Forrest Gump on the Grassy Knoll

by Jim Fetzer

As a huge fan of actor Tom Hanks, I have admired him in many roles, including in Charlie Wilson’s War and Saving Private Ryan. I am also a fan of Leonardo DiCaprio, who became a worldwide phenomenon in Titanic.
But I was distressed and dismayed to learn that they had committed to films about the death of JFK – in Tom’s case, one based on Vincent Bugliosi’s Reclaiming History (2008), and in Leonardo’s, based on Lamar Waldron and Thom Hartmann’s Legacy of Secrecy (2008) – which are indefensible books.
According to Bugliosi, the Warren commission got it right: Lee Harvey Oswald was indeed “the lone assassin,” where he claims to have refuted alternative “conspiracy theories.”
According to Waldron and Hartmann, JFK was planning to assassinate Fidel, when the mob learned of the plan and took JFK out first, using its insider’s knowledge of the plot against Fidel to silence Bobby and preclude his pursuit of the guilty. The problem is that both theories are false.
Not only am I a fan of these actors but I have met Vincent Bugliosi. In my library downstairs, for example, I have a framed photo of Jesse Ventura, Vince and me at dinner in a restaurant in Minneapolis, when he came to present a lecture at the Hamlin University School of Law on 7 April 2003.
We had a great time, and I admire many of his books, from Helter Skelter (about the Charles Manson case) and Outrage (why O.J. Simpson was guilty of killing both Ron and Nicole) to The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder (for war crimes and other atrocities).
I like most of his books and have greatly admired him in the past. Similarly, I enjoy listening to Thom Hartmann over our local progressive radio station, “The Mic” at 92.1 FM in Madison, including his “Brunch with Bernie” Friday segments. I share many beliefs and values with Vince and with Thom about truth, justice and the American way. But on JFK, they are trading in fiction, not fact.

I know because I organized a research group consisting of the best-qualified students to ever study the case, including Robert B. Livingston, M.D., a world-authority on the human brain and an expert on wound ballistics; David W. Mantik, M.D., Ph.D., who is board certified in radiation oncology and an expert on the interpretation of X-rays; a physician, Charles Crenshaw, M.D., who had attended the moribund president when he was brought to Parkland Hospital after the shooting and then, two days later, his alleged assassin after he, too, had been shot; a legendary photo-analyst, Jack White, who testified before the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) when it reinvestigated the case in 1977–78, explaining a dozen or more indications that the infamous “backyard photographs” were fake; and another Ph.D. in physics, John P. Costella, whose specialization in electromagnetism, the properties of light, and the physics of moving objects enabled him to help prove the Zapruder film is a fraud.
On 3 March 2010, The Huffington Post published a piece about Tom Hanks, which included his comments about producing a television mini-series based on Bugliosi’s Reclaiming History: “We’re going to do the American public a service,” Hanks says. “A lot of conspiracy types are going to be upset. If we do it right it’ll perhaps be one of the most controversial things that has ever been on TV.”
Whether or not he knew it, I knew that I was one of those he had in mind, having published three books on the assassination, chaired or co-chaired four national conferences about it, and given hundreds of lectures and interviews about it.
On more than one occasion, I appealed to Vince not to publish his book on JFK, but to no avail. Even though he did acknowledge that mine are the only three “exclusively scientific” books about the death of our 35th president – in which I publish studies on different aspects of the case by qualified experts – he sailed ahead in reckless disregard for our findings.
The Falsifying Findings
According to The Warren Report (1964), a lone, demented former Marine named Lee Oswald fired three shots from the 6th floor of the Texas School Book Depository, with a World War II vintage Italian-made, 6.5mm Mannlicher-Carcano, scoring two hits and killing JFK.
Originally, the FBI and the Secret Service concluded that all three shots had hit, one striking JFK in the back about 5.5 inches below the collar, the second hitting Texas Governor John Connally in the back, and the third hitting JFK in the head.
When it was discovered that one shot had missed and pieces of curbing had slightly injured bystander James Tague, the commission had to revise those findings and claim that the bullet that hit JFK in the back actually struck the base of the back of his neck and had exited his throat and injured Connally – a bullet that emerged virtually pristine and has come to be known as the “magic” bullet.
Our research has demonstrated, however, that this account cannot possibly be true:
  • According to The Warren ReportThe HSCA Final Report, and articles in the Journal of the AMA, our 35th president was killed by high-velocity bullets, which have muzzle velocities of 2,600 fps or higher. The Mannlicher-Carcano only has a muzzle velocity of 2,000 fps, however, which means that it is only a medium velocity and not a high-velocity weapon, as other authors – Harold Weisberg, Whitewash(1965), Peter Model and Robert Groden, JFK: The Case for Conspiracy (1976), and Robert Groden and Harrison Livingstone, High Treason (1989) – have also observed. Insofar as this is the only weapon that Oswald has ever been alleged to have used to shoot JFK, if those official  sources are correct, then he cannot possibly have fired the bullets that killed him; and if they are wrong, then how could they be regarded as reliable on any other aspect of the case?
  • According to The Warren ReportThe HSCA Final Report, and other sources, the assassin was situated in the south-west corner of the Book Depository during the assassination, which took place at 12:30 PM on 22 November 1963. William Shelly, however, saw Oswald on the 2nd floor near the lunchroom when he (Shelly) came down to eat lunch; at Noon, Eddie Piper saw him on the 1st floor, when he (Oswald) told him (Piper) he was going up to eat; at 12:15 PM, Carolyn Arnold, the executive secretary to the Vice President, saw him sitting in the lunchroom; and again at 12:25 she observed him, but on the 1st floor near the front door. Within 90 seconds after the assassination, Motorcycle Officer Marrion Baker confronted him in the lunchroom and held him in his sights until Roy Truly, his supervisor, assured the officer that he belonged there. They both reported that Oswald was not breathing heavily or perspiring but acting normally – not what would be expected if he had run down from the 6th floor.

