

    1. Interesting analysis for sure. I used to avoid reading the National Enquirer while waiting on line at the supermarket…thought the stories were insane. Now it all seems to have become reality. Who woulda thunk?

      It’s a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World….and not in a humorous way.

    2. What is particularly interesting to me is that FBI agent in Chicago got wind of Smollett’s plan to have a hoax attack on himself BEFORE the attack, and that allowed the sting operation during the attack. Wing appears to definitely “on the case” before the case happened.

      What is particularly heartening to me is that there is at least one very professional and honest FBI agent still around.

      If Team Trump had anything to do with FBI Wing’s actions in this matter, this could play out to effect a mortal wound to the “deep state.”

      1. Sorry to say, it seems to me that Amazing Polly’s thesis is speculative. She says that in order to unravel the hoax and expose the players, FBI Agent Wing was able to substitute black attackers for white in the planned ‘hate crime’, but I missed it if she gave any evidence for this.

        Same for the table reservation app; I don’t think she offers any evidence that it has been or could be used to order up a victim.

        Hate to be a complete downer here lol, but I would be wary of putting your faith in any Special Agent. Consider the history of the FBI and its record of collusion with gangsters, both State and Organized. Individual employees of the Agency may believe they have integrity, but they are ineffective. When has the FBI ever saved us from anything? What assassination? What “terror” attack? What ‘hate crime’? What ‘mass casualty event’? Neither do they expose these events in their aftermath.

        The FBI, in all its Special Agents, is like a PR firm for bad actors and their official stories.

        1. Appreciate your viewpoint, Toni.

          Polly says herself this is just an idea of hers. I thought she did a good job of giving names and relationships. I also thought the restaurant reservations application is just a “cover operation” for more lucrative and sinister money making activity. Cover operations go way back in studying organized crime. They always seem to need a cover in place to pull some scheme off.

          This Smollett case may have to be a “future proves past” thing where we will just have to see how this plays out.

          I do tend to latch on to what looks like a new good guy on the scene and also to the idea that there is a bit of truth to Trump’s 4 D chess thing.

          Kevin Shipp is a good guy who is a retired whistleblower of the CIA and I think he is a good guy. I am worried that he has not done a video or been on a radio interview in several weeks now. I hope they haven’t gotten to him.

  2. This entire article; and apparently most of this site is all just a bunch far-right propaganda. 911 was an inside job, that’s obvious; stolen oil sent to Saudi Arabia, from two countries. etc.

    For Jussie; no, the evidence is not clear it was stagged. A lot of assumptions in this article. Not cool!

    1. You are a real stooge to make such ridiculous statements-unfortunately for you and your ilk the American People are are far too savvy and red-pilled to swallow your poison

    1. I did not find any familial relationship between Kamala Harris and the Smollett family through marriage that might provide a basis for referring to Kamala as Jussie’s “aunt.” Jussie Smollett was born in Santa Rosa, California, to Janet (Harris) Smollett and Joel Smollett Sr. (who migrated to the U.S. from Russia and Poland). Jussie said the family moved to Queens when he was two years old, and afterwards, according to the New York Times, he grew up “bouncing with [his] parents and siblings between New York and Los Angeles, as the kids pursued careers in modeling, acting and music.”

      Neither Kamala Harris’ husband, Douglas Emhoff, nor Maya Harris’ husband, Tony West, has any discernible connection to Jussie’s parents.

      The claim that Kamala Harris is Jussie Smollett’s aunt was offered by a number of social media users, but the documentation presented with it was flimsy at best. In fact, the most substantial piece of “evidence” presented to support the theory was that Smollett’s mother and the California senator share a surname: Harris, a very common name in the US.

      Kamala is not his ”aunt”.

  3. Willy, Tony and all
    Tonight, Friday Mar 29, 3 pm pacific, 5 pm central, You can go to freedomslips.com and click on Studio A, upper left hand corner to listen to James and a very special guest…. We will discuss you and this comment section.

    1. Still listening to you on freedomslips….great call …and I appreciate your getting Dr. Fetzer’s email. Thank you so much for your concern and passion!

      1. Bless you Willy! It was fun! Great callers…. You caught “Angel’s” shout out to you, right? We’re going to build solutions through community. Just watch!

        1. I heard the shout out and I thank you so much.
          Unfortunately, I continue to state this comment section is very difficult to deal with (I’m being nice here) and time consuming.. For instance, in the AM, when I tune back in, there will be a list of 5 recent comments. Thing is, I have no idea how recent they are and how many came before them. SO, to get up to date, I have to go through all the articles (at least the current ones) to find comments and updates. AND. as this blog grows, it will get worse. We need a notification system each time a reply or comment is posted. I’m a technical dino, so have no idea what that would take. ICH used to have such a method, but no longer. Could be an interim step would be to have recent comments include the most 20 recent comments. That in itself would save much time.
          I realize James is doing his best and has many kettles on the boil….this is just an issue that should be put on the table.

