Paul Craig Roberts: The Boston Bombing after Four Years

Today, April 15, 2017, is the fourth anniversary of the Boston Marathon Bombing, a hoax event performed by crisis actors and tell-tale bright red Hollywood blood. Sheila Casey has done a good job of exposing the hoax just by using the time line and photos of the event.
 A number of agencies run training programs in which amputees working as crisis actors have a prosthesis afixed to resemble a bone as a remaining piece of a leg or arm. Casey examines the Boston event by timeline. First the crisis actors are assembled. Then the prosthesis is attached. Then the blood appears. 
Notice the photo of Miracle Man laying on his side clutching the back of his left thigh with a straight line sticking out from what appears to be below his knee. This does not resemble a leg bone. Moreover, a person with an injury this severe would not be conscious, and certainly he would not be ignored while aid workers attended to those with lesser injuries. Note also the bright red color of what is pretending to be blood. Many surgeons and trauma medical personnel have testified that blood spilled in injuries is dark red.
[Editor’s note: For those who would benefit from an introduction to the case, watch:
Sheila Casey walks you through the hoax. I am convinced that the only victims of the Boston Marathon bombing were the framed Tsarnaev brothers. The older brother was murdered in captivity. The younger brother was also supposed to be killed in the alleged shoot-out with the police, but the operation was botched. The younger brother survived a second episode of police shooting. He was taken into custody, held incommunicato, and assigned an attorney who participated in his conviction. He now awaits execution as his appeals are denied. No one has ever heard his story. We only have alleged confessions, including one allegedly written in his own blood in total darkness as he lay bleeding under the boat where he was found and shot again. 
John Remington Graham has filed evidence with the court proving the younger brother’s innocence. [Editor’s note: As he emphasized to me, the key observation is that the backpacks don’t match, which means that there was not even probable cause for an arrest, much less an indictment and conviction at trial. 
 The backpacks that exploded were black nylon, but neither of the brothers was wearing one.]
A person has to be extremely gullible and inattentive to believe the official story. But that is what most Americans are.

Please follow and like us:

24 thoughts on “Paul Craig Roberts: The Boston Bombing after Four Years”

  1. I am looking for a video of a guy who was being interviewed on the street at the Boston bombing. He was an obvious feminine male type with a hispanic accent. I can’t find it on the internet anywhere. I saw this guy being interviewed and he had a name that I recalled was a typical name in Costa Rica where I had lived before. I returned to CR shortly after and one day I was in a restaurant and I was paying my bill and looked up at a tv and sure as heck there was this guy on the tv on a show here called Boca en Boca. It made sense to me when I thought about it. He was a crisis actor, he returned to his home country and was rewarded. And of course he was gay which also aligns well with the script.

  2. The naive Russian Tsarnaev brothers probably didn’t realize that when you’re involved in such a government production as the Boston Marathon Bombing event, that at the end of it your life isn’t worth 2 cents.

  3. The photograph at the beginning of this post shows Jeff Bauman laying on his right side, holding his left thigh in the air above a pool of blood.A few inches away is a plastic cup w/ a white interior… with not a single drop/splatter of blood inside.Mery Daniel was laying beside the cup as well.Blood supposedly gushing from their wounds but failing to reach the inside of the cup.

    Interesting note: Mery Daniel walked past the Forum directly in front of Tamerlan.I thought is really odd that no media picked this up and ran a story on it.
    Proof of this claim is visible here in trial exhibit 22 – (2:23 through 2:35)


      1. Thanks Chris for the photos but that bright red stuff is fake blood. Gallons of it were used at that amateurish hoax bombing.
        I showed my Dr. the photo of Jeff merrily riding down the street in a wheelchair with blood gushing from his blown off legs. His comment was that …”this man is faking it…he would be unconscious or dead within minutes of his legs being blown off”.
        So many people were being pushed around in wheelchairs at the Boston Marathon ”event”…don’t they have any ambulances for the injured in that city?