Jesse Ventura’s “Conspiracy Theory”
  •  Later, when she was interrogated, his wife, Marina, stated that Lee admired JFK and bore him no malice. During his recent “Conspiracy Theory” program on the assassination, broadcast on TruTV on Friday, 19 November 2010, Jesse Ventura had the opportunity to talk with Marina, who did not want her face shown on television because she lives in fear for the life of her children – nearly 50 years later. Jesse had 2.5 hours to talk with her, however, and she said that, although at one time she had thought Lee had done it, she was now convinced he was innocent and had been working undercover for the government. This conjecture had even been confirmed by the Attorney General for Texas, Waggoner Carr, who had launched his own investigation and found that Lee was working as an informant for the FBI, had been assigned informant number 179, and was being paid $200 per month right up to the time of the assassination. That may be why his W-2 forms have never been released, as if the IRS couldn’t get hold of them, which is a unique event in American history!
More Problems for Bugliosi
What this means is that the man The Warren Commission fingered for the crime had neither the means, the motive nor the opportunity to have committed the crime. Most of what I have just said, however, has long been known to serious students of the assassination as long ago as the book by Mark Lane, Rush To Judgment (1967).
The reason why it has been so difficult to crack is that the government produced X-rays and photographs that suggested the two bullets that hit JFK had been fired from above and behind – the official location of the shooter. It would not be until 1992 when David W.
Mantik began to study the X-rays in the National Archives and discovered that they had been altered and Robert B. Livingston announced that the brain shown in diagrams and photographs could not be the brain of JFK – based upon his study of the doctors’ reports from Parkland Hospital – that the case the commission had endorsed began to suffer its most significant damage.
Mantik obtained permission to study the autopsy X-rays, borrowing a technique from physics known as optical densitometry that enabled him to identify regions of the X-rays that were abnormal, including a region on the right lateral-cranial X-ray (of his skull taken from the side), which had been “patched” to conceal a massive blow-out at the back of the head, which corroborated the reports from the Parkland physicians that he had a major defect at the back of his head.
When he studied the anterior-posterior X-ray (of the skull taken from the front), he found a 6.5mm slice of metal, which had apparently been added to the X-ray (in the darkroom) after they were taken from the morgue by Secret Service Agent Roy Kellerman.
So the reason the HSCA had discounted more than 40 eyewitness reports of a massive blow-out at the back of his head was wrong and could no longer be defeated by the X-rays.

