Sundance, Beware of Obama’s Outrage Trap – Susan Rice’s “By The Book” Memo…

With the Mueller probe coming to a close, there is increased focus on congress (Lindsey Graham and/or Devin Nunes), along with President Trump, beginning a process toward accountability for those who constructed the Russia collusion/conspiracy hoax. However, amid the increased calls for sunlight and accountability, there are well-intended voices walking perilously close to an outrage trap.

The issue(s) surround President Obama and high-ranking Obama intelligence officials, notably: Comey, Clapper, Brennan and Yates, intentionally lying and/or misrepresenting issues to president-elect Donald Trump and the transition team in/around the transition period and shortly after the January 20, 2017, inauguration.

Some of the misinformation stems from intelligence officials telling direct lies (ex. telling President-elect, and President Trump he was not under investigation).  Other aspects were lies of omission surrounding the Steele Dossier during the January 6th, 2017, intelligence briefing session with the President-elect in Trump Tower.

In essence, there were many misleading and false statements, with varying scales of severity, during the period from November 9th, 2016, through mid-May 2017 when President Trump fired FBI Director James Comey.

For an analysis of the history of the Russia hoax, click here to view on Bitchute.

The FBI, DOJ, ODNI, CIA and intelligence officials were intentionally not being direct and honest with President Trump and key members of his new administration.  Obviously their lack of honesty was a serious issue, and in some cases had serious ramifications.

The expressed finding by Robert Mueller’s two-year probe of ‘no Trump-Russia collusion, no Trump-Russia conspiracy, and no Trump-Russia obstruction’ has led to some hindsight reviews by media voices where anger surfaces about the now visible deception.

However, there is a trap laid here and Democrats are hoping outraged voices will walk straight into it.   Some are already getting very close.

At 12:15pm on January 20th, 2017, Obama’s outgoing National Security Advisor Susan Rice wrote a memo-to-self.  Many people have called this her “CYA” (cover your ass) memo, from the position that Susan Rice was protecting herself from consequences if the scheme against President Trump was discovered.  Here’s the email:

On January 5, following a briefing by IC leadership on Russian hacking during the 2016 Presidential election, President Obama had a brief follow-on conversation with FBI Director Jim Corney and Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates in the Oval Office. Vice President Biden and I were also present.

President Obama began the conversation by stressing his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue is handled by the Intelligence and law enforcement communities “by the book“.

The President stressed that he is not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book.

From a national security perspective, however, President Obama said he wants to be sure that, as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia.

[Redacted Classified Section of Unknown length]

The President asked Corney to inform him if anything changes in the next few weeks that should affect how we share classified information with the incoming team. Corney said he would.

Susan Rice ~ (pdf link)

As stated, many have looked at this as a “CYA” memo, but that’s not what this is.

This is a justification memo, written by an outgoing National Security Advisor Susan Rice to document why there have been multiple false and misleading statements given to the incoming President Trump and all of his officials.

This is not a “CYA” memo, this is a justification memo for use AFTER the Trump-Russia collusion/conspiracy narrative collapsed; if the impeachment effort failed.

The “By The Book” aspect refers to President Obama and Susan Rice being told by CIA  Director John Brennan, FBI Director James Comey, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, that President Trump was the subject of an active counterintelligence investigation to determine if he was under the influence of the Russian government.

Even the timing of the memo, written 15 minutes prior to the end of the Obama administration, is ex-post-facto useful as evidence of the author’s intent.

Put aside the nonsense aspect to the origination of the investigation for a moment; that part doesn’t apply here…. Accept their position ‘as if’ it is substantive.

We are talking about Brennan, Comey, Clapper and Yates telling President Obama and NSA Susan Rice that President-elect Trump is under a counterintelligence investigation where the suspicion is that Donald J Trump is an agent of a foreign power.

Under that auspices (fraudulent though it may be) the incoming President is a counterintelligence investigation target. A potentially compromised Russian asset. Under this auspices all of the officials would be permitted to lie and mislead their target, so long as they did so “By The Book.”

That’s their justification for a lengthy series of lies and false statements.

That’s why FBI Director James Comey can lie to the President and tell him he’s not the target of the ongoing Russia investigation.  That’s the justification for keeping the accusations inside the Steele Dossier (remember, the Dossier is evidence) from the President-elect.  That’s the justification for all of the officials to lie to President Trump, and even mislead the media if needed.

The Susan Rice email is one big Justification Letter; setting the stage for all of the participants to have a plausible reason for lies to anyone and everyone.

Call out John Brennan for telling Harry Reid about the Steele Dossier during his gang-of-eight briefing, but not telling Go8 member Devin Nunes about it.  Brennan escapes by saying Nunes was on the Trump transition team; and briefing a conflicted politician on the dossier would have compromised the FBI investigation.  See how that works?

Call out James Comey for lying to President-elect Trump during the January 6th Trump Tower meeting…. Comey escapes by saying Trump was a target of the FBI investigation for potential compromise as a Russian asset; informing the target of the evidence against him would have compromised the investigation. See how that works?

Every lie, every omission, every false and/or misleading statement, must first be filtered through the “By The Book” prism of Trump being considered a Russian asset.  This is the justification trap democrats are waiting to exploit for maximum damage and diminishment of counter attack.

The “By the Book” justification, where every action could have been taken because Trump might have been an actual Russian operative, is the weapon under the camouflage tarp as the radical left lures-in their political opposition.  They shrug their shoulders and say in condescending voice: ‘well, we didn’t know; we had to be prudent‘, etc.

Getting outraged about the Obama administration’s lies, misstatements and fabrications can backfire if you don’t first think about it from their constructed frame-of-reference.

