Appendix B: Hillary used Body Doubles during the Campaign–and even in the Debates

Jim Fetzer

Separating issues, I am publishing additional demonstrations of the power of new research techniques to establish new findings, even about the presidential campaign of 2016, which illustrates the application of the techniques used to establish that “Noah Pozner” was created as a fictitious character by using photos and films of Michael Vabner as a child in exposing the chicanery of Hillary Clinton. 


A similar technique has been used to demonstrate that Hillary Clinton used body doubles during the campaign, one of whom was good enough to actually participate in debates with Bernie Sanders and with Donald Trump. The first of three doubles was sent out of Chelsea’s apartment building, lest public anxiety about her health create an insuperable obstacle to the continuation of pursuit of our nation’s highest office:

She was 2-3 inches shorter, 35-40 pounds lighter and looked at least ten years younger. She was limber and agile and–most unlike Hillary–pleasant. She was not surrounded by bodyguards, was missing her health handler and Chelsea did not come out to wish her well. She reminded me of the actress in “You’ve Got Mail!” that I refer to her as Hillary’s “Meg Ryan” double. But just a few days later, another was impersonating her on the plane to Greensboro:

This “Hillary” was taller and thinner than Hillary, with a more sloping forehead, the wrong nose and missing the two moles that Hillary has above and below the right corner of her mouth. Because she reminds me of America’s most celebrated actress, I refer to her as Hillary’s “Meryl Streep” double. When we take a closer look by comparing this double with the woman she is impersonating, there really isn’t any room for doubt about it:

Most audacious of all, Hillary used a third double, who was outed using a technique like that which has cemented “Noah” as Michael-Vebner-as-a-child. Consider the ratio of the distance between the pupils to the bottom of the upper teeth, which appears to be constant throughout one’s life. Hillary had an eye-teeth ratio of 1/1.2, but her double–who was by far the best and even substituted for her during the debates–had an eye-teeth ratio of 1/1.06:

Here’s the video study that established that Hillary has gotten away with a monstrous fraud upon the American people, which is only one more proof that she is completely and totally corrupt and would have made a terrible President of the United States. The one we elected has his obvious human failings, but only some combination of megalomania and narcissim could possibly justify a deception of the public of this enormous magnitude:

For extensive documentation of Hillary’s use of body doubles, including a hundred photos comparing them--the first and the second, but not the third, which is a more recent discovery–check out From Orlando to Dallas and Beyond (2016). The extent and variety of “false flag” events during the Obama administration has been simply overwhelming:

Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth.

Please follow and like us:

9 thoughts on “Appendix B: Hillary used Body Doubles during the Campaign–and even in the Debates”

  1. Pingback: Roberto's World
  2. I tried this ratio on pictures of Paul McCartney prior to 1966 and after 1966 and it appears to show a difference. The ratio was the same for the after 1966 Paul and William Campbell (Billy Shears) or Faul McCartney. If it works for Hillary and her doubles it must work for Paul McCartney.

Leave a Reply