David W. Mantik, M.D., Ph.D.
Livingston studied the reports from the physicians at Parkland, who, unlike the pathologists at Bethesda, were well-experienced with gunshot wounds. One after another – including Charles Crenshaw, M.D., Marion Jenkins, M.D., Charles Carrico, M.D., Malcolm Perry, M.D., Robert McClelland, M.D., Charles Baxter, M.D., and Kemp Clark, M.D., the Director of Neurosurgery – they reported that both cerebral and cerebellar tissue had been extruding from the wound.
When Livingston compared their consistent and detailed reports with the diagrams and photographs of a brain at the National Archives, which shows only slight damage and a completely intact cerebellum, he was obligated to conclude that the brain shown in the diagrams and photographs could not be the brain of John Fitzgerald Kennedy. Once they had “patched” the massive defect to the back of the head, where was no place for that tissue to go, so they simply substituted another man’s brain.
These discoveries were astonishing enough, but an even more important discovery would follow from them: that the home movie of the assassination (associated with Abraham Zapruder) had been edited to conceal the true causes of JFK’s death.
There were reasons to suspect the film had been re-created – by removing some events and adding others – since there were more than 59 witnesses who reported that the vehicle either had slowed dramatically or had come to a complete stop. It had to slow dramatically as it came to a complete halt, where some saw more, some less.
The back-and-to-the left motion of the body, moreover, was not reported by any of the witnesses in Dealey Plaza, even though it is the most striking feature of the extant film. And his brains had been blown-out to the left-rear and had struck a motorcycle patrolman with such force he thought he himself had been shot. Yet the film shows brains bulging out to the right-front, giving the impression of a shot from above and behind.
He Should Have Known Better
What bothers me is that these crucial findings – for which we have adduced abundant proof – had been published in Assassination Science (1998), Murder In Dealey Plaza (2000), and The Great Zapruder Film Hoax (2003) at least five years before Bugliosi published his massive tome. As David W. Mantik observes in his review of Reclaiming History, although I had laid out “16 smoking guns” in Prologue to Murder, “authentic discussion of our paradoxes was, by and large, quite off limits.
There was a lot of palaver about many other things but little at all about the central 16 – or [his] “20 Conclusions [after nine visits to the National Archives].” Nor did he take up the challenge of defeating our argument about the fabrication of the film, which includes a visual tutorial by John P. Costella explaining how we know that the film has been faked. This means our major findings remain unchallenged.”
Instead, Vince placed his faith in an argument about several bullet fragments that had been found in the front floor of the limousine. The claim that neutron-activation analysis (NAA) had shown the fragments to have come from allotments of WWII Mannlicher-Carcano ammunition (on the basis of the analysis of its trace mineral composition with respect to their percentage of zinc, arsenic, lead and other elements) had convinced Robert Blakey, Executive Directory of the HSCA, that Oswald had been the lone assassin.
Alas, as Mantik explains, the assumption of homogeneous composition of the Italian ammunition – which used recycled lead – was seriously flawed and therefore NAA could not be used to justify claims about their common origin. (Indeed, a recent article by Gary Aguilar, M.D., “Is Vincent Bugliosi Right that Neutron Activation Analysis Proves Oswalds Guilt?” has put the final nail in its coffin.)
And, as I observed in my review of Bugliosi’s book, had they come from a Mannlicher-Carcano or even from the same weapon, that would not have proven the location from which they were fired or by whom. But this means that Bugliosi’s principal scientific argument was misconceived from the beginning.

