False flag terror is an intentional and mortal trick whereby blame is projected and made to fall upon an innocent third party. It has the specific and diabolical purpose of demonizing an ‘enemy’ normally with the purpose of facilitating a war. It involves the State or elements of the State conspiring to kill its own citizens and that depends on media collaboration, whereby the national media will project the required narrative.
The perpetrators remain hidden, whereas the blame falls in a very public manner–this is the new art-form, made by Those Who Create Delusion.
–Nicholas Kollerstrom, Ph.D., Chronicles of False Flag Terror
The long line of State sponsored, or supported “mass casualty” shootings has given governments the opportunity to increase the number of ways they can prevent or remove a US Citizen’s right to ‘Keep and Bear Arms.’ Media proctored mass shooting events have steadily increased over the past 20 years and have been the source of inspiration for renewed efforts to disarm Americans. After the Parkland False Flag, State supported, ‘mass shooting’ in Florida there has been a new tactical approach to disarming and deprivation of Citizen’s Constitutional and Natural right to self defense. This technique involves questioning the mental health (an abstract subjective and non scientific means) of gun buyers and gun owners.
Enlisting the support of Social Justice Warriors and their attendant Useful Idiots, Anti Gun Operatives are now approaching the problem of how to disconnect the Constitutional right to own weapons for purposes of self defense, from its broad application to Citizens of the States, to the idea of pre-qualifying for a right to own a weapon. This idea is similar to the idea of obtaining a license, an insidious tool of disconnection, whereby people are disjoined from Constitutional Lawful freedom of action and assigned to a new condition of a slave who must routinely re-qualify to take some action, which has been otherwise now classified as illegal.
Red Flag Law
Liberty is not freedom. Liberty is something one grants another. Freedom is another matter and, if you want to be free you better have what it takes. JoeTV
Red Flag Laws were quickly conceived as a way to intervene in the process of an individual naturally acting in a manner consistent with Constitutional Law, to an individual first obtaining ‘permission’ to act in a manner consistent with someone who has Constitutional rights.
Red Flag Laws are passive-aggressively named “Extreme Risk Protection Orders” and are packaged first by their sponsors (agents of political organizations, usually associated with well funded Orthodox Jewry) as a sensible or responsible way to reduce the likelihood that someone dangerous will come into possession of a weapon (gun.)
According to a Maryland Attorney describing Maryland’s “Red Flag” law,
The law will temporarily prohibit a person’s access to guns when a judge determines he or she is a danger to him or herself, or others. The surrender of all guns and ammunition must be immediate if law enforcement serves the order. If the order is received by mail, the respondent must make immediate arrangements to have the firearms and ammunition surrendered. The respondent cannot access any guns or firearms between the surrender and the hearings, or for the time that the ERPO is in effect. Clark
The aggressive portion of the “well-meaning law” can easily be seen because the Constitutionally Lawful Citizen is immediately deprived of his or her rights by the determination (whim) of a Judge who is acting on 3rd party information provided by ‘concerned’ citizens or family members. This eliminates the Constitutional right to due process and the legal idea of “Innocent until proven Guilty.”
Recently Donald Trump exclaimed, while referring to the Parkland School Shooting False Flag (State supported Terrorism,) that an identified target of Red Flag Law should have their weapons taken first and worry about “Due Process Later.”
But Do Red Flag Laws Stop Violence?
According to a new study done by Dr. John Lott and Professor Carl Moody of crimeresearch.org, Red Flag Laws do not reduce crime or violence and, in fact, may increase rates of rape. According the abstract of this report,
Red flag laws had no significant effect on murder, suicide, the number of people killed in mass public shootings, robbery, aggravated assault, or burglary. There is some evidence that rape rates rise. These laws apparently do not save lives. read or download the report here
The report examined data from States having “Red Flag Laws” on the books the longest. This provided them with 36 years of data for purposes of statistical analysis. According to the report, ” the results imply about a four percent increase in rape rates”, the reasons for which are obscure.
Moreover, these laws interfere with the natural operation of a market of interactions. Manipulating the natural, self-organizing caused by people free to act in accordance with their own ends (and their own benefits) changes the entire market, misallocating resources and causing poor decisions based on expected outcomes that are no longer possible. These dispositions govern self-ordering, rational social systems — and nothing else could. It is only when markets are ‘regulated’ that free action no longer can work its magic. This is the entire premise of the science of economics.
The Anti-Gun movement in the United States does not have as its interest saving lives or protecting Citizens from gun crime, but rather disarming Citizens for purposes of protecting government and their controllers from the possibility of people rising in an organized way to take back control of their Usurped Government. Further, history shows that when a government insists on taking the Citizen’s weapons, they are planning to do violence against the citizens. Genocides are typically preceded by Gun Confiscation.