Kevin Barrett attacks Jim Fetzer on VT over “Dying CIA Agent Confession”

“Dying CIA agent confesses to demolition of WTC-7” FAKE NEWS

By Kevin Barrett on July 14, 2017

Watch this week’s False Flag Weekly News above, and click HERE for links to the stories we covered, and HERE to support FFWN.
Today’s False Flag Weekly News did NOT cover the “bombshell” story of the supposed WTC-7 demolition confession by a dying CIA agent. Why not? Because it’s OBVIOUS BULLSHIT.
If you can’t tell that this is a made-up story from the way it’s written, you need to take your BS detector in for a tune-up. That’s right, Jim Fetzer, this means you! 

When Jim was my co-host at FFWN, he occasionally got taken in by hoaxes like this. One such blatantly bogus fake news story was the notorious FORMER BEATLE RINGO STARR CLAIMS THE “REAL” PAUL MCCARTNEY DIED IN 1966 AND WAS REPLACED BY LOOK-ALIKE. (The story’s prose style is SO bogus – how can anyone read stuff like this with a straight face? ““When Paul died, we all panicked!” claims Ringo, obviously very emotional. “We didn’t know what to do..”)

The “Dying CIA agent confesses to WTC-7” story is just a rewrite of a previous article by the same hoaxer, Jay Greenberg.

How much do they pay Greenberg to crank out this low-grade garbage? Nice work if you can get it, I guess.

These fake news stories catapult the “surely someone would have confessed” anti-truth propaganda meme.  Any suckers who might actually believe that the world’s most successful criminals will surely confess to their crimes, for no particular reason except a bad conscience (as if the high-IQ psychopaths hired for these crimes had consciences) will be left holding the bag.

Deathbed (and non-deathbed) confessions do sometimes happen. E. Howard Hunt did confess to helping the CIA murder JFK. And a US Army Col. did confess to William Pepper his role in helping orchestrate the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr.. But don’t expect the MSM to tell you about THAT.

So how can you tell fake news from real news?

1.    Keep your BS detector tuned up.

2.     Watch False Flag Weekly News every week.

3.     Watch out for guys like “Jay Greenberg.”

Related Posts:


Sort by 

John Scudamore

Like · Reply · 1 · Jul 14, 2017 4:14pm
James Henry Fetzer · 

The article you cite, John, is by Jay Greenberg. But the article Kevin is discussing is by Baxter Dmitry, Does Kevin believe that Baxter is a pseudonymn used by Jay Greenberg? Even this point puzzles me. He may have found the same guy, Jay Greenberg, is reposting articles that bear his name, but were not written by him. If they are not the same, his argument is bullshit.
Like · Reply · 1 hr · Edited
James Henry Fetzer · 

Paul Craig Roberts, who posted the original article, has taken it down: “I have taken down the Baxter Dmitry article. Apparently, he is one of these people who like to make practical jokes out of serious matters. PCR”. I don’t know how he established that to be the case, but it suggests this was written as a spoof on 9/11 Truth–and an effective one in generating division. I take no exception to his skepticism, but Kevin didn’t even have the name of the author right. We must do better in sorting things out and explain what’s true and what’s not.
Like · Reply · 3 mins · Edited
Phillip Haldane

About that Beatles singer,watch on goggle the “Norman gunston show”
He interviews the “replacement Beatle”
Norman gunston even once tried to walk in the frount gate of the American spy base PINE GAP here in Australia,
A funny thing is ,it was a rumor here in Australia that he was a SAS spy!
He got close to some very important people!
Even if he wasn’t a spy,there is something strange about his “interviewing style
He even interviewed Prince Charles!
Maybe he was a CIA experiment,..and just didn’t know it!!!
The interview with boy gorge is quite funny
Like · Reply · 18 hrs
Phillip Haldane

Norman gunston show back in 1975,
He interviews Paul McCartney and his wife and asks him straight out about the rumors that he died,
McCartney’s response,if you watch his body language is bit strange,
That “rumor”has been around for a long time
who’s read that book?
Like · Reply · 17 hrs
Harry Haller ·

Billy Shepherd deserves his due; that was his dying fathers wish.
Like · Reply · 2 · 17 hrs
James Henry Fetzer · 

You got it right, Harry! Kevin is shoddy and self-serving. We had it out over the “Ringo Confession” years ago. He even admitted to me last year that I was right and he was wrong. But even though he knows I published a rebuttal that set the record straight–“Why Ringo’s Confession–‘We replaced Paul!’–appears to be true”,…/why-ringos-confession…, he doesn’t cite it so you could learn the other side–my side–of the story.
Like · Reply · 1 · 2 hrs · Edited
Gery Warner · 