Indeed, Bugliosi contends that Oswald was too unstable and insufficiently reliable for the CIA or the Mafia to have depended upon him to carry off the biggest murder in American history.
After all, given the official story, he had defected to the Soviet Union, slashed his wrist trying to commit suicide, behaved erratically in New Orleans, and lived the life of a loner. Why would the CIA or the Mafia have trusted him?
If Lee had been part of a conspiracy, as soon as he departed from the building, a car would have been waiting to take him to his death. Instead, he becomes the first successful assassin in history to make his escape by public transportation!
Bugliosi, alas!, appears unable to appreciate that the same reasons he offers for why Oswald might not have been an appropriate choice to serve as an assassin are excellent reasons why he would have made a great selection in a conspiracy to serve as the patsy!
Jesse Ventura made this point with devastating effect during his stunning exposure of Vince during their confrontation in the JFK segment of “Conspiracy Theory”.
Impending Disaster
If the planned mini-series based upon Reclaiming History starring Tom Hanks should make it to the small screen, his own remarks (“A lot of conspiracy types are going to be upset. If we do it right it’ll perhaps be one of the most controversial things that has ever been on TV”) are going to play out in ways he no doubt did not intend, an opinion shared by many other experts.
On 19 November 2010, alas, an announcement appeared that Leonardo DiCaprio is set to star in and produce “Legacy of Secrecy”, a movie based on the book by Lamar Waldron and Thom Hartmann about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.
The authors claim that JFK and RFK were planning a covert coup in Cuba, that the mob got wind of it and whacked JFK, then covered its back by threatening to expose the coup plans if RFK went after them. And they insist that LBJ and the FBI were not complicit in the crime. It has received rave praise, such as the following:
“I believe Waldron’s heavy-to-lift book is actually all but the last word on these troubling assassinations which have been so wildly speculated about since 1963 . . . Lamar Waldron, indefatigable public servant and author deserves his own Pulitzer Prize for his great work.” – Liz Smith, New York Post
“They’ve done a service by digging up the deepest, darkest, most disturbing archival evidence to support their Mob hit theory.” – Ron Rosenbaum
“Staggering!” – Mark Crispin Mill
“Exhaustively researched” – New York Observer
“[Legacy of Secrecy contains] over 800 pages of intricately documented data. Their findings add pieces to one of our most perplexing puzzles, and suggest where the key missing pieces may be found.” – Ronald Goldfarb, Daily Beast
Unfortunately, their scenario is completely ludicrous.
(1) After the abortive “Bay of Pigs” fiasco, JFK had entered into agreements with the Soviet Union that the US would not invade Cuba, which he could not have broken, even covertly, without profoundly tarnishing his reputation and that of the US.
(2) There are more than 15 indications of Secret Service complicity in setting him up for the hit.
(3) The autopsy X-rays were altered to conceal a massive blow-out to the back of the head and by adding a 6.5 mm metallic slice.
(4) The home movie of the assassination was re-created to remove incriminating evidence, including that the driver, William Greer, brought the limousine to a halt after bullets began to be fired.
Once JFK was dead, RFK was rendered powerless, sandwiched between his powerful superior, LBJ, and his nominal subordinate, J. Edgar Hoover, both of whom appear to have been deeply involved in planning for JFK’s death and then covering it up. None of this could have been arranged by the mob.