  4. This case goes much deeper than the protect Kamala Harris no matter what thesis.

    zzzzzhttps://truepundit.com/top-fbi-child-sex-trafficking-did-jussie-rat-out-hollywood/zzzzz delete z\’s to copy and paste

    Child abuse, child sex trafficking is involved and some big names in politics and maybe some big names in Hollywood are possibly implicated, as well as the name of Smallett himself in this regard.

    1. The country is enslimed ,morality has taken a hike. Politicians only lie when their lips are moving. Rest assured, an event is often a distraction meant to hide another event.
      When you have a second, look up Alinsky’s principles, you’ll see an awful lot of information that truly describes today’s America.

  5. Let us not ignore the fact that kamala harris can not possibly be a “Natural Born” U.S. citizen. She was born to immigrants of differing nationality who could not have naturalized before her birth, if at all.

    I fear the whole matter of natural born citizenship has become untouchable now out of the real concern of the media and the mass of conspirators involved in the placement and protection of the ineligible fraud obama in our white house will be forced to acknowledge their crimes.

      1. The point is; birth place alone does not determine the “jurisdiction” of ones citizenship, or ones allegiance. That is national law. Clearly one born of parents with differing citizenship will have conflicted allegiance, with birth on soil foreign to both parents only a further complication of loyalty. That is the whole purpose for “Natural Born Citizen” being a requirement in our Constitution. To insure un-conflicted allegiance as best as possible, not being able to positively ensure against treason it self.

        There is only one source our founders could have derived the very :term” with its clear definition, of which they were all undeniably well familiar. That is the “Law of Nations” by Emmerich de Vattell. obama was elected through a massive scam that took advantage of dumbed down masses and lying pundits claiming expertise.

        1. I have no dispute re Obama….who knows where that mongrel was born. But KH was born in the US…CA, I think….

          The Constitution directly addresses the minimum qualifications necessary to serve as President. In addition to requiring thirty-five years of age and fourteen years of residency, the Constitution limits the presidency to “a natural born Citizen.” All the sources routinely used to interpret the Constitution confirm that the phrase “natural born Citizen” has a specific meaning: namely, someone who was a U.S. citizen at birth with no need to go through a naturalization proceeding at some later time. And Congress has made equally clear from the time of the framing of the Constitution to the current day that, subject to certain residency requirements on the parents, someone born to a U.S. citizen parent generally becomes a U.S. citizen without regard to whether the birth takes place in Canada, the Canal Zone, or the continental United States.

          1. Obama was born in Hawaii to an Indonesian ”bar worker” [Lederer’s Bar, now closed.] and her Indonesian customer. Obama is 100% Indonesian. When he left Hawaii and came to the mainland he began to pretend he was black. There is nothing African-American about him. He took on the name of his fake father Barack Hussein Obama, a foreign student who already had a wife back home in Africa. He changed his name [Barry Soetoro] and magically became ”black”, to game the system. The idea that he’s half white is total fiction…. but that’s part of his fake identity.

            He even had the nerve to post a totally fake pdf berth certificate on the White House dot gov. website …which is a FELONY. His ”father” is listed on that pdf as ”African American” which nomenclature was not in use at the time of his birth. The word then required in Hawaii was ”negro”.

            I could go on but you get the picture. He identity is a total fraud.

            A bar is mentioned in his fake bio book. His fake grandfather took him to that bar when he was 14 to see the obscene Disney art that shows Micky mouse boinking Minnie. I guess that Lederer’s Bar was rather nostalgic because that was where is mother had worked.

            When BHO speaks to a black audience he can slip into his version of jive-talk. I guess he figures that American black like to hear that jive lingo.

          2. Yeah, it’s complex. But “Obama’s” father was Frank Marshall Davis, a much older communist porn producer that hired Obama’s mother. Barry calls him “Uncle Frank” in his memoirs. Look at the pictures. Layers upon layers.

          3. I don’t think there is any resemblance between BHO and FMD, the communist porn producer. There was a another woman in the nudie photos of Ann Dunham. She was still alive in 2010 and has been interviewed by a well known author I know. She revealed a lot, including the fact that Ann Dunham was not the bio mother of BHO. The bio mother was an Indonesian woman from Java, Indonesia. That Java tribe is rather dark and can pass for black if you’re not aware.

