Joe Olson: 9/11 Twin Towers were destroyed using “clean nukes”, WTC 7 with conventional demolitions

Joe Olson

9/11 Twin Towers were destroyed using “clean nukes”, WTC 7 with conventional demolitions

6 July 2018

Mr. President,

“Clean Nukes.” The Twin Towers and most of the World Trade Center (apart from WTC-7, which came down seven hours later in a classic controlled demolition) appear to have been demolished – much of it vaporized – using “clean nukes.”

The technical term is “minimum residual radiation” (MRR, also sometimes called “reduced residual radiation,” RRR). Residual radiation is what remains by way of radioactive contaminants after the initial radiation of the first minute has worn off. Because the fission products are the “dirty” part of the nuclear blast, two factors are central in order to keep the device as “clean” as possible: (1) the fission-fusion mix of the thermonuclear device, i.e., the share of the total yield delivered by the fission primary and fusion secondary, respectively; and (2) the conditions under which the nuke is fired, whether it’s an air burst, ground burst or underground explosion, and whether the underground explosion takes place in an unobstructed shaft and whether any structure stands on top of the shaft, i.e. the energy can be channeled. Actual MRR appears to have been a 400-ton equivalent requiring 4 pounds of uranium.

Construction Favoring Nuclear Effect & Containment. WTC 1 & 2 exemplified a novel tube-within-a tube design that created open office space with 47 massive core columns and 240 external support columns. This allowed the deeply buried nuclear devices to have their full force channeled upwards and destroy the inner tube from the bottom/up, but caused the external tube to blow apart from the top/down. The buildings were converted into millions of cubic yards of very fine dust (which is itself a signature of the use of nuclear devices) and, when it was done (about 9 seconds for South Tower, 11 for North), there was no stack of debris in their footprints, where the result of a classic controlled demolition would have been around 13.5 floors to debris (roughly, 12% of the height of the original 110 floors for each structure). Additional explosives may have been used as a supplemental means of destroying the buildings. Many floors appear to have been unoccupied – free of both occupants and furniture  – prior vacancy rates having been accelerated by a 40% increase in rental rate to encourage tenants to vacate.

Radioactivity Indications in USGS Dust Studies. The contrast between the destruction of the Twin Towers and WTC-7, which collapsed about seven hours later as the effect of a classic controlled demolition, was striking. Instead of vaporization in every direction, all the floors of WTC-7 came down at the same time. There was no conversion into millions of yards of very fine dust. And, when it was done, there was a stack of debris of about 5.5 floors (or 12% of the original 47 floors). Studies of dust samples from 35 location in Lower Manhattan confirmed elements that, in their quantifies and correlations, were indicative of a nuclear event, including Barium, Strontium, Thorium, Uranium, Lithium, Lanthanum, Yttrium, Chromium and Tritium.

Nuclear Vaporization versus Thermite Melting. 0.13 pounds of thermite required to heat each pound of steel to its melting point. The decorative Aluminum Cladding + Iron Oxide + high heat = thermite spheres, which were residue. With 400,000 tons of missing steel and concrete – much of it vaporized – nuclear energy is posited. The directed force spared “the bathtub” any horizontal stress such that it continued to function as designed.

Very respectfully,
Joe Olson
Structural Engineer

Primary Reference: Tahil, William, Ground Zero: The Nuclear Demolition of the World Trade Centre (2006). See also: Andre Gsponer, Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons: Military Effectiveness and Collateral Effects (2005).

DOC (1 Page):  911 POTUS Olson Nuclear

Joe Olson is attended the University of Houston and passed multiple Professional Engineer examinations . He has been self-employed since 1980, retiring in 2009, performing design services on hundreds of projects in multi-story, commercial properties in twenty states. He is the co-author of Slaying the Sky Dragon: Death of the Greenhouse Gas Theoryand author of over one hundred major web posted articles on science fraud in global warming, sustainable energy and peak oil, a partial bibliography is at FauxScienceSlayer.  He has been a guest on Coast to Coast AM radio and interviewed with Dr James Fetzer, “Unequivocal 9/11 Nukes” at RealDeal.blogspot, among others.

See Also:

Memorandums for the President on 9/11: Experts Say What the 9/11 Commission Was Too Corrupt to Address

Please follow and like us:
error20

20 thoughts on “Joe Olson: 9/11 Twin Towers were destroyed using “clean nukes”, WTC 7 with conventional demolitions”

  1. Does the mini-nuke hypothesis explain the occurrence of what Judy Wood refers to as toasty cars (meaning they are toast)? They are rusted out, look like they are extremely old, and I believe certain parts, such as the tires, look unchanged.