  4. Dr. Fetzer,
    Thank you for your kind reply. Yes, I’m familiar with your work on Sandy Hook and the Boston Bombing, of course, and I agree with your view that they were both contrived events that faked injuries and death. No question. I’ve followed you for years now, and I think you deserve better than the gaggle of flat-earthers who comment here now.

    Anyway, the video provides no proof that Spielberg ‘did’ the Boston Bombing, other than the word of Nathan Folks. To Mr. Folks I would ask one question: if this was a Hollywood production, where is the movie? If there was any hyper-realistic film-making done that day, it was not shared with the public.

    The photo provided of the medical person running down the street with an alleged victim is not Spielberg, but appears (as mentioned by Chris204) to be Dr. Martin Levine who claims to be the person in the photo, and who has made a fine living off the Boston Bombing ever since he was one of its playactors. He resembles Spielberg in an Ashkenazi way, but he is much younger. Here he discusses his Boston Bombing role in this video, which isolates him in more photos:

    Here’s the much-older Spielberg at Cannes, about two months after the Boston event:

    As personal evidence, I used to work for Spielberg. One of the things I did was put on live events. If Steven Spielberg had been involved at all, the Boston Bombing would not have been immediately recognizable as fake. Verisimilitude is his métier. At the very least, it would have looked real to the camera.

    Steven Spielberg’s persona is so carefully curated that most people would find it hard to believe. He would never show up and ‘play a part.’ He won’t even take direction when he appears on camera, he’s that protective of his public persona. He’s recognized everywhere he goes. He would never put his considerable prestige at risk by participating publicly in such a rankly faked event. Nor would his agents let him jeopardize himself. He is way too valuable to them.

    To his Jewish controllers, I mean agents, Spielberg’s worth as a propagandist is incalculable. Schindler’s List was their idea, not Steven’s. He was handed the book and told he was going to make it into a film thirteen years before he finally did.

    And from his successful film, Schindler’s List, came the money for Spielberg’s Survivors of the Shoah Foundation, which collected some 60 thousand ‘survivor’ testimonies in the mission to ‘Never Forget!’ Thus, he helped release ‘Teaching Tolerance’ upon the world as part of the broader effort to silence criticism of Jews as well as stem historical research into the so-called Holocaust.

    One specific example of Spielberg’s propagandizing is brought up by Michael Hoffman in his book ‘Judaism’s Strange Gods.’ Hoffman points out that, “The Babylonian Talmud’s text in Sanhedrin 37a restricts the duty to save life to saving only Jewish lives,” and that Spielberg elides the original meaning:
    The book on Hebrew censorship, (Hesronot Ha-shas), notes that some Talmud texts use a universalist phrasing:
    “Whoever destroys the life of a single human being…it is as if he had destroyed an entire world; and whoever preserves the life of a single human being …it is as if he had preserved an entire world.”

    However, Hesronot Ha-shas points out that this is not the authentic text of the Talmud. In other words, the preceding universalist rendering is a counterfeit and thus, for example, this universalist version, which Steven Spielberg in his famous movie, Schindler’s List attributed to the Talmud (and which became the motto of the movie on posters and in advertisements), is a hoax and constitutes propaganda intended to give a humanistic gloss to a Talmud which, in its essence, constitutes racist hate literature.

    In the authentic, original Talmud text it states that “whoever preserves a single soul of Israel, it is as if he had preserved an entire world” (emphasis supplied). The authentic Talmud text sanctions only the saving of Jewish lives. Mr. Spielberg suppressed the actual Talmudic saying in favor of a fanciful version more suitable to the indoctrination he intended to impart to his audience.

    This is what Steven Spielberg is good for: propaganda for the Righteous Gentile. He wouldn’t be wasted on an amateur hour event like the Boston Bombing.