Jesse Ventura, Vince Bugliosi, and Jim Fetzer
No doubt, the mob wanted to regain control of its resorts and casinos in Havana, where it had been running the largest money-laundering operation in the Western Hemisphere. If JFK and RFK were going to take out Castro, the mob would have waited until after that had been accomplished.
The book appears to have been inspired, in part, by a misunderstood contingency plan for an operation of this kind, one that was filed and forgotten. Even Robert McNamara had never even heard of it; yet its execution was allegedly only weeks away when the mob took Jack out.
The idea that JFK could be planning something like this without the knowledge of his close and trusted Secretary of Defense verges on the absurd. And, as other, more qualified sources, including Robert Dalleck, An Unfinished Life (2003), have also explained, JFK was planning to promote a new era of less stressful and far more peaceful relations with the USSR, including the normalization of relations with Cuba.
Tom Hanks and Leonardo DiCaprio have now embarked upon a voyage into the unknown, which is rife with hazards of which they appear to be blithely unaware. Bugliosi is an impressive prosecutor, but he knows very little about the alteration of X-rays or the fabrication of films.
He produced a brilliant brief in his zeal to convince his readers that Oswald committed the crime. If Oswald didn’t do it, then the Mafia would be a serious alternative, which Robert Blakey pushed when The HSCA Final Report (1979) appeared.
But the mob could not have altered X-rays under control of medical officers of the US Navy, agents of the Secret Service, or the president’s own personal physician. Neither pro- nor anti-Castro Cubans could have substituted another brain for that of JFK.
And even if the Soviets had the capacity to fabricate movies comparable to that of the CIA and Hollywood, it would have been unable to get its hands on the Zapruder film. These things could only have been done with complicity from the highest levels of the American government.
There are books worth producing as mini-series and as films, especially ones by James Douglass, JFK and the Unspeakable (2008), and by Phillip Nelson, LBJ: Mastermind of JFK’s Assassination (2010). The situation is not unlike that of those who controlled a magnificent ship, thought to be unsinkable, steaming blissfully ahead and unaware of its destiny. They bought the wrong books.
Special thanks to David W. Mantik for his comments and suggestions on this article.
Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer who earned his Ph.D. in the history and the philosophy of science, is McKnight Professor Emeritus at the Duluth campus of the University of Minnesota. [NOTE: This is one in a series of articles being republished since veterans deleted them in a dispute with its Senior Editor, Gordon Duff, about which I have since written several articles.] Updated article originally published December 17, 2010, Copyright © 2010 by

Please follow and like us:

18 thoughts on “Forrest Gump on the Grassy Knoll”

  1. Godsend you committed a fallacy of logic when you stated because someone was an agnostic he can't see the bigger spiritual picture. What if he saw the bigger picture and was agnostic, then what? The two are mutually exclusive.

    The Talmud promotes hatred of the Goyim and at least one researcher indicates Talmudism will be the one world religion

  2. [Apo commentary in below-copied text by "Godsend," capped, bracketed.]

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    GodSendOctober 1, 2015 at 6:35 PM

    "Read (assuming you can read with comprehension – a BIG assumption) Alan Hart's book: "Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews". [WHY NOT JUST SAY WHAT THE BOOK IS ABOUT AND SAYS–IF U REALLY READ IT URSELF AND KNOW WHAT IT SAYS?

    "Authentic Jews (mostly Hasidic Orthodox Jews) are not a threat to anyone. [U'RE JUST A LYING SHILL: JEWS FOLLOW THE SATANIC TALMUD WHICH TALMUD, WE NOTICE, U DON'T TALK ABOUT, DO U?

    "The vast majority of so-called "Jews" are nominal Jews only, [HOW COULD AN IGNORANT LIAR LIKE U KNOW THIS?

    "…who simply practice Jewish cultural traditions [YES, TALMUDIC WAR AGAINST GENTILES, INCLUDING MASS-MURDER AND LYING.

    "…and don't know (or don't believe) the racist teachings of the Talmud. [U'RE JUST A JEWWY LIAR, LYING FOR JEW MONSTERS AND MURDERERS.]

    "Most of them are descendants of Khazars – NOT authentic Jews. [WHAT DIFF. DOES IT MAKE?–IF THEY FOLLOW TALMUD THEY'RE JUST CRIMINALS AND ANTI-HUMAN MONSTERS.]

    "They are not a threat to anyone, either. [U'RE A LIAR, LYING FOR UR FELLOW LIARS.]

    "Judaic Talmudist zealots are small in number and are not a threat to anyone, either. [U'RE A LIAR, JUST LYING.]