    1. Again, the best and most completely researched book on this (e-book only) is Dmitri Khalezov’s 911-Thology..The Third Truth. It truly is encyclopedic in it’s scope, so even if you do not accept his ideas, the information he provides on other topics makes it well worth the read. It’s quite long (1096 pages) so many will not care to read it. It’s ingeniously presented as a mystery which makes it a very enjoyable read. BUT, I will say, even Khalezov finds the half burned cars to be a problem. Personally, I believe several methods were used on 9/11, not to make sure the job got done, but only to muddy the waters.
      Btw, he clearly states in the book, they were not mini-nukes…they were full-fledged multi kiloton devices that were there from day one.

  2. People who deny the Holocaust are an insult to the millions of people who were murdered in the Concentration camps.

    I don’t know what Jim Fetzer’s thoughts are on this topic…..but I doubt he denies it happened.

    The photos of boxes full of gold filled teeth, warehouse rooms loaded to the ceiling with discarded shoes and other such items reveal that someone must have worn those items. Where are these people?

    1. Even if we accept the holocaust as ‘officially’ presented (which I do not, btw), what other race/religion/belief as a victim of genocide has used that ultimate victim hood to the extent Israel has? What other religion has a power over the US CONgress and the MSM ? And while were are at it, what other religion actually has a tax on most products in the name of their religion? Whatever one thinks of the Jews and Israel, it cannot be denied they wield a power over this country comparable to no other group.

      1. Willy,
        I watched the video you suggested, Auschwitz – Why The Gas Chambers Are A Myth, and it does a great job of showing the logistical impossibility of gassing and cremating mass populations. It is particularly persuasive in describing the perverse engineering decisions made in the design of the Auschwitz facilities (these are GERMANS!), as well as the protracted cremation process itself which destroys any workable timeline for the gassing story.

        What he doesn’t even get into are the effects of the residual cyanide on the Jewish sonderkommandos themselves, exposed to Zyklon B as they dragged around fresh corpses in the close air of the underground death chambers.

        If one is credulous, it is especially horrifying to contemplate the poor sonderdentists who must have breathed the last exhalations of poisoned bodies as they pried open the jaws of the dead to get at Don’s talismanic gold teeth.

        Here’s a description from Friedrich Jansson:

        QUOTE: All of the sonderkommando witnesses in Gideon Grief’s We Wept Without Tears describe the pulling of gold teeth, both in the crematoria and at the bunkers. Leon Cohen claims to have specialized in this task. Here is a passage from his testimony (We Wept Without Tears p. 301):

        (Q) So you had only half an hour to pull out the gold teeth.
        (A) No, less. Only ten minutes.
        (Q) How many corpses are you talking about?
        (A) Let’s see. I have to count . . . Sixty to seventy-five corpses in ten minutes.
        (Q) How could you pull out teeth from so many bodies so quickly?
        (A) It’s definitely possible. You pry the body’s mouth open, look in, and if there aren’t any gold teeth you go onto the next body, and so on. Sometimes it went very fast.
        (Q) Please tell me exactly how you did your work.
        (A) The bodies were prostrate on the floor. First I had to open their mouths. I had to use force to accomplish that. The mouths were tightly closed, so I had to force them open with the pliers. Whenever I noticed a gold tooth, I pulled it out with the second pair of pliers. I used dentist’s pliers to do this. The moment I noticed a gold tooth, I ripped it out with the pliers. We also pulled out false teeth.

        (Jansson again:) So he could deal with one corpse every ten seconds. For every corpse he had to break open the jaw; when there were gold teeth he had to extract them. It’s not quite clear to me how pliers are used to open a clenched jaw. Maybe they serve as an impact tool.

        Cyanide is noted for producing a firmly locked jaw, which can even happen for still living victims of cyanide poisoning.” UNQUOTE

        Don, your response to the implausibility of these sonderkommando stories?

        1. As with so many of these official stories, it is mind-boggling as to what most will accept as truth with not even a moment of thought into the implausibility of some given action….for instance, the \”melting\” of that plane into the towers..as if the tower was made of butter and the plane a hot knife. Unfortunately, these are examples of how the human mind has been hijacked and reason and common sense have become rare entities.
          Great stuff…thanks for that find.
          Will Don pay attention or take the time?

      1. Toni…Hopefully, he will watch a vid I posted above your comment that is awaiting moderation.
        Considering the nature of the vid, I won’t bet on it’s posting.
        h t t p s colon slash slash w w w dot youtube  dotcom slash watch ? v =r u D 414f5L k Q& bpctr = 1552576651

        1. At youtube, I’m getting a message that the video you tried to link to is not available, Willy.
          What is the name in the description? maybe I can find it in a search.

          (Also, all comments with links appear to go to moderation – need I bring up the convenience of using the Dissenter browser plugin again lol? It helps keep the conversation flowing.)

          1. I watched the vid and posted a review and everything, but it disappeared. I didn’t even link to anything!

            Guess we’ll see it, when we see it.