Kev, I must admit having doubts about it concerning some details he disclosed. But you must have more. Let’s not kill the messenger unless we can site proof of his lie.
Like · Reply · 1 · 17 hrs
Harold Saive · 

The publication “Your Newswire” has a history of publishing stories that have litlle or no sourcing.
Like · Reply · 16 hrs
Harold Saive · 

Kevin Barrett caught promoting unsupported allegations amounting to FAKE NEWS, that Paul McCartney was not replaced. Several Books disagree with Barett. Here’s one authored by Prof Nicholas Kollerstrom —…/dp/1517283132/ref=pd_sim_14_1…
Like · Reply · 16 hrs · Edited
Harold Saive · 

The publication “Your Newswire” has a history of publishing stories that have litlle or no sourcing.
Like · Reply · 16 hrs
James Henry Fetzer · 

Maybe so. But Kevin is committing the fallacy of dismissing the content as FALSE because he doesn’t like the SOURCE. In logic, this is known as “the genetic fallacy”. It was pulled on Dan Rather relative to W’s fitness report, which was word-for-word accurate. They had it retyped using a newer font and then claimed that, because the document was fake, the content must be false. But it was completely true.
Like · Reply · 1 · 16 hrs
Phillip Haldane

James Henry Fetzer that reverse psychology could be said about veterans today,if I try show people this sight,some my read just a hand full of articles and say all are bullcrap
Like · Reply · 16 hrs
Harold Saive · 

James Henry Fetzer Anyone doing serious research on “false” flags” should be open to deceptions in many forms. The death and replacement of McCartney requires no leap in logic and several books confirm what Kevin has failed to research and source. Huge fly in the soup when Kevin correctly warns of the NEWSWIRE article then spoils it by recklessly stomping on sound reasearch.
Like · Reply · 15 hrs
Harold Saive · 

Jim Fetzer interviews Nick Kollerstrom, author “The Life and Death of Paul McCartney 1942 – 1966: A very English Mystery”
Like · Reply · 16 hrs
Baharuddin Bin Shafie · 

Like · Reply · 15 hrs
Harold Saive · 

The “authorities” are working for your enemy.
Like · Reply · 14 hrs
Amanda Kavanagh

Wow, Kevin. 
Long time fan and supporter of your many platforms. 
Shocked that you would insult those of us who disagree about Faul McCartney.
Yes, there are a lot of ludicrous articles.
Cherry-picking just the ludicrous to support an issue … is weak.
Like · Reply · 2 · 16 hrs
Kevin Barrett · 

The “news story” that Ringo confessed to replacing Paul is an obvious low-grade BS hoax. Whether or not Paul was replaced is a completely different issue. What I don’t like is Jim Fetzer’s tendency to believe ridiculous hoaxes because he agrees with ideas put forth in the hoax – in this case, that Paul was replaced. His readiness to accept an obviously false news story “reporting” that Ringo confessed, simply because he thinks Paul was replaced, is an off-the-charts example of confirmation bias. “Dick Cheney confesses to 9/11 demolitions” is obviously a fake news story, even if there really were 9/11 demolitions, because the confession never happened. It’s a lie. Jim Fetzer repeatedly falls for lies of this type.
Like · Reply · 1 hr
James Henry Fetzer · 

Kevin Barrett has gone off the cliff. He has no ability to separate a story and its content from its source, which is about as blatant an example of “confirmation bias” as I could imagine. I have explained to him in person and in print that sometimes true stories are published in dubious venues to create a pretext for plausible deniability. He has displayed a stunning incapacity to differentiate gray areas that mix truth with falsehoods. Even if this guy was fictiional, his story (for the most part) coincidences with 9/11 truth; and it conveys the global impression that the CIA was involved in 9/11, which is also correct. It therefore fails as disinformation because–intentionally or not–it’s overall message is TRUE AND INFORMATIVE. I don’t want to say Kevin is a complete idiot, but attacking me on this basis is idiotic. And he’s done it more than once.
Like · Reply · 7 mins · Edited
Donald T. Grahn · 

Ian, as a competent managing editor, ( i get good info from many of your hard-hitting articles) please point out something(s) on one or some of the 358 pages of Fetzer’s Sandy Hook book that proves it (all) is ’embarassingly bad,’ as I am in seaarch of the truth wherever the truth leads. Thanks
Like · Reply · 11 hrs
James Henry Fetzer · 

Don, invite him onto the show for a debate about Sandy Hook. The man is a complete and total fraud. He has OBVIOUSLY never bothered to read NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK (2015). That he is using this occaion to attack research on Sandy Hook (with his position here at VT) means that he is working for the other side to suppress serious research that exposes the charade. VT is now participating in the cover up.
Like · Reply · 2 hrs · Edited
Donald T. Grahn · 