    "That only leaves the Zionist ISRAEL-FIRSTer fanatics (aka NEOCONS) who are not Jews but are the "Synagogue of SATAN". [THEY'RE JEW SATANISTS FOLLOWING THEIR SATANIC TEXT, THE TALMUD.]

    "THEY LIVE – and are AGENTS of the ANCIENT ALIEN RACE of SATAN (referred to in Revelation 2:9). THEY are an existential threat to all of Humanity! THEY worship Satan, aka Lucifer, DRAGON, SERPENT and GREAT DECEIVER. Read (if you can) the Harold Wallace Rosenthal interview: "The Hidden Tyranny". Humanoid, reptilian critters who worship Satan (their natural "Father") CANNOT be Jews. [U DON'T EVEN MAKE ANY SENSE. "JEW," BY DEFINITION, FOLLOWS TALMUD–SEE and FOR EXPO.]

    "A human Jewish Zionist is an oxymoron! [WELL, U'RE A LYING MORON, HO HO HO HO]

    "You are blinded by irrational (mindless) hatred! True followers of Christ, who have been "born again from Above", do not suffer from blind, mindless hatred of "Jews"! [JEWS ARE LYING FOLLOWERS OF THEIR FATHER, SATAN–SEE GOSP. JOHN 8:44.]

    "That (most probably) makes you an imbecile, aka NUTCASE! [U'RE A LIAR, SHILLING FOR JEWS.]

  3. There's No "Good" Jew, Anymore Than Good Satanist–Get Rid Of Them ALL

    Godsend: u're just a lying shill for Jews. Jews are followers of Talmud by definition ("Reform" Jews follow similar "midrash"). No decent human being would call themselves "Jew" any more than calling themselves satanist, psychopath, or Christ-killer.

    Judaism must and will be exterminated, and humanity must record in history victory over satanism known as Jews.

  4. Read (assuming you can read with comprehension – a BIG assumption) Alan Hart's book: "Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews". Authentic Jews (mostly Hasidic Orthodox Jews) are not a threat to anyone. The vast majority of so-called "Jews" are nominal Jews only, who simply practice Jewish cultural traditions and don't know (or don't believe) the racist teachings of the Talmud. Most of them are descendants of Khazars – NOT authentic Jews. They are not a threat to anyone, either. Judaic Talmudist zealots are small in number and are not a threat to anyone, either. That only leaves the Zionist ISRAEL-FIRSTer fanatics (aka NEOCONS) who are not Jews but are the "Synagogue of SATAN". THEY LIVE – and are AGENTS of the ANCIENT ALIEN RACE of SATAN (referred to in Revelation 2:9). THEY are an existential threat to all of Humanity! THEY worship Satan, aka Lucifer, DRAGON, SERPENT and GREAT DECEIVER. Read (if you can) the Harold Wallace Rosenthal interview: "The Hidden Tyranny". Humanoid, reptilian critters who worship Satan (their natural "Father") CANNOT be Jews. A human Jewish Zionist is an oxymoron! You are blinded by irrational (mindless) hatred! True followers of Christ, who have been "born again from Above", do not suffer from blind, mindless hatred of "Jews"! That (most probably) makes you an imbecile, aka NUTCASE!

  5. It's clear in the film of the assassination that the right front of Kennedy's head blew outward after he was hit from the rear for the second time.His head tips ever so slightly forward upon being struck by that second shot and then the exiting of the bullet destroyed his head.A spastic reaction occurred which sent his body and head recoiling backward and to the left,towards Mrs. Kennedy.
    Instead of relying on the blizzards of bullshit that Fetzer astroturfs the internet with just watch the clip in the slowest motion you can get and see what I'm saying.

  6. Jew Shills Pretend "Zionism" Is Diff. FM Judaism

    It's not just "zionism"–it's all Judaism, based on Pharisees, Talmud, and similar "midrash." See and It's Judaism and Jews, following their satanic Talmud which preaches war, murder, and slavery of gentiles–NOT JUST "ZIONISTS."