          2. If interested, I posted my disappeared comment in the discussion thread for this page in the browser plugin, “Dissenter”

  3. There are hundreds of photos of nuclear decontamination very evident at the WTC 911 ground zero site.

    Dr Fetzer really hit Bingo with this Post. It goes straight to the 911 truth. NYC was nuked on 911, not once but several times on the same day.

    The US nuked Japan in WW II. I guess the US government and others decided it was time to nuke a US city.

    Yes the mini-nukes used were clean but not that clean. The hundreds of radiation related cancers now appearing in first responders are epidemic in numbers.

    Yes, bless Jim Fetzer, Joe Olson and others for spreading this information far and wide.

  4. I attended the Alex Jones press conference for the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, DVD premier in May 2009, where I reviewed NYC stamped approved structural plans and A&E evidence of controlled demolition. I did not agree with their thermite hypothesis, further research into every hypothesis confirmed the VeteransToday mininuke evidence.

    I took laminated color copies of this PDJT memo to the Oct 22, 2018 MAGA rally in Houston. Winding through the thousands in queue, from 10 am until 6:30 pm I explained this to hundreds of Patriots, and only three who disagreed. On Jan 17, 2019 Dr Fetzer and I discussed additional evidence, and defects in some of the other memos.

    Mr President, tear down this NIST wall on 9/11 Truth

    (God bless Dr Fetzer for his lifetime of honest courage)

    1. What is your motive for keeping the classified technically that used DEW a secret?

      https://vgy.me/rdJ9xg.jpg

      Words from Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount, in the Gospel of Matthew, were found by a firefighter in March 2002, under the Tully Road, a temporary truck route that covered the last remnants of the south tower. The pages of the Bible in which they were printed had fused to a chunk of steel as the World Trade Center turned to dust in mid-air, to be found only months later.

      “You have heard that it was said, ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’ But I tell you not to resist an evildoer. On the contrary, whoever slaps you on the right cheek, turn the other to him as well. If anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, let him have your coat as well. And if anyone forces you to go one mile, go two with him. Give to the person who asks you for something, and do not turn away from the person who wants to borrow something from you.”

      The fabric of the human mind is flexible, but the strings of credulity can only stretch out so far, and then incredulity settles in. The image above depicts an artifact residing in the 9/11 Museum of an open Bible fused to a hunk of steel wreckage, with some of the steel overlapping the pages after it was softened by a type of directed energy. How could this happen and not have burned the paper yet the result can clearly be seen?

      The autoignition point of paper has a range of from 440 – 470°F, depending on the type of paper. Steel melts at 2500°F. How then, did this artifact of Bible pages become “fused” with steel, without the paper combusting into a blackened mass of ashes?

      Revisit that day, and remember all the images of showers of paper floating down through the air and scattering all over the sidewalks and streets, when the towers were destroyed. These papers were intact and surely not burned. What process was at work that could turn steel and concrete towers to dust, and yet not affect paper?

      A process used in directed energy technology can cause a dissociation and alteration of the molecular structure of metal, to fuse with combustible objects and appear as if the materials melted together, but with no discernable evidence of heat or combustion.

      So evidently, a technology exists which can accomplish those results, the results seen in the Bible papers fused to the steel. This is not a miracle, other than this technology being able to appear miraculous to most people. Arthur C. Clarke once opined: “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.” Other forces were at work the day of 9/11, other than magic or the hand of the Divine.

      Very much related to this anomalous artifact in the 9/11 Museum, is another one found in the ruins of an almost forgotten and seldom mentioned building which was immediately destroyed on the morning of 9/11.

      St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox church, just across the street from the south side of the South Tower, or WTC-2. When retrieval of the relics in the church was undertaken in the following days, only a few pieces survived and one find was called a miracle. “The great miracle, was the recovery of an icon of St. Spyridon. The silver around the icon had melted, but the paper icon had not been burnt.”

      https://vgy.me/toY1uh.jpg

      This discovery was one of the church’s most holy relics, and it was declared a miracle because the silver onlay applied to a paper icon of St. Spyridon had “dustified”, leaving the paper intact and unscorched. The melting point of silver is 1,763°F.

      The best collection of evidence making the case for a directed energy technology at work and used as a weapon on 9/11, can be found at the website of Judy Wood, Ph.D – and in her landmark book: ”Where Did The Towers Go?”.

      A copy of the book is available at The Library of Congress.

      https://lccn.loc.gov/2010916516

      Or, you have the option of purchasing a copy from Amazon.

      This download is the Foreword and book review of “WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?” by Eric Larsen, Professor Emeritus at John Jay College of Criminal Justice 1971 – 2006 (35 years), plus the Author’s Preface.

      http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/Where%20Did%20The%20Towers%20Go%20-%20Dr%20Judy%20Wood.pdf

Leave a Reply