Dr. Eowyn, James Fetzer answers Leonard Pozner’s defamation lawsuit

Leonard Pozner is the alleged father of alleged Sandy Hook child-victim Noah Pozner whose image, mysteriously, was among the posters of those who were killed by the Taliban in the Army Public School shooting massacre in Peshawar, Pakistan, on December 16, 2014, two years after Sandy Hook.

See “Sandy Hook Child Victim Noah Pozner Was Killed Twice! Also a Victim in Pakistan Taliban Shooting

Leonard Pozner has harassed bloggers and YouTubers with DMCA copyright-infringement take-down demands, and is successful at it. He has also sued Wolfgang Halbig and Alex Jones on Sandy Hook. Curiously, in his last lawsuit against Halbig, Lenny dropped the lawsuit when it came time for him to be deposed, under oath, which reinforces the skepticism by some who wonder if “Leonard Pozner” is a real person. For more on this, see “Sandy Hook’s Leonard Pozner sues Professor James Fetzer and publisher“.

On November 27, 2018, Leonard Pozner filed a defamation lawsuit against Professor James Fetzer and his publisher, Moon Rock Books, claiming that he, Leonard Pozner:

  1. Is a private citizen, instead of a public figure.
  2. Has been defamed by the defendants’ publication of an alleged death certificate of Noah, which Fetzer maintains is fake. See Leonard Pozner v. James Fetzer, et al.

As required by the court, Fetzer submitted an Answer to the lawsuit, in which he makes the following points:

(1) Leonard Pozner is a public figure: “Assuming he is a real person, the plaintiff styling himself as Leonard Pozner has thrust himself into the forefront of public controversy, and is, therefore, a public figure.”

(2) As a public figure, Pozner’s lawsuit against Fetzer, et al., “is therefore governed by New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U. S. 254 (l964), and Garrison v. Louisiana, 379 U. S. 64 (1964),” which clearly specify that “defamation” must meet the “actual malice” standard — that the defendant(s) knowingly published a falsehood, with malicious intentions. In the case of the alleged Noah death certificate, however, Fetzer maintains that his writings on the death certificate “were written in good faith and were and still are for good cause believed to be true.”

(3) The following are some of the reasons Fetzer maintains the death certificate of Noah Pozner, which Fetzer had received from Kelley Watt (who claims Leonard Pozner as the source), is inauthentic:

  • In the last two lines of paragraph 3, the type is clearly smaller in Box 3 than in the rest of the page.
  • A capital “A” in Box 12, Box 22, and Box 33 has a small flag in the pinnacle, yet the capital “A” in Box 12, Box 22, Box 26, Box 39, and Box 46 does not have a small flag in the pinnacle, which indicates fabrication and fakery.
  • In paragraph 3, the spacing between “N” and “o” in Box 1 and Box 7 are clearly different, which indicates fabrication and fakery.
  • In the last two lines of paragraph 3, the “N” in Box 1 and the “N” in Box 26, are clearly not the same; and the spacing between “S” and “a” in Box 1 is clearly not the same as the spacing between “S” and “a” in Box 11 — all of which indicates fabrication and fakery.
  • Again in paragraph 3, the printing of the name “Pozner” in Box 1 is clearly different from the name “Pozner” in Box 20, which indicates fabrication and fakery.

Fetzer concludes his Answer as follows:

This suit has been brought for the illicit purpose of intimidation to prevent public knowledge of the truth concerning the events at Sandy Hook, and not for genuine legal relief for actionable harm done, and is therefore an actionable abuse of process. The defendant Fetzer reserves for himself and his co-defendants the options to counterclaim for abuse of process and/or to seek relief under Section 802.05 and/or under Section 895.044 of Wisconsin Statutes.

WHEREFORE, the defendant Fetzer demands that the plaintiff take nothing, that the complaint be dismissed, and that he be granted such further protection and remedy as may be necessary and proper, and allowed by law. He prays as well for like protection of his co-defendants, as is indispensable to protection of himself.

To read the entirety of Fetzer’s Answer to Pozner v. Fetzerclick here.

It is estimated that the legal expenses of Fetzer, et al., may total $20,000. Please help protect and ensure free speech by donating to their legal defense. Go to moonrockbooks.com where there is a “Donate” button.

And please keep Jim Fetzer and Wolfgang Halbig in your prayers.

Thank you.

For a free copy of James Fetzer, ed., Nobody Died at Sandy Hookclick here.

See also:

~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
error20

10 thoughts on “Dr. Eowyn, James Fetzer answers Leonard Pozner’s defamation lawsuit”

  1. It’s all a big misdirection designed to distract from the important action that is occurring which is the lawsuit involving the deep state operative Alex Jones who is intentionally losing the defamation suit by the SH demons. Jones abruptly changed his story and suddenly conceded that SH was a real event which is the key because that’s what allows the Plantiffs to avoid discovery of their records, true identity , etc. . That lawsuit is an effort to create a new legal precident thst will shut down public discussion that challenges the gvt narratives. Keep an eye on that lawsuit as it is a real threat.

  2. Hey here’s a fun thought exercise. What if the Professor made an offer in good faith to settle
    as his “answer”. To wit: Exhume and bring forth the body of ‘Noah Pozner’ for examination, and
    upon confirmation of identity, defendant will pay all claims. That’d get the party started 🙂

  3. “Sandy Hookers Victory Against InfoWimps” at Robert David Steele website….rather than fight fraud with

    discovery and deposition….Alex Jones took a dive with NO CONTEST, CEASE AND DESIST, CONSENT DECREE

    1. The caving in by Infowars on the Sandy Hook issue is one of the most disgusting developments in the history of the “truth” movement. Information I’ve received indicates that Paul Joseph Watson was largely responsible for convincing Alex that the event was “real.” So let me see… given the choice of believing someone with the credentials of Wolfgang Halbig – a 70-something former school principal and national school safety expert and consultant, who knows all the protocols of school operations and procedures during mass casualty events – and a Gen-X blabbermouth, who pontificates from an isolated studio in the U.K. (his mother’s basement?) and thinks he’s a “journalist,” I think it’s obvious to anyone with brains as to who to trust. Shame on you, Alex Jones, after the many, many hours you devoted to guest appearances by Wolfgang on your show and the dynamic, compelling radio that resulted! You are indeed a traitor.

  4. Why would Posner continue to bring lawsuits that he knows he will have to drop?
    If I had raked in millions courtesy of this fraud I wouldn’t do anything to advertise it.

    1. It appears to me that “putative Pozner” is being financed by a big, bottomless pit called the Deep State. As in, money is no object. Take whatever risks you want, sue at will, etc. When you are backed up by a monolith that absolutely cannot afford to lose this Sandy Hook brouhaha, you can let out the shaft and go for broke. There’s lots of fat cats that are involved in the drama, the Poz is not alone so he is obviously emboldened. It’s too bad the nation is not listening in to this court case, it might serve to alert them to what really happened at SH. Imagine the cost the perps have had to shell out to finance this event. Then again, it might well be that the taxpayers paid for 911 as well as SH! Let’s all ask ourselves if there would be military tribunals were Hillary Clinton to have been elected……The sheer depth of the Deep State numbers in the mega-thousands, lots of perps are joined at the waist thereby making it enormously difficult to separate wheat from chaff. Would Occasio Cortez demand answers to SH and 911? Or, is she just headed for another totally partisan career of name calling and ultimately, communism?

Leave a Reply