The ‘By-the-Book’ framework is based on a false-premise; but the action, just about any action, taken to mislead (even undermine) the incoming administration is excusable under this carefully crafted justification memo.   That’s exactly why Susan Rice wrote it; and each of the participating members knows they can use it, when needed.

The way to get around the legal and political defense inside this justification memo is to ignore the activity of those protected by it and go directly to the origin of how they created that false premise in the first place:

♦ Prove the July 31st, 2016, Crossfire Hurricane operation originated from fraud by exposing the CIA operation that created the originating “Electronic Communication” memo.  Declassify that two-page “EC” document that Brennan gave to Comey.

♦ Reveal the November 2015 through April 2016 FISA-702 search query abuse by declassifying the April 2017 court opinion written by FISC Presiding Judge Rosemary Collyer.  Show the FBI contractors behind the 85% fraudulent search queries. [Crowdstrike? Fusion-GPS? Nellie Ohr?]

♦ Subpoena former DOJ-NSD (National Security Division) head John Carlin, or haul him in front of a grand jury, and get his testimony about why he hid the abuse from the FISA court in October 2016; why the DOJ-NSD rushed the Carter Page application to beat NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers to the FISA court; and why Carlin quit immediately thereafter. Squeeze this bastard’s nuts in the proverbial legal vice.

♦ Prove the Carter Page FISA application (October 2016) was fraudulent and based on deceptions to the FISA Court.  Declassify the entire document, and release the transcripts of those who signed the application(s); and/or depose those who have not yet testified.

♦ Release all of the Lisa Page and Peter Strzok text messages without redactions.  Let sunlight pour in on the actual conversation(s) that were taking place when Crossfire Hurricane (July ’16) and the FISA Application (Oct ’16) were taking place.

♦ Release all of Bruce Ohr 302’s, FBI notes from interviews and debriefing sessions, and other relevant documents associated with the interviews of Bruce Ohr and his internal communications. Including exculpatory evidence that Bruce Ohr may have shared with FBI Agent Joseph Pientka.  [And get a deposition from this Pientka fella]

In short, avoid the “justification trap” by ignoring the downstream activity (stemming as a result of the fraudulent origin), and focus on revealing the origin of the fraud.

Please follow and like us:

14 thoughts on “Sundance, Beware of Obama’s Outrage Trap – Susan Rice’s “By The Book” Memo…”

    1. So,I assume Sundance is on that channel as the author of this article?

      I would pray that if Sundance has figured out this strategy, that Trump and his team have, also….then again, who knows how much is theater and how much, if any, is real.

      No one I know.

      1. No, my bad. I think I should have posted as a reply to Mr. Olson’s

        “Beyond Censorship, Destruction of Free Thought Online” by Melissa & Aaron Dykes
        at > TruthsyreamMedia(.)com

        THAT was the article I was referring to where URL appears to be in error.

        I have not even read this thread’s main article by Sundance as I am looking at too many different “cases” right now and am having info overload.

        I really am off of looking back too much at Obama and his operatives and the Clintons and their operatives.

        I try to focus on what will blow the lid off the massive corruption and deception that is threatening the the entire takedown of our republic. That is what is at stake and most pressing to me.

        1. Understood.. Thanks.

          But would you not agree they are influencing this coup? After all, if the coup succeeds (present set-back considered and likely factored in), these creatures go free.

          I, too, do not like wasting time on them….except for constructing a good strong gallows to handle the crowd (fat chance, but I can dream that some justice will prevail). As a retired carpenter, I would love to be part of the construction effort!

          1. You are right. The coup is real and the actors there do go back in time.

            I have always been a bit behind and naive in understanding how all this massive incredible deep state corruption works so I am still reeling a bit psychologically. That is why I hold fast to my Christian faith.

            Surprised to hear you were a carpenter. I thought you were an attorney. I love to watch good carpentry of people building their own homes and out buildings on the YouTube homesteading channels. That is my recreation and relaxation from all the very dark news we look at here.

          2. DL…accountant/chef/carpenter…in that order.
            There is only one BAR with which I was ever associated… own…
            …and another one of which I was a rather frequent attendant of in “the day”..Allen’s Ale House…with my favorite raconteur/bar tender…Malachy McCourt….not far from the WTC….

          3. Willy, Malachy McCourt of literary fame, right? Pretty cool.
            Born NYC, raised in poverty in Limerick:
            \\\”Somebody once said that the Irish derived the greatest benefit from the English language. They court it like a beautiful woman. They make it bray with donkey laughter, they fling it at the sky like paint pots full of rainbow colors.\\\”

          4. Beautifully said, Toni…Frank was his brother who wrote Angela’s Ashes. Malachy had the gift of story telling which made him such a great bartender….enhanced by his drinking of course. I would go there for lunch and sometimes never make it back to work.

            Malachy and Richard Harris were great friends and he would tell me stories of the two that were just delicious. the time Malachy took all of Harris’ clothes and let reporters into some hotel room while Harris was in the shower.

            This was all when they were building the WTC a few blocks away. I worked for Allied Chemical on Rector Street. So I watched the WTC go up and know very well how that place was built. It would have taken a lot more than a couple of (non-existent) planes to bring them down.

  1. CHT does some great investigative journalism, however it is a limited hangout. Don’t mention Pope, pedos, JFK, 9/11, SES, SERCO, or any conspiracy in history, ignore PDJT cabinet of neocons,. RussiaGate is undeniable conspiracy, so acceptable.

    “Beyond Censorship, Destruction of Free Thought Online” by Melissa & Aaron Dykes
    at > TruthsyreamMedia(.)com

    1. Joseph- Yes, I noticed the same about Conservative Treehouse–Sundance and most of the people commenting over there believe the official narratives on almost everything (JFK, 911, Sandy Hook, Boston Marathon, and all the other hoaxes under Obama)

Leave a Reply