And, Ian please feel free to give some cogent criticism on Ji9m Fetzer’s stories playing on TV yesterday.
Like · Reply · 10 hrs
James Henry Fetzer · 

That he hasn’t even read the book should be obvious. There are thirteen (13) contributors, including six (current or retired) Ph.D. college professors. One (Dr. Eowyn) had published 80 articles on Sandy Hook before I selected the best of her best; I myself had published 30. Ian Greenhaugh cannot be excused for his indefensible position. No competent student of Sandy Hook believes that anyone died there. Unreal!
Like · Reply · 1 hr
Gordon Betsill · 

One only has to view the tape of WTC-7 falling perfectly into its own footprint would be dumb as dirt not to know it was a controlled demolition just like WTC 1 & 2.
Like · Reply · 1 · 3 hrs
James Henry Fetzer · 

Gordon, Yes–but the Twin Towers were taken down using different methods than those used on WTC-7. Notice the towers are blowing apart from the top down, but not WTC-7. The towers are being converted into milliions of cubic yards of very fine dust, but not WTC-7. The towers left no stack of debris in their footprint but were destroyed to (or even slightly below) ground level, but WTC-7 left 5.5 floors of debris. For my latest video presentation about 9/11, see
Like · Reply · 1 hr

Jeffrey Dougherty · 

If the story were true, there would probably be a video-taped confession. The obvious question would be to ask; ‘When did your start wiring the building and how long did it take?” the story seems fake to me.
Like · Reply · 1 · 3 hrs
James Henry Fetzer · 

Here is one of several YouTube’s about E. Howard Hunt’s deathbed confession to his son, St. John, in which he identified the chain of command as going from LBJ to Cord Meyer to David Atlee Phillips to William Harvey to David Sanchez Morales: He is mistakenly identified as the third (and oldest) of the tramps, who was actually Chauncey Marvin Holt.
Like · Reply · 3 mins
Donald T. Grahn · 

Good Morning Ian, Greenhalgh, dba. Managing Editor VT,: 
For the record, I give Prof. James Fetzer an hour+ of TV time each week. Soooo… In an effort to at least appear to be fair and balanced, I would like to extend at least a 28 minute or 58 minute block of TV air-time (via Skype or ?) for you to verify your apparent ad hominem comments on Fetzer’s dis-info efforts and works that you apparently know so much about.. 
Please let me know ASAP here (or by my contact info on the TV screen), to arrange an interview. Thanks,
Like · Reply · 1 · 2 hrs · Edited
James Henry Fetzer · 

Let me see if I have this right. This guy “Ian” claims that, because of unspecified (but repeated) acts of “sexual harassment”, I have been blackmailed into collaborative research with the best experts on JFK, 9/11, Sandy Hook, the Boston bombing to expose atrocities and deceptions by the government (where I have published books on them available at Isn’t that about as absurd as it gets? Does that make sense to anyone? And this guy is the “Managing Editor” of VT! Between Kevin and Ian, does VT have any credibility left? Coincidentally, my wife and I have just celebrated our 40th anniversary!

Like · Reply · 4 mins · Edited

Donald T. Grahn

BTW, on Sandy hook, was that disaster a FEMA Drill where “Everyone Must Check In”?
Like · Reply · 3 hrs
Sarah Angel

Isn’t this a fine thread? Watch out Jim and Don, these VT folks like to let the “facebook comments” hang until they can delete them… then everyone’s time is wasted. This site is such heavy disinfo it makes your head spin. Fck ’em I say! 
Hey everyone! Don’t miss Gordon Bob Foote Duff’s “Stunning Keynote Address” to a table of babbling foreigners. He has the mike for a full 7 minutes! Sitting at his lunch seat! And the things he says!!! Oh my goodness, he doesn’t need notes, he can ramble incoherently completely off the cuff! It’s incomprehensable that no one was listening! Don’t they know WHO HE IS??
Like · Reply · 1 hr
Sarah Angel

Hey Barrett, I thought you learned your lesson about impugning Jim Fetzer? Still here at VT, eh? 
I know you think homosexuality is evil, but it’s ok if the person is a closet case like your lispy friend Duff? That guy is poofier than a blow fish. 
“I’m SSUPER thanks for asking…”
Like · Reply · 1 hr
Donald T. Grahn · 

UPDATE: I see that Ian Greenhalgh has now doubled-down on his attack on old prof Fetzer., (1:24 AM, below). And I hear that Fetzer was on Dr. Barrett’s radio show last night for 20 minutes – and argued his (Fetzer’s) position very well, according to Barrett, himself. 
This death-bed confession story will now appear on our next ‘Truth vs. NEW$ INC. TV program (filming on Monday) 
Soooooo, I again earnestly extend an offer to Ian to appear on this or one of my two other TV programs (All-ways Pursuing Truth) this week.or next..
Like · Reply · 40 mins
James Henry Fetzer · 