    For regarding Philosophy, Christianity stands for TRUTH (= Christ, Gosp. JOHN 14:6), hence the objective reality, against Jew lies (JOHN 8:44), not just "zionism," Judaism and Jew lies founded on subjectivism.

    And eliminating ALL JEWS will take care of the "zionists," the easy, simple way of going about things. Jews = satanists = extreme subjectivism.

  7. Jim Fetzer usually has his head buried so deep in scientific facts (aka trees) that he typically (intentionally or otherwise) fails to see the forest! A MAJOR problem with Jim Fetzer is that, as an agnostic, he is totally unaware of spiritual truth and fails to see the BIG PICTURE! The BIG PICTURE about 911, the Kennedy assassinations, the Wellstone and Forrestal, etc. "suicidings", is that ALL of them have a COMMON CAUSE: Israeli Zionist Slimeballs, working with their countless katzas and sayanim embedded in American society (and other countries), launching endless "False-Flag" ops to promote their ALIEN AGENDA to destroy America, the Human Habitat (311) and Humanity!

    Jim Fetzer never heard of: "I know the blasphemy of THEM which say THEY are Jews and are not, but are the Synagogue of SATAN" (Revelation 2:9).

    A BIG CLUE about the true origin and nature of Israel's Zionist leaders (since 1948) is their relentless persecution (GENOCIDE) and periodic ethnic cleansing of the indigenous Palestinian population in Israel (especially the GAZA GULAG), aka "mowing the lawn", freely employing American-supplied weapons such as white phosphor shells and cluster bombs against defenseless civilians! During the last "lawn mowing", THEY specifically targeted and slaughtered 500+ Palestinian children (among 5,000 or so other civilians). Only a PACK of CUNNING and COLD-BLOODED RAPTORS could do such a thing! Zionism=Nazism=Satanism! Jim Fetzer is clueless and speechless about the BIG PICTURE!

  8. Fetzer Is Miserable FAILURE, Subversive, And Gate-Keeper

    Fetzer has SERIOUS problems, for one thing, the failure of inductive logic for the large conspiracy entailing the top criminals who run the central-banking, legalized COUNTERFEITING scam(s) that dominate the world and have done so now for yrs and yrs and yrs.

    This large conspiracy is plainly SATANIC–dominated by extreme subjectivist philosophy which Fetzer refuses to grasp or even acknowledge. And the satanism has been noted by many observers, as in the near-pornographic entertainment, esp. in "hip-hop" music, but also for the application and selective enforcement of legal treatment.

    Fetzer also refuses to face-up to the philosophic/ethical aspects, limited as it might be, for Christianity and Jew Talmudism, Jews now absolutely dominant within the world, but especially in Western world, and esp. in USA.

    Thus Fetzer, the academic hack, acts as GATE-KEEPER keeping attn. upon mere details and items, AWAY fm the larger aspects of cultural and philosophic significance, refusing and failing to pt.-out the absolute Jew dominance, NOT JUST "ZIONIST."

    For heretofore the Christian culture, civilization, and PHILOSOPHY–which philosophy Fetzer refuses to grasp–has kept satanism at bay and relatively suppressed, much in same way Jews were suppressed, for Judaism is satanism, and Fetzer is gross incompetent and failure for this necessary and simple cultural analysis. So Fetzer is actually exposed as gate-keeper and subversive as he really is.

  9. Mr. Fetzer… Another excellent analysis, as all yours are.
    As I've written a few times before about other articles you've written about the JFK assassination and other subjects, you're one of a very few who can evaluate the significance of a wide variety of evidence and you're one of only a few who can draw reasonable inferences – as opposed to scatterbrained inferences – and argue an issue logically and unemotionally.
    I keep making this point in the hopes that others will pick up on the obvious clues. But my knowledge of human nature tells me it's not likely to happen.