            ”Frank” is mentioned 22 times in the fake BHO autobio book, ghost written by Bill Ayers.

            Why did BHO declare his past records are sealed forever in the first week he was in the Oval Office? His past is explosive information and is very different from what the public has been told.

          4. You are not listening to KJL. The whole POINT of the exercise of requiring a candidate for the office of the presidency to be a ‘natural born’ citizen, rather than just a citizen, was to make sure that the occupant of that office – who would as well, then, become the Commander in Chief of the nation’s military forces (a key factor in the eyes of the constitutional Framers) – had NO DUAL OR OTHERWISE CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES OR INFLUENCES. Had SOLE ALLEGIANCE to the U.S. (in this case). And this is confirmed by the to-some inconvenient historical fact that Alexander Hamilton, as a delegate to the C’l Convention proceedings, made a proposal that the president need only be, quote, “born a Citizen” – and his proposal was SPECIFICALLY TURNED DOWN, in favor of the more stringent category of citizen, i.e., one born “in the country, of parents who are citizens”. The quote being from the source that KJL referred to; which was the definitive tome of the day on such nation-building matters.

            And that’s why BHO wasn’t eligible, either. And when Truth and Justice are finally served in this country, all of the legislation that he signed into law, and all of the E.O.’s and P..D.’s that he issued, and all of the appointments that he made – including to the SCOTUS, and inferior courts – will go with him. Into the trash bin For it to be as though he had never been there. For, he was never there legally.

          5. Here we have the ‘Wiki take’

            Status as a natural-born citizen of the United States is one of the eligibility requirements established in the United States Constitution for holding the office of President or Vice President. This requirement was intended to protect the nation from foreign influence.[1]

            The U.S. Constitution uses but does not define the phrase “natural born Citizen”, and various opinions have been offered over time regarding its precise meaning. The consensus of early 21st-century constitutional scholars, together with relevant case law, is that natural-born citizens include, subject to exceptions, those born in the United States. Many scholars have also concluded that those who meet the legal requirements for U.S. citizenship “at the moment of birth”, regardless of place of birth, are also natural-born citizens.[2][3] Every president to date was either a citizen at the adoption of the Constitution in 1789 or was born in the United States; of these there have been seven that had at least one parent who was not born on U.S. soil.[4][5]

            The natural-born-citizen clause has been mentioned in passing in several decisions of the United States Supreme Court, and by some lower courts that have addressed eligibility challenges, but the Supreme Court has never directly addressed the question of a specific presidential or vice-presidential candidate’s eligibility as a natural-born citizen. Many eligibility lawsuits from the 2008, 2012, and 2016 election cycles were dismissed in lower courts due to the challengers’ difficulty in showing that they had standing to raise legal objections. Additionally, some experts have suggested that the precise meaning of the natural-born-citizen clause may never be decided by the courts because, in the end, presidential eligibility may be determined to be a non-justiciable political question that can be decided only by Congress rather than by the judicial branch of government.[6

            MY take:
            How this has become a political issue is beyond my understanding. Natural Citizen was never adequately defined by the Constitution, so who better to do it than the SCOTUS? Why are politics becoming involved in every decision we make, including word definitions? I would call that fascism. The state determines what words mean? Ridiculous.

    1. The total fraud Obama had one thing that no previous president had. He had an iron clad form of protection against ANYTHING said against him…..his skin color. He did anything he wanted and gave you his middle finger if you disagreed.

      The Republicans are scared out of their minds to be called….. RACIST.

      1. I don’t think Republicans are scared to be called racist, I think they are lazy, ambivalent, and simply won’t make an effort to show some displeasure at the state of affairs. Americans are nothing if not supremely lazy, they don’t care, they believe all the tommyrot about the US being “exceptional”. They have their electronic baubles, what else do they need to keep ’em happy?

      1. Neither was Obama, but the Masters wanted him in. This is not the case here….Harris will go no where and put a few campaign bucks in her own account when it’s all over.
        Trump is a shoe in if he pulls of some ballot reform; more than a shoe in if he indicts the Clinton’s…may wind up with the greatest plurality in history.
        No need to worry.

  6. I watched Kamala’s performance at the Judge Kavanaugh Hearing. It was sickening.

    I don’t like to name-call anyone but a few words come to mind: repugnant, repellent, revolting.

  7. Look on the bright side, we can dispense with the word “white” before the word “privilege” forever now.
    As if OJ wasn’t enough.
    Funny, the bastard is doubling down, threatening to “sue the police.” If he succeeds at that, we’ll have to make him an honorary white person.

Leave a Reply