Not to make the obvious point, but if a guy who claims to be CIA offers a deathbed confession of complicity in 9/11, which includes many important truths about what actually happened, what are we doing DEBUNKING IT? Why is Kevin Barrett disavowing his report, which accurately implicates the government in the atrocities of 9/11? If it’s fake, let the government debunk it–along with the CIA’s complicity in 9/11, the controlled demolition of WTC-7, that it went “too smoothly” and that the BBC made an obvious blunder in calling it too soon! Barrett is doing it for them! Express skepticism about some of it but acknowledge why it conveys the right impression. He needs to be a great deal more discriminating in sorting out what he takes to be true and what he takes to be false. That’s what the situation calls for–not wholesale dismissal! Don’t unintentionally create the false impression that the CIA was not involved in 9/11!
Like · Reply · 11 mins · Edited

Please follow and like us:

21 thoughts on “Kevin Barrett attacks Jim Fetzer on VT over “Dying CIA Agent Confession””

  1. จีคลับ A new type of investment that you can play with ease at all.

    จีคลับ The leading online gaming site for online live betting. Or we called. For playing online casino games in the form of live casino games, it is very popular with me. Because of this kind of online gambling, it's easy to play with realism, you can play online gambling games without boredom.

    And for playing online live betting games via live streaming. Online Casino Service Provider Our video and audio signals are output from real playing locations. And to play online games, there are also many games to choose from, whether it is online baccarat. Online Roulette Online Gourmet Crabs Online There are also many other online gambling games that you can easily join.

    So if you are thinking about playing online gambling games, our online casino site is considered to be a very attractive investment and if you are thinking about playing online gambling games, we would like you to opt for the site. บาคาร่า

  2. We at Famous Movie Jackets offer an extensive variety of celebrity enthused outfit at best price. We never trade off quality against the prices. We claim to provide the best quality with authenticity and durability. Mark yourself on the height of fashion by picking one of your favorite style. Famous Movie Jacket is back with another catchy offer now you can enjoy flat 15% off on all products by using coupon code "win2017". Hurry up pick your fashion wear now before the offer fades away. Just Click on famous Movie jackets

  3. Anybody who read Dr Barrett's article must notice that he left out how he comes to the conclusion Jay Greenberg is involved. What I don't understand is why Dr Barrett doesn't protocol in his article if he tried to contact the man on his deathbed, who would surely had done his best to
    answer any question for Dr Barrett. It seems what really interests Dr Barrett is not this dying man's testimony, but to demonstrate his i.e. Dr Barrett's ability to be critical i.e. not naive, and to point out the danger of naivité
    to his readers.

  4. Recently it was reported on VT that the new CIA director Mike Pompous, reported that the U.S. had good evidence that Syria gassed its citizens but provided no proof. They cited a conversation between Trump and Pompous where Trump asked him to look into this and get back to him. Why not write Trump a letter on this issue and ask him to do the same in this case. Have Pompous find out of this was a real CIA employee and is he now telling the truth on his death bed. Trump and Pompous might just take the bait.

  5. See how easy it is to keep a cover-up in place!

    How to add confusion and doubt to cover-up what actually happened on 9/11 at the World Trade Center…

    3 nondescript non-threatening comments

    And now the original 78 comments

    October 13, 2012 – 4:02 pm

    I thought you had decided it was mini nukes at the Vancouver Hearings ?

    I am still backing the DEWs theory.

    Why ? Gut feeling and a perceived belief in the integrity of Judy Wood.

    Jim Fetzer
    October 13, 2012 – 4:40 pm

    I needed to add a note of clarification on this very point. When Jack and I prepared this, it looked as though DEWs might have played the primary role, where the weight of the evidence now more strongly supports the use of mini and micro nukes as the principal cause of the destruction of the Twin Towers. Check out “9/11 Truth will out: The Vancouver Hearings I”. The dust evidence turns out to be especially powerfully in support of the occurrence of nuclear events, where some of these effects suggest that DEWs may have also been used, but they do not appear to have been the principal mechanism for the demolition of the WTC. The Twin Towers were destroyed from the top down, apparently by taking out 10 floor segments per second. Since the North Tower had all 110 floors still standing, that took 11 seconds. In the case of the South Tower, the top 30 floors tilted over and were taken out in one demolition, which meant that it only took 9 seconds instead, where those figures are the same as the NIST.

  6. I remember way back when I predicted that you and Barrett would 'divorce'.

    It was so very obvious long before you to ever had a real falling out.

    Barrett's never-ending defense and misdirection regarding radical Islam shows what his modus operandi is.

Leave a Reply