    Photo from 2004


      1. You should really show more respect for fellow bloggers. You may disagree with my views and other flatearthers, but that gives you no right to attack us with your little innuendos. Claiming I am disrespecting Dr. Fetzer because I present my flat earth views is outrageous and inexcusable. Dr. Fetzer can speak for himself. Jumping on Don because he did not accept your views of the holocaust is also outrageous. We are here to agree and disagree. You seem to make it a point to attack anyone who disagrees with your viewpoint. Making silly remarks like some teenager about not being my friend or trusting me any longer because I refused to hold a grudge against a fellow blogger was ridiculous.
        Your experience with Spielberg is admirable. But it’s also opinion…no different than what anyone else presents here….just opinion.
        We are here to exchange ideas with folks we will likely never meet. Why not just do that and allow all else to express what they believe…outrageous as it may seem….as long as it’s done respectfully.

      2. Oh, are you a blogger? lol

        Y’all can go sally on, spouting your unsupported ‘beliefs’ all you want. (Belief is such an apropos word for it!) But don’t expect not to be challenged. Or ridiculed.

        If you don’t like what I write, don’t read it. I don’t owe you anything, certainly not respect.

  5. Example: The Millikan Oil Drop experiment performed by Robert Millikan at the University of Chicago about 1909 which proved that all electric charge exists in integral units of the charge on an electron and no other units. He was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics for this seminal experiment about 1923. This profound but simple experiment can be performed by anyone today on a kitchen table. Millikan was one of the world's greatest physicists and went on to do great things in cosmic rays at Cal Tech at Pasadena for the remainder of his fabulous life. These were the days when one earned a Nobel Prize.

    “Nye told The Guardian earlier this week that scientists should unapologetically throw themselves into the political fray as Trump’s administration seeks to dismantle large areas of scientific endeavor, from cancer research to climate analysis.” What does Nye think about Sandy Hook, 9/11/01, Boston Bombing, and all the other false flag events by government? He has clammed up. I urge Jim to write him directly; no reply is almost a certainty. The government cancer research for the past 50 years is a dismal failure. He is evidently ignorant of the seminal discoveries decades ago by Otto H. Warburg M.D., Ph.D. along with the ignorant and corrupt cancer generals. The cancer generals should be fired and jailed. What kind of a "scientist" is Bill Nye? A politically correct coward like all the rest. Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics P.S. Some of the best scientific research was performed before WWII when professors were paid little more than laborers and there was little government money for research.

      1. I have been told it’s an open secret in Hollywood. The whole thing was openly staged. One of the most amateurish ever until New Zealand!

      2. Steven Spielberg directs films not live events. And if he did, it wouldn’t be amateurish.

        False events are not an open secret in Hollywood. People there flock to the popular opinion, no matter what it is, if it will help their careers. No one who wants to work in Hollywood would question the Boston Bombing or any other false event, anymore than they would think to criticize Jewish control of their careers.

        You give them too much credit.

      3. Toni, I think that’s a reasonable response. I have never made a point of it, but I have it from someone who is in the position to know that “he did it!” Nevertheless, I agree that it seem implausible that he would have directed such an amateurish production. Here’s an early review of Sandy Hook and the Boston bombing that lays out some of the proof that they were both contrived events where nobody died:

      4. Independent investigators found a theatrical smoke machine someone had left at the scene of the ‘blast’….including its 12 V battery. You would only use that to hide what was happening.
        Boston city workers replaced the paving stones that were earlier covered in fake blood. They didn’t want even tiny trace amounts of fake blood left there.
        Tamerlan Tsarnaev, the older brother, was photographed completely nude standing by a police car the night of the event. He was later photographed dead at a hospital morgue.
        His mother said that Tamerlan had been in constant contact with the FBI for the previous year.

      5. This certainly makes one question why someone like Kubrick (considered a genius by many) would get involved with the moon landing hoax, knowing that the technology to pull off such a stunt (as advanced as it was then) would eventually be exposed making the government look like the fools they are. Of course, it could be that was his plan when taking into consideration all the hints he brilliantly left in The Shining.

Leave a Reply