CIA Agent Confesses on Deathbed: ‘We blew up WTC7 on 9/11’

Baxter Dmitry 

[Editor’s note: Bear in mind that, should this be disinformation, the depiction presented of the demolition of WTC-7 (with the possible exception of the role of “military grade” nano-thermite) bears a striking resemblance to how it was done, as I have elsewhere explained in some detail.] 

CIA agent confesses to blowing up WTC7 on 9/11


79-year-old retired CIA agent, Malcom Howard, has made a series of astonishing claims since being released from hospital in New Jersey on Friday and told he has weeks to live. Mr. Howard claims he was involved in the “controlled demolition” of World Trade Center 7, the third building that was destroyed on 9/11.
Mr. Howard, who worked for the CIA for 36 years as an operative, claims he was tapped by senior CIA agents to work on the project due to his engineering background, and early career in the demolition business.
Trained as a civil engineer, Mr. Howard became an explosives expert after being headhunted by the CIA in early 1980s. Mr. Howard says has extensive experience in planting explosives in items as small as cigarette lighters and as large as “80 floor buildings.
The 79-year-old New Jersey native says he worked on the CIA operation they dubbed “New Century” between May 1997 and September 2001, during a time he says the CIA “was still taking orders from the top.” Mr. Howard says he was part of a cell of 4 operatives tasked with ensuring the demolition was successful.
Mr. Howard says the World Trade Center 7 operation is unique among his demolitions, as it is the only demolition that “we had to pretend wasn’t a demolition job”. He claims he had no problem going through with the deception at the time, because “when you are a patriot, you don’t question the motivation of the CIA or the White House. You assume the bigger purpose is for a greater good. They pick good, loyal people like me, and it breaks my heart to hear the shit talk.
But even he admits that now, looking back, “Something wasn’t right.”
No good has come from this. This isn’t the America we envisioned.”
Explaining how the building was bought down, Mr. Howard says, “It was a classic controlled demolition with explosives. We used super-fine military grade nanothermite composite materials as explosives. The hard part was getting thousands of pounds of explosives, fuses and ignition mechanisms into the building without causing too much concern. But almost every single office in the Building 7 was rented by the CIA, the Secret Service, or the military, which made it easier.
Mr. Howard explains that WTC 7 was “loaded with explosives in strategic places” in the month leading up to the day that changed the course of American history. On September 11th, while the North and South towers burned, fuses were ignited in World Trade Center 7, and nanothermite explosions hollowed out the building, destroying the steel structure, removing the reinforcements, and allowing the office fires to tear through the rest of the building, hollowing it out like a shell.

[Editor’s note: The fires in the building were very modest and cannot have caused it to have collapsed. The building was brought down in a classic “controlled demolition”, as A&E911 has emphasized, but “office fires”, which only burn at 500*F, could not possibly have “hollow(ed) it out like a shell”.]

World Trade Center 7 collapsed into its own footprint at 5:20pm, seven hours after the destruction of WTC 1 and 2. The building shocked witnesses by coming down at the speed of freefall, indicating that it encountered zero resistance on the way down.
Mr. Howard and his colleagues had done their job.
When the building came down, it was such a rush. Everything went exactly to plan. It was so smooth. Everybody was evacuated. Nobody was hurt in WTC 7. We were celebrating. We kept watching replays of the demolition, we had the whiskey and cigars out, and then all of a sudden the strangest thing happened. We all started to worry that it looked a bit too smooth. We watched the tape again and again and again and we started to get paranoid. It looked like a controlled demolition. We thought shit, people are going to question this. And then we heard that people from the street were reporting that they heard the explosions during the afternoon. When we were told that the BBC botched their report and announced to the world that the building collapsed 20 minutes before it actually did… At that point we really thought the gig was up.”
According to the official 9/11 report issued by the government, WTC 7 collapsed due to “uncontrolled fires” that were caused by debris that floated over from WTC 1 and 2, which had been hit by passenger planes. If the official narrative was true, WTC 7 would be the first tall building in the world to ever collapse due to uncontrolled fires, and the only steel skyscraper in the world to have collapsed into itself, due to “office fires.”
Mr. Howard and his colleagues feared the public would see through the official narrative and rise up against the government, demanding to be told the truth.
There were so many loose ends, so much evidence left behind. We thought the public would be all over it. We thought there would be a public uprising that the media couldn’t ignore. They’d be funding investigations and demanding to know why they were being lied to. We thought they’d find chemical composites in the area that would prove Building 7 was blown up. 
“We thought there would be a revolution. It would go all the way to the top, to President Bush. He’d be dragged out of the White House.
“But none of that happened. Almost nobody questioned anything. The media shot down anyone who dared question anything they were told.”
Follow the money
Mr. Howard claims he has “no direct knowledge” about the destruction of North and South Towers of the World Trade Center, explaining that “CIA operations are very specific” and that it is common to be working on a larger project while only understanding a small piece of the puzzle.
But he has advice for investigators seeking to understand the entire puzzle and work out who was behind the most devastating attack on American soil in history.
Follow the money.”
When you want to find out who is behind something, just follow the money. Look at the trades made just before 9/11. These are the guys that knew what was coming. The sons of CIA agents, government officials. Close relatives of the most powerful men in America. Cheney, Rumsfeld. They all got rich. It wasn’t just the contracts awarded to their friends in the construction business and the wars and the kickbacks.”
“It was insider trading.”
Many countries including Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and Monaco launched insider trading investigations in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, believing that if they could prove Al-Qaeda operatives profited on the stock market then they could prove the terror organization was behind the attacks.
And all the evidence pointed to heavy insider trading around 9/11.
Italy’s foreign minister, Antonio Martino, said: “I think that there are terrorist states and organizations behind speculation on the international markets.” German central bank president, Ernst Welteke, said his researchers had found “almost irrefutable proof of insider trading.”
Even CNN reported that regulators were seeing “ever-clearer signs” that someone “manipulated financial markets ahead of the terror attack in the hope of profiting from it.
Mr. Howard says that a serious study of who profited on the stock market from 9/11 would “tear the heart out of the oligarchy in America.
There is only one organization that spans the entire world, and let me tell you now, it isn’t and it never was al-Qaeda.
It’s the CIA.
There could never be a real investigation. The entire shadow government, as you call them now, are implicated.”
The 79-year-old, spending his final weeks at home, said he doesn’t expect to be taken into custody following his confession because “then they’d have to go after everyone else. They will just use the media to attack me. They are all on the payroll to suppress everything around 9/11.”
Baxter Dmitry