  10. By George W. Hoeltjeon January 13, 2015
    Format: Paperback

    Without question, Michael Collins Piper's FINAL JUDGMENT sets the STANDARD for all other books written about the Kennedy assassination. Piper fills in the missing link, namely Israel's Mossad and masterfully connects the dots to the other nefarious elements within the CIA, Jewish organized crime and corrupt political bureaucracies here and abroad responsible for this terrible tragedy. The tremendous tension that existed between JFK largely caused by David Ben-Gurion's obsession to make Israel a nuclear power is something you'll never learn in the mainstream history books. Nor will you learn about the James Angleton and Meyer Lansky CIA-organized crime connections to the Mossad. The SPOTLIGHT of truth is clearly shining on FINAL JUDGMENT as Piper is unafraid to identify by name those who contributed to Kennedy's untimely demise. If you really want to know what's behind today's insane, "America Last" foreign policy debacle driven by the Neocon sociopaths, you must read this book.

    Professor George W. Hoeltje, P. E.
    (Amazon book review)

  11. Tom Hanks and Leonardo DiCaprio are Zionist Asse(t)s, like ALL Hollywood actors! If any of them dares speak out of the closet (Martin Sheen, Mel Gibson), he/she will be quickly made to recant, or their Hollywood career will crash and burn! If THEY don't like the profuse apology and self-flagellation, THEY will end the career anyway!

  12. The only book about the JFK assassination worth reading is Michael Collins Piper's "FINAL JUDGMENT"!

    Here's the FINAL JUDGMENT on the JFK assassination: Zionist Israel (Mossad – aka "Jewish Mafia") "took out" JFK, aided by their katzas and sayanim in the WH, Federal Gov't Agencies (especially the CIA), local government agencies (especially the LAPD) and just about everywhere else! Everything else is irrelevant trivia, designed to obfuscate. Hollywood, a Zionist Slimeball-controlled institution, will never do anything to reveal ZIONIST CRIMES! To expect otherwise (Jim Fetzer), is plain stupidity!

  13. Look at the "Nix" film of JFK's assassination. Fast-forward to the guy "diving onto the ground" to duck flying bullets. He's standing on the "infield" across the street from the grassy knoll when he realizes bullets are being fired and DIVES to the ground just as the limo passes him. (He's easy to spot).

    Then, compare that Nix film to the Zapruder film. Around the time Ducking Man dives onto the ground, you'll notice a MAN, WIFE and SON standing TOGETHER (on the infield) watching JFK go by. FATHER has his hand on SON's shoulder. WIFE is standing right next to FATHER (possibly arm-in-arm; immediately adjacent to FATHER).

    In the other film (reverse angle), you'll notice those same 3 people (the family) — except this time, they are separated since the father/son are together and the wife is standing approximately 10 feet away.

    That is impossible — since those 2 films are supposed to show the "same moment in time" as JFK's limo passes the family.

    Comparing Zapruder to Nix film showing the same moment in time, how can 3 people (family) be standing close together from one angle, while the wife is standing well apart from the father/son when viewed from the other angle….. at the same instant?

    This comparison of Zapruder to Nix proves the spectators were moved around by special effects film technicians, and the film is digitally manufactured or heavily edited. It's easy to show anyone in 10 seconds the JFK shooting was faked.

    It's possible the government used the LEFT-SIDE curb (street edge, along the driver's LEFT SIDE) as a dividing line when manufacturing the Zapruder film's background (lawn/spectator) action — in much the same way the Apollo missions used a division line across the ground to insert the "moon landscape" background.

    The techniques would be totally different (Apollo/Kubrick hoax used a Scotchlite projection screen to project the moon landscape background), but these division lines make it easy to manufacture foreground/background separately, then combine them in post-production to give the impression of "one film, of real events."

    The eye forgives the division line (which stretches across the whole frame) because the line looks like the curb along the edge of a street, or looks like a horizon line. In other words, the dividing line "looks like it's supposed to be there."

Leave a Reply