   Baxter Dmitry

Baxter Dmitry is a writer at Your News Wire. He covers politics, business and entertainment. Speaking truth to power since he learned to talk, Baxter has travelled in over 80 countries and won arguments in every single one. Live without fear.
Follow: @baxter_dmitry
Please follow and like us:

20 thoughts on “CIA Agent Confesses on Deathbed: ‘We blew up WTC7 on 9/11’”

  1. คาสิโนออนไลน์ Make millions of dollars to millions of players.

    คาสิโนออนไลน์ Online casino site is another fun new alternative for people who have a game because of the current online betting is a very popular among gamblers in Thailand because of the game. Online gambling in each form generates millions of dollars for players without the need to invest a lot of money. Himself

    Online gambling is also something Ruby888 เล่นผ่านมือถือ you do not have to worry about when you are playing games. Online gambling with us is lost because playing games online in each form can earn money and generate revenue. You do not have to invest or invest a lot of money.

    Because you can balance your pocket into millions of dollars with your own ability, because today, playing online casino games with our online casino site is considered to be a great million for people. There are lots of ways to earn money by playing games. Online gambling takes place every time you go to the site.

  2. Dear Dr Abbe,
    You contribute many valuable posts on Veteran Today, but your scolding of that doubter is inappropriate, especially
    your arrogant judgment his contribution is worthless and intolerant threat of erasure. Prof. Fetzer doesn't need your superfluous defense and you were better advised to analyze how Fetzer deals with that criticism.

  3. Interesting confession. Indeed this report provides several reasons to doubt its authenticity. But this matter has no impact on the essential teaching of Building 7's destruction:
    a) the scientifically established truth of the controlled demolition
    b) the simplicity of this truth, such that even people with an average intelligence can understand it with relatively little mental work
    c) the cover-up thereof by a U.S.-led team of technical experts
    d) the transparency of this cover-up
    e) the remarkably tight and effective censorship of the above by all the mass media and all the major scientific and technical institutions, worldwide
    f) the participation in this censorship of governments, media and technical institutions that would ostensibly benefit from teaching their nationals, viewers and members about the "crime of the century in NYC" and the mediocre U.S.-led effort to cover it up.

    And of course the value of Building 7's story is to prepare people who become cognizant of it to critically review the Twin Towers' destruction. But this is another story.


  4. On the contrary, death bed confessions, like admissions contrary to interest, are given additional weight in the eyes of the law because there would appear to be no reason for those offering them to have lied when they do not reflect favorably upon themselves. I have no idea why you posted this, because it appears to be false.

  5. Even if everything in the supposed quotes by this alleged "CIA agent" appear to make sense logically, and seem to match our own observations and theories about what really happened that day, where is the proof that this man exists? What is the original source of this story? Where is an audio or video recording of this man's confession? Anyone serious about making a statement with this level of gravitas would be smart enough to release a video and make an attempt to back up their identity. With no credible source and no primary source evidence, this reporting smells like more bullshit/clickbait, designed to spread a specific narrative. Operation Mindfuck in full swing here….

  6. The research suggests nobody actually died as a result of the events on 9/11, therefore this must be considered misdirection.

    And as with most misdirection, you'll usually find some nuggets of truth. While it's true untold millions were made illegally through insider trading and backroom deals, nobody had to be 'whacked' in order to get away with it.

  7. Seven Seer or Seven Up or Seven Down, whatever your true name is: Your comments are totally meaningless because you provide no, zero, evidence and facts which might dispute or contradict the well thought out analysis of the article. Then you seek to discredit and insult Professor Fetzer, a highly intelligent intellect with decades of teaching and research experience at a very high level, while you seek to hide your identity. Most site operators would have erased your meaningless garbage. You need to return to grade school or high school and learn the basic rules of logic and analysis as well as some common manners. Perhaps you never graduated past the 8th grade, who knows? The fact that Professor Fetzer allowed your worthless comments to remain shows his absolute respect for freedom of speech despite how worthless and disparaging that speech is by an anonymous coward like you. Shame, shame, shame on you!
    Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics

  8. Seven, the depiction he provides of how it was done corresponds to how it was done–with the possible exception of the use of "military grade" nano-thermite. So it is not "TOTAL BULLSHIT". But it may be a case of laying out the truth using a source that can be denied, as you are doing, and thereby allow it to be debunked, as you are doing, without considering that what it lays out appears to be both accurate and true.

  9. James – You should be very proud of how you have done such a good job over the years alerting the public to the truth of things. Thank you very much for your services to this country. You are a true patriot.

Leave a Reply